This seems like a premature optimization. It's unlikely a user would pass something the frontend can tell is all ones to the masked load/store intrinsics.
We do this optimization for emitting select for masking because we have builtin calls in header files that pass an all ones mask in. Though at this point we may not longer have any builtins that emit some IR and a select. We may only have the select builtins so maybe we can remove that optimization too.
llvm-svn: 333847
There's a patchwork of existing transforms trying to handle
these cases, but as seen in the changed test, we weren't
catching them all.
llvm-svn: 333845
Ensure we test on 32-bit and 64-bit targets, and strip -mcpu usage.
Part of ongoing work to ensure we test all intrinsic style tests on 32 and 64 bit targets where possible.
llvm-svn: 333843
Further refactoring will wait until D47452 has landed.
Part of ongoing work to ensure we test all intrinsic style tests on 32 and 64 bit targets where possible.
llvm-svn: 333841
Summary: This creates a small perf regression, but after talking with Jacques Pienaar, he was good with it to get things moving toward removng SETCCE.
Reviewers: jpienaar, bryant
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47626
llvm-svn: 333838
Existing implementations of these methods do not require lazy materialization,
and switching to JITEvaluatedSymbol allows us to remove error checking on the
client side.
llvm-svn: 333835
We currently support them only in AArch64. The NEON Reference,
however, says they are 'ARMv7, ARMv8' intrinsics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47121
llvm-svn: 333829
I had to tweak the i32 tests so we check both reg-reg and reg-mem cases.
I also added i64 load tests.
Part of ongoing work to ensure we test all intrinsic style tests on 32 and 64 bit targets where possible.
llvm-svn: 333827
We currently support them only in AArch64. The NEON Reference,
however, says they are 'ARMv7, ARMv8' intrinsics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47120
llvm-svn: 333825
Object FIle Representation
At codegen time this is emitted into the ELF file a pair of symbol indices and a weight. In assembly it looks like:
.cg_profile a, b, 32
.cg_profile freq, a, 11
.cg_profile freq, b, 20
When writing an ELF file these are put into a SHT_LLVM_CALL_GRAPH_PROFILE (0x6fff4c02) section as (uint32_t, uint32_t, uint64_t) tuples as (from symbol index, to symbol index, weight).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44965
llvm-svn: 333823
As noted in the review thread for rL333782, we could have
made a bug harder to hit if we were simplifying instructions
before trying other folds.
The shuffle transform in question isn't ever a simplification;
it's just a canonicalization. So I've renamed that to make that
clearer.
This is NFCI at this point, but I've regenerated the test file
to show the cosmetic value naming difference of using
instcombine's RAUW vs. the builder.
Possible follow-ups:
1. Move reassociation folds after simplifies too.
2. Refactor common code; we shouldn't have so much repetition.
llvm-svn: 333820
We currently support them only in AArch64. The NEON Reference,
however, says they are 'ARMv7, ARMv8' intrinsics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47121
llvm-svn: 333819
As noted in the review thread for rL333782, we're lacking coverage
for this transform, so add tests for each binop opcode with constant
operand.
llvm-svn: 333818
```
// Primary fixed point types
signed short _Accum s_short_accum;
signed _Accum s_accum;
signed long _Accum s_long_accum;
unsigned short _Accum u_short_accum;
unsigned _Accum u_accum;
unsigned long _Accum u_long_accum;
// Aliased fixed point types
short _Accum short_accum;
_Accum accum;
long _Accum long_accum;
```
This diff only allows for declaration of the fixed point types. Assignment and other operations done on fixed point types according to http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n1169.pdf will be added in future patches. The saturated versions of these types and the equivalent `_Fract` types will also be added in future patches.
The tests included are for asserting that we can declare these types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46084
llvm-svn: 333814
On Darwin, the binary's symbol table points to debug info in object
files -- potentially object files within a static library. Such a
library may have multiple entries with the same name, distinguished
only by timestamp.
The code was already _attempting_ to handle this case (see the code in
ObjectContainerBSDArchive::Archive::FindObject which disambiguates via
timestamp). But, unfortunately, while the timestamp was taken into
account on the _first_ lookup, the result was then cached in a map
keyed only off of the path.
Added the timestamp to the cache, and added a test case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47660
llvm-svn: 333813
These instructions are unusual in that they operate on 4 consecutive registers so supporting them in codegen will be more difficult than normal.
Includes an assembler check to warn if the source register is not the first register of a 4 register group.
llvm-svn: 333812
Summary:
I noticed this issue because we didn't put the primary cloned loop into
the `NonChildClonedLoops` vector and so never iterated on it. Once
I fixed that, it made it clear why I had to do a really complicated and
unnecesasry dance when updating the loops to remain in canonical form --
I was unwittingly working around the fact that the primary cloned loop
wasn't in the expected list of cloned loops. Doh!
Now that we include it in this vector, we don't need to return it and we
can consolidate the update logic as we correctly have a single place
where it can be handled.
I've just added a test for the iteration order aspect as every time
I changed the update logic partially or incorrectly here, an existing
test failed and caught it so that seems well covered (which is also
evidenced by the extensive working around of this missing update).
Reviewers: asbirlea, sanjoy
Subscribers: mcrosier, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47647
llvm-svn: 333811
LLD also supports order files using the `--symbol-ordering-file` option.
As the name would suggest, the order file format is slightly different
from gold; gold's order files specify section names, whereas LLD's
specify symbol names. Assuming you have an order file in the correct
format though, we should support using it with LLD.
Switch the check to actually use LLVM's linker detection rather than
just checking for the presence of the gold executable, since we might
have a gold executable present but be using LLD (or bfd for that matter)
as our linker.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47669
llvm-svn: 333810
In r333801 I added a test for a dump method that, for reasons I don't
understand, fails on an msvc bot:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86-windows-msvc2015/builds/12306/
I'll remove the test for now to unblock the bot and try to look into why
there's a discrepancy on this platform later.
llvm-svn: 333807
and using the latter in DIBuilder::createArtificialType and
DIBuilder::createObjectPointerType methods as well as introducing
mirroring DISubprogram::cloneWithFlags and
DIBuilder::createArtificialSubprogram methods.
The primary goal here is to add createArtificialSubprogram to support
a pass downstream while keeping the method consistent with the
existing ones and making sure we don't encourage changing already
created DI-nodes.
Reviewed By: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47615
llvm-svn: 333806
Previously we just returned undef, but really we should be returning the pass thru input. We also need to make sure we preserve the chain output that the original intrinsic node had to maintain connectivity in the DAG. So we should just return the incoming chain as the output chain.
llvm-svn: 333804
This re-lands r333797 with a fix for big endian systems.
Original commit message:
This isn't encountered anywhere inside LLVM, so I wrote a test case to expose the issue and verify that it is fixed.
The basic problem is that the macho_load_command union contains all load comamnd structs. Load command structs in 32-bit macho files can be 32-bit aligned instead of 64-bit aligned.
There are some strange circumstances in which this can be exposed in a 64-bit macho if the load commands are invalid or if a 32-bit aligned load command is used. In the past we've worked around this type of problem with changes like r264232.
llvm-svn: 333803
Craig Topper