This makes it clear `ELF/**/*.cpp` files define things in the `lld::elf`
namespace and simplifies `elf::foo` to `foo`.
Reviewed By: atanasyan, grimar, ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68323
llvm-svn: 373885
This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote
using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the
source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual
post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against
lld's code base.
Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style:
https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html
In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable
naming scheme change, and this patch does that.
I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that
is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter.
Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld
repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts
because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But
there's a remedy.
clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your
downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to
a commit after the mass renaming:
1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming,
2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and
3. rebase again to the head.
Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and
for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and
disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by
hand, but that shouldn't be too many.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121
llvm-svn: 365595
ARM and RISC-V do not support TLS relaxations. However, for General
Dynamic and Local Dynamic models, if we are producing an executable and
the symbol is non-preemptable, we know it must be defined and the
R_ARM_TLS_DTPMOD32/R_RISCV_TLS_DTPMOD{32,64} dynamic relocation can be
omitted because it is always 1. This may be necessary for static linking
as DTPMOD may not be expected at load time.
Merge handleARMTlsRelocation() into handleTlsRelocation(). This requires
more logic to R_TLSGD_PC and R_TLSLD_PC. Because we use SymbolicRel to
resolve the relocation at link time, R_ARM_TLS_DTPMOD32 can be deleted
from relocateOne(). It cannot be used as a static relocation type.
As a bonus, the additional logic in R_TLSGD_PC code can be shared by the
TLS support for RISC-V (D63220).
Reviewed By: ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63333
llvm-svn: 363927
The current rule is loose: `!Sym.IsPreemptible || Expr == R_GOT`.
When the symbol is non-preemptable, this allows absolute relocation
types with smaller numbers of bits, e.g. R_X86_64_{8,16,32}. They are
disallowed by ld.bfd and gold, e.g.
ld.bfd: a.o: relocation R_X86_64_8 against `.text' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
This patch:
a) Add TargetInfo::SymbolicRel to represent relocation types that resolve to a
symbol value (e.g. R_AARCH_ABS64, R_386_32, R_X86_64_64).
As a side benefit, we currently (ab)use GotRel (R_*_GLOB_DAT) to resolve
GOT slots that are link-time constants. Since we now use Target->SymbolRel
to do the job, we can remove R_*_GLOB_DAT from relocateOne() for all targets.
R_*_GLOB_DAT cannot be used as static relocation types.
b) Change the condition to `!Sym.IsPreemptible && Type != Target->SymbolicRel || Expr == R_GOT`.
Some tests are caught by the improved error checking (ld.bfd/gold also
issue errors on them). Many misuse .long where .quad should be used
instead.
Reviewed By: ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63121
llvm-svn: 363059
GotEntrySize and GotPltEntrySize were added in D22288. Later, with
the introduction of wordsize() (then Config->Wordsize), they become
redundant, because there is no target that sets GotEntrySize or
GotPltEntrySize to a number different from Config->Wordsize.
Reviewed By: grimar, ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62727
llvm-svn: 362220
This is a minor improvement inspired by https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38303.
A person reported that he observed message complaining about unsupported R_ARM_V4BX:
error: can't create dynamic relocation R_ARM_V4BX against local symbol in readonly segment; recompile object files with -fPIC
But with -z notext he only saw a relocation number, what is not convenient:
error: ../../gfx/cairo/libpixman/src/pixman-arm-neon-asm-bilinear.o:(.text+0x4F0): unrecognized reloc 40
Also, in the error messages we use relocation but not reloc.
With this patch we start to print one of the following messages:
error: file.o: unrecognized relocation Unknown(999)
error: file.o: unrecognized relocation R_X_KNOWN_BY_LLVM_BUT_UNSUPPORTED_BY_LLD_NAME
There is no way to write a test for that I believe.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62237
llvm-svn: 361472
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
When the range between the source and target of a V7PILongThunk exceeded an
int32 we would trigger a relocation out of range error for the
R_ARM_MOVT_PREL or R_ARM_THM_MOVT_PREL relocation. This case can happen when
linking the linux kernel as it is loaded above 0xf0000000.
There are two parts to the fix.
- Remove the overflow check for R_ARM_MOVT_PREL or R_ARM_THM_MOVT_PREL. The
ELF for the ARM Architecture document defines these relocations as having no
overflow checking so the check was spurious.
- Use int64_t for the offset calculation, in line with similar thunks so
that PC + (S - P) < 32-bits. This results in less surprising disassembly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56396
llvm-svn: 350836
Previously we considered R_ARM_V4BX to be an absolute relocation,
which meant that we rejected it in read-only sections in PIC output
files. Instead, treat it as a hint relocation so that relocation
processing ignores it entirely.
Also fix a problem with the test case where it was never being run
because it has a .yaml extension and we don't run tests with that
extension.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55728
llvm-svn: 349216
Summary: This patch implementation the handler for ARM_V4BX. This relocation is used by GNU runtime files and other armv4 applications.
Patch by Yin Ma
Reviewers: espindola, MaskRay, ruiu, peter.smith, pcc
Reviewed By: ruiu
Subscribers: yinma, pcc, peter.smith, MaskRay, rovka, efriedma, emaste, javed.absar, arichardson, kristof.beyls, chrib, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53444
llvm-svn: 347077
The uint32_t type does not clearly convey that these fields are interpreted
in the target endianness. Converting them to byte arrays should make this
more obvious and less error-prone.
Patch by James Clarke
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D54207
llvm-svn: 346893
Summary:
There are really three different kinds of TLS layouts:
* A fixed TLS-to-TP offset. On architectures like PowerPC, MIPS, and
RISC-V, the thread pointer points to a fixed offset from the start
of the executable's TLS segment. The offset is 0x7000 for PowerPC
and MIPS, which allows a signed 16-bit offset to reach 0x1000 of
per-thread implementation data and 0xf000 of the application's TLS
segment. The size and layout of the TCB isn't relevant to the static
linker and might not be known.
* A fixed TCB size. This is the format documented as "variant 1" in
Ulrich Drepper's TLS spec. The thread pointer points to a 2-word TCB
followed by the executable's TLS segment. The first word is always
the DTV pointer. Used on ARM. The thread pointer must be aligned to
the TLS segment's alignment, possibly creating alignment padding.
* Variant 2. This format predates variant 1 and is also documented in
Drepper's TLS spec. It allocates the executable's TLS segment before
the thread pointer, apparently for backwards-compatibility. It's
used on x86 and SPARC.
Factor out an lld:🧝:getTlsTpOffset() function for use in a
follow-up patch for Android. The TcbSize/TlsTpOffset fields are only used
in getTlsTpOffset, so replace them with a switch on Config->EMachine.
Reviewers: espindola, ruiu, PkmX, jrtc27
Reviewed By: ruiu, PkmX, jrtc27
Subscribers: jyknight, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, javed.absar, arichardson, kristof.beyls, kbarton, fedor.sergeev, atanasyan, PkmX, jsji, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53905
llvm-svn: 345775
This is https://bugs.llvm.org//show_bug.cgi?id=38919.
Currently, LLD may report "unsupported relocation target while parsing debug info"
when parsing the debug information.
At the same time LLD does that for zeroed R_X86_64_NONE relocations,
which obviously has "invalid" targets.
The nature of R_*_NONE relocation assumes them should be ignored.
This patch teaches LLD to stop reporting the debug information parsing errors for them.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52408
llvm-svn: 343078
Previously, if you invoke lld's `main` more than once in the same process,
the second invocation could fail or produce a wrong result due to a stale
pointer values of the previous run.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52506
llvm-svn: 343009
Older Arm architectures do not support the MOVT and MOVW instructions so we
must use an alternative sequence of instructions to transfer control to the
destination.
Assuming at least Armv5 this patch adds support for Thunks that load or add
to the program counter. Note that there are no Armv5 Thumb Thunks as there
is no Thumb branch instruction in Armv5 that supports Thunks. These thunks
will not work for Armv4t (arm7tdmi) as this architecture cannot change state
from using the LDR or ADD instruction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50077
llvm-svn: 340160
The Thumb BL and BLX instructions on older Arm Architectures such as v5 and
v6 have a constrained encoding J1 and J2 must equal 1, later Architectures
relaxed this restriction allowing J1 and J2 to be used to calculate a larger
immediate.
This patch adds support for the old encoding, it is used when the build
attributes for the input objects only contain older architectures.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50076
llvm-svn: 340159
The Tag_ABI_VFP_args build attribute controls the procedure call standard
used for floating point parameters on ARM. The values are:
0 - Base AAPCS (FP Parameters passed in Core (Integer) registers
1 - VFP AAPCS (FP Parameters passed in FP registers)
2 - Toolchain specific (Neither Base or VFP)
3 - Compatible with all (No use of floating point parameters)
If the Tag_ABI_VFP_args build attribute is missing it has an implicit value
of 0.
We use the attribute in two ways:
- Detect a clash in calling convention between Base, VFP and Toolchain.
we follow ld.bfd's lead and do not error if there is a clash between an
implicit Base AAPCS caused by a missing attribute. Many projects
including the hard-float (VFP AAPCS) version of glibc contain assembler
files that do not use floating point but do not have Tag_ABI_VFP_args.
- Set the EF_ARM_ABI_FLOAT_SOFT or EF_ARM_ABI_FLOAT_HARD ELF header flag
for Base or VFP AAPCS respectively. This flag is used by some ELF
loaders.
References:
- Addenda to, and Errata in, the ABI for the ARM Architecture for
Tag_ABI_VFP_args
- Elf for the ARM Architecture for ELF header flags
Fixes PR36009
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49993
llvm-svn: 338377
As was mentioned in comments for D45158,
isPicRel's name does not make much sense,
because what this method does is checks if
we need to create the dynamic relocation or not.
Instead of renaming it to something different,
we can 'isPicRel' completely.
We can reuse the getDynRel method.
They are logically very close, getDynRel can just return
R_*_NONE in case no dynamic relocation should be produced
and that would simplify things and avoid functionality
correlation/duplication with 'isPicRel'.
The patch does this change.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45248
llvm-svn: 329275
This is the same as 327248 except Arm defining _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ to
be the base of the .got section as some existing code is relying upon it.
For most Targets the _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ symbol is expected to be at
the start of the .got.plt section so that _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_[0] =
reserved value that is by convention the address of the dynamic section.
Previously we had defined _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ as either the start or end
of the .got section with the intention that the .got.plt section would
follow the .got. However this does not always hold with the current
default section ordering so _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_[0] may not be consistent
with the reserved first entry of the .got.plt.
X86, X86_64 and AArch64 will use the .got.plt. Arm, Mips and Power use .got
Fixes PR36555
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44259
llvm-svn: 327823
A more efficient PLT sequence can be used when the distance between the
.plt and the end of the .plt.got is less than 128 Megabytes, which is
frequently true. We fall back to the old sequence when the offset is larger
than 128 Megabytes. This gives us an alternative to forcing the longer
entries with --long-plt as we gracefully fall back to it as needed.
See ELF for the ARM Architecture Appendix A for details of the PLT sequence.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41246
llvm-svn: 320987
When an undefined weak reference has a PLT entry we must generate a range
extension thunk for any B or BL that can't reach the PLT entry.
This change explicitly looks for whether a PLT entry exists rather than
assuming that weak references never need PLT entries unless Config->Shared
is in operation. This covers the case where we are linking an executable
with dynamic linking, hence a PLT entry will be needed for undefined weak
references. This case comes up in real programs over 32 Mb in size as there
is a B to a weak reference __gmon__start__ in the Arm crti.o for glibc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40248
llvm-svn: 319020
Now that we have only SymbolBody as the symbol class. So, "SymbolBody"
is a bit strange name now. This is a mechanical change generated by
perl -i -pe s/SymbolBody/Symbol/g $(git grep -l SymbolBody lld/ELF lld/COFF)
nd clang-format-diff.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39459
llvm-svn: 317370
This change adds initial support for range extension thunks. All thunks must
be created within the first pass so some corner cases are not supported. A
follow up patch will add support for multiple passes.
With this change the existing tests arm-branch-error.s and
arm-thumb-branch-error.s now no longer fail with an out of range branch.
These have been renamed and tests added for the range extension thunk.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34691
llvm-svn: 316752
When an OutputSection is larger than the branch range for a Target we
need to place thunks such that they are always in range of their caller,
and sufficiently spaced to maximise the number of callers that can use
the thunk. We use the simple heuristic of placing the
ThunkSection at intervals corresponding to a target specific branch range.
If the OutputSection is small we put the thunks at the end of the executable
sections.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34689
llvm-svn: 316751
Summary:
The COFF linker and the ELF linker have long had similar but separate
Error.h and Error.cpp files to implement error handling. This change
introduces new error handling code in Common/ErrorHandler.h, changes the
COFF and ELF linkers to use it, and removes the old, separate
implementations.
Reviewers: ruiu
Reviewed By: ruiu
Subscribers: smeenai, jyknight, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, nhaehnle, mgorny, javed.absar, kbarton, fedor.sergeev, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39259
llvm-svn: 316624
A section was passed to getRelExpr just to create an error message.
But if there's an invalid relocation, we would eventually report it
in relocateOne. So we don't have to pass a section to getRelExpr.
llvm-svn: 315552
We were using uint32_t as the type of relocation kind. It has a
readability issue because what Type really means in `uint32_t Type`
is not obvious. It could be a section type, a symbol type or a
relocation type.
Since we do not do any arithemetic operations on relocation types
(e.g. adding one to R_X86_64_PC32 doesn't make sense), it would be
more natural if they are represented as enums. Unfortunately, that
is not doable because relocation type definitions are spread into
multiple header files.
So I decided to use typedef. This still should be better than the
plain uint32_t because the intended type is now obvious.
llvm-svn: 315525
In preparation for range extension thunks introduce a function that will
check whether a branch identified by a relocation type at a source address
can reach a destination.
For targets where range extension thunks are not supported the function will
return true as it is not expected that branches are out of range. An
implementation has been provided for ARM.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34690
llvm-svn: 308188
This patch fills holes in executable sections with 0xd4 (ARM) or
0xef (MIPS). These trap instructions were suggested by Theo de Raadt.
llvm-svn: 306322
Target.cpp contains code for all the targets that LLD supports. It was
simple and easy, but as the number of supported targets increased,
it got messy.
This patch splits the file into per-target files under ELF/arch directory.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34222
llvm-svn: 305565
Fangrui Song