so that it looks through certain syntactic forms and applies
even if normal inference would have succeeded.
There is potential for source incompatibility from this
change, but overall we feel that it produces a much
cleaner and more defensible result, and the block
compatibility rules should curb a lot of the potential
for annoyance.
rdar://13200889
llvm-svn: 176743
In C, enum constants have the type of the enum's underlying integer type,
rather than the type of the enum. (This is not true in C++.) Thus, when a
block's return type is inferred from an enum constant, it is incompatible
with expressions that return the enum type.
In r158899, I told block returns to pretend that enum constants have enum
type, like in C++. Doug Gregor pointed out that this can break existing code.
Now, we don't check the types of return statements until the end of the block.
This lets us go back and add implicit casts in blocks with mixed enum
constants and enum-typed expressions.
<rdar://problem/11662489> (again)
llvm-svn: 159591
In C, enum constants have the type of the enum's underlying integer type,
rather than the type of the enum. (This is not true in C++.) This leads to
odd warnings when returning enum constants directly in blocks with inferred
return types. The easiest way out of this is to pretend that, like C++, enum
constants have enum type when being returned from a block.
<rdar://problem/11662489>
llvm-svn: 158899
diagnostic message are compared. If either is a substring of the other, then
no error is given. This gives rise to an unexpected case:
// expect-error{{candidate function has different number of parameters}}
will match the following error messages from Clang:
candidate function has different number of parameters (expected 1 but has 2)
candidate function has different number of parameters
It will also match these other error messages:
candidate function
function has different number of parameters
number of parameters
This patch will change so that the verification string must be a substring of
the diagnostic message before accepting. Also, all the failing tests from this
change have been corrected. Some stats from this cleanup:
87 - removed extra spaces around verification strings
70 - wording updates to diagnostics
40 - extra leading or trailing characters (typos, unmatched parens or quotes)
35 - diagnostic level was included (error:, warning:, or note:)
18 - flag name put in the warning (-Wprotocol)
llvm-svn: 146619
method parameter, provide a note pointing at the parameter itself so
the user does not have to manually look for the function/method being
called and match up parameters to arguments. For example, we now get:
t.c:4:5: warning: incompatible pointer types passing 'long *' to
parameter of
type 'int *' [-pedantic]
f(long_ptr);
^~~~~~~~
t.c:1:13: note: passing argument to parameter 'x' here
void f(int *x);
^
llvm-svn: 102038
destination type for initialization, assignment, parameter-passing,
etc. The main issue fixed here is that we used rather confusing
wording for diagnostics such as
t.c:2:9: warning: initializing 'char const [2]' discards qualifiers,
expected 'char *' [-pedantic]
char *name = __func__;
^ ~~~~~~~~
We're not initializing a 'char const [2]', we're initializing a 'char
*' with an expression of type 'char const [2]'. Similar problems
existed for other diagnostics in this area, so I've normalized them all
with more precise descriptive text to say what we're
initializing/converting/assigning/etc. from and to. The warning for
the code above is now:
t.c:2:9: warning: initializing 'char *' from an expression of type
'char const [2]' discards qualifiers [-pedantic]
char *name = __func__;
^ ~~~~~~~~
Fixes <rdar://problem/7447179>.
llvm-svn: 100832
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
a default target).
llvm-svn: 91446
hack which introduces some strange inconsistencies in compatibility
for block pointers.
Note that unlike an earlier revision proposed on cfe-commits, this patch
still allows declaring block pointers without a prototype.
llvm-svn: 73041
John McCall