This is needed for clients that want to highlight virtual functions
differently.
Reviewed By: sammccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107145
This allows us to differentiate symbols from the system (e.g. system
includes or sysroot) differently than symbols defined in the user's
project, which can be used by editors to display them differently.
This is currently based on `FileCharacteristic`, but we can
consider alternatives such as `Sysroot` and file paths in the future.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101554
- highlight references to protocols in class/protocol/extension decls
- support multi-token selector highlights in semantic + xref highlights
(method calls and declarations only)
- In `@interface I(C)`, I now references the interface and C the category
- highlight uses of interfaces as types
- added semantic highlightings of protocol names (as "interface") and
category names (as "namespace").
These are both standard kinds, maybe "extension" will be standardized...
- highlight `auto` as "class" when it resolves to an ObjC pointer
- don't highlight `self` as a variable even though the AST models it as one
Not fixed: uses of protocols in type names (needs some refactoring of
unrelated code first)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97617
This is obsoleted by the standard semanticTokens request family.
As well as the protocol details, this allows us to remove a bunch of plumbing
around pushing highlights to clients.
This should not land until the new protocol has feature parity, see D77702.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95576
This change makes dependentName a modifier, rather than a token type.
It can be combined with:
- type (new, standard) - this combination replaces dependentType like T::typename Foo
- unknown (new, nonstandard) - for general dependent names
- Field, etc - when the name is dependent but we heuristically resolve it
While here, fix cases where template-template-parameter cases were
incorrectly flagged as type-dependent.
And the merging of modifiers when resolving conflicts accidentally
happens to work around a bug that showed up in a test.
The behavior observed through the pre-standard protocol should be mostly
unchanged (it'll see the bugfixes only). This is done in a somehat
fragile way but it's not expected to live long.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95706
These allow (function-) local variables to be distinguished, but also a
bunch more cases.
It's not quite independent with existing information (e.g. the
field/variable distinction is redundant if you have class-scope + static
attributes) but I don't think this is terribly important.
Depends on D77811
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95701
- Infrastructure to support modifiers (protocol etc)
- standard modifiers:
- declaration (but no definition, yet)
- deprecated
- readonly (based on a fairly fuzzy const checking)
- static (for class members and locals, but *not* file-scope things!)
- abstract (for C++ classes, and pure-virtual methods)
- nonstandard modifier:
- deduced (on "auto" whose Kind is Class etc)
Happy to drop this if it's controversial at all.
- While here, update sample tweak to use our internal names, in
anticipation of theia TM scopes going away.
This addresses some of the goals of D77702, but leaves some things undone.
Mostly because I think these will want some discussion.
- no split between dependent type/name.
(We may want to model this as a modifier, type+dependent vs ???+dependent)
- no split between primitive/typedef.
(Is introducing a nonstandard kind is worth this distinction?)
- no nonstandard local attribute
This probably makes sense, I'm wondering if we want others and how
they fit together.
There's one minor regression in explicit template specialization declarations
due to a latent bug in findExplicitReferences, but fixing it after seems OK.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77811
Summary:
This returns incremental highlights as a set of edits against the
previous highlights.
Server-side, we compute the full set of highlights, this just saves
wire-format size.
For now, the diff used is trivial: everything from the first change to
the last change is sent as a single edit.
The wire format is grungy - the replacement offset/length refer to
positions in the encoded array instead of the logical list of tokens.
We use token-oriented structs and translating to LSP forms when serializing.
This departs from LSP (but is consistent with semanticTokens today).
Tested in VSCode insiders (with a patched client to enable experimental
features).
Reviewers: hokein
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, mgrang, arphaman, kadircet, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77225
Summary:
We still attempt to highlight them as underlying types, but fallback to
the generic 'typedef' highlighting kind if the underlying type is too
complicated.
Reviewers: hokein
Reviewed By: hokein
Subscribers: nridge, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67290
llvm-svn: 371402
Summary:
The latter simplifies the client code by avoiding the need to handle it
as a separate case statement.
Reviewers: hokein
Reviewed By: hokein
Subscribers: nridge, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67277
llvm-svn: 371375
Summary:
Instead of matching lists of highlightings, we annotate input code with
resulting highlightings and diff it against the expected annotated input.
In case of failures, this produces much nicer output in form of text-based
diffs.
Reviewers: hokein
Reviewed By: hokein
Subscribers: nridge, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67274
llvm-svn: 371373
This much better reflects what is (now) in this header.
Maybe a rename to ParsedTU would be an improvement, but that's a much
more invasive change and life is too short.
ClangdUnit is dead, long live ClangdUnitTests!
llvm-svn: 370862
Summary: This would make the client life (tracking the changes) easier.
Reviewers: jvikstrom
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66541
llvm-svn: 369884
Summary: This means that function parameters are no longer highlighted as variable.other.cpp but instead as variable.parameter.cpp which is the more "correct" TextMate scope for them.
Reviewers: hokein, ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66335
llvm-svn: 369238
Summary:
Adds a new HighlightingKind "Primitive". Adds a special case for TypeLocs that have an underlying TypePtr that is are builtin types, adding them as primitives.
The primary reason for this change is because otherwise typedefs that typedef primitives `typedef int A` would not get highlighted (so in the example `A` would not get any highlightings.)
Reviewers: hokein, ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65943
llvm-svn: 368291
Summary: Added a class for diffing highlightings and removing duplicate lines. Integrated into the highlighting generation flow. Only works correctly if all tokens are on a single line. Also returns empty lines if the IDE should remove previous highlightings on a line.
Reviewers: hokein, sammccall, ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, mgrang, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64475
llvm-svn: 367521
Summary: Template parameters and specializations were not being highlighted before. This adds highlightings to those types of tokens by adding two Visit* methods.
Reviewers: hokein, sammccall, ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64855
llvm-svn: 366420
Summary: VSCode does not have a scope for enum constants. So they were placed under "constant.other.enum" as that seems to be the most correct scope for enum constants. However, this makes theia color them blue (the same color it uses for keywords).
Reviewers: hokein, sammccall, ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64624
llvm-svn: 366045
Summary:
We have already set it when the AST is being built, and setting TraversalScope
is not free (it will clear the cache, which is expensive to build).
Reviewers: jvikstrom
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63874
llvm-svn: 364528
Kadir Cetinkaya