- Make clangd's internal representation more aligned with the standard.
We keep range and extra inlayhint kinds around, but don't serialize
them on standard version.
- Have custom serialization for extension (ugly, but going to go away).
- Support both versions until clangd-17.
- Don't advertise extension if client has support for standard
implementation.
- Log a warning at startup about extension being deprecated, if client
doesn't have support.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125228
... if there is a match.
This is needed to that clients can can make a connection between a
diagnostic and an associated quickfix-tweak.
Ideally, quickfix-kind tweak code actions would be provided inline along
with the non-tweak fixes, but this doesn't seem easily achievable.
Reviewed By: sammccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118976
Auto-generated patch based on clang-tidy readability-identifier-naming.
Only some manual cleanup for `extern "C"` declarations and a GTest change was required.
I'm not sure if this cleanup is actually very useful. It cleans up clang-tidy findings to the number of warnings from clang-tidy should be lower. Since it was easy to do and required only little cleanup I thought I'd upload it for discussion.
One pattern that keeps recurring: Test **matchers** are also supposed to start with a lowercase letter as per LLVM convention. However GTest naming convention for matchers start with upper case. I would propose to keep stay consistent with the GTest convention there. However that would imply a lot of `//NOLINT` throughout these files.
To re-product this patch run:
```
run-clang-tidy -checks="-*,readability-identifier-naming" -fix -format ./clang-tools-extra/clangd
```
To convert the macro names, I was using this script with some manual cleanup afterwards:
https://gist.github.com/ChristianKuehnel/a01cc4362b07c58281554ab46235a077
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115634
This means it's a "real feature" in clangd 14, albeit one that requires special
client support.
- remove "preview" from the flag description
- expose the `clangdInlayHints` capability by default
- provide `position` as well as `range`
- support `InlayHintsParams.range` to restrict the range retrieved
- inlay hint list is in document order (sorted by position)
Still to come: control feature via config rather than flag.
Fixes https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/313
Protocol doc is in https://github.com/llvm/clangd-www/pull/56/files
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116699
Implementation is based on the "expected type" as used for
designated-initializers in braced init lists. This means it can deduce the type
in some cases where it's not written:
void foo(Widget);
foo({ /*help here*/ });
Only basic constructor calls are in scope of this patch, excluded are:
- aggregate initialization (no help is offered for aggregates)
- initializer_list initialization (no help is offered for these constructors)
Fixes https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/306
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116317
Provide signature while typing template arguments: Foo< ^here >
Here the parameters are e.g. "typename x", and the result type is e.g.
"struct" (class template) or "int" (variable template) or "bool (std::string)"
(function template).
Multiple overloads are possible when a template name is used for several
overloaded function templates.
Fixes https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/299
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116352
This unifies the behaviour we have in code completion item
documentations and signaturehelp. Providing better line wrapping and detection
of inline code blocks in comments to be renedered appropriately in markdown.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115442
The configuration may kick off indexing, which may involve sending LSP
messages.
The crash is fiddly to reproduce in a hermetic test (we need background
indexing on without disk storage, and to handle server->client messages
in LSPClient...)
Fixes https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/926
Cleanup of clang-tidy findings: removing "else" after a return statement
to improve readability of the code.
This patch was created by applying the clang-tidy fixes automatically.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113892
For example, if you have:
void foo(int bar);
foo(/*^
it should auto-complete to "bar=".
Because Sema callbacks for code completion in comments happen before we
have an AST we need to cheat in clangd by detecting completion on /*
before, moving cursor back by two characters, then running a simplified
verion of SignatureHelp to extract argument name(s) from possible
overloads.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110823
Useful in logs to understand issues around some platforms we don't have much
experience with (e.g. m1, mingw)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105681
This is causing weird code patterns in various places and I can't see
any difference between None and empty change list. Neither in the current use
cases nor in the spec.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103449
Due to a somewhat annoying, but necessary, shortfall in -Wunused-lambda-capture, These unused captures aren't warned about.
Reviewed By: kadircet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101611
This enables unifying command line flags with config options in clangd
internals. This patch changes behaviour in 2 places:
- BackgroundIndex was previously disabled when -remote-index was
provided. After this patch, it will be enabled but all files will have
bkgindex policy set to Skip.
- -index-file was loaded at startup (at least load was initiated), now
the load will happen through ProjectAwareIndex with first index query.
Unfortunately this doesn't simplify any options initially, as
- CompileCommandsDir is also used by clangd --check workflow, which
doesn't use configs.
- EnableBackgroundIndex option controls whether the component will be
created at all, which implies creation of extra threads registering a
listener for compilation database discoveries.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98029
Create a `ThreadsafeFS` in the `DraftStore` that overlays the dirty file contents over another `ThreadsafeFS`.
This provides a nice thread-safe interface for using dirty file contents throughout the codebase, for example cross file refactoring.
Creating a Filesystem view will overlay a snapshot of the current contents, so if the draft store is updated while the view is being used, it will contain stale contents.
Reviewed By: sammccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94554
As pointed out in D96244, "Module" is already pretty overloaded to refer
to clang and llvm modules. (And clangd deals directly with the former).
FeatureModule is a bit of a mouthful but it's pretty self-descriptive.
I think it might be better than "Component" which doesn't really capture
the "common interface" aspect - it's IMO confusing to refer to
"components" but exclude CDB for example.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97950
Clangd can invalidate client state of features like semantic higlighting
without client explicitly triggering, for example after a preamble build
caused by an onSave notification on a different file.
This patch introduces a mechanism to let client know of such actions,
and also calls the workspace/semanticTokens/refresh request to
demonstrate the situation after each preamble build.
Fixes https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/699.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97548
ClangdServer already gets notified of every change, so it makes sense for it to
be the source of truth.
This is a step towards having ClangdServer expose a FS that includes dirty
buffers: D94554
Related changes:
- version is now optional for ClangdServer, to preserve our existing fuzziness
in this area (missing version ==> autoincrement)
- ClangdServer::format{File,Range} are now more regular ClangdServer functions
that don't need the code passed in. While here, combine into one function.
- incremental content update logic is moved from DraftStore to
ClangdLSPServer, with most of the implementation in SourceCode.cpp.
DraftStore is now fairly trivial, and will probably ultimately be
*replaced* by the dirty FS stuff.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97738
The redundancy around work-done-progress is annoying but ok for now.
There's a weirdness with context lifetimes around outgoing method calls, which
I've preserved to keep this NFC. We should probably fix it though.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96717
This is NFC because the MessageHandler refused to dispatch to them until the
server is initialized anyway.
This is a more natural time to bind them - it's when they become callable, and
it's when client capabalities are available and server ones can be set.
One module-lifecycle function will be responsible for all three.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96608
The goal is to allow the LSP bindings of features to be defined outside
the ClangdLSPServer class, turning it into less of a monolith.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96544
This is obsoleted by the standard semanticTokens request family.
As well as the protocol details, this allows us to remove a bunch of plumbing
around pushing highlights to clients.
This should not land until the new protocol has feature parity, see D77702.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95576
- Infrastructure to support modifiers (protocol etc)
- standard modifiers:
- declaration (but no definition, yet)
- deprecated
- readonly (based on a fairly fuzzy const checking)
- static (for class members and locals, but *not* file-scope things!)
- abstract (for C++ classes, and pure-virtual methods)
- nonstandard modifier:
- deduced (on "auto" whose Kind is Class etc)
Happy to drop this if it's controversial at all.
- While here, update sample tweak to use our internal names, in
anticipation of theia TM scopes going away.
This addresses some of the goals of D77702, but leaves some things undone.
Mostly because I think these will want some discussion.
- no split between dependent type/name.
(We may want to model this as a modifier, type+dependent vs ???+dependent)
- no split between primitive/typedef.
(Is introducing a nonstandard kind is worth this distinction?)
- no nonstandard local attribute
This probably makes sense, I'm wondering if we want others and how
they fit together.
There's one minor regression in explicit template specialization declarations
due to a latent bug in findExplicitReferences, but fixing it after seems OK.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77811
Unfortunately this treats overrides declarations as declarations, not as
references. I don't plan to land this until I have a fix for that issue.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95450
Kazu Hirata