This patch adds functions for managing fibers:
__tsan_get_current_fiber()
__tsan_create_fiber()
__tsan_destroy_fiber()
__tsan_switch_to_fiber()
__tsan_set_fiber_name()
See the added tests for use examples.
Author: yuri (Yuri Per)
Reviewed in: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54889
llvm-svn: 353817
Logic in `getInsertPointForUses` doesn't account for a corner case when `Def`
only comes to a Phi user from unreachable blocks. In this case, the incoming
value may be arbitrary (and not even available in the input block) and break
the loop-related invariants that are asserted below.
In fact, if we encounter this situation, no IR modification is needed. This
Phi will be simplified away with nearest cleanup.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58045
Reviewed By: spatel
llvm-svn: 353816
The function `LI.erase` has some invariants that need to be preserved when it
tries to remove a loop which is not the top-level loop. In particular, it
requires loop's preheader to be strictly in loop's parent. Our current logic
of deletion of dead blocks may erase the information about preheader before we
handle the loop, and therefore we may hit this assertion.
This patch changes the logic of loop deletion: we make them top-level loops
before we actually erase them. This allows us to trigger the simple branch of
`erase` logic which just detatches blocks from the loop and does not try to do
some complex stuff that need this invariant.
Thanks to @uabelho for reporting this!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57221
Reviewed By: fedor.sergeev
llvm-svn: 353813
Summary:
The two classes contained a lot of duplicated code, but there wasn't a
good place to factor it to. It couldn't be the base Platform class,
since we also have platforms which are only remote (such as
PlatformGDBRemoteServer), and so it did not make sense for those to have
an m_remote_platform member.
This patch creates a new class, RemoteAwarePlatform, which can serve as
a base class for platforms which can both serve as a host, and forward
actions to a remote system. It is motivated partly by D56232 (which was
about to add a bunch of additional duplicated methods), and partly by my
own need to modify a function which happens to be implemented in both
places identically.
The patch moves the methods which are trivially identical in the two
classes into the common base class, there were one or two more methods
which could probably be merged into one, but this wasn't completely
trivial, so I did not attempt to do that now.
Reviewers: jingham, zturner, clayborg, asmith
Subscribers: emaste, mgorny, Hui, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58052
llvm-svn: 353812
ELFYAML.h contains a `Section` class which is a base for a few other
sections classes that are used for mapping different section types.
`Section` has a `StringRef Info` field used for storing sh_info.
At the same time, sh_info has very different meanings for sections and
cannot be processed in a similar way generally,
for example ELFDumper does not handle it in `dumpCommonSection`
but do that in `dumpGroup` and `dumpCommonRelocationSection` respectively.
At this moment, we have and handle it as a string, because that was possible for
the current use case. But also it can simply be a number:
For SHT_GNU_verdef is "The number of version definitions within the section."
The patch moves `Info` field out to be able to have it as a number.
With that change, each class will be able to decide what type and purpose
of the sh_info field it wants to use.
I also had to edit 2 test cases. This is because patch fixes a bug. Previously we
accepted yaml files with Info fields for all sections (for example, for SHT_DYNSYM too).
But we do not handle it and the resulting objects had zero sh_info fields set for
such sections. Now it is accepted only for sections that supports it.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58054
llvm-svn: 353810
Summary:
This patch makes virtual bases to be added in the correct order to the bases
list. It is important because `VTableContext` (`MicrosoftVTableContext` in our
case) uses then the order of virtual bases in the list to restore the virtual
table indexes. These indexes are used then to resolve the layout of the virtual
bases.
We haven't enough information about offsets of virtual bases regarding to the
object (moreover, in a common case we can't rely on such information, see the
example here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53506#1272306 ), but there should be
enough information to restore the layout of the virtual bases from the indexes
in runtime. After D53506 this information is used whenever possible, so there
should be no problems with virtual bases' fields reading.
Reviewers: zturner, rnk, stella.stamenova
Subscribers: abidh, teemperor, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56904
llvm-svn: 353806
Utility function that we use for blocks deletion always unconditionally removes
one-input Phis. In LoopSimplifyCFG, it can lead to breach of LCSSA form.
This patch alters this function to keep them if needed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57231
Reviewed By: fedor.sergeev
llvm-svn: 353803
Ensure that HandleLLVMOptions adds all necessary required flags,
including -Wno-error when building with LLVM_ENABLE_WERROR enabled.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58092
llvm-svn: 353790
We build libc++ and libc++abi with -nodefaultlibs, so -rtlib=compiler-rt
has no effect and results in an 'argument unused during compilation'
warning which breaks the build when using -Werror. We can therefore drop
-rtlib=compiler-rt without any functional change; note that the actual
compiler-rt linking is handled by HandleCompilerRT.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58084
llvm-svn: 353786
Otherwise this propagates all the way to CMake and results in an error
during configuration. We check and handle the result and report warning
separately so this is not changing the behavior.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58086
llvm-svn: 353784
Summary:
This test instruments the following code with coverage, runs the fuzzer
once, and asserts that there are uncovered PCs. The ARM64 backend
optimizes this code using the `csel` (Conditional select) instruction,
which removes all branching from the resulting machine code. The test
then fails because we do not have any uncovered PCs. The easiest
solution for now is to turn off optimization for the DSOs used in this
test.
```
int DSO1(int a) {
if (a < 123456)
return 0;
return 1;
}
```
rdar://47646400
Reviewers: kcc
Tags: #sanitizers, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58087
llvm-svn: 353780
The code checked that the first root was an appropriate distance from
the base value, but skipped checking the other roots. This could lead to
rerolling a loop that can't be legally rerolled (at least, not without
rewriting the loop in a non-trivial way).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56812
llvm-svn: 353779
Apparently there are multiple places where MSVC complains about
instantiations with extended aligment. I think it's better to define
`_ENABLE_EXTENDED_ALIGNED_STORAGE` as suggested by the error message.
I don't have access to a Windows machine so this is all speculative.
llvm-svn: 353778
This configuration (due to r349207) was intended not to emit any DWO CU,
but a degenerate CU was still being emitted - containing a header and a
DW_TAG_compile_unit with no attributes.
Under that situation, emit nothing to the .dwo file. (since this is a
dynamic property of the input the .dwo file is still emitted, just with
nothing in it (so a valid, but empty, ELF file) - if some other CU
didn't satisfy this criteria, its DWO CU would still go there, etc)
llvm-svn: 353771
Summary:
Some implementations of fenv.h use macros to define the functions they provide. This can cause problems when `std::fegetround()` is spelled in source.
This patch adds a `fenv.h` header to libc++ for the sole purpose of turning those macros into real functions.
Reviewers: rsmith, mclow.lists, ldionne
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: mgorny, christof, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57729
llvm-svn: 353767
Background: As described in https://reviews.llvm.org/D57601, I'm working towards separating volatile and atomic in the MMO uses for atomic instructions.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D57593, I fixed a bug where isUnordered was returning the wrong result, but didn't account for the fact I was getting slightly ahead of myself. While both uses of isUnordered are correct (as far as I can tell), we don't have tests to demonstrate this and being aggressive gets in the way of having the removal of volatile truly be non-functional. Once D57601 lands, I will return to these call sites, revert this patch, and add the appropriate tests to show the expected behaviour.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57802
llvm-svn: 353766
Dmitry Vyukov