If you specify a type-bound procedure with an alternate return, there
will be no symbol associated with that dummy argument. In such cases,
the compiler's list of dummy arguments will contain a nullptr. In our
analysis of the PASS arguments of type-bound procedures, we were
assuming that all dummy arguments had non-null symbols associated with
them and were using that assumption to get the name of the dummy
argument. This caused the compiler to try to dereference a nullptr.
I fixed this by explicitly checking for a nullptr and, in such cases, emitting
an error message. I also added tests that contain type-bound procedures with
alternate returns in both legal and illegal constructs to ensure that semantic
analysis is working for them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98430
You can define a base type with a type-bound procedure which is erroneously
missing a NOPASS attribute and then define another type that extends the base
type and overrides the erroneous procedure. In this case, when we perform
semantic checking on the overriding procedure, we verify the "pass index" of
the overriding procedure. The attempt to get the procedure's pass index fails
a call to CHECK().
I fixed this by calling SetError() on the symbol of the overridden procedure in
the base type. Then, I check HasError() before executing the code that invokes
the failing call to CHECK(). I also added a test that will cause the compiler
to fail the call to CHECK() without this change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98355
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D98283, the RUN line in pre-fir-tree04.f90
was updated to use `%flang_fc1` instead of `%f18` (so that the test is
shared between the old and the new driver). Unfortunately, the new
driver does not know yet how to find standard intrinsics modules. As a
result, the test fails when `FLANG_BUILD_NEW_DRIVER` is set to On.
I'm restoring the original RUN line. This is rather straightforward, so
sending without a review. This should make Flang builders happy.
The PFT has been updated to support Fortran 77.
clang-tidy cleanup.
Authors: Val Donaldson, Jean Perier, Eric Schweitz, et.al.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98283
This patch adds `-fdebug-dump-parsing-log` in the new driver. This option is
semantically identical to `-fdebug-instrumented-parse` in `f18` (the
former is added as an alias in `f18`).
As dumping the parsing log makes only sense for instrumented parses, we
set Fortran::parser::Options::instrumentedParse to `True` when
`-fdebug-dump-parsing-log` is used. This is consistent with `f18`.
To facilitate tweaking the configuration of the frontend based on the
action being requested, `setUpFrontendBasedOnAction` is introduced in
CompilerInvocation.cpp.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97457
Until now we've been maintaining 2 test directories for Flang's drivers:
* test/Driver for `f18` (the current driver)
* test/Flang-Driver for `flang-new` (the new driver)
As we have started sharing tests between the drivers, this separation is
no longer required. This patch merges the two test directories. As
suggested in the review, moving forward we'll avoid having tests
specifically for the old driver.
A few notable changes:
* Driver/version-test.f90 and Driver/no-files.f90 are deleted. The
versions for the new driver are more robust, but tricky to share.
* Driver/write-module.f90 is deleted in favour of
Flang-Driver/write-module.f90 (see https://reviews.llvm.org/D97197
for more context)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98257
We have a "<" operator defined on the type semantics::Symbol that's based on
the symbols' locations in the cooked character stream. This is potentially
problematic when comparing symbols from .mod files when the cooked character
streams themselves might be allocated to varying memory locations.
This change fixes that by using the order in which symbols are created as the
basis for the "<" operator. Thanks to Tim and Peter for consultation on the
necessity of doing this and the idea for what to use as the basis of the sort.
This change in the "<" operator changed the expected results for three of the
tests. I manually inspected the new results, and they look OK to me. The
differences in data05.f90 and typeinfo01.f90 are entirely the order, offsets,
and sizes of the derived type components. The changes in resolve102.f90 are
due to the new, different "<" operator used for sorting.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98225
This patch refactors include-module.f90:
* rename the test file as use-module.f90 to better highlight which
driver feature is being tested
* move tests for diagnostics to use-module-error.f90 (it tests that
`-J/-module-dir` can only be used once)
* make sure that `f18` is tested when `FLANG_BUILD_NEW_DRIVER` is
set to `Off`
* add tests for when all module files are successfully discovered and
loaded
With this patch, there should be a clear separation into 3 scenarios in
use-module.f90:
* Everything is OK
* One module file wasn't found (missing include path for
basictestingmoduletwo.mod)
* Two module files are found, but the test requires
`basictestingmoduleone.mod` from both `Inputs` and `Inputs/module-dir`.
Only the latter is found.
Reviewed By: tskeith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97197
When we have a subprogram that has been determined to contain errors, we do not
perform name resolution on its execution part. In this case, if the subprogram
contains a NULLIFY statement, the parser::Name of a pointer object in a NULLIFY
statement will not have had name resolution performed on it. Thus, its symbol
will not have been set. Later, however, we do semantic checking on the NULLIFY
statement. The code that did this assumed that the parser::Name of the
pointer object was non-null.
I fixed this by just removing the null pointer check for the "symbol" member of
the "parser::Name" of the pointer object when doing semantic checking for
NULLIFY statements. I also added a test that will make the compiler crash
without this change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98184
Add diagnostic tests with fir-opt for the diagnostics emitted by the ops verifier
Reviewed By: jeanPerier
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97996
Add support for the following Fortran dialect options:
- -default*
- -flarge-sizes
It also adds two test cases:
# For checking whether `flang-new` is passing options correctly to `flang-new -fc1`.
# For checking if `fdefault-` arguments are processed properly.
Also moves the Dialect related option parsing to a dedicated function
and adds a member `defaultKinds()` to `CompilerInvocation`
Depends on: D96032
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96344
We were allowing procedures with the MODULE prefix to be declared at the global
scope. This is prohibited by C1547 and was causing an internal check of the
compiler to fail.
I fixed this by adding a check. I also added a test that would trigger a crash
without this change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97875
It's possible to define a procedure whose interface depends on a procedure
which has an interface that depends on the original procedure. Such a circular
definition was causing the compiler to fall into an infinite loop when
resolving the name of the second procedure. It's also possible to create
circular dependency chains of more than two procedures.
I fixed this by adding the function HasCycle() to the class DeclarationVisitor
and calling it from DeclareProcEntity() to detect procedures with such
circularly defined interfaces. I marked the associated symbols of such
procedures by calling SetError() on them. When processing subsequent
procedures, I called HasError() before attempting to analyze their interfaces.
Unfortunately, this did not work.
With help from Tim, we determined that the SymbolSet used to track the
erroneous symbols was instantiated using a "<" operator which was defined using
the location of the name of the procedure. But the location of the procedure
name was being changed by a call to ReplaceName() between the times that the
calls to SetError() and HasError() were made. This caused HasError() to
incorrectly report that a symbol was not in the set of erroneous symbols.
I fixed this by changing SymbolSet to be an unordered set that uses the
contents of the name of the symbol as the basis for its hash function. This
works because the contents of the name of the symbol is preserved by
ReplaceName() even though its location changes.
I also fixed the error message used when reporting recursively defined
dummy procedure arguments by removing extra apostrophes and sorting the
list of symbols.
I also added tests that will crash the compiler without this change.
Note that the "<" operator is used in other contexts, for example, in the map
of characterized procedures, maps of items in equivalence sets, maps of
structure constructor values, ... All of these situations happen after name
resolution has been completed and all calls to ReplaceName() have already
happened and thus are not subject to the problem I ran into when ReplaceName()
was called when processing procedure entities.
Note also that the implementation of the "<" operator uses the relative
location in the cooked character stream as the basis of its implementation.
This is potentially problematic when symbols from diffent compilation units
(for example symbols originating in .mod files) are put into the same map since
their names will appear in two different source streams which may not be
allocated in the same relative positions in memory. But I was unable to create
a test that caused a problem. Using a direct comparison of the content of the
name of the symbol in the "<" operator has problems. Symbols in enclosing or
parallel scopes can have the same name. Also using the location of the symbol
in the cooked character stream has the advantage that it preserves the the
order of the symbols in a structure constructor constant, which makes matching
the values with the symbols relatively easy.
This patch supersedes D97749.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97774
It's possible to define a procedure whose interface depends on a procedure
which has an interface that depends on the original procedure. Such a circular
definition was causing the compiler to fall into an infinite loop when
resolving the name of the second procedure. It's also possible to create
circular dependency chains of more than two procedures.
I fixed this by adding the function HasCycle() to the class DeclarationVisitor
and calling it from DeclareProcEntity() to detect procedures with such
circularly defined interfaces. I marked the associated symbols of such
procedures by calling SetError() on them. When processing subsequent
procedures, I called HasError() before attempting to analyze their interfaces.
Unfortunately, this did not work.
With help from Tim, we determined that the SymbolSet used to track the
erroneous symbols was instantiated using a "<" operator which was defined using
the location of the name of the procedure. But the location of the procedure
name was being changed by a call to ReplaceName() between the times that the
calls to SetError() and HasError() were made. This caused HasError() to
incorrectly report that a symbol was not in the set of erroneous symbols.
I fixed this by changing SymbolSet to be an unordered set that uses the
contents of the name of the symbol as the basis for its hash function. This
works because the contents of the name of the symbol is preserved by
ReplaceName() even though its location changes.
I also fixed the error message used when reporting recursively defined dummy
procedure arguments.
I also added tests that will crash the compiler without this change.
Note that the "<" operator is used in other contexts, for example, in the map
of characterized procedures, maps of items in equivalence sets, maps of
structure constructor values, ... All of these situations happen after name
resolution has been completed and all calls to ReplaceName() have already
happened and thus are not subject to the problem I ran into when ReplaceName()
was called when processing procedure entities.
Note also that the implementation of the "<" operator uses the relative
location in the cooked character stream as the basis of its implementation.
This is potentially problematic when symbols from diffent compilation units
(for example symbols originating in .mod files) are put into the same map since
their names will appear in two different source streams which may not be
allocated in the same relative positions in memory. But I was unable to create
a test that caused a problem. Using a direct comparison of the content of the
name of the symbol in the "<" operator has problems. Symbols in enclosing or
parallel scopes can have the same name. Also using the location of the symbol
in the cooked character stream has the advantage that it preserves the the
order of the symbols in a structure constructor constant, which makes matching
the values with the symbols relatively easy.
This change supersedes D97201.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97749
Semantic checks for the following OpenMP 4.5 clauses.
1. 2.15.4.2 - Copyprivate clause
2. 2.15.3.4 - Firstprivate clause
3. 2.15.3.5 - Lastprivate clause
Add related test cases and resolve test cases marked as XFAIL.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91920
This reverts commit 07de0846a5.
The original patch has caused 6 out 8 of Flang's public buildbots to
fail. As I'm not sure what the fix should be, I'm reverting this for
now. Please see https://reviews.llvm.org/D97201 for more context and
discussion.
- add ops: rebox, insert_on_range, absent, is_present
- embox, coordinate_of: replace old hand-written parser/pretty-printer with assembly format
- remove dead floating point ops, since buitlins work for all types
- update call op
- update documentation
- misc. NFC to formatting
- add op round trip tests
Authors: Eric Schweitz, Jean Perier, Zachary Selk, Kiran Chandramohan, et.al.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97500
It's possible to define a procedure whose interface depends on a procedure
which has an interface that depends on the original procedure. Such a circular
definition was causing the compiler to fall into an infinite loop when
resolving the name of the second procedure. It's also possible to create
circular dependency chains of more than two procedures.
I fixed this by adding the function HasCycle() to the class DeclarationVisitor
and calling it from DeclareProcEntity() to detect procedures with such
circularly defined interfaces. I marked the associated symbols of such
procedures by calling SetError() on them. When processing subsequent
procedures, I called HasError() before attempting to analyze their interfaces.
Unfortunately, this did not work.
With help from Tim, we determined that the SymbolSet used to track the
erroneous symbols was instantiated using a "<" operator which was
defined using the name of the procedure. But the procedure name was
being changed by a call to ReplaceName() between the times that the
calls to SetError() and HasError() were made. This caused HasError() to
incorrectly report that a symbol was not in the set of erroneous
symbols. I fixed this by making SymbolSet be an ordered set, which does
not use the "<" operator.
I also added tests that will crash the compiler without this change.
And I fixed the formatting on an error message from a previous update.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97201
We lower expressions with rank > 0 to a set of high-level array operations.
These operations are then analyzed and refined to more primitve
operations in subsequent pass(es).
This patch upstreams these array operations and some other helper ops.
Authors: Eric Schweitz, Rajan Walia, Kiran Chandramohan, et.al.
https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18-llvm-project/pull/565
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97421
This patch makes sure that for the following invocation of the new Flang
driver, clangDriver sets the input type to Fortran:
```
flang-new -E -
```
This change does not affect `clang`, i.e. for the following invocation
the input type is set to C:
```
clang -E -
```
This change leverages the fact that for `flang-new` the driver is in
Flang mode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96777
This patch adds the new zero_bits operation and upstrams other changes
including the following:
- update tablegen syntax to newer forms
- update memory effects annotations
- update documentation [NFC]
- other NFC, such as whitespace and formatting
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97331
Originally, when we added the new driver, we created dedicated test
directories for `flang-new`. This way we separated the tests for the
`throwaway` and the new driver.
As we are increasing test coverage and starting to share tests between
the two drivers, it makes sense to share all directories and instead
rely on:
```
! REQUIRES: new-flang-driver
```
to mark tests as exclusively for the new driver.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97207
Add -J to the f18 driver for compatibility with gfortran.
Add -module-dir for compatibility with the new flang driver.
They both set the output directory for .mod files and add the
directory to the search list. -module still only does the former.
Clean up the new driver test to match.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97164
This patch adds support for `-Xflang` in `flang-new`. The semantics are
identical to `-Xclang`.
With the addition of `-Xflang`, we can modify `-test-io` to be a
compiler-frontend only flag. This makes more sense, this flag is:
* very frontend specific
* to be used for development and testing only
* not to be exposed to the end user
Originally we added it to the compiler driver, `flang-new`, in order to
facilitate testing. With `-Xflang` this is no longer needed. Tests are
updated accordingly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96864
Add the following options:
* -fdebug-measure-parse-tree
* -fdebug-pre-fir-tree
Summary of changes:
- Add 2 new frontend actions: DebugMeasureParseTreeAction and DebugPreFIRTreeAction
- Add MeasurementVisitor to FrontendActions.h
- Make reportFatalSemanticErrors return true if there are any fatal errors
- Port most of the `-fdebug-pre-fir-tree` tests to use the new driver if built, otherwise use f18.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96884
Most Fortran compilers accept the following benign extension,
and it appears in some applications:
SUBROUTINE FOO(A,N)
IMPLICIT NONE
REAL A(N) ! N is used before being typed
INTEGER N
END
Allow it in f18 only for default integer scalar dummy arguments.
Differential Revesion: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96982
Add the following options:
* -fdebug-dump-symbols
* -fdebug-dump-parse-tree
* -fdebug-dump-provenance
Summary of changes:
- Add 3 new frontend actions: DebugDumpSymbolsAction, DebugDumpParseTreeAction and DebugDumpProvenanceAction
- Add a unique pointer to the Semantics instance created in PrescanAndSemaAction
- Move fatal semantic error reporting to its own method, FrontendActions#reportFatalSemanticErrors
- Port most tests using `-fdebug-dump-symbols` and `-fdebug-dump-parse-tree` to the new driver if built, otherwise default to f18
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96716
Fortran 2018 explicitly permits an ignored type declaration
for the result of a generic intrinsic function. See the comment
added to Semantics/expression.cpp for an explanation of why this
is somewhat dangerous and worthy of a warning.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96879
The intrinsic procedure table properly classify the various
intrinsics, but the PURE and ELEMENTAL attributes that these
classifications imply don't always make it to the utility
predicates that test symbols for them, leading to spurious
error messages in some contexts. So set those attribute flags
as appropriate in name resolution, using a new function to
isolate the tests.
An alternate solution, in which the predicates would query
the intrinsic procedure table for these attributes on demand,
was something I also tried, so that this information could
come directly from an authoritative source; but it would have
required references to the intrinsic table to be passed along
on too many seemingly unrelated APIs and ended up looking messy.
Several symbol table tests needed to have their expected outputs
augmented with the PURE and ELEMENTAL flags. Some bogus messages
that were flagged as such in test/Semantics/doconcurrent01.f90 were
removed, since they are now correctly not emitted.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96878
It's possible to define a procedure that has a procedure dummy argument which
names the procedure that contains it. This was causing the compiler to fall
into an infinite loop when characterizing a call to the procedure.
Following a suggestion from Peter, I fixed this be maintaining a set of
procedure symbols that had already been seen while characterizing a procedure.
This required passing a new parameter to the functions that characterized a
Procedure, a DummyArgument, and a DummyProcedure.
I also added several tests that will crash the compiler without this change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96631
This patch introduce the fir-opt tool. Similar to mlir-opt for FIR.
It will be used in following patches to test fir opt and round-trip.
Reviewed By: schweitz, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96535
Add the following options:
* -fimplicit-none and -fno-implicit-none
* -fbackslash and -fno-backslash
* -flogical-abbreviations and -fno-logical-abbreviations
* -fxor-operator and -fno-xor-operator
* -falternative-parameter-statement
* -finput-charset=<value>
Summary of changes:
- Enable extensions in CompilerInvocation#ParseFrontendArgs
- Add encoding_ to Fortran::frontend::FrontendOptions
- Add encoding to Fortran::parser::Options
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96407
This patch adds the following compiler frontend driver options:
* -fdebug-unparse (f18 spelling: -funparse)
* -fdebug-unparse-with-symbols (f18 spelling: -funparse-with-symbols)
The new driver will only accept the new spelling. `f18` will accept both
the original and the new spelling.
A new base class for frontend actions is added: `PrescanAndSemaAction`.
This is added to reduce code duplication that otherwise these new
options would lead to. Implementation from
* `ParseSyntaxOnlyAction::ExecutionAction`
is moved to:
* `PrescanAndSemaAction::BeginSourceFileAction`
This implementation is now shared between:
* PrescanAndSemaAction
* ParseSyntaxOnlyAction
* DebugUnparseAction
* DebugUnparseWithSymbolsAction
All tests that don't require other yet unimplemented options are
updated. This way `flang-new -fc1` is used instead of `f18` when
`FLANG_BUILD_NEW_DRIVER` is set to `On`. In order to facilitate this,
`%flang_fc1` is added in the LIT configuration (lit.cfg.py).
`asFortran` from f18.cpp is duplicated as `getBasicAsFortran` in
FrontendOptions.cpp. At this stage it's hard to find a good place to
share this method. I suggest that we revisit this once a switch from
`f18` to `flang-new` is complete.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96483
The following _action_ options are always used with `-fsyntax-only`
(also an _action_ option):
* -fdebug-dump-symbols
* -fdebug-dump-parse-tree
This patch makes the above options imply `-fsyntax-only`.
From the perspective of `f18` this change saves typing and is otherwise
a non-functional change. But it will simplify things in the new driver,
`flang-new`, in which only the last action option is taken into account
and executed. In other words, the following would only run
`-fsyntax-only`:
```
flang-new -fdebug-dump-symbols -fsyntax-only <input>
```
whereas this would only run `-fdebug-dump-symbols`:
```
flang-new -fsyntax-only -fdebug-dump-symbols <input>
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96528
Implementation of Do loop iteration variable check, Do while loop check, Do loop cycle restrictions.
Also to check whether the ordered clause is present on the loop construct if any ordered region ever
binds to a loop region arising from the loop construct.
Files:
check-omp-structure.h
check-omp-structure.cpp
resolve-directives.cpp
Testcases:
omp-do06-positivecases.f90
omp-do06.f90
omp-do08.f90
omp-do09.f90
omp-do10.f90
omp-do11.f90
omp-do12.f90
omp-do13.f90
omp-do14.f90
omp-do15.f90
omp-do16.f90
omp-do17.f90
Reviewed by: Kiran Chandramohan @kiranchandramohan , Valentin Clement @clementval
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92732
This patch introduce the fir-opt tool. Similar to mlir-opt for FIR.
It will be used in following patches to test fir opt and round-trip.
Reviewed By: schweitz, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96535
Instead of using a message attachment with further details,
emit the details as part of a single message.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96465
Most components required for this are already there.
Build and Testing clean.
ninja check-flang
Reviewed By: clementval, tskeith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96411
Some state in name resolution is stored in the DeclarationVisitor
instance and processed at the end of the specification part.
This state needs to accommodate nested specification parts, namely
the ones that can be nested in a subroutine or function interface
body.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96466
Add support for the following options:
* -fopenmp
* -fopenacc
Update OpenMP and OpenACC semantics tests to use the new driver if it is built, otherwise use f18.
OpenMP tests that include `use omp_lib` or run `test_symbols.sh` have not been updated as they require options `-intrinsic-module-directory` and `-funparse-with-symbols` which are currently not implemented in the new driver.
Similarly OpenACC tests that run `test_symbols.sh` have not been updated.
This patch also moves semanticsContext to CompilerInvocation and creates it in CompilerInvocation#setSemanticsOpts so that the semantics context can use Fortran::parser::Options#features.
Summary of changes:
- Move semanticsContext to CompilerInvocation.h
- Update OpenMP and OpenACC semantics tests that do not rely on `-intrinsic-module-directory` and `-funparse-with-symbols` to use %flang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96032
Peter Steinfeld