This was left over from when I had used some pointer authentication
instructions to sign the pointer. Then I realised that simply setting
the top byte is enough to prove the ABI plugin is being called.
Top byte ignore is a feature of the armv8-a architecure and doesn't
need any extra compiler flags.
The AST doesn't track their locations, and the default behavior of attributing
them to the lexically-enclosing node is sloppy and often inaccurate.
Also add a couple of passing test cases for declarators that weren't obvious.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117185
When searching for AST nodes that may overlap the selection, mayHit() was only
attempting to prune nodes whose begin/end are both in the main file.
While failing to prune never gives wrong results, it hurts performance.
In GTest unit-tests, `TEST()` macros at the top level declare classes.
These were never pruned and we traversed *every* such class for any selection.
We fix this by reasoning about what tokens such a node might claim.
They must lie within its ultimate macro expansion range, so if this doesn't
overlap with the selection, we can prune the node.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116978
Partial element rotate patterns (e.g. for element insertion on Issue #53124) were being split if every lane wasn't crossing, but really there's a good repeated mask hiding in there.
Without this patch when using CMAKE_CXX_STANDARD=20
and MSVC 19.30.30705.0 compilation fails with
clang\lib\Tooling\Syntax\Tree.cpp(347): error C2666: 'clang::syntax::Tree::ChildIteratorBase<clang::syntax::Tree::ChildIterator,clang::syntax::Node>::operator ==': 4 overloads have similar conversions
clang\lib\Tooling\Syntax\Tree.cpp(392): error C2666: 'clang::syntax::Tree::ChildIteratorBase<clang::syntax::Tree::ChildIterator,clang::syntax::Node>::operator ==': 4 overloads have similar conversions
Note that removed comment that
"iterator_facade_base requires == to be a member"
was made obsolete by change https://reviews.llvm.org/D78938
Reviewed By: sammccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116904
A lot of neon intrinsics work lane-wise, meaning that non-demanded
elements in and not demanded out. This teaches that to
AArch64TTIImpl::simplifyDemandedVectorEltsIntrinsic for some simple
single-input truncate intrinsics, which can help remove unnecessary
instructions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117097
LLVM Dialect Constant Op translations assume that if the attribute is a
vector, it's a fixed length one, generating an invalid translation for
constant scalable vector initializations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117125
Since 26c6a3e736, LLVM's inliner will "upgrade" the caller's stack protector
attribute based on the callee. This lead to surprising results with Clang's
no_stack_protector attribute added in 4fbf84c173 (D46300). Consider the
following code compiled with clang -fstack-protector-strong -Os
(https://godbolt.org/z/7s3rW7a1q).
extern void h(int* p);
inline __attribute__((always_inline)) int g() {
return 0;
}
int __attribute__((__no_stack_protector__)) f() {
int a[1];
h(a);
return g();
}
LLVM will inline g() into f(), and f() would get a stack protector, against the
users explicit wishes, potentially breaking the program e.g. if h() changes the
value of the stack cookie. That's a miscompile.
More recently, bc044a88ee (D91816) addressed this problem by preventing
inlining when the stack protector is disabled in the caller and enabled in the
callee or vice versa. However, the problem remained if the callee is marked
always_inline as in the example above. This affected users, see e.g.
http://crbug.com/1274129 and http://llvm.org/pr52886.
One way to fix this would be to prevent inlining also in the always_inline
case. Despite the name, always_inline does not guarantee inlining, so this
would be legal but potentially surprising to users.
However, I think the better fix is to not enable the stack protector in a
caller based on the callee. The motivation for the old behaviour is unclear, it
seems counter-intuitive, and causes real problems as we've seen.
This commit implements that fix, which means in the example above, g() gets
inlined into f() (also without always_inline), and f() is emitted without stack
protector. I think that matches most developers' expectations, and that's also
what GCC does.
Another effect of this change is that a no_stack_protector function can now be
inlined into a stack protected function, e.g. (https://godbolt.org/z/hafP6W856):
extern void h(int* p);
inline int __attribute__((__no_stack_protector__)) __attribute__((always_inline)) g() {
return 0;
}
int f() {
int a[1];
h(a);
return g();
}
I think that's fine. Such code would be unusual since no_stack_protector is
normally applied to a program entry point which sets up the stack canary. And
even if such code exists, inlining doesn't change the semantics: there is still
no stack cookie setup/check around entry/exit of the g() code region, but there
may be in the surrounding context, as there was before inlining. This also
matches GCC.
See also the discussion at https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94722
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116589
IR:
- globals (and functions, ifuncs, aliases) can have a partition
- catchret has a `to` before the label
- the sint/int types do not exist
- signext comes after the type
- a variable was missing its type
TableGen:
- The second value after a `#` concatenation is optional
See e.g. llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86InstrAVX512.td:L3351
- IncludeDirective and PreprocessorDirective were never referenced in
the grammar
- Add some missing ;
- Parent classes of multiclasses can have generic arguments.
Reuse the `ParentClassList` that is already used in other places.
MIR:
- liveins only allows physical registers, which start with a $
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116674
* This is useful when you need to build mixed array from external static/dynamic arrays (e.g. from adaptor during dialect conversion)
* Also, to reduce C++ code in td and generated files
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117106
If you want to check for all uses of PAC, the SpillsLR argument to
shouldSignReturnAddress should be true instead of false, as that value will be
returned from the function if the other checks fall through.
Reviewed By: miyuki
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116213
The nounwind and uwtable attributes were just cluttering up the test.
Using regexes to give symbolic names to the attribute lists make the
test more readable.
This is pre-committing parts of D116589.
Implement the qXfer:siginfo:read that is used to read the siginfo_t
(extended signal information) for the current thread. This is currently
implemented on FreeBSD and Linux.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117113
Implement support for matching an index from a WebAssembly CALL
instruction. Add test.
Reviewed By: tlively
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115327
Change FileCheck to accept patterns like "[[[var...]]" and treat the
excess open brackets at the start as literals.
This makes the patterns for matching assembler output with literal
brackets much cleaner. For example an AMDGPU pattern that used to be
written like:
buffer_store_dwordx2 v{{\[}}[[LO]]:[[HI]]{{\]}}
can now be:
buffer_store_dwordx2 v[[[LO]]:[[HI]]]
(Even before this patch the final close bracket did not need to be
wrapped in {{}}, but people tended to do it anyway for symmetry.)
This does not introduce any ambiguity since "[[" was always followed by
an identifier or '@' or '#', so "[[[" was always an error.
I've included a few test updates in this patch just for illustration and
testing. There are a couple of hundred tests that could be updated as a
follow up, mostly in test/CodeGen/.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117117
Change-Id: Ia6bc6f65cb69734821c911f54a43fe1c673bcca7
When we know the value we're extending is a negative constant then it
makes sense to use SIGN_EXTEND because this may improve code quality in
some cases, particularly when doing a constant splat of an unpacked vector
type. For example, for SVE when splatting the value -1 into all elements
of a vector of type <vscale x 2 x i32> the element type will get promoted
from i32 -> i64. In this case we want the splat value to sign-extend from
(i32 -1) -> (i64 -1), whereas currently it zero-extends from
(i32 -1) -> (i64 0xFFFFFFFF). Sign-extending the constant means we can use
a single mov immediate instruction.
New tests added here:
CodeGen/AArch64/sve-vector-splat.ll
I believe we see some code quality improvements in these existing
tests too:
CodeGen/AArch64/dag-numsignbits.ll
CodeGen/AArch64/reduce-and.ll
CodeGen/AArch64/unfold-masked-merge-vector-variablemask.ll
The apparent regressions in CodeGen/AArch64/fast-isel-cmp-vec.ll only
occur because the test disables codegen prepare and branch folding.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114357
Add a variant of the clspv target that is built using spir64.
This is a pre-requisite to supporting spir64 in clspv which is
required to take advantage of SPV_KHR_physical_storage_buffer which
in turn enables more OpenCL C programs to be compiled with clspv.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D116668
If we are inserting into or extracting from a scalable vector we do
not know the number of elements at runtime, so we can only let the
index wrap for fixed-length vectors.
Tests added here:
Analysis/CostModel/AArch64/sve-insert-extract.ll
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117099
Do nothing on R_AARCH64_NONE relocation. The relocation is used by BOLT when re-linking the final binary. It is used as a dummy relocation hack in order to stop the RuntimeDyld to skip the allocation of the section.
Reviewed By: lhames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117066
In practice we don't expect to see the get.active.lane.mask intrinsic
being used for fixed-width vectors, but we should at least be able
to generate code for it. This patch simply adds some fixed-width tests
to an existing file:
CodeGen/AArch64/active_lane_mask.ll
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116644
This patch makes jitlink to report an out of range error when the fixup value out of range
Reviewed By: lhames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107328
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/27037
Sorry its taken so long to get to this issue! (got it before it hit its 6th birthday!)
```
void operator delete(void *foo)ATTRIB;
```
(void *foo) is incorrectly determined to be a C-Style Cast resulting in the space being removed after the ) and before the attrib, due to the detection of
```
delete (A* )a;
```
The following was previously unaffected
```
void operator new(void *foo) ATTRIB;
```
Fixes#27037
Reviewed By: curdeius, HazardyKnusperkeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116920
New values:
- Split Dynamic into Open/Preamble
- Add Background (previously was just Unknown)
- Soon: stdlib index
This requires extending to 16 bits, which fits within the padding of Symbol.
Unfortunately we're also *serializing* SymbolOrigin as a fixed 8 bits.
Stop serializing SymbolOrigin:
- conceptually, the source is whoever indexes or *deserializes* a symbol
- deserialization takes SymbolOrigin as a parameter and stamps it on each sym
- this is a breaking format change
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115243
C++ member function bodies (including ctor initializers) are first captured
into a buffer and then parsed after the class is complete. (This allows
members to be referenced even if declared later).
When the boundary of the function body cannot be established, its buffer is
discarded and late-parsing never happens (it would surely fail).
For code completion this is the wrong tradeoff: the point of the parse is to
generate completions as a side-effect.
Today, when the ctor body wasn't typed yet there are no init list completions.
With this patch we parse such an init-list if it contains the completion point.
There's one caveat: the parser has to decide where to resume parsing members
after a broken init list. Often the first clear recovery point is *after* the
next member, so that member is missing from completion/signature help etc. e.g.
struct S {
S() m //<- completion here
int maaa;
int mbbb;
}
Here "int maaa;" is treated as part of the init list, so "maaa" is not available
as a completion. Maybe in future indentation can be used to recognize that
this is a separate member, not part of the init list.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116294
This extends D81784. Sections can be discarded when linking a
relocatable output. Before the patch, LLD did not update the content
of debug sections and only replaced the corresponding relocations with
R_*_NONE, which could break the debug information.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116946
Denys Shabalin