clang_codeCompleteAt(). This uncovered a few issues with the latter:
- ASTUnit wasn't saving/restoring diagnostic state appropriately between
reparses and code completions.
- "Overload" completions weren't being passed through to the client
llvm-svn: 116241
into the clients, e.g., the printing code-completion consumer and
c-index-test. Clients may want to re-sort the results anyway.
Provide a libclang function that sorts the results.
3rd try. How embarrassing.
llvm-svn: 112180
into the clients, e.g., the printing code-completion consumer and
c-index-test. Clients may want to re-sort the results anyway.
Provide a libclang function that sorts the results.
llvm-svn: 112149
sure to (1) actually use the remapped files we were given rather
than old data, and (2) keep the remapped files alive until the
code-completion results are destroyed. Big thanks to Daniel for the
test case.
llvm-svn: 111597
declarations (in addition to macros). Each kind of declaration maps to
a certain set of completion contexts, and the ASTUnit completion logic
introduces the completion strings for those declarations if the actual
code-completion occurs in one of the contexts where it matters.
There are a few new code-completion-context kinds. Without these,
certain completions (e.g., after "using namespace") would need to
suppress all global completions, which would be unfortunate.
Note that we don't get the priorities right for global completions,
because we don't have enough type information. We'll need a way to
compare types in an ASTContext-agnostic way before this can be
implemented.
llvm-svn: 111093
when the CXTranslationUnit_CacheCompletionResults option is given to
clang_parseTranslationUnit(). Essentially, we compute code-completion
results for macro definitions after we have parsed the file, then
store an ASTContext-agnostic version of those results (completion
string, cursor kind, priority, and active contexts) in the
ASTUnit. When performing code completion in that ASTUnit, we splice
the macro definition results into the results provided by the actual
code-completion (which has had macros turned off) before libclang gets
those results. We use completion context information to only splice in
those results that make sense for that context.
With a completion involving all of the macros from Cocoa.h and a few other
system libraries (totally ~8500 macro definitions) living in a
precompiled header, we get about a 9% performance improvement from
code completion, since we no longer have to deserialize all of the
macro definitions from the precompiled header.
Note that macro definitions are merely the canary; the cache is
designed to also support other top-level declarations, which should be
a bigger performance win. That optimization will be next.
Note also that there is no mechanism for determining when to throw
away the cache and recompute its contents.
llvm-svn: 111051
flags enumeration + default-generating function that allows
code-completion to be customized via the libclang API.
Plus, turn on spell-checking when performing code completion.
llvm-svn: 110319
completion within the translation unit using the same command-line
arguments for parsing the translation unit. Eventually, we'll reuse
the precompiled preamble to improve code-completion performance, and
this also gives us a place to cache results.
Expose this function via the new libclang function
clang_codeCompleteAt(), which performs the code completion within a
CXTranslationUnit. The completion occurs in-process
(clang_codeCompletion() runs code completion out-of-process).
llvm-svn: 110210
Douglas Gregor