Currently it's not possible to access MCSubtargetInfo from a TgtMCAsmBackend.
D20830 threaded an MCSubtargetInfo reference through
MCAsmBackend::relaxInstruction, but this isn't the only function that would
benefit from access. This patch removes the Triple and CPUString arguments
from createMCAsmBackend and replaces them with MCSubtargetInfo.
This patch just changes the interface without making any intentional
functional changes. Once in, several cleanups are possible:
* Get rid of the awkward MCSubtargetInfo handling in ARMAsmBackend
* Support 16-bit instructions when valid in MipsAsmBackend::writeNopData
* Get rid of the CPU string parsing in X86AsmBackend and just use a SubtargetFeature for HasNopl
* Emit 16-bit nops in RISCVAsmBackend::writeNopData if the compressed instruction set extension is enabled (see D41221)
This change initially exposed PR35686, which has since been resolved in r321026.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41349
llvm-svn: 321692
functions.
This makes the ownership of the resulting MCObjectWriter clear, and allows us
to remove one instance of MCObjectStreamer's bizarre "holding ownership via
someone else's reference" trick.
llvm-svn: 315327
ELFObjectWriter's constructor.
Fixes the same ownership issue for ELF that r315245 did for MachO:
ELFObjectWriter takes ownership of its MCELFObjectTargetWriter, so we want to
pass this through to the constructor via a unique_ptr, rather than a raw ptr.
llvm-svn: 315254
IMHO it is an antipattern to have a enum value that is Default.
At any given piece of code it is not clear if we have to handle
Default or if has already been mapped to a concrete value. In this
case in particular, only the target can do the mapping and it is nice
to make sure it is always done.
This deletes the two default enum values of CodeModel and uses an
explicit Optional<CodeModel> when it is possible that it is
unspecified.
llvm-svn: 309911
The issue is not if the value is pcrel. It is whether we have a
relocation or not.
If we have a relocation, the static linker will select the upper
bits. If we don't have a relocation, we have to do it.
llvm-svn: 307730
This adds all remaining instructions that were still missing, mostly
privileged and semi-privileged system-level instructions. These are
provided for use with the assembler and disassembler only.
This brings the LLVM assembler / disassembler to parity with the
GNU binutils tools.
llvm-svn: 306876
processFixupValue is called on every relaxation iteration. applyFixup
is only called once at the very end. applyFixup is then the correct
place to do last minute changes and value checks.
While here, do proper range checks again for fixup_arm_thumb_bl. We
used to do it, but dropped because of thumb2. We now do it again, but
use the thumb2 range.
llvm-svn: 306177
This creates a new library called BinaryFormat that has all of
the headers from llvm/Support containing structure and layout
definitions for various types of binary formats like dwarf, coff,
elf, etc as well as the code for identifying a file from its
magic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33843
llvm-svn: 304864
I did this a long time ago with a janky python script, but now
clang-format has built-in support for this. I fed clang-format every
line with a #include and let it re-sort things according to the precise
LLVM rules for include ordering baked into clang-format these days.
I've reverted a number of files where the results of sorting includes
isn't healthy. Either places where we have legacy code relying on
particular include ordering (where possible, I'll fix these separately)
or where we have particular formatting around #include lines that
I didn't want to disturb in this patch.
This patch is *entirely* mechanical. If you get merge conflicts or
anything, just ignore the changes in this patch and run clang-format
over your #include lines in the files.
Sorry for any noise here, but it is important to keep these things
stable. I was seeing an increasing number of patches with irrelevant
re-ordering of #include lines because clang-format was used. This patch
at least isolates that churn, makes it easy to skip when resolving
conflicts, and gets us to a clean baseline (again).
llvm-svn: 304787
A number of backends (AArch64, MIPS, ARM) have been using
MCContext::reportError to report issues such as out-of-range fixup values in
their TgtAsmBackend. This is great, but because MCContext couldn't easily be
threaded through to the adjustFixupValue helper function from its usual
callsite (applyFixup), these backends ended up adding an MCContext* argument
and adding another call to applyFixup to processFixupValue. Adding an
MCContext parameter to applyFixup makes this unnecessary, and even better -
applyFixup can take a reference to MCContext rather than a potentially null
pointer.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30264
llvm-svn: 299529
Now that we have fixups that only fill parts of a byte, it turns
out we have to mask off the bits outside the fixup area when
applying them. Failing to do so caused invalid object code to
be emitted for bprp with a negative 12-bit displacement.
llvm-svn: 288374
This adds assembler support for the instructions provided by the
execution-hint facility (NIAI and BP(R)P). This required adding
support for the new relocation types for 12-bit and 24-bit PC-
relative offsets used by the BP(R)P instructions.
llvm-svn: 288031
Summary:
* ARM is omitted from this patch because this check appears to expose bugs in this target.
* Mips is omitted from this patch because this check either detects bugs or deliberate
emission of instructions that don't satisfy their predicates. One deliberate
use is the SYNC instruction where the version with an operand is correctly
defined as requiring MIPS32 while the version without an operand is defined
as an alias of 'SYNC 0' and requires MIPS2.
* X86 is omitted from this patch because it doesn't use the tablegen-erated
MCCodeEmitter infrastructure.
Patches for ARM and Mips will follow.
Depends on D25617
Reviewers: tstellarAMD, jmolloy
Subscribers: wdng, jmolloy, aemerson, rengolin, arsenm, jyknight, nemanjai, nhaehnle, tstellarAMD, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25618
llvm-svn: 287439
Add the 16 access registers as LLVM registers. This allows removing
a lot of special cases in the assembler and disassembler where we
were handling access registers; this can all just use the generic
register code now.
Also add a bunch of instructions to operate on access registers,
for assembler/disassembler use only. No change in code generation
intended.
llvm-svn: 286283
LLVM currently treats the first operand of MVCK as if it were a
regular base+index+displacement address. However, it is in fact
a base+displacement combined with a length register field.
While the two might look syntactically similar, there are two
semantic differences:
- %r0 is a valid length register, even though it cannot be used
as an index register.
- In an expression with just a single register like 0(%rX), the
register is treated as base with normal addresses, while it is
treated as the length register (with an empty base) for MVCK.
Fixed by adding a new operand parser class BDRAddr and reworking
the assembler parser to distinguish between address + length
register operands and regular addresses.
llvm-svn: 285574
Some targets, notably AArch64 for ILP32, have different relocation encodings
based upon the ABI. This is an enabling change, so a future patch can use the
ABIName from MCTargetOptions to chose which relocations to use. Tested using
check-llvm.
The corresponding change to clang is in: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16538
Patch by: Joel Jones
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D16213
llvm-svn: 276654
Having an enum member named Default is quite confusing: Is it distinct
from the others?
This patch removes that member and instead uses Optional<Reloc> in
places where we have a user input that still hasn't been maped to the
default value, which is now clear has no be one of the remaining 3
options.
llvm-svn: 269988
Summary:
This patch is provided in preparation for removing autoconf on 1/26. The proposal to remove autoconf on 1/26 was discussed on the llvm-dev thread here: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-January/093875.html
"I felt a great disturbance in the [build system], as if millions of [makefiles] suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced. I fear something [amazing] has happened."
- Obi Wan Kenobi
Reviewers: chandlerc, grosbach, bob.wilson, tstellarAMD, echristo, whitequark
Subscribers: chfast, simoncook, emaste, jholewinski, tberghammer, jfb, danalbert, srhines, arsenm, dschuff, jyknight, dsanders, joker.eph, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16471
llvm-svn: 258861
These days relocations are created and stored in a deterministic way.
The order they are created is also suitable for the .o file, so we don't
need an explicit sort.
The last remaining exception is MIPS.
llvm-svn: 255902
The SystemZ linkers provide an optimization to transform a general-
or local-dynamic TLS sequence into an initial-exec sequence if possible.
Do do that, the compiler generates a function call to __tls_get_offset,
which is a brasl instruction annotated with *two* relocations:
- a R_390_PLT32DBL to install __tls_get_offset as branch target
- a R_390_TLS_GDCALL / R_390_TLS_LDCALL to inform the linker that
the TLS optimization should be performed if possible
If the optimization is performed, the brasl is replaced by an ld load
instruction.
However, *both* relocs are processed independently by the linker.
Therefore it is crucial that the R_390_PLT32DBL is processed *first*
(installing the branch target for the brasl) and the R_390_TLS_GDCALL
is processed *second* (replacing the whole brasl with an ld).
If the relocs are swapped, the linker will first replace the brasl
with an ld, and *then* install the __tls_get_offset branch target
offset. Since ld has a different layout than brasl, this may even
result in a completely different (or invalid) instruction; in any
case, the resulting code is corrupted.
Unfortunately, the way the MC common code sorts relocations causes
these two to *always* end up the wrong way around, resulting in
wrong code generation by the linker and crashes.
This patch overrides the sortRelocs routine to detect this particular
pair of relocs and enforce the required order.
llvm-svn: 255787
Summary:
This is the first patch in the series to migrate Triple's (which are ambiguous)
to TargetTuple's (which aren't).
For the moment, TargetTuple simply passes all requests to the Triple object it
holds. Once it has replaced Triple, it will start to implement the interface in
a more suitable way.
This change makes some changes to the public C++ API. In particular,
InitMCSubtargetInfo(), createMCRelocationInfo(), and createMCSymbolizer()
now take TargetTuples instead of Triples. The other public C++ API's have
been left as-is for the moment to reduce patch size.
This commit also contains a trivial patch to clang to account for the C++ API
change. Thanks go to Pavel Labath for fixing LLDB for me.
Reviewers: rengolin
Subscribers: jyknight, dschuff, arsenm, rampitec, danalbert, srhines, javed.absar, dsanders, echristo, emaste, jholewinski, tberghammer, ted, jfb, llvm-commits, rengolin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10969
llvm-svn: 247692
Summary:
This is the first patch in the series to migrate Triple's (which are ambiguous)
to TargetTuple's (which aren't).
For the moment, TargetTuple simply passes all requests to the Triple object it
holds. Once it has replaced Triple, it will start to implement the interface in
a more suitable way.
This change makes some changes to the public C++ API. In particular,
InitMCSubtargetInfo(), createMCRelocationInfo(), and createMCSymbolizer()
now take TargetTuples instead of Triples. The other public C++ API's have
been left as-is for the moment to reduce patch size.
This commit also contains a trivial patch to clang to account for the C++ API
change.
Reviewers: rengolin
Subscribers: jyknight, dschuff, arsenm, rampitec, danalbert, srhines, javed.absar, dsanders, echristo, emaste, jholewinski, tberghammer, ted, jfb, llvm-commits, rengolin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10969
llvm-svn: 247683
Force all creators of `MCSubtargetInfo` to immediately initialize it,
merging the default constructor and the initializer into an initializing
constructor. Besides cleaning up the code a little, this makes it clear
that the initializer is never called again later.
Out-of-tree backends need a trivial change: instead of calling:
auto *X = new MCSubtargetInfo();
InitXYZMCSubtargetInfo(X, ...);
return X;
they should call:
return createXYZMCSubtargetInfoImpl(...);
There's no real functionality change here.
llvm-svn: 241957
Summary:
This concludes the patch series to eliminate StringRef forms of GNU triples
from the internals of LLVM that began in r239036.
At this point, the StringRef-form of GNU Triples should only be used in the
public API (including IR serialization) and a couple objects that directly
interact with the API (most notably the Module class). The next step is to
replace these Triple objects with the TargetTuple object that will represent
our authoratative/unambiguous internal equivalent to GNU Triples.
Reviewers: rengolin
Subscribers: llvm-commits, jholewinski, ted, rengolin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10962
llvm-svn: 241472
Summary:
This continues the patch series to eliminate StringRef forms of GNU triples
from the internals of LLVM that began in r239036.
Reviewers: rafael
Reviewed By: rafael
Subscribers: rafael, ted, jfb, llvm-commits, rengolin, jholewinski
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10311
llvm-svn: 239467
Summary:
This continues the patch series to eliminate StringRef forms of GNU triples
from the internals of LLVM that began in r239036.
Reviewers: echristo, rafael
Reviewed By: rafael
Subscribers: rafael, llvm-commits, rengolin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10243
llvm-svn: 239464
Summary:
This is the first of several patches to eliminate StringRef forms of GNU
triples from the internals of LLVM. After this is complete, GNU triples
will be replaced by a more authoratitive representation in the form of
an LLVM TargetTuple.
Reviewers: rengolin
Reviewed By: rengolin
Subscribers: ted, llvm-commits, rengolin, jholewinski
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10236
llvm-svn: 239036
The architecture doesn't really have any native v4f32 operations except
v4f32->v2f64 and v2f64->v4f32 conversions, with only half of the v4f32
elements being used. Even so, using vector registers for <4 x float>
and scalarising individual operations is much better than generating
completely scalar code, since there's much less register pressure.
It's also more efficient to do v4f32 comparisons by extending to 2
v2f64s, comparing those, then packing the result.
This particularly helps with llvmpipe.
Based on a patch by Richard Sandiford.
llvm-svn: 236523
This patch adds support for the z13 processor type and its vector facility,
and adds MC support for all new instructions provided by that facilily.
Apart from defining the new instructions, the main changes are:
- Adding VR128, VR64 and VR32 register classes.
- Making FP64 a subclass of VR64 and FP32 a subclass of VR32.
- Adding a D(V,B) addressing mode for scatter/gather operations
- Adding 1-, 2-, and 3-bit immediate operands for some 4-bit fields.
Until now all immediate operands have been the same width as the
underlying field (hence the assert->return change in decode[SU]ImmOperand).
In addition, sys::getHostCPUName is extended to detect running natively
on a z13 machine.
Based on a patch by Richard Sandiford.
llvm-svn: 236520
Alex Bradbury