at more than those which define CPSR. You can have this situation:
(1) subs ...
(2) sub r6, r5, r4
(3) movge ...
(4) cmp r6, 0
(5) movge ...
We cannot convert (2) to "subs" because (3) is using the CPSR set by
(1). There's an analogous situation here:
(1) sub r1, r2, r3
(2) sub r4, r5, r6
(3) cmp r4, ...
(5) movge ...
(6) cmp r1, ...
(7) movge ...
We cannot convert (1) to "subs" because of the intervening use of CPSR.
llvm-svn: 117950
looks like is happening:
Without the peephole optimizer:
(1) sub r6, r6, #32
orr r12, r12, lr, lsl r9
orr r2, r2, r3, lsl r10
(x) cmp r6, #0
ldr r9, LCPI2_10
ldr r10, LCPI2_11
(2) sub r8, r8, #32
(a) movge r12, lr, lsr r6
(y) cmp r8, #0
LPC2_10:
ldr lr, [pc, r10]
(b) movge r2, r3, lsr r8
With the peephole optimizer:
ldr r9, LCPI2_10
ldr r10, LCPI2_11
(1*) subs r6, r6, #32
(2*) subs r8, r8, #32
(a*) movge r12, lr, lsr r6
(b*) movge r2, r3, lsr r8
(1) is used by (x) for the conditional move at (a). (2) is used by (y) for the
conditional move at (b). After the peephole optimizer, these the flags resulting
from (1*) are ignored and only the flags from (2*) are considered for both
conditional moves.
llvm-svn: 117876
must be called in the pass's constructor. This function uses static dependency declarations to recursively initialize
the pass's dependencies.
Clients that only create passes through the createFooPass() APIs will require no changes. Clients that want to use the
CommandLine options for passes will need to manually call the appropriate initialization functions in PassInitialization.h
before parsing commandline arguments.
I have tested this with all standard configurations of clang and llvm-gcc on Darwin. It is possible that there are problems
with the static dependencies that will only be visible with non-standard options. If you encounter any crash in pass
registration/creation, please send the testcase to me directly.
llvm-svn: 116820
perform initialization without static constructors AND without explicit initialization
by the client. For the moment, passes are required to initialize both their
(potential) dependencies and any passes they preserve. I hope to be able to relax
the latter requirement in the future.
llvm-svn: 116334
into OptimizeCompareInstr.
This necessitates the passing of CmpValue around,
so widen the virtual functions to accomodate.
No functionality changes.
llvm-svn: 114428
iterator when an optimization took place. This allows us to do more insane
things with the code than just remove an instruction or two.
llvm-svn: 113640
Evan Cheng