it to follow the mode needed by the new isel. Instead of returning
the input and output chains, it just returns the (currently only one,
which is a silly limitation) node that has input and output chains.
Since we want the old thing to still work, add a new
SelectScalarSSELoad to emulate the old interface. The XXX suffix
and the wrapper will eventually go away.
llvm-svn: 96715
true or false as its exit condition. These are usually eliminated by
SimplifyCFG, but the may be left around during a pass which wishes
to preserve the CFG.
llvm-svn: 96683
from an instance method. Previously, we were following the Objective-C
name lookup rules for ivars, which are of course completely different
from and incompatible with the Objective-C++ rules.
For the record, the Objective-C++ rules are the sane ones.
This is another part of <rdar://problem/7660386>.
llvm-svn: 96677
dragonegg self-host build. I reverted 96640 in order to revert
96556 (96640 goes on top of 96556), but it also looks like with
both of them applied the breakage happens even earlier. The
symptom of the 96556 miscompile is the following crash:
llvm[3]: Compiling AlphaISelLowering.cpp for Release build
cc1plus: /home/duncan/tmp/tmp/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAG.cpp:4982: void llvm::SelectionDAG::ReplaceAllUsesWith(llvm::SDNode*, llvm::SDNode*, llvm::SelectionDAG::DAGUpdateListener*): Assertion `(!From->hasAnyUseOfValue(i) || From->getValueType(i) == To->getValueType(i)) && "Cannot use this version of ReplaceAllUsesWith!"' failed.
Stack dump:
0. Running pass 'X86 DAG->DAG Instruction Selection' on function '@_ZN4llvm19AlphaTargetLowering14LowerOperationENS_7SDValueERNS_12SelectionDAGE'
g++: Internal error: Aborted (program cc1plus)
This occurs when building LLVM using LLVM built by LLVM (via
dragonegg). Probably LLVM has miscompiled itself, though it
may have miscompiled GCC and/or dragonegg itself: at this point
of the self-host build, all of GCC, LLVM and dragonegg were built
using LLVM. Unfortunately this kind of thing is extremely hard
to debug, and while I did rummage around a bit I didn't find any
smoking guns, aka obviously miscompiled code.
Found by bisection.
r96556 | evancheng | 2010-02-18 03:13:50 +0100 (Thu, 18 Feb 2010) | 5 lines
Some dag combiner goodness:
Transform br (xor (x, y)) -> br (x != y)
Transform br (xor (xor (x,y), 1)) -> br (x == y)
Also normalize (and (X, 1) == / != 1 -> (and (X, 1)) != / == 0 to match to "test on x86" and "tst on arm"
r96640 | evancheng | 2010-02-19 01:34:39 +0100 (Fri, 19 Feb 2010) | 16 lines
Transform (xor (setcc), (setcc)) == / != 1 to
(xor (setcc), (setcc)) != / == 1.
e.g. On x86_64
%0 = icmp eq i32 %x, 0
%1 = icmp eq i32 %y, 0
%2 = xor i1 %1, %0
br i1 %2, label %bb, label %return
=>
testl %edi, %edi
sete %al
testl %esi, %esi
sete %cl
cmpb %al, %cl
je LBB1_2
llvm-svn: 96672
Fix some bugs with function-try-blocks and simplify normal try-block
code generation.
This implementation excludes a deleting destructor's call to
operator delete() from the function-try-block, which I believe
is correct but which I can't find straightforward support for at
a moment's glance.
llvm-svn: 96670
Chris Lattner