Reland https://reviews.llvm.org/D76696
All known crashes have been fixed, another attemption.
We have rolled out this to all internal users for a while, didn't see
big issues, we consider it is stable enough.
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: rsmith, hubert.reinterpretcast, ebevhan, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78350
trivial.
We previously took a shortcut by assuming that if a subobject had a
trivial copy assignment operator (with a few side-conditions), we would
always invoke it, and could avoid going through overload resolution.
That turns out to not be correct in the presenve of ref-qualifiers (and
also won't be the case for copy-assignments with requires-clauses
either). Use the same logic for lazy declaration of copy-assignments
that we use for all other special member functions.
Previously committed as c57f8a3a20. This
now also includes an extension of LLDB's workaround for handling special
members without the help of Sema to cover copy assignments.
trivial.
We previously took a shortcut by assuming that if a subobject had a
trivial copy assignment operator (with a few side-conditions), we would
always invoke it, and could avoid going through overload resolution.
That turns out to not be correct in the presenve of ref-qualifiers (and
also won't be the case for copy-assignments with requires-clauses
either). Use the same logic for lazy declaration of copy-assignments
that we use for all other special member functions.
Summary:
This patch would cause clang emit more diagnostics, but it is much better than https://reviews.llvm.org/D76831
```cpp
struct A {
A(int);
~A() = delete;
};
void k() {
A a;
}
```
before the patch:
/tmp/t3.cpp:24:5: error: no matching constructor for initialization of 'A'
A a;
^
/tmp/t3.cpp:20:3: note: candidate constructor not viable: requires 1 argument, but 0 were provided
A(int);
^
/tmp/t3.cpp:19:8: note: candidate constructor (the implicit copy constructor) not viable: requires 1 argument, but 0 were provided
struct A {
After the patch:
/tmp/t3.cpp:24:5: error: no matching constructor for initialization of 'A'
A a;
^
/tmp/t3.cpp:20:3: note: candidate constructor not viable: requires 1 argument, but 0 were provided
A(int);
^
/tmp/t3.cpp:19:8: note: candidate constructor (the implicit copy constructor) not viable: requires 1 argument, but 0 were provided
struct A {
^
/tmp/t3.cpp:24:5: error: attempt to use a deleted function
A a;
^
/tmp/t3.cpp:21:3: note: '~A' has been explicitly marked deleted here
~A() = delete;
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77395
ownership qualifications in C++ unions under ARC.
An ObjC pointer member with non-trivial ownership qualifications causes
all of the defaulted special functions of the enclosing union to be
defined as deleted, except when the member has an in-class initializer,
the default constructor isn't defined as deleted.
rdar://problem/34213306
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57438
llvm-svn: 352949
before adding a delayed diagnostic to DelayedDiagnostics.
This fixes an assertion failure in Sema::DelayedDiagnostics::add that
was caused by the changes made in r141037.
rdar://problem/42782323
llvm-svn: 351911
type is an unqualified objc pointer in arc. Treat it just
as being treated in c++98. This fixes a bogus vararg warning
with -std=c++11. //rdar://12229679
llvm-svn: 163236
This could happen for cases like this:
- (NSArray *)getAllNames:(NSArray *)images {
NSMutableArray *results = [NSMutableArray array];
for (auto img in images) {
[results addObject:img.name];
}
return results;
}
Here the property access will fail because 'img' has type 'id', rather than,
say, NSImage.
This warning will not fire in templated code, since the 'id' could have
come from a template parameter.
llvm-svn: 158239
increasingly prevailing case to the point that new features
like ARC don't even support the fragile ABI anymore.
This required a little bit of reshuffling with exceptions
because a check was assuming that ObjCNonFragileABI was
only being set in ObjC mode, and that's actually a bit
obnoxious to do.
Most, though, it involved a perl script to translate a ton
of test cases.
Mostly no functionality change for driver users, although
there are corner cases with disabling language-specific
exceptions that we should handle more correctly now.
llvm-svn: 140957
Language-design credit goes to a lot of people, but I particularly want
to single out Blaine Garst and Patrick Beard for their contributions.
Compiler implementation credit goes to Argyrios, Doug, Fariborz, and myself,
in no particular order.
llvm-svn: 133103
Haojian Wu