I have made a small fix for readability-delete-null-pointer check so it also checks for class members.
Example of case that it fixes
```
struct A {
void foo() {
if(mp)
delete mp;
}
int *mp;
};
```
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, aaron.ballman, alexfh, malcolm.parsons
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29726
llvm-svn: 294912
...function type with a redeclaration having the same attribute. Fixing this
introduced a secondary problem where we were assuming that K&R functions
could not be attributed types when reporting old-style function definitions
that are not preceded by a prototype."
Also Revert "Hopefully fixes a compile error introduced by r294861."
This reverts commit r294862, r294861, as they bork the ARM builds and
haven't fix it back.
Also, please, short commit titles, long commit decsriptions...
llvm-svn: 294910
I can't prove that we can select this instruction or the AVX/SSE version, but I'm adding it for consistency for now so I can continue matching the load folding tables.
llvm-svn: 294907
This test explicitly is checking the behaviour of std::thread and
pthread interactions. This requires pthreads. Add an appropriate
requirement.
llvm-svn: 294903
The target shuffle match function arguments were using the term 'Ops' but the function names referred to them as 'Inputs' - use 'Inputs' consistently.
llvm-svn: 294900
The newer versions of ucrt have the math routines. Use the CRT version
to determine if we should include the math routines. Fixes two tests
for Windows.
llvm-svn: 294899
Initial 256-bit vector support - 512-bit support requires extra checks for AVX512BW support (PMOVZXBW) that will be handled in a future patch.
llvm-svn: 294896
Formatting unnamed array names is expensive in LLVM as the this requires
deriving the numbered virtual instruction name (e.g., %12) for an llvm::Value,
which is currently not implemented efficiently. As instruction numberes anyhow
do not really carry a lot of information for the user, we just print 'unknown'
instead.
This change reduces the scop detection time from 24 to 19 seconds, for one of
our large-scale inputs. This is a reduction by 21%.
llvm-svn: 294894
proven larger than the loop-count
This fixes PR31098: Try to resolve statically data-dependences whose
compile-time-unknown distance can be proven larger than the loop-count,
instead of resorting to runtime dependence checking (which are not always
possible).
For vectorization it is sufficient to prove that the dependence distance
is >= VF; But in some cases we can prune unknown dependence distances early,
and even before selecting the VF, and without a runtime test, by comparing
the distance against the loop iteration count. Since the vectorized code
will be executed only if LoopCount >= VF, proving distance >= LoopCount
also guarantees that distance >= VF. This check is also equivalent to the
Strong SIV Test.
Reviewers: mkuper, anemet, sanjoy
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28044
llvm-svn: 294892
When deriving the range of valid values of a scalar evolution expression might
be a range [12, 8), where the upper bound is smaller than the lower bound and
where the range is expected to possibly wrap around. We theoretically could
model such a range as a union of two non-wrapping ranges, but do not do this
as of yet. Instead, we just do not derive any bounds. Before this change,
we could have obtained bounds where the maximal possible value is strictly
smaller than the minimal possible value, which is incorrect and also caused
assertions during scop modeling.
llvm-svn: 294891
default pipeline.
A clang with this patch built with ASan and asserts can build all of the
test-suite as well, so it seems to not uncover any latent problems.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29853
llvm-svn: 294888
All the invalidation issues and bugs in this seem to be fixed, it has
survived a full build of the test suite plus SPEC with asserts and ASan
enabled on the Clang binary used.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29815
llvm-svn: 294887
On Windows the filename might have an extension, namely
`.exe`, so the search will fail. Sorry, I don't have a
good way to test this as it seems to fail only in some
weird configurations. r284430 has the same modification
for Fuchsia.
llvm-svn: 294879
Use # as the comment leader for AArch64 auto-release elision marker.
This is to keep it in sync with the value used in swift. When building
libdispatch for Linux AArch64, the auto-release elision marker was
emitted. However, ELF uses # as the comment leader while MachO accepts
both ; and #. Use the common marker for it instead.
llvm-svn: 294877
Certain ARC runtime functions have an ABI contract of being forwarding.
Annotate the functions with the appropriate `returned` attribute on the
arguments. This hoists some of the runtime ABI contract information
into the frontend rather than the backend transformations.
The test adjustments are to mark the returned function parameter as
such. The minor change to the IR output is due to the fact that the
returned reference of the object causes it to extend the lifetime of the
object by returning an autoreleased return value. The result is that
the explicit objc_autorelease call is no longer formed, as autorelease
elision is now possible on the return.
llvm-svn: 294872
Many quoted code blocks were not in sync with the actual toy.cpp
files. Improve tutorial text slightly in several places.
Added some step descriptions crucial to avoid crashes (like
InitializeNativeTarget* calls).
Solve/workaround problems with Windows (JIT'ed method not found, using
custom and standard library functions from host process).
Patch by: Moritz Kroll <moritz.kroll@gmx.de>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29864
llvm-svn: 294870
Summary:
The -mmcu option for GCC sets macros like __AVR_ATmega328P__ (with the trailing
underscores), be sure to include these underscores for Clangs -mcpu option.
See "AVR Built-in Macros" in https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/AVR-Options.html
Reviewers: jroelofs, dylanmckay
Reviewed By: jroelofs, dylanmckay
Subscribers: efriedma, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29817
llvm-svn: 294869