This check performs basic analysis of macros and replaces them
with an anonymous unscoped enum. Using an unscoped anonymous enum
ensures that everywhere the macro token was used previously, the
enumerator name may be safely used.
Potential macros for replacement must meet the following constraints:
- Macros must expand only to integral literal tokens. The unary
operators plus, minus and tilde are recognized to allow for positive,
negative and bitwise negated integers.
- Macros must be defined on sequential source file lines, or with
only comment lines in between macro definitions.
- Macros must all be defined in the same source file.
- Macros must not be defined within a conditional compilation block.
- Macros must not be defined adjacent to other preprocessor directives.
- Macros must not be used in preprocessor conditions
Each cluster of macros meeting the above constraints is presumed to
be a set of values suitable for replacement by an anonymous enum.
From there, a developer can give the anonymous enum a name and
continue refactoring to a scoped enum if desired. Comments on the
same line as a macro definition or between subsequent macro definitions
are preserved in the output. No formatting is assumed in the provided
replacements.
The check cppcoreguidelines-macro-to-enum is an alias for this check.
Fixes#27408
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117522
Change RewriteRule from holding an `Explanation` to being able to generate
arbitrary metadata. Where TransformerClangTidyCheck was interested in a string
description for the diagnostic, other tools may be interested in richer metadata
at a higher level of abstraction than at the edit level (which is currently
available as ASTEdit::Metadata).
Reviewed By: ymandel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120360
Change RewriteRule from holding an `Explanation` to being able to generate
arbitrary metadata. Where TransformerClangTidyCheck was interested in a string
description for the diagnostic, other tools may be interested in richer metadata
at a higher level of abstraction than at the edit level (which is currently
available as ASTEdit::Metadata).
Reviewed By: ymandel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120360
Link to the GitHub Issue: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53745
Added config_path variable within the python script which makes the
required call to the clang-tidy binary with --config-file option.
If the config_path is None then config will be used. No error is raised
if both are given but silently chooses config_path over config
The checker removes `const`s that are superfluos and badly affect
readability. `decltype(auto)`/`decltype(expr)` are often const-qualified, but
have no effect on readability and usually can't stop being const-qualified
without significant code change.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/52890
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119470
This changes the clang-tidy script to discover binaries you've built
locally without having to pass them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100692
It was probably a copy-paste mistake.
The check was added as `cert-dcl58-cpp`, so the doc should point there.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121373
The docs URL was dangling, and the docs suggested that it has no fixits,
but it actually had.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121372
It cannot match a `pure virtual function`. This patch fixes this behavior.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116439
As originally reported by @steakhal in
http://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54074, the name extraction logic of
`readability-suspicious-call-argument` crashes if the argument passed to a
function was a function call to a non-trivially named entity (e.g. an operator).
Fixed this crash case by ignoring such constructs and considering them as having
no name.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, steakhal
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D120555
The checker missed a check for a case when the parameter is referenced by an lvalue and this could cause build breakages.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117090
The tristate is a little redundant as we can determine if the item was already in the cache based on the return from try_emplace.
Reviewed By: salman-javed-nz
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120196
D90110 modified the behavior of `run-clang-tidy` to always pass the
`--use-color` option to clang-tidy, which enabled colored diagnostics
output regardless of TTY status or .clang-tidy settings. This left the
user with no option to disable the colored output.
This presents an issue when trying to parse the output of run-clang-tidy
programmaticall, as the output is polluted with ANSI escape characters.
This PR fixes this issue in two ways:
1. It restores the default behavior of `run-clang-tidy` to let
`clang-tidy` decide whether to color output. This allows the user to
configure color via the `UseColor` option in a .clang-tidy file.
2. It adds mutually exclusive, optional `-use-color` and `-no-use-color`
argument flags that let the user explicitly set the color option via
the invocation.
After this change the default behavior of `run-clang-tidy` when no
.clang-tidy file is available is now to show no color, presumably
because `clang-tidy` detects that the output is being piped and defaults
to not showing colored output. This seems like an acceptable tradeoff
to respect .clang-tidy configurations, as users can still use the
`-use-color` option to explicitly enable color.
Fixes#49441 (50097 in Bugzilla)
Reviewed By: njames93
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119562
This option allows callers to disable the warning from
https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/performance-move-const-arg.html
that would warn on the following
```
void f(const string &s);
string s;
f(std::move(s)); // ALLOWED if performance-move-const-arg.CheckMoveToConstRef=false
```
The reason people might want to disable this check, is because it allows
callers to use `std::move()` or not based on local reasoning about the
argument, and without having to care about how the function `f` accepts
the argument. Indeed, `f` might accept the argument by const-ref today,
but change to by-value tomorrow, and if the caller had moved the
argument that they were finished with, the code would work as
efficiently as possible regardless of how `f` accepted the parameter.
Reviewed By: ymandel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119370
Implement P2128R6 in C++23 mode.
Unlike GCC's implementation, this doesn't try to recover when a user
meant to use a comma expression.
Because the syntax changes meaning in C++23, the patch is *NOT*
implemented as an extension. Instead, declaring an array with not
exactly 1 parameter is an error in older languages modes. There is an
off-by-default extension warning in C++23 mode.
Unlike the standard, we supports default arguments;
Ie, we assume, based on conversations in WG21, that the proposed
resolution to CWG2507 will be accepted.
We allow arrays OpenMP sections and C++23 multidimensional array to
coexist:
[a , b] multi dimensional array
[a : b] open mp section
[a, b: c] // error
The rest of the patch is relatively straight forward: we take care to
support an arbitrary number of arguments everywhere.
The test invocation at the start of run-clang-tidy.py (line 257) prints
all enabled checks - meaning either the default set or anything
configured via the -checks option. If any checks were (un-)configured
via the -config option, these are not printed. This is confusing to the
user, since the list of checks that are printed may be different from
the list of checks that are used by the non-testing calls to clang-tidy,
where the -config option is passed correctly.
This patch adds the -config option to the test invocation of clang-tidy
at the start of the script. This means that checks (un-)configured via
the -config option (rather than the -checks option) are applied
correctly, when printing the list of enabled checks.
Display notes for a possible call chain if an unsafe function is found to be
called (maybe indirectly) from a signal handler.
The call chain displayed this way includes probably not the first calls of
the functions, but it is a valid possible (in non path-sensitive way) one.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118224
This reverts commit 36892727e4 which
breaks the build when LLVM_INSTALL_TOOLCHAIN_ONLY is enabled with:
CMake Error at cmake/modules/AddLLVM.cmake:683 (add_dependencies):
The dependency target "clang-tidy-headers" of target "CTTestTidyModule"
does not exist.
Inside a switch the caseStmt() and defaultStmt() have a nested statement
associated with them. Similarly, labelStmt() has a nested statement.
These statements were being missed when looking for a compound-if of the
form "if (x) return true; return false;" when the if is nested under one
of these labelling constructs.
Enhance the matchers to look for these nested statements using some
private matcher hasSubstatement() traversal matcher on case, default
and label statements. Add the private matcher hasSubstatementSequence()
to match the compound "if (x) return true; return false;" pattern.
- Add unit tests for private matchers and corresponding test
infrastructure
- Add corresponding test file readability-simplify-bool-expr-case.cpp.
- Fix variable name copy/paste error in readability-simplify-bool-expr.cpp.
- Drop the asserts, which were used only for debugging matchers.
- Run clang-format on the whole check.
- Move local functions out of anonymous namespace and declare state, per
LLVM style guide
- Declare labels constexpr
- Declare visitor arguments as pointer to const
- Drop braces around simple control statements per LLVM style guide
- Prefer explicit arguments over default arguments to methods
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56303Fixes#27078
This commit checks if a function is marked with the naked attribute
and, if it is, will silence the emission of any unused-parameter
warning.
Inside a naked function only the usage of basic ASM instructions is
expected. In this context the parameters can actually be used by
fetching them according to the underlying ABI. Since parameters might
be used through ASM instructions, the linter and the compiler will have
a hard time understanding if one of those is unused or not, therefore
no unused-parameter warning should ever be triggered whenever a
function is marked naked.
The check previously inspected only the immediate parent namespace.
`static` in a named namespace within an unnamed namespace is still
redundant.
We will use `Decl::isInAnonymousNamespace()` method that traverses the
namespaces hierarchy recursively.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118010
Douglas Yung