as constant size arrays. This has slightly different semantics in some insane cases, but allows
us to accept some constructs that GCC does. Continue to be pedantic in -std=c99 and other
modes. This addressed rdar://8733881 - error "variable-sized object may not be initialized"; g++ accepts same code
llvm-svn: 132983
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
a default target).
llvm-svn: 91446
1. In a struct field redefinition, don't mark the struct erroneous. The
field is erroneous, but the struct is otherwise well formed.
2. Don't emit diagnostics about functions that are known to be broken already.
Either fix is sufficient to silence the second diagnostic in the example,
but the combination is better :)
llvm-svn: 70371
required to actually be an error for correctness. The attached testcase
now gives an error instead of mysteriously crashing.
Now, it's possible we actually want to support the given usage, but I
haven't looked at the relevant code closely.
llvm-svn: 65253
elaborated-type-specifier declarations into outer scopes while
retaining their proper lexical scope. This way is simpler and more
consistent with the way DeclContexts work, and also fixes
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=3430
llvm-svn: 63581
Chris Lattner