Commit Graph

3 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Craig Topper e538fc74d4 [X86] Remove checks for FeatureAVX512 from the X86 assembly parser. Remove mcpu/mattr from assembly test command lines.
Summary:
We should always be able to accept AVX512 registers and instructions in llvm-mc. The only subtarget mode that should be checked is 16-bit vs 32-bit vs 64-bit mode.

I've also removed all the mattr/mcpu lines from test RUN lines to be consistent with this. Most were due to AVX512, but a few were for other features.

Fixes PR36202

Reviewers: RKSimon, echristo, bkramer

Reviewed By: echristo

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42824

llvm-svn: 324106
2018-02-02 17:02:58 +00:00
Ahmed Bougacha 0dc1979293 [MC] Reset the MCInst in the matcher function before adding opcode/operands.
On X86, the Intel asm parser tries to match all memory operand sizes when
none is explicitly specified.  For LEA, which doesn't really have a memory
operand (just a pointer one), this results in multiple successful matches,
one for each memory size.  There's no error because it's same opcode, so
really, it's just one match.  However, the tablegen'd matcher function
adds opcode/operands to the passed MCInst, and this results in multiple
duplicated operands.

This commit clears the MCInst in the tablegen'd matcher function.
We sometimes clear it when the match failed, so there's no expectation of
keeping the previous content anyway.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6670

llvm-svn: 224347
2014-12-16 18:05:28 +00:00
Ahmed Bougacha d65f787a5f [X86][MC] Intel syntax: accept implicit memory operand sizes larger than 80.
The X86AsmParser intel handling was refactored in r216481, making it
try each different memory operand size to see which one matches.
Operand sizes larger than 80 ("[xyz]mmword ptr") were forgotten, which
led to an "invalid operand" error for code such as:
  movdqa [rax], xmm0

llvm-svn: 223187
2014-12-03 02:03:26 +00:00