members of dependent contexts.
This permits cases where the names before and after the '::' in a
dependent inherited constructor using-declaration do not match, but
where we can nonetheless tell when parsing the template that a
constructor is being named. Under (open) core language DR 2070, such
cases will probably be ill-formed, but r335182 does not quite give
that result and didn't intend to change this, so restore the old
behavior for now.
llvm-svn: 335381
Diagnose the name of the class being shadowed by using declarations, and
improve the diagnostics for the case where the name of the class is
shadowed by a non-static data member in a class with constructors. In
the latter case, we now always give the "member with the same name as
its class" diagnostic regardless of the relative order of the member and
the constructor, rather than giving an inscrutible diagnostic if the
constructor appears second.
llvm-svn: 335182
Summary:
This patch adds the newly added `%sub` diagnostic modifier to cleanup repetition in the overload candidate diagnostics.
I think this should be good to go.
@rsmith: Some of the notes now emit `function template` where they only said `function` previously. It seems OK to me, but I would like your sign off on it.
Reviewers: rsmith, EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: cfe-commits, rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47101
llvm-svn: 333485
If the name after 'template' is an unresolved using declaration (not containing
'typename'), then we don't yet know if it's a valid template-name, so don't
reject it prior to instantiation. Instead, treat it as naming a dependent
member of the current instantiation.
llvm-svn: 332291
For 'x::template y', consistently give a "no member named 'y' in 'x'"
diagnostic if there is no such member, and give a 'template keyword not
followed by a template' name error if there is such a member but it's not a
template. In the latter case, add a note pointing at the non-template.
Don't suggest inserting a 'template' keyword in 'X::Y<' if X is dependent
if the lookup of X::Y was actually not a dependent lookup and found only
non-templates.
llvm-svn: 332076
template arguments.
This fixes some cases where we'd incorrectly accept "A::template B" when B is a
kind of template that requires template arguments (in particular, a variable
template or a concept).
llvm-svn: 331013
Found via codespell -q 3 -I ../clang-whitelist.txt
Where whitelist consists of:
archtype
cas
classs
checkk
compres
definit
frome
iff
inteval
ith
lod
methode
nd
optin
ot
pres
statics
te
thru
Patch by luzpaz! (This is a subset of D44188 that applies cleanly with a few
files that have dubious fixes reverted.)
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44188
llvm-svn: 329399
layout" rules.
The new rules say that a standard-layout struct has its first non-static
data member and all base classes at offset 0, and consider a class to
not be standard-layout if that would result in multiple subobjects of a
single type having the same address.
We track "is C++11 standard-layout class" separately from "is
standard-layout class" so that the ABIs that need this information can
still use it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45176
llvm-svn: 329332
Summary:
As the title says, this makes following code compile:
```
template<typename> struct Foo {};
Foo() -> Foo<void>;
Foo f; // ok
```
Thanks Nicolas Lesser for coining the fix.
Reviewers: rsmith, lichray
Reviewed By: rsmith, lichray
Subscribers: lichray, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38216
llvm-svn: 328409
Summary:
This fixes [PR35381](https://llvm.org/pr35381) and an additional bug where clang didn't warn about the C++17 extension when having an expression in the init statement.
Thanks Nicolas Lesser for contributing the patch.
Reviewers: rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: erik.pilkington, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40445
llvm-svn: 327782
More generally, this permits a template to be specialized in any scope in which
it could be defined, so this also supersedes DR44 and DR374 (the latter of
which we previously only implemented in C++11 mode onwards due to unclarity as
to whether it was a DR).
llvm-svn: 327705
template parameter that is an expanded parameter pack, only substitute into the
current slice, not the entire pack.
This reduces the checking of N template template arguments for an expanded
parameter pack containing N parameters from quadratic time to linear time in
the length of the pack. This is important because one (and possibly the only?)
general technique for splitting a template parameter pack in linear time
depends on doing this.
llvm-svn: 326973
Specifically, we would not properly parse these types within template arguments
(for non-type template parameters), and in tentative parses. Fixing both of
these essentially requires that we parse deduced template specialization types
as types in all contexts, even in template argument lists -- in particular,
tentative parsing may look ahead and annotate a deduced template specialization
type before we figure out that we're actually supposed to treat the tokens as a
template-name. We deal with this by simply permitting deduced template
specialization types when parsing template arguments, and converting them to
template template arguments.
llvm-svn: 326299
The tests that failed on a windows host have been fixed.
Original message:
Start setting dso_local for COFF.
With this there are still some GVs where we don't set dso_local
because setGVProperties is never called. I intend to fix that in
followup commits. This is just the bare minimum to teach
shouldAssumeDSOLocal what it should do for COFF.
llvm-svn: 325940
Summary:
According to [dcl.init.list]p7:
A narrowing conversion is an implicit conversion
- ...
- from an integer type or unscoped enumeration type to a
floating-point type, except where the source is a constant
expression and the actual value after conversion will fit into
the target type and will produce the original value when
converted back to the original type, or
- ...
Currently clang does not handle the 'unscoped enumeration' case. This
patch fixes the corresponding check.
Reviewers: faisalv, rsmith, rogfer01
Reviewed By: rogfer01
Subscribers: rogfer01, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42545
llvm-svn: 325668
Summary:
According to the C++11 standard [dcl.type.simple]p4:
The type denoted by decltype(e) is defined as follows:
- if e is an unparenthesized id-expression or an unparenthesized
class member access (5.2.5), decltype(e) is the type of the entity
named by e.
Currently Clang handles the 'member access' case incorrectly for
static data members (decltype returns T& instead of T). This patch
fixes the issue.
Reviewers: faisalv, rsmith, rogfer01
Reviewed By: rogfer01
Subscribers: rogfer01, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42969
llvm-svn: 325117
While here, fix up the myriad other ways in which Sema's two "can this handler
catch that exception?" implementations get things wrong and unify them.
llvm-svn: 322431
an inline namespace, update its semantic DeclContext to match.
We would previously get the semantic DeclContext wrong (pointing to the named
scope rather than the inline namespace within it), resulting in wrong lookup
results and linkage-related problems if the inline namespace was an anonymous
namespace.
llvm-svn: 321770
(Re-submission of D39937 with fixed tests.)
Adjust wording for const-qualification mismatch to be a little more clear.
Also add another diagnostic for a ref qualifier mismatch, which previously produced a useless error (this error path is simply very old; see rL119336):
Before:
error: cannot initialize object parameter of type 'X0' with an expression of type 'X0'
After:
error: 'this' argument to member function 'rvalue' is an lvalue, but function has rvalue ref-qualifier
Reviewers: aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: lebedev.ri, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41646
llvm-svn: 321609
Summary:
Adjust wording for const-qualification mismatch to be a little more clear.
Also add another diagnostic for a ref qualifier mismatch, which previously produced a useless error (this error path is simply very old; see rL119336):
Before:
error: cannot initialize object parameter of type 'X0' with an expression of type 'X0'
After:
error: 'this' argument to member function 'rvalue' is an lvalue, but function has rvalue ref-qualifier
Reviewers: rsmith, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: lebedev.ri, aaron.ballman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39937
llvm-svn: 321592
The standard correctly forbids various decl-specifiers that dont make sense on non-type template parameters - such as the extern in:
template<extern int> struct X;
This patch implements those restrictions (in a fashion similar to the corresponding checks on function parameters within ActOnParamDeclarator).
Credit goes to miyuki (Mikhail Maltsev) for drawing attention to this issue, authoring the initial versions of this patch, and supporting the effort to re-engineer it slightly. Thank you!
For details of how this patch evolved please see: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40705
llvm-svn: 321339
This allows you to dump C++ code that spells bool instead of _Bool, leaves off the elaborated type specifiers when printing struct or class names, and other C-isms.
Fixes the -Wreorder issue and fixes the ast-dump-color.cpp test.
llvm-svn: 321310
This allows you to dump C++ code that spells bool instead of _Bool, leaves off the elaborated type specifiers when printing struct or class names, and other C-isms.
llvm-svn: 321223
Summary:
This is a side-effect brought in by p0620r0, which allows other placeholder types (derived from `auto` and `decltype(auto)`) to be usable in a `new` expression with a single-clause //braced-init-list// as its initializer (8.3.4 [expr.new]/2). N3922 defined its semantics.
References:
http://wg21.link/p0620r0http://wg21.link/n3922
Reviewers: rsmith, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39451
llvm-svn: 320401
Summary:
This is so we can implement concepts per P0734R0. Relevant failing test
cases are disabled.
Reviewers: hubert.reinterpretcast, rsmith, saar.raz, nwilson
Reviewed By: saar.raz
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40380
Patch by Changyu Li!
llvm-svn: 319992
Sometimes we check the validity of some construct between producing a
diagnostic and producing its notes. Ideally, we wouldn't do that, but in
practice running code that "cannot possibly produce a diagnostic" in such a
situation should be safe, and reasonable factoring of some code requires it
with our current diagnostics infrastruture. If this does happen, a diagnostic
that's suppressed due to SFINAE should not cause notes connected to the prior
diagnostic to be suppressed.
llvm-svn: 319408
This also clarifies some terminology used by the diagnostic (methods -> Objective-C methods, fields -> non-static data members, etc).
Many of the tests needed to be updated in multiple places for the diagnostic wording tweaks. The first instance of the diagnostic for that attribute is fully specified and subsequent instances cut off the complete list (to make it easier if additional subjects are added in the future for the attribute).
llvm-svn: 319002
This implements [dcl.modules.export] from the C++ Modules TS, which lets a module re-export another module with the "export import" syntax.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40270
llvm-svn: 318744
In order to identify the copy deduction candidate, I considered two approaches:
- attempt to determine whether an implicit guide is a copy deduction candidate by checking certain properties of its subsituted parameter during overload-resolution.
- using one of the many bits (WillHaveBody) from FunctionDecl (that CXXDeductionGuideDecl inherits from) that are otherwise irrelevant for deduction guides
After some brittle gymnastics w the first strategy, I settled on the second, although to avoid confusion and to give that bit a better name, i turned it into a member of an anonymous union.
Given this identification 'bit', the tweak to overload resolution was a simple reordering of the deduction guide checks (in SemaOverload.cpp::isBetterOverloadCandidate), in-line with Jason Merrill's p0620r0 drafting which made it into the working paper. Concordant with that, I made sure the copy deduction candidate is always added.
References:
See https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34970
See http://wg21.link/p0620r0
llvm-svn: 316292
It seems that all of the other templated cases are handled correctly,
however the function template case was not correctly handled. This
patch recovers from this condition by setting the function to noexcept
after diagnosing. Previously it simply set NoexceptExpr to null,
which caused an Assert when this was evaluated during substitution.
Differential Revision:https://reviews.llvm.org/D38700
llvm-svn: 315638
When declaring an entity in the "purview" of a module, it's never a
redeclaration of an entity in the purview of a default module or in no module
("in the global module"). Don't consider those other declarations as possible
redeclaration targets if they're not visible, and reject any cases where we
pick a prior visible declaration that violates this rule.
This reinstates r315251 and r315256, reverted in r315309 and r315308
respectively, tweaked to avoid triggering a linkage calculation when declaring
implicit special members (this exposed our pre-existing issue with typedef
names for linkage changing the linkage of types whose linkage has already been
computed and cached in more cases). A testcase for that regression has been
added in r315366.
llvm-svn: 315379
When declaring an entity in the "purview" of a module, it's never a
redeclaration of an entity in the purview of a default module or in no module
("in the global module"). Don't consider those other declarations as possible
redeclaration targets if they're not visible, and reject any cases where we
pick a prior visible declaration that violates this rule.
llvm-svn: 315251
Move the logic for determining the `wchar_t` type information into the
driver. Rather than passing the single bit of information of
`-fshort-wchar` indicate to the frontend the desired type of `wchar_t`
through a new `-cc1` option of `-fwchar-type` and indicate the
signedness through `-f{,no-}signed-wchar`. This replicates the current
logic which was spread throughout Basic into the
`RenderCharacterOptions`.
Most of the changes to the tests are to ensure that the frontend uses
the correct type. Add a new test set under `test/Driver/wchar_t.c` to
ensure that we calculate the proper types for the various cases.
llvm-svn: 315126
function-style cast.
This fires for cases such as
T(x);
... where 'x' was previously declared and T is a type. This construct declares
a variable named 'x' rather than the (probably expected) interpretation of a
function-style cast of 'x' to T.
llvm-svn: 314570
This doesn't affect our code generation in any material way -- we already give
such declarations internal linkage from a codegen perspective -- but it has
some subtle effects on code validity.
We suppress the 'L' (internal linkage) marker for mangled names in anonymous
namespaces, because it is redundant (the information is already carried by the
namespace); this deviates from GCC's behavior if a variable or function in an
anonymous namespace is redundantly declared 'static' (where GCC does include
the 'L'), but GCC's behavior is incoherent because such a declaration can be
validly declared with or without the 'static'.
We still deviate from the standard in one regard here: extern "C" declarations
in anonymous namespaces are still granted external linkage. Changing those does
not appear to have been an intentional consequence of the standard change in
DR1113.
llvm-svn: 314037
I've been unable to find any cases whose behavior is actually changed by this,
but only because an implicitly deleted destructor also results in it being
impossible to have a trivial (non-deleted) copy constructor, which the place
where this really matters (choosing whether to pass a class in registers)
happens to also check.
llvm-svn: 313948
If a function or variable has a type with no linkage (and is not extern "C"),
any use of it requires a definition within the same translation unit; the idea
is that it is not possible to define the entity elsewhere, so any such use is
necessarily an error.
There is an exception, though: some types formally have no linkage but
nonetheless can be referenced from other translation units (for example, this
happens to anonymous structures defined within inline functions). For entities
with those types, we suppress the diagnostic except under -pedantic.
llvm-svn: 313729
This follows the scheme agreed with Nathan Sidwell, which can be found here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/cxx-modules?action=AttachFile
This will be proposed to the itanium-cxx-abi list once we have some experience
with how well it works; the ABI for this TS should be considered unstable until
it is part of the Itanium C++ ABI.
llvm-svn: 312467
Extend the -fmodule-file option to support the [<name>=]<file> value format.
If the name is omitted, then the old semantics is preserved (the module file
is loaded whether needed or not). If the name is specified, then the mapping
is treated as just another prebuilt module search mechanism, similar to
-fprebuilt-module-path, and the module file is only loaded if actually used
(e.g., via import). With one exception: this mapping also overrides module
file references embedded in other modules (which can be useful if module files
are moved/renamed as often happens during remote compilation).
This override semantics requires some extra work: we now store the module name
in addition to the file name in the serialized AST representation.
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35020
llvm-svn: 312220
Extend the -fmodule-file option to support the [<name>=]<file> value format.
If the name is omitted, then the old semantics is preserved (the module file
is loaded whether needed or not). If the name is specified, then the mapping
is treated as just another prebuilt module search mechanism, similar to
-fprebuilt-module-path, and the module file is only loaded if actually used
(e.g., via import). With one exception: this mapping also overrides module
file references embedded in other modules (which can be useful if module files
are moved/renamed as often happens during remote compilation).
This override semantics requires some extra work: we now store the module name
in addition to the file name in the serialized AST representation.
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35020
llvm-svn: 312105
If a TS module name has more than one component (e.g., foo.bar) then we
erroneously activated the submodule semantics when encountering a module
declaration in the module implementation unit (e.g., 'module foo.bar;').
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35678
llvm-svn: 312007
Prior to this patch clang would not error here:
template <class T> struct B;
template <class T> struct A {
void foo();
void foo2();
void test1() {
B<T>::foo(); // OK, foo is declared in A<int> - matches type of 'this'.
B<T>::foo2(); // This should be an error!
// foo2 is found in B<int>, 'base unrelated' to 'this'.
}
};
template <class T> struct B : A<T> {
using A<T>::foo2;
};
llvm-svn: 311851
This patch, by hamzasood, implements P0409R2, and allows [=, this] pre-C++2a as an extension (with appropriate warnings) for consistency.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D36572
Thanks Hamza!
llvm-svn: 311224
In addition to the formal linkage rules, the Modules TS includes cases where
internal-linkage symbols within a module interface unit can be referenced from
outside the module via exported inline functions / templates. We give such
declarations "module-internal linkage", which is formally internal linkage, but
results in an externally-visible symbol.
llvm-svn: 307434
These cases occur frequently for declarations in the global module (above the
module-declaration) in a Modules TS module interface. When we merge a
definition from another module into such a module-private definition, ensure
that we transitively make everything lexically within that definition visible
to that translation unit.
llvm-svn: 307129
(possible implicit) noexcept specifier
Throwing in the destructor is not good (C++11 change try to not allow see below).
But in reality, those codes are exist.
C++11 [class.dtor]p3:
A declaration of a destructor that does not have an exception-specification is
implicitly considered to have the same exception specification as an implicit
declaration.
With this change, the application worked before may now run into runtime
termination. My goal here is to emit a warning to provide only possible info to
where the code may need to be changed.
First there is no way, in compile time to identify the “throw” really throw out
of the function. Things like the call which throw out… To keep this simple,
when “throw” is seen, checking its enclosing function(only destructor and
dealloc functions) with noexcept(true) specifier emit warning.
Here is implementation detail:
A new member function CheckCXXThrowInNonThrowingFunc is added for class Sema
in Sema.h. It is used in the call to both BuildCXXThrow and
TransformCXXThrowExpr.
The function basic check if the enclosing function with non-throwing noexcept
specifer, if so emit warning for it.
The example of warning message like:
k1.cpp:18:3: warning: ''~dependent_warn'' has a (possible implicit) non-throwing
noexcept specifier. Throwing exception may cause termination.
[-Wthrow-in-dtor]
throw 1;
^
k1.cpp:43:30: note: in instantiation of member function
'dependent_warn<noexcept_fun>::~dependent_warn' requested here
dependent_warn<noexcept_fun> f; // cause warning
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33333
llvm-svn: 306149
A function declared in a friend declaration may have declarations prior
to the containing class definition. If such declaration defines default
argument, the friend function declaration inherits them. This behavior
causes problems if the class where the friend is declared is a template:
during the class instantiation the friend function looks like if it had
default arguments, so error is triggered.
With this change friend functions declared in class templates do not
inherit default arguments. Actual set of them will be defined at the
point where the containing class is instantiated.
This change fixes PR12724.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30393
llvm-svn: 304965
Clang makes check for function redefinition after it merged the new
declaration with the existing one. As a result, it produces poor
diagnostics in the case of a friend function defined inline, as in
the code:
```
void func() {}
class C { friend void func() {} };
```
Error message in this case states that `inline declaration of 'func'
follows non-inline definition`, which is misleading, as `func` does
not have explicit `inline` specifier.
With this changes compiler reports function redefinition if the new
function is a friend defined inline and it does not have explicit
`inline` specifier.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26065
llvm-svn: 304964
This is not required by the standard (yet), but there seems to be reasonable
support for this being a defect according to CWG discussion, and libstdc++ 7.1
relies on it working.
llvm-svn: 304946
member function" context notes to registering an entry on the context stack.
Also reorder the steps within defining special members to be consistent.
This has a few benefits: if multiple diagnostics are produced while checking
such a member, the note is now attached to the first such diagnostic rather
than the last, this prepares us for persisting these diagnostics between the
point at which we require the implicit instantiation of a template and the
point at which that instantiation is actually performed, and this fixes some
cases where we would fail to produce a full note stack leading back to user
code in the case of such a diagnostic.
The reordering exposed a case where we could recursively attempt to define a
defaulted destructor while we're already defining one (and other such cases
also appear to be possible, with or without this change), so this change also
reuses the "willHaveBody" flag on function declarations to track that we're in
the middle of synthesizing a body for the function and bails out if we try to
define a function that we're already defining.
llvm-svn: 303930
Correct class-template deprecation behavior
Based on the comment in the test, and my reading of the standard, a deprecated warning should be issued in the following case:
template<typename T> [[deprecated]] class Foo{}; Foo<int> f;
This was not the case, because the ClassTemplateSpecializationDecl creation did not also copy the deprecated attribute.
Note: I did NOT audit the complete set of attributes to see WHICH ones should be copied, so instead I simply copy ONLY the deprecated attribute.
Previous DiffRev: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27486, was reverted.
This patch fixes the issues brought up here by the reverter: https://reviews.llvm.org/rL298410
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31245
llvm-svn: 298634
Based on the comment in the test, and my reading of the standard, a deprecated warning should be issued in the following case:
template<typename T> [[deprecated]] class Foo{}; Foo<int> f;
This was not the case, because the ClassTemplateSpecializationDecl creation did not also copy the deprecated attribute.
Note: I did NOT audit the complete set of attributes to see WHICH ones should be copied, so instead I simply copy ONLY the deprecated attribute.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27486
llvm-svn: 298410
Summary:
3.4.6 [basic.lookup.udir] paragraph 1:
In a using-directive or namespace-alias-definition, during the lookup for a namespace-name or for a name in a nested-name-specifier, only namespace names are considered.
Reviewers: rsmith, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30848
llvm-svn: 298126
Printing typedefs or type aliases using clang_getTypeSpelling() is missing the
namespace they are defined in. This is in contrast to other types that always
yield the full typename including namespaces.
Patch by Michael Reiher!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29944
llvm-svn: 297465
Essentially, as a base class constructor does not construct virtual bases, such
a constructor for an abstract class does not need the corresponding base class
construction to be valid, and likewise for destructors.
This creates an awkward situation: clang will sometimes generate references to
the complete object and deleting destructors for an abstract class (it puts
them in the construction vtable for a derived class). But we can't generate a
"correct" version of these because we can't generate references to base class
constructors any more (if they're template specializations, say, we might not
have instantiated them and can't assume any other TU will emit a copy).
Fortunately, we don't need to, since no correct program can ever invoke them,
so instead emit symbols that just trap.
We should stop emitting references to these symbols, but still need to emit
definitions for compatibility.
llvm-svn: 296275
Richard Smith