arguments.
* Adds 'nonnull' and 'dereferenceable(N)' to 'this' pointer arguments
* Gates 'nonnull' on -f(no-)delete-null-pointer-checks
* Introduces this-nonnull.cpp and microsoft-abi-this-nullable.cpp tests to
explicitly test the behavior of this change
* Refactors hundreds of over-constrained clang tests to permit these
attributes, where needed
* Updates Clang12 patch notes mentioning this change
Reviewed-by: rsmith, jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D17993
This reverts commit fd1274fa78cb0fd32cc1fa2e6f5bb8e62d29df19.
Add an explicit triple for the test which is pattern matching overly
aggressively.
llvm-svn: 367055
A placeholder instruction for use in generation of cleanup code for an
initializer list would not be emitted if the base class contained a
non-trivial destructor and the class contains no fields of its own. This
would be the case when using CTAD to deduce the template arguments for a
struct with an overloaded call operator, e.g.
```
template <class... Ts> struct ctad : Ts... {};
template <class... Ts> ctad(Ts...)->ctad<Ts...>;
```
and this class was initialized with a list of lambdas capturing by copy,
e.g.
```
ctad c {[s](short){}, [s](long){}};
```
In a release build the bug would manifest itself as a crash in the SROA
pass, however, in a debug build the following assert in CGCleanup.cpp
would fail:
```
assert(dominatingIP && "no existing variable and no dominating IP!");
```
By ensuring that a placeholder instruction is emitted even if there's no
fields in the class, neither the assert nor the crash is reproducible.
See https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40771
Patch by Øystein Dale!
llvm-svn: 367042
CJ Johnson