Commit Graph

10 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Roman Lebedev de19f749e0 [InstCombine] matchThreeWayIntCompare(): commutativity awareness
Summary:
`matchThreeWayIntCompare()` looks for
```
   select i1 (a == b),
          i32 Equal,
          i32 (select i1 (a < b), i32 Less, i32 Greater)
```
but both of these selects/compares can be in it's commuted form,
so out of 8 variants, only the two most basic ones is handled.
This fixes regression being introduced in D66232.

Reviewers: spatel, nikic, efriedma, xbolva00

Reviewed By: spatel

Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66607

llvm-svn: 369841
2019-08-24 06:49:36 +00:00
Roman Lebedev 2c75fe7f2a [InstCombine] Try to reuse constant from select in leading comparison
Summary:
If we have e.g.:
```
  %t = icmp ult i32 %x, 65536
  %r = select i1 %t, i32 %y, i32 65535
```
the constants `65535` and `65536` are suspiciously close.
We could perform a transformation to deduplicate them:
```
Name: ult
%t = icmp ult i32 %x, 65536
%r = select i1 %t, i32 %y, i32 65535
  =>
%t.inv = icmp ugt i32 %x, 65535
%r = select i1 %t.inv, i32 65535, i32 %y
```
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/avb

While this may seem esoteric, this should certainly be good for vectors
(less constant pool usage) and for opt-for-size - need to have only one constant.

But the real fun part here is that it allows further transformation,
in particular it finishes cleaning up the `clamp` folding,
see e.g. `canonicalize-clamp-with-select-of-constant-threshold-pattern.ll`.
We start with e.g.
```
  %dont_need_to_clamp_positive = icmp sle i32 %X, 32767
  %dont_need_to_clamp_negative = icmp sge i32 %X, -32768
  %clamp_limit = select i1 %dont_need_to_clamp_positive, i32 -32768, i32 32767
  %dont_need_to_clamp = and i1 %dont_need_to_clamp_positive, %dont_need_to_clamp_negative
  %R = select i1 %dont_need_to_clamp, i32 %X, i32 %clamp_limit
```
without this patch we currently produce
```
  %1 = icmp slt i32 %X, 32768
  %2 = icmp sgt i32 %X, -32768
  %3 = select i1 %2, i32 %X, i32 -32768
  %R = select i1 %1, i32 %3, i32 32767
```
which isn't really a `clamp` - both comparisons are performed on the original value,
this patch changes it into
```
  %1.inv = icmp sgt i32 %X, 32767
  %2 = icmp sgt i32 %X, -32768
  %3 = select i1 %2, i32 %X, i32 -32768
  %R = select i1 %1.inv, i32 32767, i32 %3
```
and then the magic happens! Some further transform finishes polishing it and we finally get:
```
  %t1 = icmp sgt i32 %X, -32768
  %t2 = select i1 %t1, i32 %X, i32 -32768
  %t3 = icmp slt i32 %t2, 32767
  %R = select i1 %t3, i32 %t2, i32 32767
```
which is beautiful and just what we want.

Proofs for `getFlippedStrictnessPredicateAndConstant()` for de-canonicalization:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/THl
Proofs for the fold itself: https://rise4fun.com/Alive/THl

Reviewers: spatel, dmgreen, nikic, xbolva00

Reviewed By: spatel

Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66232

llvm-svn: 369840
2019-08-24 06:49:25 +00:00
Roman Lebedev dddc0fd9cb [NFC][InstCombine] Fixup few new tests in unrecognized_three-way-comparison.ll
llvm-svn: 369701
2019-08-22 20:34:56 +00:00
Roman Lebedev 1aeb27af22 [NFC][InstCombine] New tests: unrecognized_three-way-comparison.ll is ignorant about commutative variants part 2
llvm-svn: 369696
2019-08-22 19:53:23 +00:00
Roman Lebedev 41f89c3484 [NFC][InstCombine] New tests: unrecognized_three-way-comparison.ll is ignorant about commutative variants
D66232 "exposes" the problem.

llvm-svn: 369667
2019-08-22 16:46:16 +00:00
Eric Christopher cee313d288 Revert "Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass.""
The reversion apparently deleted the test/Transforms directory.

Will be re-reverting again.

llvm-svn: 358552
2019-04-17 04:52:47 +00:00
Eric Christopher a863435128 Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass."
As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).

This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.

llvm-svn: 358546
2019-04-17 02:12:23 +00:00
Sanjay Patel d802270808 [InstSimplify] fold select with implied condition
This is an almost direct move of the functionality from InstCombine to 
InstSimplify. There's no reason not to do this in InstSimplify because 
we never create a new value with this transform.

(There's a question of whether any dominance-based transform belongs in
either of these passes, but that's a separate issue.)

I've changed 1 of the conditions for the fold (1 of the blocks for the 
branch must be the block we started with) into an assert because I'm not 
sure how that could ever be false.

We need 1 extra check to make sure that the instruction itself is in a
basic block because passes other than InstCombine may be using InstSimplify
as an analysis on values that are not wired up yet.

The 3-way compare changes show that InstCombine has some kind of 
phase-ordering hole. Otherwise, we would have already gotten the intended
final result that we now show here.

llvm-svn: 347896
2018-11-29 18:44:39 +00:00
Sanjay Patel e7b6654711 [InstCombine] refine select-of-constants to bitwise ops
Add logic for the special case when a cmp+select can clearly be
reduced to just a bitwise logic instruction, and remove an 
over-reaching chunk of general purpose bit magic. The primary goal 
is to remove cases where we are not improving the IR instruction 
count when doing these select transforms, and in all cases here that 
is true.

In the motivating 3-way compare tests, there are further improvements
because we can combine/propagate select values (not sure if that
belongs in instcombine, but it's there for now).

DAGCombiner has folds to turn some of these selects into bit magic,
so there should be no difference in the end result in those cases.
Not all constant combinations are handled there yet, however, so it
is possible that some targets will see more cmov/csel codegen with
this change in IR canonicalization. 

Ideally, we'll go further to *not* turn selects into multiple 
logic/math ops in instcombine, and we'll canonicalize to selects.
But we should make sure that this step does not result in regressions
first (and if it does, we should fix those in the backend).

The general direction for this change was discussed here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-September/105373.html
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-July/114885.html

Alive proofs for the new bit magic:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/XG7

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46086

llvm-svn: 331486
2018-05-03 21:58:44 +00:00
Max Kazantsev 303572f3df [NFC] Add some tests that demonstrate unrecognized three-way comparison patterns
llvm-svn: 331100
2018-04-28 04:38:21 +00:00