VerifyDiagnosticConsumer previously would not check that the diagnostic and
its matching directive referenced the same source file. Common practice was
to create directives that referenced other files but only by line number,
and this led to problems such as when the file containing the directive
didn't have enough lines to match the location of the diagnostic in the
other file, leading to bizarre file formatting and other oddities.
This patch causes VerifyDiagnosticConsumer to match source files as well as
line numbers. Therefore, a new syntax is made available for directives, for
example:
// expected-error@file:line {{diagnostic message}}
This extends the @line feature where "file" is the file where the diagnostic
is generated. The @line syntax is still available and uses the current file
for the diagnostic. "file" can be specified either as a relative or absolute
path - although the latter has less usefulness, I think! The #include search
paths will be used to locate the file and if it is not found an error will be
generated.
The new check is not optional: if the directive is in a different file to the
diagnostic, the file must be specified. Therefore, a number of test-cases
have been updated with regard to this.
This closes out PR15613.
llvm-svn: 179677
Syntactically means the function macro parameter names do not need to use the same
identifiers in order for the definitions to be considered identical.
Syntactic equivalence is a microsoft extension for macro redefinitions and we'll also
use this kind of comparison to check for ambiguous macros coming from modules.
rdar://13562254
llvm-svn: 178671
Also update "test/Modules/macros.c" to test modified semantics:
-When there is an ambiguous macro, expand using the latest introduced version, not the first one.
-#undefs in submodules cause the macro to not be exported by that submodule, it doesn't cause
undefining of macros in the translation unit that imported that submodule.
This reduces macro namespace interference across modules.
llvm-svn: 178105
that redefined a macro without undef'ing it first.
Proper reconstruction of the macro info history from modules will properly fix this in subsequent commits.
rdar://13016031
llvm-svn: 173281
macro history.
When deserializing macro history, we arrange history such that the
macros that have definitions (that haven't been #undef'd) and are
visible come at the beginning of the list, which is what the
preprocessor and other clients of Preprocessor::getMacroInfo()
expect. If additional macro definitions become visible later, they'll
be moved toward the front of the list. Note that it's possible to have
ambiguities, but we don't diagnose them yet.
There is a partially-implemented design decision here that, if a
particular identifier has been defined or #undef'd within the
translation unit, that definition (or #undef) hides any macro
definitions that come from imported modules. There's still a little
work to do to ensure that the right #undef'ing happens.
Additionally, we'll need to scope the update records for #undefs, so
they only kick in when the submodule containing that update record
becomes visible.
llvm-svn: 165682
specific module (__building_module(modulename)) and to get the name of
the current module as an identifier (__MODULE__).
Used to help headers behave differently when they're being included as
part of building a module. Oh, the irony.
llvm-svn: 164605
modules. This leaves us without an explicit syntax for importing
modules in C/C++, because such a syntax needs to be discussed
first. In Objective-C/Objective-C++, the @import syntax is used to
import modules.
Note that, under -fmodules, C/C++ programs can import modules via the
#include mechanism when a module map is in place for that header. This
allows us to work with modules in C/C++ without committing to a syntax.
llvm-svn: 147467
diagnostic message are compared. If either is a substring of the other, then
no error is given. This gives rise to an unexpected case:
// expect-error{{candidate function has different number of parameters}}
will match the following error messages from Clang:
candidate function has different number of parameters (expected 1 but has 2)
candidate function has different number of parameters
It will also match these other error messages:
candidate function
function has different number of parameters
number of parameters
This patch will change so that the verification string must be a substring of
the diagnostic message before accepting. Also, all the failing tests from this
change have been corrected. Some stats from this cleanup:
87 - removed extra spaces around verification strings
70 - wording updates to diagnostics
40 - extra leading or trailing characters (typos, unmatched parens or quotes)
35 - diagnostic level was included (error:, warning:, or note:)
18 - flag name put in the warning (-Wprotocol)
llvm-svn: 146619
target triple to separate modules built under different
conditions. The hash is used to create a subdirectory in the module
cache path where other invocations of the compiler (with the same
version, language options, etc.) can find the precompiled modules.
llvm-svn: 139662
where the compiler will look for module files. Eliminates the
egregious hack where we looked into the header search paths for
modules.
llvm-svn: 139538
include guards don't show up as macro definitions in every translation
unit that imports a module. Macro definitions can, however, be
exported with the intentionally-ugly #__export_macro__
directive. Implement this feature by not even bothering to serialize
non-exported macros to a module, because clients of that module need
not (should not) know that these macros even exist.
llvm-svn: 138943
Rafael Espindola