same basic block, and it's not safe to insert code in the successor
blocks if the edges are critical edges. Splitting those edges is
possible, but undesirable, especially on the unwind side. Instead,
make the bottom-up code motion to consider invokes to be part of
their successor blocks, rather than part of their parent blocks, so
that it doesn't push code past them and onto the edges. This fixes
PR12307.
llvm-svn: 153343
This is necessary if the client wants to be able to mutate TargetOptions (for example, fast FP math mode) after the initial creation of the ExecutionEngine.
llvm-svn: 153342
dominated by Root, check that B is available throughout the scope. This
is obviously true (famous last words?) given the current logic, but the
check may be helpful if more complicated reasoning is added one day.
llvm-svn: 153323
(and hopefully on Windows). The bots have been down most of the day
because of this, and it's not clear to me what all will be required to
fix it.
The commits started with r153205, then r153207, r153208, and r153221.
The first commit seems to be the real culprit, but I couldn't revert
a smaller number of patches.
When resubmitting, r153207 and r153208 should be folded into r153205,
they were simple build fixes.
llvm-svn: 153241
execution-time regression for nsieve-bits on the ARMv7 -O0 -g nightly tester.
This may also improve compile-time on architectures that would otherwise
generate a libcall for urem (e.g., ARM) or fall back to the DAG selector.
rdar://10810716
llvm-svn: 153230
This is in braces so that it doesn't conflict with the existing %p.
It uses braces instead of parens because parens would have to be
regex-escaped.
llvm-svn: 153213
1. Declare a virtual function getPointerToNamedFunction() in JITMemoryManager
2. Move the implementation of getPointerToNamedFunction() form JIT/MCJIT to DefaultJITMemoryManager.
llvm-svn: 153205
Type legalization can zero-extend the elements of the build_vector node, so,
for example, we may have an <8 x i8> with i32 elements of value 255. That
should return 'true' for the vector being all ones.
llvm-svn: 153203
not attched to a basic block or function. There are conservatively
correct answers in these cases, and this makes the analysis more useful
in contexts where we have a partially formed bit of IR.
I don't have any way to test this directly... suggestions welcome here,
but I'm not seeing anything sadly. I only found this using a subsequent
patch to the inliner which runs instsimplify on partially inlined
instructions, and even then only on a quite large program. I never got
a reasonable testcase out of it, and anything I do get is likely to be
quite fragile due to requiring an interaction of two different passes,
and the only result being a segfault if it goes wrong.
llvm-svn: 153176
Adds /usr/lib/debug early to list, as some systems (debian) have unstripped libs in there
Adds /lib/i386-linux-gnu for systems that does multiarch (debian)
llvm-svn: 153174
We can simply confirm the handle released to open it with EXCLUSIVE. Attempting renaming was bad.
Disable win32file at ImportError. Thanks to Francois to let me know.
FIXME: Could we report warning or notification if win32file were not found?
llvm-svn: 153172
Remaining "uncategorized" functions have been organized into their
proper place in the hierarchy. Some functions were moved around so
groups are defined together.
No code changes were made.
llvm-svn: 153169
This gives a lot of love to the docs for the C API. Like Clang's
documentation, the C API is now organized into a Doxygen "module"
(LLVMC). Each C header file is a child of the main module. Some modules
(like Core) have a hierarchy of there own. The produced documentation is
thus better organized (before everything was in one monolithic list).
This patch also includes a lot of new documentation for APIs in Core.h.
It doesn't document them all, but is better than none. Function docs are
missing @param and @return annotation, but the documentation body now
commonly provides help details (like the expected llvm::Value sub-type
to expect).
llvm-svn: 153157
These changes allow us to compile big endian from the command line for 32 bit
Mips targets. This patch will result in code and data actually being produced
in the correct endianess.
llvm-svn: 153153
ImmutAVLTree uses random unsigned values as keys into a DenseMap,
which could possibly happen to be the same value as the Tombstone or
Entry keys in the DenseMap.
Test case is hard to come up with. We randomly get failures on the
internal static analyzer bot, which most likely hits this issue
(hard to be 100% sure without the full stack).
llvm-svn: 153148
relocations (i.e., pieces of data whose addresses
are referred to elsewhere in the binary image) and
update the references when the section containing
the relocations moves. The way this works is that
there is a map from section IDs to lists of
relocations.
Because the relocations are associated with the
section containing the data being referred to, they
are updated only when the target moves. However,
many data references are relative and also depend
on the location of the referrer.
To solve this problem, I introduced a new data
structure, Referrer, which simply contains the
section being referred to and the index of the
relocation in that section. These referrers are
associated with the source containing the
reference that needs to be updated, so now
regardless of which end of the relocation moves,
the relocation will now be updated correctly.
llvm-svn: 153147
Do not call SplitBlockPredecessors on a loop preheader when one of the
predecessors is an indirectbr. Otherwise, you will hit this assert:
!isa<IndirectBrInst>(Preds[i]->getTerminator()) && "Cannot split an edge from an IndirectBrInst"
llvm-svn: 153134
instead of skipping the current loop.
My prior fix was incomplete because of an overzealous compile-time optimization:
Better fix for: <rdar://problem/11049788> Segmentation fault: 11 in LoopStrengthReduce
llvm-svn: 153131
ARMBaseRegisterInfo::canRealignStack was checking for variable-sized objects
but not for stack adjustments around calls. Use hasReservedCallFrame() to
check for both. The hasBasePointer function was already correctly checking
both conditions, so the effect of this was that a base pointer would be used
without checking whether the base pointer register could be reserved. I don't
have a small testcase for this.
<rdar://problem/11075906>
llvm-svn: 153110
This results in things such as
vmovups 16(%rdi), %xmm0
vinsertf128 $1, %xmm0, %ymm0, %ymm0
to be combined to
vinsertf128 $1, 16(%rdi), %ymm0, %ymm0
rdar://11076953
llvm-svn: 153092
Jim Grosbach