Motivated by a suspicously failing build, but also good to have anyway in general.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82815
Summary:
Motivated by [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45045 | Tune inspections to a specific C++ standard. ]]
Moves the isLanguageVersionSupported virtual function from `MakeSmartPtrCheck` to the base `ClangTidyCheck` class.
This will disable registering matchers or pp callbacks on unsupported language versions for a check.
Having it as a standalone function is cleaner than manually disabling the check in the register function and should hopefully
encourage check developers to actually restrict the check based on language version.
As an added bonus this could enable automatic detection of what language version a check runs on for the purpose of documentation generation
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, gribozavr2, Eugene.Zelenko, JonasToth, alexfh, hokein
Reviewed By: gribozavr2
Subscribers: xazax.hun, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75289
This is how it should've been and brings it more in line with
std::string_view. There should be no functional change here.
This is mostly mechanical from a custom clang-tidy check, with a lot of
manual fixups. It uncovers a lot of minor inefficiencies.
This doesn't actually modify StringRef yet, I'll do that in a follow-up.
Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66259
llvm-svn: 368944
Summary:
Currently, `clang::tidy::test::runCheckOnCode()` constructs the check
instances *before* initializing the ClangTidyContext. This ordering causes
problems when the check's constructor accesses the context, for example, through
`getLangOpts()`.
This revision moves the construction to after the context initialization, which
follows the pattern used in the clang tidy tool itself.
Reviewers: gribozavr
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63784
llvm-svn: 364435
Summary:
Motivation/Context: in the code review system integrating with clang-tidy,
clang-tidy doesn't provide a human-readable description of the fix. Usually
developers have to preview a code diff (before vs after apply the fix) to
understand what the fix does before applying a fix.
This patch proposes that each clang-tidy check provides a short and
actional fix description that can be shown in the UI, so that users can know
what the fix does without previewing diff.
This patch extends clang-tidy framework to support fix descriptions (will add implementations for
existing checks in the future). Fix descriptions and fixes are emitted via diagnostic::Note (rather than
attaching the main warning diagnostic).
Before this patch:
```
void MyCheck::check(...) {
...
diag(loc, "my check warning") << FixtItHint::CreateReplacement(...);
}
```
After:
```
void MyCheck::check(...) {
...
diag(loc, "my check warning"); // Emit a check warning
diag(loc, "fix description", DiagnosticIDs::Note) << FixtItHint::CreateReplacement(...); // Emit a diagnostic note and a fix
}
```
Reviewers: sammccall, alexfh
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: MyDeveloperDay, Eugene.Zelenko, aaron.ballman, JonasToth, xazax.hun, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59932
llvm-svn: 358576
Summary:
All in-tree clang-tidy checks have been migrated to the new
ClangTidyCheck::registerPPCallbacks method. Time to drop the old one.
Reviewers: sammccall, hokein
Reviewed By: hokein
Subscribers: xazax.hun, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60197
llvm-svn: 357582
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary:
Clang's hierarchy is CompilerInstance -> DiagnosticsEngine -> DiagnosticConsumer.
(Ownership is optional/shared, but this structure is fairly clear).
Currently ClangTidyDiagnosticConsumer *owns* the DiagnosticsEngine:
- this inverts the hierarchy, which is confusing
- this means ClangTidyDiagnosticConsumer() mutates the passed-in context, which
is both surprising and limits flexibility
- it's not possible to use a different DiagnosticsEngine with ClangTidy
This means a little bit more code in the places ClangTidy is used standalone,
but more flexibility in using ClangTidy with other diagnostics configurations.
Reviewers: hokein
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54033
llvm-svn: 346418
Summary:
Currently ClangTidyContext::diag() sends the diagnostics to a
DiagnosticsEngine, which probably delegates to a ClangTidyDiagnosticsConsumer,
which is supposed to go back and populate ClangTidyContext::Errors.
After this patch, the diagnostics are stored in the ClangTidyDiagnosticsConsumer
itself and can be retrieved from there.
Why?
- the round-trip from context -> engine -> consumer -> context is confusing
and makes it harder to establish layering between these things.
- context does too many things, and makes it hard to use clang-tidy as a library
- everyone who actually wants the diagnostics has access to the ClangTidyDiagnosticsConsumer
The most natural implementation (ClangTidyDiagnosticsConsumer::take()
finalizes diagnostics) causes a test failure: clang-tidy-run-with-database.cpp
asserts that clang-tidy exits successfully when trying to process a file
that doesn't exist.
In clang-tidy today, this happens because finish() is never called, so the
diagnostic is never flushed. This looks like a bug to me.
For now, this patch carefully preserves that behavior, but I'll ping the
authors to see whether it's deliberate and worth preserving.
Reviewers: hokein
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits, alexfh
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53953
llvm-svn: 345961
This patch moves the virtual file system form clang to llvm so it can be
used by more projects.
Concretely the patch:
- Moves VirtualFileSystem.{h|cpp} from clang/Basic to llvm/Support.
- Moves the corresponding unit test from clang to llvm.
- Moves the vfs namespace from clang::vfs to llvm::vfs.
- Formats the lines affected by this change, mostly this is the result of
the added llvm namespace.
RFC on the mailing list:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-October/126657.html
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52783
llvm-svn: 344140
Summary:
I'm not sure whether there are any principal reasons why it returns raw owning pointer,
or it is just a old code that was not updated post-C++11.
I'm not too sure what testing i should do, because `check-all` is not error clean here for some reason,
but it does not //appear// asif those failures are related to these changes.
This is Clang-tools-extra part.
Clang part is D43779.
Reviewers: klimek, bkramer, alexfh, pcc
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: ioeric, jkorous-apple, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43780
llvm-svn: 326202
Summary:
This is part 2 of 3 of a series of changes to improve
Objective-C linting in clang-tidy.
Currently, `clang::tidy::test::runCheckOnCode()` assumes all files
are C++ and unconditionally adds `-std=c++11` to the list of
`clang-tidy` options.
This updates the logic to check the extension of the source file
and only add `-std=c++11` if the extension indicates C++ or
Objective-C++.
Depends On D39188
Test Plan:
ninja ClangTidyTests && \
./tools/clang/tools/extra/unittests/clang-tidy/ClangTidyTests
Patch by Ben Hamilton!
Reviewers: hokein, alexfh
Reviewed By: hokein
Subscribers: Wizard
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39189
llvm-svn: 316645
Summary:
tooling::Replacements only holds replacements for a single file, so
this patch makes Fix a map from file paths to tooling::Replacements so that it
can be applied on multiple files.
Reviewers: hokein, alexfh
Subscribers: Prazek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23257
llvm-svn: 278101
Summary:
this patch contains changes related to the interface change from
http://reviews.llvm.org/D21601. Only submit this patch after D21601 is
submitted.
Reviewers: djasper, klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21602
llvm-svn: 275063
Seems we had some internal uses that include ClangTidyTest.h and weren't
ready for a gtest dependency. Reverting to give Manuel some time to look
into it.
llvm-svn: 244658
Summary:
Force braces on the else branch if they are being added to the if branch.
This ensures consistency in the transformed code.
Reviewers: alexfh
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8708
llvm-svn: 233697
The patch was generated using this command:
$ clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -header-filter=.*clang-tidy.* -fix \
-checks=-*,llvm-header-guard clang-tidy.*
$ svn revert --recursive clangt-tidy/llvm/
(to revert a few buggy fixes)
llvm-svn: 231669
* Moved unit tests for BracesAroundStatementsCheck to
ReadabilityModuleTest.cpp.
* Moved EXPECT_NO_CHANGES macro to ClangTidyTest.h to avoid defining it three
times.
llvm-svn: 230947
A precondition of that was to run both the preprocessor checks and AST
checks from the same FrontendAction, otherwise we'd have needed to
duplicate all involved objects in order to not have any references to a
deleted source manager.
llvm-svn: 219212
Summary:
Each check can implement readOptions and storeOptions methods to read
and store custom options. Each check's options are stored in a local namespace
to avoid name collisions and provide some sort of context to the user.
Reviewers: bkramer, klimek
Reviewed By: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5296
llvm-svn: 217661
Summary:
This adds a support for the .clang-tidy file reading using
FileOptionsProvider, -dump-config option, and changes tests to not depend on
default checks set.
Reviewers: klimek, bkramer, djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5186
llvm-svn: 217155
Summary:
This patch makes it possible for clang-tidy clients to provide
different options for different translation units. The option, which doesn't
make sense to be file-dependent, was moved to a separate ClangTidyGlobalOptions
struct. Added parsing of ClangTidyOptions.
Reviewers: klimek
Reviewed By: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3979
llvm-svn: 210260
array. This simplifies usage of ClangTidyContext a bit and seems to be more
consistent.
Reviewers: klimek
Reviewed By: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3685
llvm-svn: 208407
Summary:
This patch implements filtering of clang-tidy diagnostic messages by
the check name, so that "clang-tidy -checks=^llvm-" won't output any clang
warnings, for example. This is also helpful to run specific static-analyzer
checks: static analyzer always needs core checks to be enabled, but the user may
be interested only in the checks he asked for.
This patch also exposes warning option names for built-in diagnostics. We need
to have a namespace for these names to avoid collisions and to allow convenient
filtering, so I prefix them with "-W". I'm not sure it's the best thing to do,
and maybe "W" or "clang-diagnostic-" or something like this would be better.
Reviewers: klimek
Reviewed By: klimek
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D3121
llvm-svn: 204321
This removes all references to OwningPtr, which should be fairly
undisruptive to out-of-tree projects since they are unlikely to use
clang-tools-extra as a library instead of a set of tools.
llvm-svn: 203382
Nathan James