While we still want to consider this a hard error (non-POD variadic args are
normally a DefaultError warning), delaying the diagnostic allows us to give
better error messages, which also match the usual non-POD errors more closely.
In addition, this change improves the diagnostic messages for format string
argument type mismatches by passing down the type of the callee, so we can
say "variadic method" or "variadic function" appropriately.
<rdar://problem/11825593>
llvm-svn: 160517
Previously, we would ask for the SourceLocation of an argument even if
it were NULL (i.e. if Sema resulted in an ExprError trying to build it).
<rdar://problem/11890818>
llvm-svn: 160515
This macro was being unconditionally set to zero, preceded by a FIXME comment.
This fixes <rdar://problem/11845441>. Patch by Michael Gottesman!
llvm-svn: 160491
The hack of recognizing a -D__IPHONE_OS_VERSION_MIN_REQUIRED option
in place of -mios-simulator-version-min leaves the Darwin version
unspecified. It can be set separately with -mmacosx-version-min (which
makes no sense) or inferred to match the host version (which is unpredictable
and usually wrong). This really needs to get cleaned up, but in the
meantime, force the OS X version to 10.6 so that the behavior is sane for
the iOS simulator. Thanks for Argyrios for the patch.
<rdar://problem/11858187>
llvm-svn: 160484
Panzer. I've not been able to trigger a failure caused by this, so no test yet.
Also included is a small change from Paul Robinson to only consider the
FailureKind if the overload candidate did actually fail.
llvm-svn: 160470
As pointed out by Anna, we only differentiate between explicit message sends
This also adds support for ObjCSubscriptExprs, which are basically the same
as properties in many ways. We were already checking these, but not emitting
nice messages for them.
This depends on the llvm::PointerIntPair change in r160456.
llvm-svn: 160461
We will need to be able to easily reconstruct a CallEvent from an ExplodedNode
for diagnostic purposes, and that's exactly what factory functions are for.
CallEvent objects are small enough (four pointers and a SourceLocation) that
returning them through the stack is fairly cheap. Clients who just need to use
existing CallEvents can continue to do so using const references.
This uses the same sort of "kind-field-dispatch" as SVal, though most of the
nastiness is contained in the DISPATCH and DISPATCH_ARG macros at the end of
the file. (We can't use a template for this because member-pointers to base
class methods don't call derived-class methods even when casting to the
derived class. We can't use variadic macros because they're a C99 feature.)
llvm-svn: 160459
ObjC properties are handled through their semantic form of ObjCMessageExprs
and their wrapper PseudoObjectExprs, and have been for quite a while. The
syntactic ObjCPropertyRefExprs do not appear in the CFG and are not visited
by ExprEngine.
No functionality change.
llvm-svn: 160458
This enables the faster SmallVector in clang and also allows clang's unused
variable warnings to be more effective. Fix the two instances that popped up.
The RetainCountChecker change actually changes functionality, it would be nice
if someone from the StaticAnalyzer folks could look at it.
llvm-svn: 160444
despite __attribute__(__used__). As explained by Argyrios,
> .a archive files do some stripping of their own and they remove .o files that
> contain functions that are not referenced by any other .o file.
The fix is to use these functions from another .o file.
Thanks, Argyrios!
llvm-svn: 160437
be defined as deleted, take cv-qualifiers on class members into account when
looking up the copy or move constructor or assignment operator which will be
used for them.
llvm-svn: 160418
and a function template instantiation, if there's a parameter pack in the
declaration and one at the same place in the instantiation, don't assume that
the pack wasn't expanded -- it may have expanded to nothing. Instead, go ahead
and check whether the parameter pack was expandable. We can do this as a
side-effect of the work we'd need to do anyway, to find how many parameters
were produced.
llvm-svn: 160416
[temp.deduct.call]p4 under Objective-C++ ARC, make sure to adjust the
qualifiers to introduce the implicit strong lifetime when
needed. Fixes <rdar://problem/11825671>.
llvm-svn: 160412
intrinsics. The second instruction(s) to be handled are the vector versions
of count set bits (ctpop).
The changes here are to clang so that it generates a target independent
vector ctpop when it sees an ARM dependent vector bits set count. The changes
in llvm are to match the target independent vector ctpop and in
VMCore/AutoUpgrade.cpp to update any existing bc files containing ARM
dependent vector pop counts with target-independent ctpops. There are also
changes to an existing test case in llvm for ARM vector count instructions and
to a test for the bitcode upgrade.
<rdar://problem/11892519>
There is deliberately no test for the change to clang, as so far as I know, no
consensus has been reached regarding how to test neon instructions in clang;
q.v. <rdar://problem/8762292>
llvm-svn: 160409
given declaration.
It is based on the observation that during parsing the comment that should be
attached to the decl is usually among the last two documentation comments
parsed.
llvm-svn: 160400
Checks against nil often appear as guards in macros, and comparing
Objective-C literals to nil has well-defined behavior (if tautological).
On OS X, 'nil' has not been typed as 'id' since 10.6 (possibly earlier),
so the warning was already not firing, but other runtimes continue to use
((id)0) or some variant. This change accepts comparisons to any null pointer;
to keep it simple, it looks through all casts (not just casts to 'id').
PR13276
llvm-svn: 160379
Suggested by Ted, since string literal comparison is at least slightly more
sensible than comparison of runtime literals. (Ambiguous language on
developer.apple.com implies that strings are guaranteed to be uniqued within
a translation unit and possibly across a linked binary.)
llvm-svn: 160378
Recovering as if the user had actually called -isEqual: is a bit too far from
the semantics of the program as written, /even though/ it's probably what they
intended.
llvm-svn: 160377
This code has been moved around multiple times, but seems to have been
obsolete ever since we started handled references like pointers.
llvm-svn: 160375
Anna Zaks