When `libcxx` or `libcxxabi` is built with `-DLLVM_USE_SANITIZER=MemoryWithOrigins`
**and** `-DLIBCXX[ABI]_USE_COMPILER_RT=ON`, all of the `LIBCXX[ABI]_SUPPORTS_*_FLAG`
checks fail, since the value of `CMAKE_REQUIRED_FLAGS` is not set correctly.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51774
Reviewed By: #libc, #libc_abi, compnerd, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109342
Specify the C and C++ standards explicitly for this test. This avoids
failures for drivers that default to older standards.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109857
Summary:
Introduce a new frontend flag `-fswift-async-fp={auto|always|never}`
that controls how code generation sets the Swift extended async frame
info bit. There are three possibilities:
* `auto`: which determines how to set the bit based on deployment target, either
statically or dynamically via `swift_async_extendedFramePointerFlags`.
* `always`: default, always set the bit statically, regardless of deployment
target.
* `never`: never set the bit, regardless of deployment target.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109451
Don't create a useless functional patch with only filename in it when
there is only include directives to be patched but they're not
requested.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109880
Storing the vtable field of an object should use the same address space as
the this pointer. Currently it is assumed to be addr space 0 but this may not
be true.
This assumption (added in 054cc3b1b4) caused
issues for the out-of-tree CHERI targets.
Reviewed by: John McCall, Alexander Richardson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109841
Don't install clang-tidy checks and IncludeFixer or process clang diags
when they're going to be dropped. Also disables analysis for some
warnings completely.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109884
This patch increases the expected line number for one of the checks so that it doesn't have to be updated for any added/removed lines in the RUN section.
This change is in preparation for the following patch: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109060
Reviewed By: jsji
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109541
Introduce a new command-line flag `-swift-async-fp={auto|always|never}`
that controls how code generation sets the Swift extended async frame
info bit. There are three possibilities:
* `auto`: which determines how to set the bit based on deployment target, either
statically or dynamically via `swift_async_extendedFramePointerFlags`.
* `always`: the default, always set the bit statically, regardless of deployment
target.
* `never`: never set the bit, regardless of deployment target.
Patch by Doug Gregor <dgregor@apple.com>
Reviewed By: doug.gregor
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109392
Summary:
add a new API seek for the Cursor class in the DataExtractor.cpp
Reviewers: James Henderson, Fangrui Song
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109603
Remove the previous error and add support for special handling of small
complex types as in PPC64 ELF ABI. As in, generate code to load from
varargs location and pack it in a temp variable, then return a pointer to
the struct.
Reviewed By: sfertile
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106393
Change the asan-module pass into a MODULE_PASS_WITH_PARAMS in the
pass registry, and add a single parameter called 'kernel' that
can be set instead of having a special pass name 'kasan-module'
to trigger that special pass config.
Main reason is to make sure that we have a unique mapping from
ClassName to PassName in the new passmanager framework, making it
possible to correctly identify the passes when dealing with options
such as -print-after and -print-pipeline-passes.
This is a follow-up to D105006 and D105007.
Split ThreadSanitizerPass into ThreadSanitizerPass (as a function
pass) and ModuleThreadSanitizerPass (as a module pass).
Main reason is to make sure that we have a unique mapping from
ClassName to PassName in the new passmanager framework, making it
possible to correctly identify the passes when dealing with options
such as -print-after and -print-pipeline-passes.
This is a follow-up to D105006 and D105007.
Split MemorySanitizerPass into MemorySanitizerPass (as a function
pass) and ModuleMemorySanitizerPass (as a module pass).
Main reason is to make sure that we have a unique mapping from
ClassName to PassName in the new passmanager framework, making it
possible to correctly identify the passes when dealing with options
such as -print-after and -print-pipeline-passes.
This is a follow-up to D105006 and D105007.
Recently a vulnerability issue is found in the implementation of VLLDM
instruction in the Arm Cortex-M33, Cortex-M35P and Cortex-M55. If the
VLLDM instruction is abandoned due to an exception when it is partially
completed, it is possible for subsequent non-secure handler to access
and modify the partial restored register values. This vulnerability is
identified as CVE-2021-35465.
The mitigation sequence varies between v8-m and v8.1-m as follows:
v8-m.main
---------
mrs r5, control
tst r5, #8 /* CONTROL_S.SFPA */
it ne
.inst.w 0xeeb00a40 /* vmovne s0, s0 */
1:
vlldm sp /* Lazy restore of d0-d16 and FPSCR. */
v8.1-m.main
-----------
vscclrm {vpr} /* Clear VPR. */
vlldm sp /* Lazy restore of d0-d16 and FPSCR. */
More details on
developer.arm.com/support/arm-security-updates/vlldm-instruction-security-vulnerability
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109157
When expanding the non-secure call instruction we are emiting code
to clear the secure floating-point registers only if the targeted
architecture has floating-point support. The potential problem is
when the source code containing non-secure calls are built with
-mfloat-abi=soft but some other part of the system has been built
with -mfloat-abi=softfp (soft and softfp are compatible as they use
the same procedure calling standard). In this case floating-point
registers could leak to non-secure state as the non-secure won't
have cleared them assuming no floating point has been used.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109153
Adds support for macro `__opencl_c_program_scope_global_variables`
in C++ for OpenCL 2021 enabling a respective optional core feature
from OpenCL 3.0.
This change aims to achieve compatibility between C++ for OpenCL
2021 and OpenCL 3.0.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109305
D109708 added "DIA SDK" to our win sysroot for hermetic builds
that use LLVM_ENABLE_DIA_SDK. But the build system still has to
manually pass flags pointing to it.
Since we have a /winsysroot flag, make it look at DIA SDK in
the sysroot.
With this, the following is enough to compile the DIA2Dump example:
out\gn\bin\clang-cl ^
"sysroot\DIA SDK\Samples\DIA2Dump\DIA2Dump.cpp" ^
"sysroot\DIA SDK\Samples\DIA2Dump\PrintSymbol.cpp" ^
"sysroot\DIA SDK\Samples\DIA2Dump\regs.cpp" ^
/diasdkdir "sysroot\DIA SDK" ^
ole32.lib oleaut32.lib diaguids.lib
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109828
lit.util.which('link') picks up the wrong link.exe in git bash, leading
to this error:
# command stderr:
/usr/bin/link: extra operand '/LIBPATH:C:\\Progra....'
Try '/usr/bin/link --help' for more information.
Instead, assume that link.exe is next to cl.exe.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109832
Alias the "sp" register to "x31" on AArch64 if one is present and does
not have the alt_name. This is the case when connecting to gdbserver.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109695
I am working on a target in a downstream LLVM repo, and it seems that if a target backend chooses to disable loop unrolling this test would fail. A solution would be to modify the test to search for a different string instead.
The specific test checks for `if.true.direct_targ` which appears in the output when thinlto is not used (ie samplepgo). The same is true for `if.false.orig_indirect`.
However, if a target disables loop unrolling in the backend, the test fails as `if.true.direct_targ` no longer appears, though `if.false.orig_indirect` still does. This can be seen by using a clang pragma to disable loop unrolling in the `unroll()` function.
For reference, the following files are the outputs of the last 2 test functions being compiled as the test case does, with and without thinlto, and with and without loop unrolling on the latest x86 clang build. The loop unrolling pragma was used to simulate the loop unrolling being disabled in a backend.
```
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -O2 -fprofile-sample-use=%S/Inputs/pgo-sample-thinlto-summary.prof %s -emit-llvm -o out.ll
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -O2 -fprofile-sample-use=%S/Inputs/pgo-sample-thinlto-summary.prof %s -emit-llvm -flto=thin -o out.ll
```
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109234
Remove the name and alt_name parameters from AddRegister() and instead
pass them via RegisterInfo.name and .alt_name fields. This makes
the API simpler and removes some duplication.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109872
Adding trackExpressionValue to the checker so it tracks the value of the
implicit cast's DeclRefExpression up to initialization/assignment. This
way the report becomes cleaner.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109836
instead of a pointer. There are just two callers of this function, and
both of them have a valid target pointer, so there's no need for all
implementations to concern themselves with whether the pointer is null.
When the corefile reader is adding binaries from the "all image
infos" LC_NOTE in a Mach-O corefile, it would detect if the binary
being added was an executable binary and set it as the Target's
executable binary. This has the side effect of clearing the Target's
image list, so if the executable was in the middle of the all image
infos, the initial images would be dropped. There's no need to set
the executable binary in the Target for these corefile processes,
so instead of doing multiple passes over the list to find the
executable, I'm dropping that.
Fixes https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/819
SourceLocation of macros change when a header file is included above it. This is not checked when creating a PreamblePatch, resulting in reusing previously built preamble with an incorrect source location for the macro in the example test case.
This patch stores the SourceLocation in the struct TextualPPDirective so that it gets checked when comparing old vs new preambles.
Also creates a preamble patch for code completion parsing so that clangd does not crash when following the example test case with a large file.
Reviewed By: kadircet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108045
Alive2 for `{insert/extract}element`: https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/hwy_E-
Actually, no one file of test suite is touched by this change,
which means that is rare pattern not generated by frontend. But
it's worth being in place.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109236
Recognize lr/sp/fp by their numeric register names in the ABI plugin.
This is necessary to mark them appropriately when interfacing with
gdbserver.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109691
Try determining the process architecture from <architecture/> tag
unconditionally, rather than for very specific cases. Generic gdbserver
implementations do not support LLDB-specific packets used to determine
the process architecture, therefore this fallback is necessary to
support architecture-specific behavior on these targets. Rather than
maintaining a mapping of all known architectures, just try mapping
the GDB values into triplets, as that is going to work most of the time.
This change is confirmed to fix LLDB against gdbserver when debugging
i386 and aarch64 executables.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109272
If a loop count was initially represented by a 32b unsigned int in C
then the hardware-loop pass can recognise the loop guard and insert
the llvm.test.set.loop.iterations intrinsic. If this was instead a
unsigned short/char then clang inserts a zext instruction to expand
the loop count to an i32. This patch adds the necessary pattern
matching to enable the use of lvm.test.set.loop.iterations in those
cases.
Patch by: sherwin-dc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109631
Express the input shape definitions of convolution and pooling operations in terms of the output shapes, filter shapes, strides, and dilations.
Reviewed By: shabalin, rsuderman, stellaraccident
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109815
New field `elements` is added to '!DIImportedEntity', representing
list of aliased entities.
This is needed to dump optimized debugging information where all names
in a module are imported, but a few names are imported with overriding
aliases.
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109343
MethodWrapperHandler removes some of the boilerplate when writing wrapper
functions to wrap method calls. It can be used as a handler for wrapper
functions whose first argument is an ExecutorAddress: the address is cast to a
pointer of the given class type, then the given method function pointer is
called on that object pointer (passing the rest of the arguments).
E.g.
class MyClass {
public:
void myMethod(uint32_t, bool) { ... }
};
// SPS Method signature for myMethod -- note MyClass object address as first
// argument.
using SPSMyMethodWrapperSignature =
SPSTuple<SPSExecutorAddress, uint32_t, bool>;
// Wrapper function for myMethod.
WrapperFunctionResult
myMethodCallWrapper(const char *ArgData, size_t ArgSize) {
return WrapperFunction<SPSMyMethodWrapperSignature>::handle(
ArgData, ArgSize, makeMethodWrapperHandler(&MyClass::myMethod));
}
This enables the sparsification of more kernels, such as convolutions
where there is a x(i+j) subscript. It also enables more tensor invariants
such as x(1) or other affine subscripts such as x(i+1). Currently, we
reject sparsity altogether for such tensors. Despite this restriction,
however, we can already handle a lot more kernels with compound subscripts
for dense access (viz. convolution with dense input and sparse filter).
Some unit tests and an integration test demonstrate new capability.
Reviewed By: bixia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109783
Nehal J Wani