Commit Graph

88 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Simon Pilgrim ac62c8a3aa [X86][SSE] Remove use of SSE ADDS/SUBS saturation intrinsics from schedule/stack tests
These are due to be upgraded soon, but good to replace them with generic llvm sadd_sat/ssub_sat intrinsics now.

The avx512 masked cases need doing as well but require a bit of tidyup first.

llvm-svn: 349621
2018-12-19 12:00:25 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim d4b077698a [X86][SSE] Remove SSE ADDUS/SUBUS saturation intrinsics from schedule/stack tests
These are already being autoupgraded, currently to an IR sequence, but best to replace them with generic llvm uadd_sat/usub_sat intrinsics (which D55855 will be doing shortly anyhow).

The avx512 masked cases need doing as well but require a bit of tidyup first.

llvm-svn: 349615
2018-12-19 10:39:14 +00:00
Roman Lebedev b428b8b214 [X86][BdVer2] Fix loads/stores throughput for Piledriver (PR39465)
There are two AGU units, and per 1cy, there can be either two loads,
or a load and a store; but not two stores, or two loads and a store.

Additionally, loads shouldn't affect the store scheduler and vice versa.
(but *should* affect the PdEX scheduler.)

Required rL346545.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39465

llvm-svn: 346587
2018-11-10 14:31:43 +00:00
Roman Lebedev cc554e4456 [X86][NFC] sse2-schedule.ll: disable XOP for BdVer2 tests
Else we are clearly testing the wrong instruction.

llvm-svn: 345474
2018-10-28 13:39:01 +00:00
Roman Lebedev a5baf86744 AMD BdVer2 (Piledriver) Initial Scheduler model
Summary:
# Overview
This is somewhat partial.
* Latencies are good {F7371125}
  * All of these remaining inconsistencies //appear// to be noise/noisy/flaky.
* NumMicroOps are somewhat good {F7371158}
  * Most of the remaining inconsistencies are from `Ld` / `Ld_ReadAfterLd` classes
* Actual unit occupation (pipes, `ResourceCycles`) are undiscovered lands, i did not really look there.
  They are basically verbatum copy from `btver2`
* Many `InstRW`. And there are still inconsistencies left...

To be noted:
I think this is the first new schedule profile produced with the new next-gen tools like llvm-exegesis!

# Benchmark
I realize that isn't what was suggested, but i'll start with some "internal" public real-world benchmark i understand - [[ https://github.com/darktable-org/rawspeed | RawSpeed raw image decoding library ]].
Diff (the exact clang from trunk without/with this patch):
```
Comparing /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-old/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench to /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-new/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench
Benchmark                                                                                        Time             CPU      Time Old      Time New       CPU Old       CPU New
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                             0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean                              -0.0607         -0.0604           234           219           233           219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median                            -0.0630         -0.0626           233           219           233           219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                            +0.2581         +0.2587             1             2             1             2
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                             0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean                              -0.0770         -0.0767           144           133           144           133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median                            -0.0767         -0.0763           144           133           144           133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                            -0.4170         -0.4156             1             0             1             0
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           -0.0271         -0.0270           463           450           463           450
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median                                         -0.0093         -0.0093           453           449           453           449
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         -0.7280         -0.7280            13             4            13             4
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.0004          0.0004      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           -0.0065         -0.0065           569           565           569           565
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median                                         -0.0077         -0.0077           569           564           569           564
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         +1.0077         +1.0068             2             5             2             5
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.0220          0.0199      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           +0.0006         +0.0007           312           312           312           312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median                                         +0.0031         +0.0032           311           312           311           312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         -0.7069         -0.7072             4             1             4             1
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.0004          0.0004      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           -0.0015         -0.0015           141           141           141           141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_median                                         -0.0010         -0.0011           141           141           141           141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         -0.1486         -0.1456             0             0             0             0
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.6139          0.8766      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           -0.0008         -0.0005            60            60            60            60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median                                         -0.0006         -0.0002            60            60            60            60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         -0.1467         -0.1390             0             0             0             0
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.0137          0.0137      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           +0.0002         +0.0002           275           275           275           275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median                                         -0.0015         -0.0014           275           275           275           275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         +3.3687         +3.3587             0             2             0             2
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                     0.4041          0.3933      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_mean                                      +0.0004         +0.0004            67            67            67            67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_median                                    -0.0000         -0.0000            67            67            67            67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                    +0.1947         +0.1995             0             0             0             0
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                              0.0074          0.0001      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean                               -0.0092         +0.0074           547           542            25            25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median                             -0.0054         +0.0115           544           541            25            25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev                             -0.4086         -0.3486             8             5             0             0
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                        0.3320          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean                                         +0.0015         +0.0204           218           218            12            12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median                                       +0.0001         +0.0203           218           218            12            12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                       +0.2259         +0.2023             1             1             0             0
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                      0.0000          0.0001      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_mean                                       -0.0209         -0.0179            96            94            90            88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_median                                     -0.0182         -0.0155            95            93            90            88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                     -0.6164         -0.2703             2             1             2             1
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                     0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_mean                                      -0.0098         -0.0098           176           175           176           175
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_median                                    -0.0126         -0.0126           176           174           176           174
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                    +6.9789         +6.9157             0             2             0             2
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                 0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_mean                  -0.0237         -0.0238           474           463           474           463
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_median                -0.0267         -0.0267           473           461           473           461
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev                +0.7179         +0.7178             3             5             3             5
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                   0.6837          0.6554      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_mean                    -0.0014         -0.0013          1375          1373          1375          1373
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_median                  +0.0018         +0.0019          1371          1374          1371          1374
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_stddev                  -0.7457         -0.7382            11             3            10             3
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                        0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                         -0.0080         -0.0289            22            22            10            10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median                                       -0.0070         -0.0287            22            22            10            10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                       +1.0977         +0.6614             0             0             0             0
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                       0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                        +0.0132         +0.0967            35            36            10            11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median                                      +0.0132         +0.0956            35            36            10            11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                      -0.0407         -0.1695             0             0             0             0
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                      0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                       +0.0331         +0.1307            13            13             6             6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median                                     +0.0430         +0.1373            12            13             6             6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                     -0.9006         -0.8847             1             0             0             0
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                            0.0016          0.0010      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_mean                                             -0.0023         -0.0024           395           394           395           394
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_median                                           -0.0029         -0.0030           395           394           395           393
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                           -0.0275         -0.0375             1             1             1             1
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.0232          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           -0.0047         +0.0039           114           113            28            28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_median                                         -0.0050         +0.0037           114           113            28            28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         -0.0599         -0.2683             1             1             0             0
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                          0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean                           +0.0206         +0.0207           405           414           405           414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_median                         +0.0204         +0.0205           405           414           405           414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev                         +0.2155         +0.2212             1             1             1             1
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                         0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean                          -0.0109         -0.0108           147           145           147           145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_median                        -0.0104         -0.0103           147           145           147           145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev                        -0.4919         -0.4800             0             0             0             0
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                         0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_mean                                          -0.0149         -0.0147           220           217           220           217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_median                                        -0.0173         -0.0169           221           217           220           217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                        +1.0337         +1.0341             1             3             1             3
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                         0.0001          0.0001      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean                                          -0.0019         -0.0019           194           193           194           193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median                                        -0.0021         -0.0021           194           193           194           193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                        -0.4441         -0.4282             0             0             0             0
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                0.0000          0.4263      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean                                 +0.0258         -0.0006            81            83            19            19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median                               +0.0235         -0.0011            81            82            19            19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev                               +0.1634         +0.1070             1             1             0             0
```
{F7443905}
If we look at the `_mean`s, the time column, the biggest win is `-7.7%` (`Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2`),
and the biggest loose is `+3.3%` (`Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2`);
Overall: mean `-0.7436%`, median `-0.23%`, `cbrt(sum(time^3))` = `-8.73%`
Looks good so far i'd say.

llvm-exegesis details:
{F7371117} {F7371125}
{F7371128} {F7371144} {F7371158}

Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon, andreadb, courbet, avt77, spatel, GGanesh

Reviewed By: andreadb

Subscribers: javed.absar, gbedwell, jfb, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52779

llvm-svn: 345463
2018-10-27 20:46:30 +00:00
Roman Lebedev a51921877a [NFC][X86] Baseline tests for AMD BdVer2 (Piledriver) Scheduler model
Adding the baseline tests in a preparatory NFC commit,
so that the actual commit shows the *diff*.

Yes, i'm aware that a few of these codegen-based sched tests
are testing wrong instructions, i will fix that afterwards.

For https://reviews.llvm.org/D52779

llvm-svn: 345462
2018-10-27 20:36:11 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 90947214f3 [X86][SSE] Try to make MOVLPS/MOVHPS(+PD) instructions SimplifyDemandedElts proof
Fix for D52912 which was simplifying MOVLPS/MOVHPS(+PD) instructions as the tests were only touching one of the vector halfs

llvm-svn: 343858
2018-10-05 15:50:18 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 01ae462fef [X86][SSE] Combine (some) target shuffles with multiple uses
As discussed on D41794, we have many cases where we fail to combine shuffles as the input operands have other uses.

This patch permits these shuffles to be combined as long as they don't introduce additional variable shuffle masks, which should reduce instruction dependencies and allow the total number of shuffles to still drop without increasing the constant pool.

However, this may mean that some memory folds may no longer occur, and on pre-AVX require the occasional extra register move.

This also exposes some poor PMULDQ/PMULUDQ codegen which was doing unnecessary upper/lower calculations which will in fact fold to zero/undef - the fix will be added in a followup commit.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50328

llvm-svn: 339335
2018-08-09 12:30:02 +00:00
Clement Courbet 7db69cc08a [X86] Fix skylake server scheduling info.
Summary:
This fixes most of the scheduling info for SKX vector operations.
I had to split a lot of the YMM/ZMM classes into separate classes for YMM and ZMM.

The before/after llvm-exegesis analysis are in the phabricator diff.

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47721

llvm-svn: 334407
2018-06-11 14:37:53 +00:00
Sanjay Patel 59313be8d3 [CodeGen] assume max/default throughput for unspecified instructions
This is a fix for the problem arising in D47374 (PR37678):
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37678

We may not have throughput info because it's not specified in the model 
or it's not available with variant scheduling, so assume that those
instructions can execute/complete at max-issue-width.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47723

llvm-svn: 334055
2018-06-05 23:34:45 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 1273f4ad93 [X86] Add GPR<->XMM Schedule Tags
BtVer2 - fix NumMicroOp and account for the Lat+6cy GPR->XMM and Lat+1cy XMm->GPR delays (see rL332737)

The high number of MOVD/MOVQ equivalent instructions meant that there were a number of missed patterns in SNB/Znver1:
SNB - add missing GPR<->MMX costs (taken from Agner / Intel AOM)
Znver1 - add missing GPR<->XMM MOVQ costs (taken from Agner)

llvm-svn: 332745
2018-05-18 17:58:36 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 007b50fd35 [X86][BtVer2] Improve simulation of (V)PINSR values
Include the 6cy delay transferring from the GPR to FPU.

llvm-svn: 332737
2018-05-18 17:09:41 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 3ecb0b80f6 [X86][BtVer2] Partial vector stores (inc MMX) have a 2cy latency
llvm-svn: 332722
2018-05-18 14:22:22 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim be9a206883 [X86] Split WriteCvtF2F into F32->F64 and F64->F32 scheduler classes
BtVer2 - Fixes schedules for (V)CVTPS2PD instructions

A lot of the Intel models still have too many InstRW overrides for these new classes - this needs cleaning up but I wanted to get the classes in first

llvm-svn: 332376
2018-05-15 17:36:49 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim f3ae50fca2 [X86] Split WriteFRcp/WriteFRsqrt/WriteFSqrt schedule classes
WriteFRcp/WriteFRsqrt are split to support scalar, XMM and YMM/ZMM instructions.

WriteFSqrt is split into single/double/long-double sizes and scalar, XMM, YMM and ZMM instructions.

This removes all InstrRW overrides for these instructions.

NOTE: There were a couple of typos in the Znver1 model - notably a 1cy throughput for SQRT that is highly unlikely and doesn't tally with Agner.

NOTE: I had to add Agner's numbers for several targets for WriteFSqrt80.
llvm-svn: 331629
2018-05-07 11:50:44 +00:00
Chandler Carruth 16429acacb [x86] Revert r330322 (& r330323): Lowering x86 adds/addus/subs/subus intrinsics
The LLVM commit introduces a crash in LLVM's instruction selection.

I filed http://llvm.org/PR37260 with the test case.

llvm-svn: 330997
2018-04-26 21:46:01 +00:00
Alexander Ivchenko e8fed1546e Lowering x86 adds/addus/subs/subus intrinsics (llvm part)
This is the patch that lowers x86 intrinsics to native IR
in order to enable optimizations. The patch also includes folding
of previously missing saturation patterns so that IR emits the same
machine instructions as the intrinsics.

Patch by tkrupa

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44785

llvm-svn: 330322
2018-04-19 12:13:30 +00:00
Craig Topper e56a2fc5e7 [X86] Add separate scheduling class for PSADBW instruction.
llvm-svn: 330204
2018-04-17 19:35:19 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 8fc2b49620 [X86][Atom] Convert Atom scheduler model to SchedRW (PR32431)
Atom is the only x86 target that still uses schedule itineraries, if we can remove this then we can begin the work on removing x86 itineraries. I've also found that it will help with PR36550.

I've focussed on matching the existing model as closely as possible (relying on the schedule tests), PR36895 indicated a lot of these were incorrect but we can just as easily fix these after this patch as before. Hopefully we can get llvm-exegesis to help here,

There are a few instructions that rely on itinerary scheduling (mainly push/pop/return) of multiple resource stages, but I don't think any of these are show stoppers.

There are also a few codegen changes that seem related to the post-ra scheduler acting a little differently, I haven't tracked these down but they don't seem critical.

NOTE: I don't have access to any Atom hardware, so this hasn't been tested in the wild.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45486

llvm-svn: 329837
2018-04-11 18:23:01 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 86588fc809 [X86][Btver2] Add vector extract costs
llvm-svn: 329524
2018-04-08 11:26:26 +00:00
Craig Topper 4cc3827791 [X86] Add MOVZPQILo2PQIrr to the Sandy Bridge scheduler model
llvm-svn: 329351
2018-04-05 21:40:32 +00:00
Craig Topper c6bb36a3d0 [X86] Remove some InstRWs for plain store instructions on Sandy Bridge.
We were forcing the latency of these instructions to 5 cycles, but every other scheduler model had them as 1 cycle. I'm sure I didn't get everything, but this gets a big portion.

llvm-svn: 329339
2018-04-05 20:04:06 +00:00
Craig Topper 15303dda0d [X86] Revert r329251-329254
It's failing on the bots and I'm not sure why.

This reverts:

[X86] Synchronize the SchedRW on some EVEX instructions with their VEX equivalents.
[X86] Use WriteFShuffle256 for VEXTRACTF128 to be consistent with VEXTRACTI128 which uses WriteShuffle256.
[X86] Remove some InstRWs for plain store instructions on Sandy Bridge.
[X86] Auto-generate complete checks. NFC

llvm-svn: 329256
2018-04-05 05:19:36 +00:00
Craig Topper 6c4e08c835 [X86] Remove some InstRWs for plain store instructions on Sandy Bridge.
We were forcing the latency of these instructions to 5 cycles, but every other scheduler model had them as 1 cycle. I'm sure I didn't get everything, but this gets a big portion.

llvm-svn: 329252
2018-04-05 04:42:01 +00:00
Craig Topper 96729cd64b [X86][Silvermont] Use correct latency and throughput information for divide and square root in the scheduler model.
Data taken from Table 16-17 in the Intel Optimization Manual.

llvm-svn: 328962
2018-04-02 06:34:16 +00:00
Craig Topper 8104f266a4 [X86] Correct the throughput for divide instructions in Sandy Bridge/Haswell/Broadwell/Skylake scheduler models.
Fixes most of PR36898. Still need to fix the 512-bit instructions, but Agner's tables don't have those.

llvm-svn: 328960
2018-04-02 05:33:28 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim a2f26788a3 [X86] Add WriteFMOVMSK/WriteVecMOVMSK/WriteMMXMOVMSK scheduler classes
Currently MOVMSK instructions use the WriteVecLogic class, which is a very poor choice given that MOVMSK involves a SSE->GPR transfer.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44924

llvm-svn: 328664
2018-03-27 20:38:54 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 86ea53123d [X86][Btver2] Add CVTSI2SD/CVTSI2SS scheduler costs
We still need to account for how Jaguar passes data from GPR -> XMM, which isn't as clean as XMM -> GPR.....

llvm-svn: 328551
2018-03-26 17:02:02 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 8815105cd5 [X86][Btver2] Add CVTSD2SS/CVTSS2SD scheduler costs
llvm-svn: 328541
2018-03-26 16:24:13 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 0b73b29388 [X86][Btver2] Add CVTSD2SI/CVTSS2SI scheduler costs
Account for the "+i" integer pipe transfer cost (1cy use of JALU0 for GPR PRF write)

This also adds missing vcvttss2si tests 

llvm-svn: 328505
2018-03-26 15:30:47 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 67df1cf597 [X86][Btver2] Add (V)SQRTPD/(V)SQRTSD costs
The xmm sd/pd versions were using the WriteFSQRT default which is modelled on sqrtss/sqrtps

llvm-svn: 328497
2018-03-26 14:03:40 +00:00
Craig Topper 6f28d3c954 [X86] Fix the SchedRW for intrinsic register form of SQRT/RCP/RSQRT.
llvm-svn: 328474
2018-03-26 05:05:12 +00:00
Craig Topper cdfcf8ecda [X86] Merge the SSE and AVX versions of fp divs and sqrts in the SandyBridge/Haswell/Broadwell/Skylake scheduler models.
I've used Agner's data as best I could to get the values to converge on.

llvm-svn: 328473
2018-03-26 05:05:10 +00:00
Craig Topper fbf2d850e3 [X86] Add itinerary to intrinsic version of sqrtss, rcpss, and rsqrtss instructions.
llvm-svn: 328472
2018-03-26 04:20:36 +00:00
Craig Topper 659f85af14 [X86] Swap the itineraries on the memory and register forms of CVTDQ2PD.
They were backwards.

llvm-svn: 328469
2018-03-26 02:17:13 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 91fe24b8cf [X86][SSE] Ensure we're testing both non-VEX/VEX variants of SSE instructions on AVX targets
And ensure we don't use later instruction sets in SSE schedule tests

llvm-svn: 328423
2018-03-24 14:51:52 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim e5c0a041ff [X86][Btver2] Cleanup MOVMSK instructions to use JFPA function unit
Add missing non-VEX and (V)PMOVMSKB instructions to the pattern

llvm-svn: 328338
2018-03-23 17:38:59 +00:00
Craig Topper 4787b7f434 [X86] Correct the latencies of SNB integer vector multiplies based on Agner's data. Add missing MMX multiplies.
llvm-svn: 328295
2018-03-23 06:41:43 +00:00
Craig Topper 7580a7997d [X86] Change VPSADBW itinerary to SSE_INTALU_ITINS_P to match the SSE version.
llvm-svn: 328293
2018-03-23 06:41:40 +00:00
Craig Topper 7f142b8bf1 [X86] Merge VMOVMSKBrr and MOVMSKBrr in the SNB sheduler model.
The VMOVMSKBrr was in a separate InstRW with a lower latency, but I assume they should be the same and the higher latency matches Agners table so I'm going with that.

llvm-svn: 328291
2018-03-23 06:41:38 +00:00
Craig Topper fae4173b47 [X86] Add VEXTRB/W/D/Q to Zen scheduler model.
The SSE versions were present, but not the VEX version.

llvm-svn: 328290
2018-03-23 06:41:36 +00:00
Craig Topper 58afb4ea58 [X86][SkylakeClient] Fix a bunch of instructions that were incorrectly assigned Port015 instead of Port01.
The VEC ADD and VEC MUL units aren't present on port 5 on SkylakeClient.

llvm-svn: 328241
2018-03-22 21:10:07 +00:00
Craig Topper 89dcda3e90 [X86] Remove MMX_MASKMOVQ64 and VMASKMOVDQU from scheduler models.
The information was so wildly inaccurate and incomplete its better to just remove it.

MMX_MASKMOVQ64 showed up twice in several scheduler models. In Haswell and Broadwell they were on adjacent lines. On Skylake the copies had different information.

MMX_MASKMOVQ and MASKMOVDQU were completely missing.

MMX_MASKMOVQ64 was listed on Haswell/Broadwell as 1 cycle on port 1 despite it being a store instruction.

Filed PR36780 to track fixing this right.

llvm-svn: 327783
2018-03-18 03:24:42 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim fb7aa57bf1 [X86][SSE] Introduce Float/Vector WriteMove, WriteLoad and Writetore scheduler classes
As discussed on D44428 and PR36726, this patch splits off WriteFMove/WriteVecMove, WriteFLoad/WriteVecLoad and WriteFStore/WriteVecStore scheduler classes to permit vectors to be handled separately from gpr/scalar types.

I've minimised the diff here by only moving various basic SSE/AVX vector instructions across - we can fix the rest when called for. This does fix the MOVDQA vs MOVAPS/MOVAPD discrepancies mentioned on D44428.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44471

llvm-svn: 327630
2018-03-15 14:45:30 +00:00
Puyan Lotfi 43e94b15ea Followup on Proposal to move MIR physical register namespace to '$' sigil.
Discussed here:

http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-January/120320.html

In preparation for adding support for named vregs we are changing the sigil for
physical registers in MIR to '$' from '%'. This will prevent name clashes of
named physical register with named vregs.

llvm-svn: 323922
2018-01-31 22:04:26 +00:00
Craig Topper 05af43fbad [X86] Fix some inconsistencies in the itineraries and Sched for (V)PEXTRW/(V)PINSRW
The weirdest being that PEXTRWrr was tagged as a memory operation.

llvm-svn: 323353
2018-01-24 17:58:57 +00:00
Craig Topper 002657731b [X86] Move 'Int_' to the end of the name of the VCOMISS/VUCOMISS and instructions to get them picked up by the scheduler model regexs.
All other intrinsic instructions put the _Int on the end. This make these instructions consistent and gets the prefix instregexs in the scheduler models to pick them up.

llvm-svn: 323261
2018-01-23 21:37:51 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim a8e6b885bd [X86][BTVER2] Fix scheduling of VCMPSD/VCMPSS instructions
For some reason they don't have a trailing i like the packed equivalents.

llvm-svn: 322600
2018-01-16 22:15:41 +00:00
Andrew V. Tischenko e58c0c96b2 Update BTVER2 sched numbers for some AVX instructions (xmm version).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40067

llvm-svn: 322485
2018-01-15 14:21:11 +00:00
Craig Topper 162439dcdf [X86] Pass itins.rr/itins.rm through properly for some instructions.
llvm-svn: 321452
2017-12-26 05:43:05 +00:00