merging a src register in ToBeUpdated set.
This is to fix PR40061 related with https://reviews.llvm.org/rL339035.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/rL339035, live interval of source pseudo register
in rematerialized copy may be saved in ToBeUpdated set and its update may be
postponed.
In PR40061, %t2 = %t1 is rematerialized and %t1 is added into toBeUpdated set
to postpone its live interval update. After the rematerialization, the live
interval of %t1 is larger than necessary. Then %t1 is merged into %t3 and %t1
gets removed. After the merge, %t3 contains live interval larger than necessary.
Because %t3 is not in toBeUpdated set, its live interval is not updated after
register coalescing and it will break some assumption in regalloc.
The patch requires the live interval of destination register in a merge to be
updated if the source register is in ToBeUpdated.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55867
llvm-svn: 350586
Summary: AVX512VBMI2 supports a funnel shift by immediate and a funnel shift by a variable vector.
Reviewers: spatel, RKSimon
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56361
llvm-svn: 350498
This is especially helpful on targets without avx512bw since we don't have a good way to convert from v16i8/v32i8 to v16i1/v32i1 for the truncate anyway. If we're just going to convert it to a GPR we might as well use pmovmskb to accomplish both.
llvm-svn: 350480
This adds support for calculating sign bits of insert_subvector. I based it on the computeKnownBits.
My motivating case is propagating sign bits information across basic blocks on AVX targets where concatenating using insert_subvector is common.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56283
llvm-svn: 350432
The 1st try for this was at rL350369, but it caused IR-level diffs because
our cost models differentiate custom vs. legal/promote lowering. So that was
reverted at rL350373. The cost models were fixed independently at rL350403,
so this is effectively the same patch as last time.
Original commit message:
This would show up if we fix horizontal reductions to narrow as they go along,
but it's an improvement for size and/or Jaguar (fast-hops) independent of that.
We need to do this late to not interfere with other pattern matching of larger
horizontal sequences.
We can extend this to integer ops in a follow-up patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56011
llvm-svn: 350421
Doing this late so we will prefer to fold the AND into a masked comparison first. That can be better for the live range of the mask register.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56246
llvm-svn: 350374
This would show up if we fix horizontal reductions to narrow as they go along,
but it's an improvement for size and/or Jaguar (fast-hops) independent of that.
We need to do this late to not interfere with other pattern matching of larger
horizontal sequences.
We can extend this to integer ops in a follow-up patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56011
llvm-svn: 350369
This tests a case where we need to be able to compute sign bits for two insert_subvectors that is a liveout of a basic block. The result is then used as a boolean vector in another basic block.
llvm-svn: 350359
These are similar patterns, but when you throw AVX512 onto the pile,
the number of variations explodes. For FP, we really don't care about
AVX1 vs. AVX2 for FP ops. There may be some superficial shuffle diffs,
but that's not what we're testing for here, so I removed those RUNs.
Separating by type also lets us specify 'sse3' for the FP file vs. 'ssse3'
for the integer file...because x86.
llvm-svn: 350357
As noted in PR39973 and D55558:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39973
...this is a partial implementation of a fold that we do as an IR canonicalization in instcombine:
// extelt (binop X, Y), Index --> binop (extelt X, Index), (extelt Y, Index)
We want to have this in the DAG too because as we can see in some of the test diffs (reductions),
the pattern may not be visible in IR.
Given that this is already an IR canonicalization, any backend that would prefer a vector op over
a scalar op is expected to already have the reverse transform in DAG lowering (not sure if that's
a realistic expectation though). The transform is limited with a TLI hook because there's an
existing transform in CodeGenPrepare that tries to do the opposite transform.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55722
llvm-svn: 350354
A DBG_VALUE between a two-address instruction and a following COPY
would prevent rescheduleMIBelowKill optimization inside
TwoAddressInstructionPass.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55987
llvm-svn: 350289
The test cases are constructed to avoid folding the AND into a masked compare operation.
Currently we emit a KAND and a KORTEST for these cases.
llvm-svn: 350287
INC/DEC are pretty much the same as ADD/SUB except that they don't update the C flag.
This patch removes the special nodes and just pattern matches from ADD/SUB during isel if the C flag isn't being used.
I had to avoid selecting DEC is the result isn't used. This will become a SUB immediate which will turned into a CMP later by optimizeCompareInstr. This lead to the one test change where we use a CMP instead of a DEC for an overflow intrinsic since we only checked the flag.
This also exposed a hole in our RMW flag matching use of hasNoCarryFlagUses. Our root node for the match is a store and there's no guarantee that all the flag users have been selected yet. So hasNoCarryFlagUses needs to check copyToReg and machine opcodes, but it also needs to check for the pre-match SETCC, SETCC_CARRY, BRCOND, and CMOV opcodes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55975
llvm-svn: 350245
Currently we expand the two nodes separately. This gives DAG combiner an opportunity to optimize the expanded sequence taking into account only one set of users. When we expand the other node we'll create the expansion again, but might not be able to optimize it the same way. So the nodes won't CSE and we'll have two similarish sequences in the same basic block. By expanding both nodes at the same time we'll avoid prematurely optimizing the expansion until both the division and remainder have been replaced.
Improves the test case from PR38217. There may be additional opportunities after this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56145
llvm-svn: 350239
By also promoting the input type we get a better idea for what scalar type to use. This can provide better results if the result of the extract is sign extended. What was previously happening is that the extract result would be legalized, sometime later the input of the sign extend would be legalized using the result of the extract. Then later the extract input would be legalized forcing a truncate into the input of the sign extend using a replace all uses. This requires DAG combine to combine out the sext/truncate pair. But sometimes we visited the truncate first and messed things up before the sext could be combined.
By creating the extract with the correct scalar type when we create legalize the result type, the truncate will be added right away. Then when the sign_extend input is legalized it will create an any_extend of the truncate which can be optimized by getNode to maybe remove the truncate. And then a sign_extend_inreg. Now DAG combine doesn't have to worry about getting rid of the extend.
This fixes the regression on X86 in D56156.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56176
llvm-svn: 350236
If x has multiple sign bits than it doesn't matter which one we extend from so we can sext from x's msb instead.
The X86 setcc-combine.ll changes are a little weird. It appears we ended up with a (sext_inreg (aext (trunc (extractelt)))) after type legalization. The sext_inreg+aext now gets optimized by this combine to leave (sext (trunc (extractelt))). Then we visit the trunc before we visit the sext. This ends up changing the truncate to an extractvectorelt from a bitcasted vector. I have a follow up patch to fix this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56156
llvm-svn: 350235
Peek through shift modulo masks while matching double shift patterns.
I was hoping to delay this until I could remove the X86 code with generic funnel shift matching (PR40081) but this will do for now.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56199
llvm-svn: 350222
This was added at a time when i1 was a legal type with avx512f and there was a bug. i1 is no longer considered a legal type with avx512f so there should be no codegen difference.
llvm-svn: 350203
This makes it easier to keep the LowerBRCOND and LowerSELECT code in sync with LowerXALUO so they always pick the same operation for overflowing instructions.
This is inspired by the helper functions used by ARM and AArch64 for the same purpose.
The test change is because LowerSELECT was not in sync with LowerXALUO with regard to INC/DEC for SADDO/SSUBO.
llvm-svn: 350198
This was added at a time when i1 was a legal type with avx512f and there was a bug. i1 is no longer considered a legal type with avx512f so there should be no codegen difference.
llvm-svn: 350195
When SADDO/SSUBO is used as a part of a condition, the X86 backend has to lower the instruction twice. One for the flags use and then once for the data use. These two selections should be kept in sync so they end up with one node providing the data and the flags. This doesn't seem to be happening for INC/DEC.
llvm-svn: 350194
Sanjay Patel