GNU as rejects input where .cfi_sections is used after .cfi_startproc,
if the new section differs from the old. Adjust our output to always
emit .cfi_sections before the first .cfi_startproc to minimize necessary
code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28011
llvm-svn: 290817
This reverts commit r290694. It broke sanitizer tests on Win64. I'll
probably bring this back, but the jump tables will just live in .text
like they do for MSVC.
llvm-svn: 290714
This change adds a new intrinsic which is intended to provide memcpy functionality
with additional atomicity guarantees. Please refer to the review thread
or language reference for further details.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27133
llvm-svn: 290708
Summary:
We were already using 32-bit jump table entries, but this was a
consequence of the default PIC model on Win64, and not an intentional
design decision. This patch ensures that we always use 32-bit label
difference jump table entries on Win64 regardless of the PIC model. This
is a good idea because it saves executable size and object file size.
Moving the jump tables to .rdata cleans up the disassembled object code
and reduces the available ROP targets, but it requires adding one more
RIP-relative lea to the code. COFF doesn't have relocations to express
the difference between two arbitrary symbols, so we can't use the jump
table label in the label difference like we do elsewhere.
Fixes PR31488
Reviewers: majnemer, compnerd
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28141
llvm-svn: 290694
Jump table emission can switch to .rdata before
WinException::endFunction gets called. Just remember the appropriate
text section we started in and reset back to it when we end the
function. We were already switching sections back from .xdata anyway.
Fixes the first problem in PR31488, so that now COFF switch tables can
live in .rdata if we want them to.
llvm-svn: 290678
There are cases of AVX-512 instructions that have two possible encodings. This is the case with instructions that use vector registers with low indexes of 0 - 15 and do not use the zmm registers or the mask k registers.
The EVEX encoding prefix requires 4 bytes whereas the VEX prefix can take only up to 3 bytes. Consequently, using the VEX encoding for these instructions results in a code size reduction of ~2 bytes even though it is compiled with the AVX-512 features enabled.
Reviewers: Craig Topper, Zvi Rackoover, Elena Demikhovsky
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27901
llvm-svn: 290663
The 128 and 256 bit masked intrinsics are currently unused by clang. The sse and avx2 unmasked intrinsics are used instead. The new 512-bit intrinsic will be used to do the same. Then all masked versions will removed and autoupgraded.
llvm-svn: 290573
These particular sequences will be generated after a future change to teach InstCombine to turn masked scalar arithmetic intrinsics into native IR.
llvm-svn: 290563
Summary:
In mergeSPUpdates, debug values need to be ignored when getting the
previous element, otherwise debug data could have an impact on codegen.
In eliminateCallFramePseudoInstr, debug values after the erased element
could have an impact on codegen and should be skipped.
Closes PR31319 (https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=31319)
Reviewers: mkuper, MatzeB, aprantl
Subscribers: gbedwell, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27688
llvm-svn: 290423
Summary:
This change rewrites a core component in the ImplicitNullChecks pass for
greater simplicity since the original design was over-complicated for no
good reason. Please review this as essentially a new pass. The change
is almost NFC and I've added a test case for a scenario that this new
code handles that wasn't handled earlier.
The implicit null check pass, at its core, is a code hoisting transform.
It differs from "normal" code transforms in that it speculates
potentially faulting instructions (by design), but a lot of the usual
hazard detection logic (register read-after-write etc.) still applies.
We previously detected hazards by keeping track of registers defined and
used by machine instructions over an instruction range, but that was
unwieldy and did not actually confer any performance benefits. The
intent was to have linear time complexity over the number of machine
instructions considered, but it ended up being N^2 is practice.
This new version is more obviously O(N^2) (with N capped to 8 by
default) in hazard detection. It does not attempt to be clever in
tracking register uses or defs (the previous cleverness here was a
source of bugs).
Once this is checked in, I'll extract out the `IsSuitableMemoryOp` and
`CanHoistLoadInst` lambda into member functions (they're too complicated
to be inline lambdas) and do some other related NFC cleanups.
Reviewers: reames, anna, atrick
Subscribers: mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27592
llvm-svn: 290394
This is a succeeding patch of https://reviews.llvm.org/D22840 to address the
issue when a value to be merged into an int64 pair is in a different BB. Redoing
the store splitting in CodeGenPrepare so we can match the pattern across multiple
BBs and move some instructions into the same BB. We still keep the code in dag
combine so that we can catch cases that show up after DAG combining runs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25914
llvm-svn: 290365
This patch renumbers the metadata nodes in debug info testcases after
https://reviews.llvm.org/D26769. This is a separate patch because it
causes so much churn. This was implemented with a python script that
pipes the testcases through llvm-as - | llvm-dis - and then goes
through the original and new output side-by side to insert all
comments at a close-enough location.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27765
llvm-svn: 290292
I added API for creation a target specific memory node in DAG. Today, all memory nodes are common for all targets and their constructors are located in SelectionDAG.cpp.
There are some cases in X86 where we need to create a special node - truncation-with-saturation store, float-to-half-store.
In the current patch I added truncation-with-saturation nodes and I'm using them for intrinsics. In the future I plan to implement DAG lowering for truncation-with-saturation pattern.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27899
llvm-svn: 290250
The vectorcall calling convention specifies that arguments to functions are to be passed in registers, when possible.
vectorcall uses more registers for arguments than fastcall or the default x64 calling convention use.
The vectorcall calling convention is only supported in native code on x86 and x64 processors that include Streaming SIMD Extensions 2 (SSE2) and above.
The current implementation does not handle Homogeneous Vector Aggregates (HVAs) correctly and this review attempts to fix it.
This aubmit also includes additional lit tests to cover better HVAs corner cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27392
llvm-svn: 290240
This patch implements PR31013 by introducing a
DIGlobalVariableExpression that holds a pair of DIGlobalVariable and
DIExpression.
Currently, DIGlobalVariables holds a DIExpression. This is not the
best way to model this:
(1) The DIGlobalVariable should describe the source level variable,
not how to get to its location.
(2) It makes it unsafe/hard to update the expressions when we call
replaceExpression on the DIGLobalVariable.
(3) It makes it impossible to represent a global variable that is in
more than one location (e.g., a variable with multiple
DW_OP_LLVM_fragment-s). We also moved away from attaching the
DIExpression to DILocalVariable for the same reasons.
This reapplies r289902 with additional testcase upgrades and a change
to the Bitcode record for DIGlobalVariable, that makes upgrading the
old format unambiguous also for variables without DIExpressions.
<rdar://problem/29250149>
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=31013
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26769
llvm-svn: 290153
The original version of the code in XRayInstrumentation.cpp assumed that
functions may not have empty machine basic blocks (or that the first one
couldn't be). This change addresses that by special-casing that specific
situation.
We provide two .mir test-cases to make sure we're handling this
appropriately.
Fixes llvm.org/PR31424.
Reviewers: chandlerc
Subscribers: varno, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27913
llvm-svn: 290091
Not sure whether it causes and ASAN false positive or whether it
actually leads to incorrect code or whether it even exposes bad code.
Hans, I'll get you instructions to reproduce this.
llvm-svn: 290066
These nodes are only emitted for lowering FABS/FNEG/FNABS/FCOPYSIGN. Ideally we just wouldn't create these nodes if SSE2 or higher is available, but it was simple to just convert them in DAG combine.
For SSE2, AVX, and AVX512 with DQI this is no functional change as the execution domain fixing pass ensures the right domain is selected regardless of the ISD opcode.
For AVX-512 without DQI we end up using integer instructions since the floating point versions aren't available. But we were already doing that for any logical operations in code that didn't come from FABS/FNEG/FNABS/FCOPYSIGN so this seems no worse. And we get the benefit of being able to fold broadcasts now.
llvm-svn: 290060
This is recommit of r287553 after fixing the invalid loop info after eliminating an empty block and unit test failures in AVR and WebAssembly :
Summary: Merging an empty case block into the header block of switch could cause ISel to add COPY instructions in the header of switch, instead of the case block, if the case block is used as an incoming block of a PHI. This could potentially increase dynamic instructions, especially when the switch is in a loop. I added a test case which was reduced from the benchmark I was targetting.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, mcrosier, manmanren, wmi, joerg, davidxl
Subscribers: joerg, qcolombet, danielcdh, hfinkel, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22696
llvm-svn: 289988
This reverts commit 289920 (again).
I forgot to implement a Bitcode upgrade for the case where a DIGlobalVariable
has not DIExpression. Unfortunately it is not possible to safely upgrade
these variables without adding a flag to the bitcode record indicating which
version they are.
My plan of record is to roll the planned follow-up patch that adds a
unit: field to DIGlobalVariable into this patch before recomitting.
This way we only need one Bitcode upgrade for both changes (with a
version flag in the bitcode record to safely distinguish the record
formats).
Sorry for the churn!
llvm-svn: 289982
atomic_load_add returns the value before addition, but sets EFLAGS based on the
result of the addition. That means it's setting the flags based on effectively
subtracting C from the value at x, which is also what the outer cmp does.
This targets a pattern that occurs frequently with reference counting pointers:
void decrement(long volatile *ptr) {
if (_InterlockedDecrement(ptr) == 0)
release();
}
Clang would previously compile it (for 32-bit at -Os) as:
00000000 <?decrement@@YAXPCJ@Z>:
0: 8b 44 24 04 mov 0x4(%esp),%eax
4: 31 c9 xor %ecx,%ecx
6: 49 dec %ecx
7: f0 0f c1 08 lock xadd %ecx,(%eax)
b: 83 f9 01 cmp $0x1,%ecx
e: 0f 84 00 00 00 00 je 14 <?decrement@@YAXPCJ@Z+0x14>
14: c3 ret
and with this patch it becomes:
00000000 <?decrement@@YAXPCJ@Z>:
0: 8b 44 24 04 mov 0x4(%esp),%eax
4: f0 ff 08 lock decl (%eax)
7: 0f 84 00 00 00 00 je d <?decrement@@YAXPCJ@Z+0xd>
d: c3 ret
(Equivalent variants with _InterlockedExchangeAdd, std::atomic<>'s fetch_add
or pre-decrement operator generate the same code.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27781
llvm-svn: 289955
This is recommit of r287553 after fixing the invalid loop info after eliminating an empty block:
Summary: Merging an empty case block into the header block of switch could cause ISel to add COPY instructions in the header of switch, instead of the case block, if the case block is used as an incoming block of a PHI. This could potentially increase dynamic instructions, especially when the switch is in a loop. I added a test case which was reduced from the benchmark I was targetting.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, mcrosier, manmanren, wmi, joerg, davidxl
Subscribers: joerg, qcolombet, danielcdh, hfinkel, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22696
llvm-svn: 289951
This patch implements PR31013 by introducing a
DIGlobalVariableExpression that holds a pair of DIGlobalVariable and
DIExpression.
Currently, DIGlobalVariables holds a DIExpression. This is not the
best way to model this:
(1) The DIGlobalVariable should describe the source level variable,
not how to get to its location.
(2) It makes it unsafe/hard to update the expressions when we call
replaceExpression on the DIGLobalVariable.
(3) It makes it impossible to represent a global variable that is in
more than one location (e.g., a variable with multiple
DW_OP_LLVM_fragment-s). We also moved away from attaching the
DIExpression to DILocalVariable for the same reasons.
This reapplies r289902 with additional testcase upgrades.
<rdar://problem/29250149>
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=31013
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26769
llvm-svn: 289920
idiom.
r289538: Match load by bytes idiom and fold it into a single load
r289540: Fix a buildbot failure introduced by r289538
r289545: Use more detailed assertion messages in the code ...
r289646: Add a couple of assertions to the load combine code ...
This DAG combine has a bad crash in it that is quite hard to trigger
sadly -- it relies on sneaking code with UB through the SDAG build and
into this particular combine. I've responded to the original commit with
a test case that reproduces it.
However, the code also has other problems that will require substantial
changes to address and so I'm going ahead and reverting it for now. This
should unblock us and perhaps others that are hitting the crash in the
wild and will let a fresh patch with updated approach come in cleanly
afterward.
Sorry for any trouble or disruption!
llvm-svn: 289916
This patch implements PR31013 by introducing a
DIGlobalVariableExpression that holds a pair of DIGlobalVariable and
DIExpression.
Currently, DIGlobalVariables holds a DIExpression. This is not the
best way to model this:
(1) The DIGlobalVariable should describe the source level variable,
not how to get to its location.
(2) It makes it unsafe/hard to update the expressions when we call
replaceExpression on the DIGLobalVariable.
(3) It makes it impossible to represent a global variable that is in
more than one location (e.g., a variable with multiple
DW_OP_LLVM_fragment-s). We also moved away from attaching the
DIExpression to DILocalVariable for the same reasons.
<rdar://problem/29250149>
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=31013
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26769
llvm-svn: 289902
Craig Topper