Commit Graph

558 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Zijiao Ma bf6007bd1b Make the canonicalisation on shifts benifit to more case.
1.Fix pessimized case in FIXME.
2.Add tests for it.
3.The canonicalisation on shifts results in different sequence for
  tests of machine-licm.Correct some check lines.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27916

llvm-svn: 290410
2016-12-23 02:56:07 +00:00
Sjoerd Meijer 96e10b5a9e [Thumb] Teach ISel how to lower compares of AND bitmasks efficiently
This is essentially a recommit of r285893, but with a correctness fix. The
problem of the original commit was that this:

bic r5, r7, #31
cbz r5, .LBB2_10

got rewritten into:

lsrs  r5, r7, #5
beq .LBB2_10

The result in destination register r5 is not the same and this is incorrect
when r5 is not dead. So this fix includes checking the uses of the AND
destination register. And also, compared to the original commit, some regression
tests didn't need changing anymore because of this extra check.

For completeness, this was the original commit message:

For the common pattern (CMPZ (AND x, #bitmask), #0), we can do some more
efficient instruction selection if the bitmask is one consecutive sequence of
set bits (32 - clz(bm) - ctz(bm) == popcount(bm)).

1) If the bitmask touches the LSB, then we can remove all the upper bits and
set the flags by doing one LSLS.
2) If the bitmask touches the MSB, then we can remove all the lower bits and
set the flags with one LSRS.
3) If the bitmask has popcount == 1 (only one set bit), we can shift that bit
into the sign bit with one LSLS and change the condition query from NE/EQ to
MI/PL (we could also implement this by shifting into the carry bit and
branching on BCC/BCS).
4) Otherwise, we can emit a sequence of LSLS+LSRS to remove the upper and lower
zero bits of the mask.

1-3 require only one 16-bit instruction and can elide the CMP. 4 requires two
16-bit instructions but can elide the CMP and doesn't require materializing a
complex immediate, so is also a win.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27761

llvm-svn: 289794
2016-12-15 09:38:59 +00:00
James Molloy e7d97368f2 Revert "[Thumb] Teach ISel how to lower compares of AND bitmasks efficiently"
This reverts commit r285893. It caused (probably) http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-thumbv7-a15-full-sh/builds/83 .

llvm-svn: 285912
2016-11-03 14:08:01 +00:00
James Molloy b60d8b1987 [Thumb] Teach ISel how to lower compares of AND bitmasks efficiently
This recommits r281323, which was backed out for two reasons. One, a selfhost failure, and two, it apparently caused Chromium failures. Actually, the latter was a red herring. The log has expired from the former, but I suspect that was a red herring too (actually caused by another problematic patch of mine). Therefore reapplying, and will watch the bots like a hawk.

For the common pattern (CMPZ (AND x, #bitmask), #0), we can do some more efficient instruction selection if the bitmask is one consecutive sequence of set bits (32 - clz(bm) - ctz(bm) == popcount(bm)).

1) If the bitmask touches the LSB, then we can remove all the upper bits and set the flags by doing one LSLS.
2) If the bitmask touches the MSB, then we can remove all the lower bits and set the flags with one LSRS.
3) If the bitmask has popcount == 1 (only one set bit), we can shift that bit into the sign bit with one LSLS and change the condition query from NE/EQ to MI/PL (we could also implement this by shifting into the carry bit and branching on BCC/BCS).
4) Otherwise, we can emit a sequence of LSLS+LSRS to remove the upper and lower zero bits of the mask.

1-3 require only one 16-bit instruction and can elide the CMP. 4 requires two 16-bit instructions but can elide the CMP and doesn't require materializing a complex immediate, so is also a win.

llvm-svn: 285893
2016-11-03 10:18:20 +00:00
James Molloy 70a3d6df52 [Thumb-1] Synthesize TBB/TBH instructions to make use of compressed jump tables
[Reapplying r284580 and r285917 with fix and testing to ensure emitted jump tables for Thumb-1 have 4-byte alignment]

The TBB and TBH instructions in Thumb-2 allow jump tables to be compressed into sequences of bytes or shorts respectively. These instructions do not exist in Thumb-1, however it is possible to synthesize them out of a sequence of other instructions.

It turns out this sequence is so short that it's almost never a lose for performance and is ALWAYS a significant win for code size.

TBB example:
Before: lsls r0, r0, #2    After: add  r0, pc
        adr  r1, .LJTI0_0         ldrb r0, [r0, #6]
        ldr  r0, [r0, r1]         lsls r0, r0, #1
        mov  pc, r0               add  pc, r0
  => No change in prologue code size or dynamic instruction count. Jump table shrunk by a factor of 4.

The only case that can increase dynamic instruction count is the TBH case:

Before: lsls r0, r4, #2    After: lsls r4, r4, #1
        adr  r1, .LJTI0_0         add  r4, pc
        ldr  r0, [r0, r1]         ldrh r4, [r4, #6]
        mov  pc, r0               lsls r4, r4, #1
                                  add  pc, r4
  => 1 more instruction in prologue. Jump table shrunk by a factor of 2.

So there is an argument that this should be disabled when optimizing for performance (and a TBH needs to be generated). I'm not so sure about that in practice, because on small cores with Thumb-1 performance is often tied to code size. But I'm willing to turn it off when optimizing for performance if people want (also note that TBHs are fairly rare in practice!)

llvm-svn: 285690
2016-11-01 13:37:41 +00:00
Eli Friedman b37864b58d Revert r284580+r284917. ("Synthesize TBB/TBH instructions")
The optimization has correctness issues, so reverting for now to fix tests
on thumb1 targets.

llvm-svn: 284993
2016-10-24 17:20:50 +00:00
James Molloy fbfd173447 [Thumb-1] Synthesize TBB/TBH instructions to make use of compressed jump tables
The TBB and TBH instructions in Thumb-2 allow jump tables to be compressed into sequences of bytes or shorts respectively. These instructions do not exist in Thumb-1, however it is possible to synthesize them out of a sequence of other instructions.

It turns out this sequence is so short that it's almost never a lose for performance and is ALWAYS a significant win for code size.

TBB example:
Before: lsls r0, r0, #2    After: add  r0, pc
        adr  r1, .LJTI0_0         ldrb r0, [r0, #6]
        ldr  r0, [r0, r1]         lsls r0, r0, #1
        mov  pc, r0               add  pc, r0
  => No change in prologue code size or dynamic instruction count. Jump table shrunk by a factor of 4.

The only case that can increase dynamic instruction count is the TBH case:

Before: lsls r0, r4, #2    After: lsls r4, r4, #1
        adr  r1, .LJTI0_0         add  r4, pc
        ldr  r0, [r0, r1]         ldrh r4, [r4, #6]
        mov  pc, r0               lsls r4, r4, #1
                                  add  pc, r4
  => 1 more instruction in prologue. Jump table shrunk by a factor of 2.

So there is an argument that this should be disabled when optimizing for performance (and a TBH needs to be generated). I'm not so sure about that in practice, because on small cores with Thumb-1 performance is often tied to code size. But I'm willing to turn it off when optimizing for performance if people want (also note that TBHs are fairly rare in practice!)

llvm-svn: 284580
2016-10-19 12:06:49 +00:00
Reid Kleckner bdfc05ff93 Re-land "[Thumb] Save/restore high registers in Thumb1 pro/epilogues"
Reverts r283938 to reinstate r283867 with a fix.

The original change had an ArrayRef referring to a destroyed temporary
initializer list. Use plain C arrays instead.

llvm-svn: 283942
2016-10-11 21:14:03 +00:00
Reid Kleckner f4876beb2b Revert "[Thumb] Save/restore high registers in Thumb1 pro/epilogues"
This reverts r283867.

This appears to be an infinite loop:

    while (HiRegToSave != AllHighRegs.end() && CopyReg != AllCopyRegs.end()) {
      if (HiRegsToSave.count(*HiRegToSave)) {
        ...

        CopyReg = findNextOrderedReg(++CopyReg, CopyRegs, AllCopyRegs.end());
        HiRegToSave =
            findNextOrderedReg(++HiRegToSave, HiRegsToSave, AllHighRegs.end());
      }
    }

llvm-svn: 283938
2016-10-11 20:54:41 +00:00
Oliver Stannard d2083fb356 [Thumb] Save/restore high registers in Thumb1 pro/epilogues
The high registers are not allocatable in Thumb1 functions, but they
could still be used by inline assembly, so we need to save and restore
the callee-saved high registers (r8-r11) in the prologue and epilogue.

This is complicated by the fact that the Thumb1 push and pop
instructions cannot access these registers. Therefore, we have to move
them down into low registers before pushing, and move them back after
popping into low registers.

In most functions, we will have low registers that are also being
pushed/popped, which we can use as the temporary registers for
saving/restoring the high registers. However, this is not guaranteed, so
we may need to push some extra low registers to ensure that the high
registers can be saved/restored. For correctness, it would be sufficient
to use just one low register, but if we have enough low registers
available then we only need one push/pop instruction, rather than one
per high register.

We can also use the argument/return registers when they are not live,
and the link register when saving (but not restoring), reducing the
number of extra registers we need to push.

There are still a few extreme edge cases where we need two push/pop
instructions, because not enough low registers can be made live in the
prologue or epilogue.

In addition to the regression tests included here, I've also tested this
using a script to generate functions which clobber different
combinations of registers, have different numbers of argument and return
registers (including variadic arguments), allocate different fixed sized
objects on the stack, and do or don't use variable sized allocas and the
__builtin_return_address intrinsic (all of which affect the available
registers in the prologue and epilogue). I ran these functions in a test
harness which verifies that all of the callee-saved registers are
correctly preserved.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24228

llvm-svn: 283867
2016-10-11 10:12:25 +00:00
James Molloy 9790d8f81d Revert "[Thumb] Teach ISel how to lower compares of AND bitmasks efficiently"
This reverts commit r281323. It caused chromium test failures and a selfhost failure.

llvm-svn: 281451
2016-09-14 09:45:28 +00:00
James Molloy d246c598de [Thumb] Teach ISel how to lower compares of AND bitmasks efficiently
For the common pattern (CMPZ (AND x, #bitmask), #0), we can do some more efficient instruction selection if the bitmask is one consecutive sequence of set bits (32 - clz(bm) - ctz(bm) == popcount(bm)).

1) If the bitmask touches the LSB, then we can remove all the upper bits and set the flags by doing one LSLS.
2) If the bitmask touches the MSB, then we can remove all the lower bits and set the flags with one LSRS.
3) If the bitmask has popcount == 1 (only one set bit), we can shift that bit into the sign bit with one LSLS and change the condition query from NE/EQ to MI/PL (we could also implement this by shifting into the carry bit and branching on BCC/BCS).
4) Otherwise, we can emit a sequence of LSLS+LSRS to remove the upper and lower zero bits of the mask.

1-3 require only one 16-bit instruction and can elide the CMP. 4 requires two 16-bit instructions but can elide the CMP and doesn't require materializing a complex immediate, so is also a win.

llvm-svn: 281323
2016-09-13 12:12:32 +00:00
Nico Weber 7c31d0ebc0 Revert r281215, it caused PR30358.
llvm-svn: 281263
2016-09-12 21:40:50 +00:00
James Molloy 1e1b56bd48 [Thumb] Teach ISel how to lower compares of AND bitmasks efficiently
For the common pattern (CMPZ (AND x, #bitmask), #0), we can do some more efficient instruction selection if the bitmask is one consecutive sequence of set bits (32 - clz(bm) - ctz(bm) == popcount(bm)).

1) If the bitmask touches the LSB, then we can remove all the upper bits and set the flags by doing one LSLS.
2) If the bitmask touches the MSB, then we can remove all the lower bits and set the flags with one LSRS.
3) If the bitmask has popcount == 1 (only one set bit), we can shift that bit into the sign bit with one LSLS and change the condition query from NE/EQ to MI/PL (we could also implement this by shifting into the carry bit and branching on BCC/BCS).
4) Otherwise, we can emit a sequence of LSLS+LSRS to remove the upper and lower zero bits of the mask.

1-3 require only one 16-bit instruction and can elide the CMP. 4 requires two 16-bit instructions but can elide the CMP and doesn't require materializing a complex immediate, so is also a win.

llvm-svn: 281215
2016-09-12 14:30:48 +00:00
James Molloy 4d86bed0bb [Thumb] Select (CMPZ X, -C) -> (CMPZ (ADDS X, C), 0)
The CMPZ #0 disappears during peepholing, leaving just a tADDi3, tADDi8 or t2ADDri. This avoids having to materialize the expensive negative constant in Thumb-1, and allows a shrinking from a 32-bit CMN to a 16-bit ADDS in Thumb-2.

llvm-svn: 281040
2016-09-09 12:52:24 +00:00
Saleem Abdulrasool 02d9851c1c CodeGen: ensure that libcalls are always AAPCS CC
The original commit was too aggressive about marking LibCalls as AAPCS.  The
libcalls contain libc/libm/libunwind calls which are not AAPCS, but C.

llvm-svn: 280833
2016-09-07 17:56:09 +00:00
Saleem Abdulrasool a7ade33d16 Revert "CodeGen: ensure that libcalls are always AAPCS CC"
This reverts SVN r280683.  Revert until I figure out why this is breaking lli
tests.

llvm-svn: 280778
2016-09-07 03:17:19 +00:00
Saleem Abdulrasool a6519b1d54 CodeGen: ensure that libcalls are always AAPCS CC
All of the builtins are designed to be invoked with ARM AAPCS CC even on ARM
AAPCS VFP CC hosts.  Tweak the default initialisation to ARM AAPCS CC rather
than C CC for ARM/thumb targets.

The changes to the tests are necessary to ensure that the calling convention for
the lowered library calls are honoured.  Furthermore, these adjustments cause
certain branch invocations to change to branch-and-link since the returned value
needs to be moved across registers (d0 -> r0, r1).

llvm-svn: 280683
2016-09-06 00:28:43 +00:00
Kyle Butt 8699921c4b IfConversion: Fix bug introduced by rescanning diamonds.
Passing the wrong values for predicate-clobbering. Simple to miss.
Added an assert to make this easier to catch in the future.

llvm-svn: 280517
2016-09-02 18:29:26 +00:00
Kyle Butt a8c7371d16 CodeGen: If Convert blocks that would form a diamond when tail-merged.
The following function currently relies on tail-merging for if
conversion to succeed. The common tail of cond_true and cond_false is
extracted, and this then forms a diamond pattern that can be
successfully if converted.

If this block does not get extracted, either because tail-merging is
disabled or the threshold is higher, we should still recognize this
pattern and if-convert it.

Fixed a regression in the original commit. Need to un-reverse branches after
reversing them, or other conversions go awry.

define i32 @t2(i32 %a, i32 %b) nounwind {
entry:
        %tmp1434 = icmp eq i32 %a, %b           ; <i1> [#uses=1]
        br i1 %tmp1434, label %bb17, label %bb.outer

bb.outer:               ; preds = %cond_false, %entry
        %b_addr.021.0.ph = phi i32 [ %b, %entry ], [ %tmp10, %cond_false ]
        %a_addr.026.0.ph = phi i32 [ %a, %entry ], [ %a_addr.026.0, %cond_false ]
        br label %bb

bb:             ; preds = %cond_true, %bb.outer
        %indvar = phi i32 [ 0, %bb.outer ], [ %indvar.next, %cond_true ]
        %tmp. = sub i32 0, %b_addr.021.0.ph
        %tmp.40 = mul i32 %indvar, %tmp.
        %a_addr.026.0 = add i32 %tmp.40, %a_addr.026.0.ph
        %tmp3 = icmp sgt i32 %a_addr.026.0, %b_addr.021.0.ph
        br i1 %tmp3, label %cond_true, label %cond_false

cond_true:              ; preds = %bb
        %tmp7 = sub i32 %a_addr.026.0, %b_addr.021.0.ph
        %tmp1437 = icmp eq i32 %tmp7, %b_addr.021.0.ph
        %indvar.next = add i32 %indvar, 1
        br i1 %tmp1437, label %bb17, label %bb

cond_false:             ; preds = %bb
        %tmp10 = sub i32 %b_addr.021.0.ph, %a_addr.026.0
        %tmp14 = icmp eq i32 %a_addr.026.0, %tmp10
        br i1 %tmp14, label %bb17, label %bb.outer

bb17:           ; preds = %cond_false, %cond_true, %entry
        %a_addr.026.1 = phi i32 [ %a, %entry ], [ %tmp7, %cond_true ], [ %a_addr.026.0, %cond_false ]
        ret i32 %a_addr.026.1
}

Without tail-merging or diamond-tail if conversion:
LBB1_1:                                 @ %bb
                                        @ =>This Inner Loop Header: Depth=1
        cmp     r0, r1
        ble     LBB1_3
@ BB#2:                                 @ %cond_true
                                        @   in Loop: Header=BB1_1 Depth=1
        subs    r0, r0, r1
        cmp     r1, r0
        it      ne
        cmpne   r0, r1
        bgt     LBB1_4
LBB1_3:                                 @ %cond_false
                                        @   in Loop: Header=BB1_1 Depth=1
        subs    r1, r1, r0
        cmp     r1, r0
        bne     LBB1_1
LBB1_4:                                 @ %bb17
        bx      lr

With diamond-tail if conversion, but without tail-merging:
@ BB#0:                                 @ %entry
        cmp     r0, r1
        it      eq
        bxeq    lr
LBB1_1:                                 @ %bb
                                        @ =>This Inner Loop Header: Depth=1
        cmp     r0, r1
        ite     le
        suble   r1, r1, r0
        subgt   r0, r0, r1
        cmp     r1, r0
        bne     LBB1_1
@ BB#2:                                 @ %bb17
        bx      lr

llvm-svn: 279671
2016-08-24 21:34:27 +00:00
Kyle Butt 6262ca3448 IfConversion: Rescan diamonds.
The cost of predicating a diamond is only the instructions that are not shared
between the two branches. Additionally If a predicate clobbering instruction
occurs in the shared portion of the branches (e.g. a cond move), it may still
be possible to if convert the sub-cfg. This change handles these two facts by
rescanning the non-shared portion of a diamond sub-cfg to recalculate both the
predication cost and whether both blocks are pred-clobbering.

Fixed 2 bugs before recommitting. Branch instructions must be compared and found
identical before diamond conversion. Also, predicate-clobbering instructions in
the shared prefix disqualifies a potential diamond conversion. Includes tests
for both.

llvm-svn: 279670
2016-08-24 21:34:24 +00:00
Oliver Stannard 9aa6f010a4 [ARM] Generate consistent frame records for Thumb2
There is not an official documented ABI for frame pointers in Thumb2,
but we should try to emit something which is useful.

We use r7 as the frame pointer for Thumb code, which currently means
that if a function needs to save a high register (r8-r11), it will get
pushed to the stack between the frame pointer (r7) and link register
(r14). This means that while a stack unwinder can follow the chain of
frame pointers up the stack, it cannot know the offset to lr, so does
not know which functions correspond to the stack frames.

To fix this, we need to push the callee-saved registers in two batches,
with the first push saving the low registers, fp and lr, and the second
push saving the high registers. This is already implemented, but
previously only used for iOS. This patch turns it on for all Thumb2
targets when frame pointers are required by the ABI, and the frame
pointer is r7 (Windows uses r11, so this isn't a problem there). If
frame pointer elimination is enabled we still emit a single push/pop
even if we need a frame pointer for other reasons, to avoid increasing
code size.

We must also ensure that lr is pushed to the stack when using a frame
pointer, so that we end up with a complete frame record. Situations that
could cause this were rare, because we already push lr in most
situations so that we can return using the pop instruction.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23516

llvm-svn: 279506
2016-08-23 09:19:22 +00:00
Kyle Butt ce0196de3f Revert "CodeGen: If Convert blocks that would form a diamond when tail-merged."
This reverts commit 0fda93481c4231c06b838ef476c0c404c51ff875.

llvm-svn: 279288
2016-08-19 18:17:04 +00:00
Kyle Butt 780b517d6b CodeGen: If Convert blocks that would form a diamond when tail-merged.
The following function currently relies on tail-merging for if
conversion to succeed. The common tail of cond_true and cond_false is
extracted, and this then forms a diamond pattern that can be
successfully if converted.

If this block does not get extracted, either because tail-merging is
disabled or the threshold is higher, we should still recognize this
pattern and if-convert it.

Fixed a regression in the original commit. Need to un-reverse branches after
reversing them, or other conversions go awry.

Regression on self-hosting bots with no obvious explanation. Tidied up range
handling to be more obviously correct, but there was no smoking gun.

define i32 @t2(i32 %a, i32 %b) nounwind {
entry:
        %tmp1434 = icmp eq i32 %a, %b           ; <i1> [#uses=1]
        br i1 %tmp1434, label %bb17, label %bb.outer

bb.outer:               ; preds = %cond_false, %entry
        %b_addr.021.0.ph = phi i32 [ %b, %entry ], [ %tmp10, %cond_false ]
        %a_addr.026.0.ph = phi i32 [ %a, %entry ], [ %a_addr.026.0, %cond_false ]
        br label %bb

bb:             ; preds = %cond_true, %bb.outer
        %indvar = phi i32 [ 0, %bb.outer ], [ %indvar.next, %cond_true ]
        %tmp. = sub i32 0, %b_addr.021.0.ph
        %tmp.40 = mul i32 %indvar, %tmp.
        %a_addr.026.0 = add i32 %tmp.40, %a_addr.026.0.ph
        %tmp3 = icmp sgt i32 %a_addr.026.0, %b_addr.021.0.ph
        br i1 %tmp3, label %cond_true, label %cond_false

cond_true:              ; preds = %bb
        %tmp7 = sub i32 %a_addr.026.0, %b_addr.021.0.ph
        %tmp1437 = icmp eq i32 %tmp7, %b_addr.021.0.ph
        %indvar.next = add i32 %indvar, 1
        br i1 %tmp1437, label %bb17, label %bb

cond_false:             ; preds = %bb
        %tmp10 = sub i32 %b_addr.021.0.ph, %a_addr.026.0
        %tmp14 = icmp eq i32 %a_addr.026.0, %tmp10
        br i1 %tmp14, label %bb17, label %bb.outer

bb17:           ; preds = %cond_false, %cond_true, %entry
        %a_addr.026.1 = phi i32 [ %a, %entry ], [ %tmp7, %cond_true ], [ %a_addr.026.0, %cond_false ]
        ret i32 %a_addr.026.1
}

Without tail-merging or diamond-tail if conversion:
LBB1_1:                                 @ %bb
                                        @ =>This Inner Loop Header: Depth=1
        cmp     r0, r1
        ble     LBB1_3
@ BB#2:                                 @ %cond_true
                                        @   in Loop: Header=BB1_1 Depth=1
        subs    r0, r0, r1
        cmp     r1, r0
        it      ne
        cmpne   r0, r1
        bgt     LBB1_4
LBB1_3:                                 @ %cond_false
                                        @   in Loop: Header=BB1_1 Depth=1
        subs    r1, r1, r0
        cmp     r1, r0
        bne     LBB1_1
LBB1_4:                                 @ %bb17
        bx      lr

With diamond-tail if conversion, but without tail-merging:
@ BB#0:                                 @ %entry
        cmp     r0, r1
        it      eq
        bxeq    lr
LBB1_1:                                 @ %bb
                                        @ =>This Inner Loop Header: Depth=1
        cmp     r0, r1
        ite     le
        suble   r1, r1, r0
        subgt   r0, r0, r1
        cmp     r1, r0
        bne     LBB1_1
@ BB#2:                                 @ %bb17
        bx      lr

llvm-svn: 279168
2016-08-18 22:09:27 +00:00
Diana Picus 68be1eb885 Revert "CodeGen: If Convert blocks that would form a diamond when tail-merged."
This reverts commit r278287.

This commit broke the clang-cmake-thumbv7-a15-full-sh bot.
See https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=28949

llvm-svn: 278621
2016-08-14 02:10:18 +00:00
Kyle Butt e1c931b171 CodeGen: If Convert blocks that would form a diamond when tail-merged.
The following function currently relies on tail-merging for if
conversion to succeed. The common tail of cond_true and cond_false is
extracted, and this then forms a diamond pattern that can be
successfully if converted.

If this block does not get extracted, either because tail-merging is
disabled or the threshold is higher, we should still recognize this
pattern and if-convert it.

Fixed a regression in the original commit. Need to un-reverse branches after
reversing them, or other conversions go awry.

define i32 @t2(i32 %a, i32 %b) nounwind {
entry:
        %tmp1434 = icmp eq i32 %a, %b           ; <i1> [#uses=1]
        br i1 %tmp1434, label %bb17, label %bb.outer

bb.outer:               ; preds = %cond_false, %entry
        %b_addr.021.0.ph = phi i32 [ %b, %entry ], [ %tmp10, %cond_false ]
        %a_addr.026.0.ph = phi i32 [ %a, %entry ], [ %a_addr.026.0, %cond_false ]
        br label %bb

bb:             ; preds = %cond_true, %bb.outer
        %indvar = phi i32 [ 0, %bb.outer ], [ %indvar.next, %cond_true ]
        %tmp. = sub i32 0, %b_addr.021.0.ph
        %tmp.40 = mul i32 %indvar, %tmp.
        %a_addr.026.0 = add i32 %tmp.40, %a_addr.026.0.ph
        %tmp3 = icmp sgt i32 %a_addr.026.0, %b_addr.021.0.ph
        br i1 %tmp3, label %cond_true, label %cond_false

cond_true:              ; preds = %bb
        %tmp7 = sub i32 %a_addr.026.0, %b_addr.021.0.ph
        %tmp1437 = icmp eq i32 %tmp7, %b_addr.021.0.ph
        %indvar.next = add i32 %indvar, 1
        br i1 %tmp1437, label %bb17, label %bb

cond_false:             ; preds = %bb
        %tmp10 = sub i32 %b_addr.021.0.ph, %a_addr.026.0
        %tmp14 = icmp eq i32 %a_addr.026.0, %tmp10
        br i1 %tmp14, label %bb17, label %bb.outer

bb17:           ; preds = %cond_false, %cond_true, %entry
        %a_addr.026.1 = phi i32 [ %a, %entry ], [ %tmp7, %cond_true ], [ %a_addr.026.0, %cond_false ]
        ret i32 %a_addr.026.1
}

Without tail-merging or diamond-tail if conversion:
LBB1_1:                                 @ %bb
                                        @ =>This Inner Loop Header: Depth=1
        cmp     r0, r1
        ble     LBB1_3
@ BB#2:                                 @ %cond_true
                                        @   in Loop: Header=BB1_1 Depth=1
        subs    r0, r0, r1
        cmp     r1, r0
        it      ne
        cmpne   r0, r1
        bgt     LBB1_4
LBB1_3:                                 @ %cond_false
                                        @   in Loop: Header=BB1_1 Depth=1
        subs    r1, r1, r0
        cmp     r1, r0
        bne     LBB1_1
LBB1_4:                                 @ %bb17
        bx      lr

With diamond-tail if conversion, but without tail-merging:
@ BB#0:                                 @ %entry
        cmp     r0, r1
        it      eq
        bxeq    lr
LBB1_1:                                 @ %bb
                                        @ =>This Inner Loop Header: Depth=1
        cmp     r0, r1
        ite     le
        suble   r1, r1, r0
        subgt   r0, r0, r1
        cmp     r1, r0
        bne     LBB1_1
@ BB#2:                                 @ %bb17
        bx      lr

llvm-svn: 278287
2016-08-10 20:45:56 +00:00
Sam Parker 62965c96df [ARM] Improve sxta{b|h} and uxta{b|h} tests
Created a Thumb2 predicated pattern matcher that uses Thumb2 and
HasT2ExtractPack and used it to redefine the patterns for sxta{b|h}
and uxta{b|h}. Also used the similar patterns to fill in isel pattern
gaps for the corresponding instructions in the ARM backend.
The patch is mainly changes to tests since most of this functionality
appears not to have been tested.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23273

llvm-svn: 278207
2016-08-10 09:34:34 +00:00
Nico Weber 99ceee8a85 Revert r277905, it caused PR28894
llvm-svn: 277962
2016-08-07 20:18:04 +00:00
Kyle Butt 71cb44d969 CodeGen: If Convert blocks that would form a diamond when tail-merged.
The following function currently relies on tail-merging for if
conversion to succeed. The common tail of cond_true and cond_false is
extracted, and this then forms a diamond pattern that can be
successfully if converted.

If this block does not get extracted, either because tail-merging is
disabled or the threshold is higher, we should still recognize this
pattern and if-convert it.
define i32 @t2(i32 %a, i32 %b) nounwind {
entry:
	%tmp1434 = icmp eq i32 %a, %b		; <i1> [#uses=1]
	br i1 %tmp1434, label %bb17, label %bb.outer

bb.outer:		; preds = %cond_false, %entry
	%b_addr.021.0.ph = phi i32 [ %b, %entry ], [ %tmp10, %cond_false ]
	%a_addr.026.0.ph = phi i32 [ %a, %entry ], [ %a_addr.026.0, %cond_false ]
	br label %bb

bb:		; preds = %cond_true, %bb.outer
	%indvar = phi i32 [ 0, %bb.outer ], [ %indvar.next, %cond_true ]
	%tmp. = sub i32 0, %b_addr.021.0.ph
	%tmp.40 = mul i32 %indvar, %tmp.
	%a_addr.026.0 = add i32 %tmp.40, %a_addr.026.0.ph
	%tmp3 = icmp sgt i32 %a_addr.026.0, %b_addr.021.0.ph
	br i1 %tmp3, label %cond_true, label %cond_false

cond_true:		; preds = %bb
	%tmp7 = sub i32 %a_addr.026.0, %b_addr.021.0.ph
	%tmp1437 = icmp eq i32 %tmp7, %b_addr.021.0.ph
	%indvar.next = add i32 %indvar, 1
	br i1 %tmp1437, label %bb17, label %bb

cond_false:		; preds = %bb
	%tmp10 = sub i32 %b_addr.021.0.ph, %a_addr.026.0
	%tmp14 = icmp eq i32 %a_addr.026.0, %tmp10
	br i1 %tmp14, label %bb17, label %bb.outer

bb17:		; preds = %cond_false, %cond_true, %entry
	%a_addr.026.1 = phi i32 [ %a, %entry ], [ %tmp7, %cond_true ], [ %a_addr.026.0, %cond_false ]
	ret i32 %a_addr.026.1
}

Without tail-merging or diamond-tail if conversion:
LBB1_1:                                 @ %bb
                                        @ =>This Inner Loop Header: Depth=1
        cmp     r0, r1
        ble     LBB1_3
@ BB#2:                                 @ %cond_true
                                        @   in Loop: Header=BB1_1 Depth=1
        subs    r0, r0, r1
        cmp     r1, r0
        it      ne
        cmpne   r0, r1
        bgt     LBB1_4
LBB1_3:                                 @ %cond_false
                                        @   in Loop: Header=BB1_1 Depth=1
        subs    r1, r1, r0
        cmp     r1, r0
        bne     LBB1_1
LBB1_4:                                 @ %bb17
        bx      lr

With diamond-tail if conversion, but without tail-merging:
@ BB#0:                                 @ %entry
        cmp     r0, r1
        it      eq
        bxeq    lr
LBB1_1:                                 @ %bb
                                        @ =>This Inner Loop Header: Depth=1
        cmp     r0, r1
        ite     le
        suble   r1, r1, r0
        subgt   r0, r0, r1
        cmp     r1, r0
        bne     LBB1_1
@ BB#2:                                 @ %bb17
        bx      lr

llvm-svn: 277905
2016-08-06 01:52:37 +00:00
James Molloy ae5ff990ae [Thumb] Reapply r272251 with a fix for PR28348 (mk 2)
The important thing I was missing was ensuring newly added constants were kept in topological order. Repositioning the node is correct if the constant is newly added (so it has no topological ordering) but wrong if it already existed - positioning it next in the worklist would break the topological ordering.

Original commit message:
  [Thumb] Select a BIC instead of AND if the immediate can be encoded more optimally negated

  If an immediate is only used in an AND node, it is possible that the immediate can be more optimally materialized when negated. If this is the case, we can negate the immediate and use a BIC instead;

    int i(int a) {
      return a & 0xfffffeec;
    }

  Used to produce:
      ldr r1, [CONSTPOOL]
      ands r0, r1
    CONSTPOOL: 0xfffffeec

  And now produces:
      movs    r1, #255
      adds    r1, #20  ; Less costly immediate generation
      bics    r0, r1

llvm-svn: 274543
2016-07-05 12:37:13 +00:00
James Molloy c3b4ed4a70 Revert "[Thumb] Reapply r272251 with a fix for PR28348"
This reverts commit r274510 - it made green dragon unhappy.

llvm-svn: 274512
2016-07-04 17:14:24 +00:00
James Molloy 9f019835ef [Thumb] Reapply r272251 with a fix for PR28348
We were using DAG->getConstant instead of DAG->getTargetConstant. This meant that we could inadvertently increase the use count of a constant if stars aligned, which it did in this testcase. Increasing the use count of the constant could cause ISel to fall over (because DAGToDAG lowering assumed the constant had only one use!)

Original commit message:
  [Thumb] Select a BIC instead of AND if the immediate can be encoded more optimally negated

  If an immediate is only used in an AND node, it is possible that the immediate can be more optimally materialized when negated. If this is the case, we can negate the immediate and use a BIC instead;

    int i(int a) {
      return a & 0xfffffeec;
    }

  Used to produce:
      ldr r1, [CONSTPOOL]
      ands r0, r1
    CONSTPOOL: 0xfffffeec

  And now produces:
      movs    r1, #255
      adds    r1, #20  ; Less costly immediate generation
      bics    r0, r1

llvm-svn: 274510
2016-07-04 16:35:41 +00:00
Kyle Butt 267164df0a Codegen: Fix broken assumption in Tail Merge.
Tail merge was making the assumption that a layout successor or
predecessor was always a cfg successor/predecessor. Remove that
assumption. Changes to tests are necessary because the errant cfg edges
were preventing optimizations.

llvm-svn: 273700
2016-06-24 18:16:36 +00:00
Artur Pilipenko 4fec7b7131 Fix an old memset signature in 2009-09-01-PostRAProlog.ll test causing a buildbot failure
llvm-svn: 273573
2016-06-23 16:07:10 +00:00
Rafael Espindola afade35003 Don't print (PLT) on arm.
The R_ARM_PLT32 relocation is deprecated and is not produced by MC.

This means that the code being deleted is dead from the .o point of
view and was making the .s more confusing.

llvm-svn: 272909
2016-06-16 16:09:53 +00:00
Tim Northover b5ece527a1 ARM: stop emitting blx instructions for most calls on MachO.
I'm really not sure why we were in the first place, it's the linker's job to
convert between BL/BLX as necessary. Even worse, using BLX left Thumb calls
that could be locally resolved completely unencodable since all offsets to BLX
are multiples of 4.

rdar://26182344

llvm-svn: 269101
2016-05-10 19:17:47 +00:00
Mandeep Singh Grang e5a2f116d6 Fix PR26655: Bail out if all regs of an inst BUNDLE have the correct kill flag
Summary:
While setting kill flags on instructions inside a BUNDLE, we bail out as soon
as we set kill flag on a register.  But we are missing a check when all the
registers already have the correct kill flag set. We need to bail out in that
case as well.

This patch refactors the old code and simply makes use of the addRegisterKilled
function in MachineInstr.cpp in order to determine whether to set/remove kill
on an instruction.

Reviewers: apazos, t.p.northover, pete, MatzeB

Subscribers: MatzeB, davide, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17356

llvm-svn: 269092
2016-05-10 17:57:27 +00:00
Tim Northover a6dea06fe3 ARM: use r7 as the frame-pointer on all MachO targets.
This is better for a few reasons:
  + It matches the other tooling for iOS.
  + It matches EABI in more cases (i.e. Thumb-mode, and in practice we don't
    use ARM mode).
  + It leads to infinitesimally smaller code (0.2%, yay!).

rdar://25369506

llvm-svn: 266003
2016-04-11 22:27:40 +00:00
Kyle Butt 5e241b11ed [Codegen] Decrease minimum jump table density.
Minimum density for both optsize and non optsize are now options
-sparse-jump-table-density (default 10) for non optsize functions
-dense-jump-table-density (default 40) for optsize functions, which
matches the current default. This improves several benchmarks at google
at the cost of a small codesize increase. For code compiled with -Os,
the old behavior continues

llvm-svn: 264689
2016-03-29 00:23:41 +00:00
Matthias Braun f290912d22 ARM: Introduce conservative load/store optimization mode
Most of the time ARM has the CCR.UNALIGN_TRP bit set to false which
means that unaligned loads/stores do not trap and even extensive testing
will not catch these bugs. However the multi/double variants are not
affected by this bit and will still trap. In effect a more aggressive
load/store optimization will break existing (bad) code.

These bugs do not necessarily manifest in the broken code where the
misaligned pointer is formed but often later in perfectly legal code
where it is accessed. This means recompiling system libraries (which
have no alignment bugs) with a newer compiler will break existing
applications (with alignment bugs) that worked before.

So (under protest) I implemented this safe mode which limits the
formation of multi/double operations to cases that are not affected by
user code (stack operations like spills/reloads) or cases where the
normal operations trap anyway (floating point load/stores). It is
disabled by default.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17015

llvm-svn: 262504
2016-03-02 19:20:00 +00:00
Wei Mi a49559befb [SCEV] Try to reuse existing value during SCEV expansion
Current SCEV expansion will expand SCEV as a sequence of operations
and doesn't utilize the value already existed. This will introduce
redundent computation which may not be cleaned up throughly by
following optimizations.

This patch introduces an ExprValueMap which is a map from SCEV to the
set of equal values with the same SCEV. When a SCEV is expanded, the
set of values is checked and reused whenever possible before generating
a sequence of operations.

The original commit triggered regressions in Polly tests. The regressions
exposed two problems which have been fixed in current version.

1. Polly will generate a new function based on the old one. To generate an
instruction for the new function, it builds SCEV for the old instruction,
applies some tranformation on the SCEV generated, then expands the transformed
SCEV and insert the expanded value into new function. Because SCEV expansion
may reuse value cached in ExprValueMap, the value in old function may be
inserted into new function, which is wrong.
   In SCEVExpander::expand, there is a logic to check the cached value to
be used should dominate the insertion point. However, for the above
case, the check always passes. That is because the insertion point is
in a new function, which is unreachable from the old function. However
for unreachable node, DominatorTreeBase::dominates thinks it will be
dominated by any other node.
   The fix is to simply add a check that the cached value to be used in
expansion should be in the same function as the insertion point instruction.

2. When the SCEV is of scConstant type, expanding it directly is cheaper than
reusing a normal value cached. Although in the cached value set in ExprValueMap,
there is a Constant type value, but it is not easy to find it out -- the cached
Value set is not sorted according to the potential cost. Existing reuse logic
in SCEVExpander::expand simply chooses the first legal element from the cached
value set.
   The fix is that when the SCEV is of scConstant type, don't try the reuse
logic. simply expand it.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12090

llvm-svn: 259736
2016-02-04 01:27:38 +00:00
Wei Mi 97de385868 Revert r259662, which caused regressions on polly tests.
llvm-svn: 259675
2016-02-03 18:05:57 +00:00
Wei Mi ed133978a0 [SCEV] Try to reuse existing value during SCEV expansion
Current SCEV expansion will expand SCEV as a sequence of operations
and doesn't utilize the value already existed. This will introduce
redundent computation which may not be cleaned up throughly by
following optimizations.

This patch introduces an ExprValueMap which is a map from SCEV to the
set of equal values with the same SCEV. When a SCEV is expanded, the
set of values is checked and reused whenever possible before generating
a sequence of operations.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12090

llvm-svn: 259662
2016-02-03 17:05:12 +00:00
David Majnemer bff6b581e2 Address buildbot fallout from r259065
llvm-svn: 259074
2016-01-28 18:59:04 +00:00
Dan Gohman 61d15ae4f5 [MC] Use .p2align instead of .align
For historic reasons, the behavior of .align differs between targets.
Fortunately, there are alternatives, .p2align and .balign, which make the
interpretation of the parameter explicit, and which behave consistently across
targets.

This patch teaches MC to use .p2align instead of .align, so that people reading
code for multiple architectures don't have to remember which way each platform
does its .align directive.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16549

llvm-svn: 258750
2016-01-26 00:03:25 +00:00
Bill Seurer aea3d38d81 Fix test case label check
Several (but not all) of the labels that are checked for in this test case
are checked as strings instead of labels.  This can cause an apparent test
case failure if they are tested in an appropriately named directory.

For example, one of them that fails:

define zeroext i32 @test2(i32 %A.u, i32 %B.u)  {
; A8: test2
; A8: uxtab  r0, r0, r1


Output that causes it to fail:

. . .
	.file	"/home/seurer/llvm/llvm-test2/test/CodeGen/Thumb2/thumb2-uxt_rot.ll"
. . .
	.globl	test2
	.align	1
	.type	test2,%function
	.code	16                      @ @test2
	.thumb_func
test2:
	.fnstart


The "A8: test2" matches on the directory name instead of the label.

llvm-svn: 253702
2015-11-20 20:24:49 +00:00
Pete Cooper 67cf9a723b Revert "Change memcpy/memset/memmove to have dest and source alignments."
This reverts commit r253511.

This likely broke the bots in
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64-elf-linux2/builds/20202
http://bb.pgr.jp/builders/clang-3stage-i686-linux/builds/3787

llvm-svn: 253543
2015-11-19 05:56:52 +00:00
Pete Cooper 72bc23ef02 Change memcpy/memset/memmove to have dest and source alignments.
Note, this was reviewed (and more details are in) http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20151109/312083.html

These intrinsics currently have an explicit alignment argument which is
required to be a constant integer.  It represents the alignment of the
source and dest, and so must be the minimum of those.

This change allows source and dest to each have their own alignments
by using the alignment attribute on their arguments.  The alignment
argument itself is removed.

There are a few places in the code for which the code needs to be
checked by an expert as to whether using only src/dest alignment is
safe.  For those places, they currently take the minimum of src/dest
alignments which matches the current behaviour.

For example, code which used to read:
  call void @llvm.memcpy.p0i8.p0i8.i32(i8* %dest, i8* %src, i32 500, i32 8, i1 false)
will now read:
  call void @llvm.memcpy.p0i8.p0i8.i32(i8* align 8 %dest, i8* align 8 %src, i32 500, i1 false)

For out of tree owners, I was able to strip alignment from calls using sed by replacing:
  (call.*llvm\.memset.*)i32\ [0-9]*\,\ i1 false\)
with:
  $1i1 false)

and similarly for memmove and memcpy.

I then added back in alignment to test cases which needed it.

A similar commit will be made to clang which actually has many differences in alignment as now
IRBuilder can generate different source/dest alignments on calls.

In IRBuilder itself, a new argument was added.  Instead of calling:
  CreateMemCpy(Dst, Src, getInt64(Size), DstAlign, /* isVolatile */ false)
you now call
  CreateMemCpy(Dst, Src, getInt64(Size), DstAlign, SrcAlign, /* isVolatile */ false)

There is a temporary class (IntegerAlignment) which takes the source alignment and rejects
implicit conversion from bool.  This is to prevent isVolatile here from passing its default
parameter to the source alignment.

Note, changes in future can now be made to codegen.  I didn't change anything here, but this
change should enable better memcpy code sequences.

Reviewed by Hal Finkel.

llvm-svn: 253511
2015-11-18 22:17:24 +00:00
Quentin Colombet 8cb95b8e51 [ARM] Enable shrink-wrapping by default.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14357

rdar://problem/21942589

llvm-svn: 253411
2015-11-18 00:40:54 +00:00
Renato Golin 93064025bd Revert "[ARM] Enable shrink-wrapping by default."
This reverts commit r252825, as it broke ASAN on ARM. Investigating...

llvm-svn: 252889
2015-11-12 13:34:50 +00:00