When linking the linux kernel on ppc64le
ld.lld -EL -m elf64lppc -Bstatic --orphan-handling=warn --build-id -o
.tmp_vmlinux1 -T ./arch/powerpc/kernel/vmlinux.lds --whole-archive
built-in.a --no-whole-archive --start-group lib/lib.a --end-group
ld.lld: error: discarding .rela.plt section is not allowed
The linker script discards with the following matches
*(.glink .iplt .plt .rela* .comment)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54871
llvm-svn: 348258
When linking the linux kernel on ppc64 and ppc
ld.lld: error: unrecognized reloc 11
11 is PPC_REL14 and PPC64_REL14
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54868
llvm-svn: 348255
Summary:
Partitions include graphs in auto-index so that each shards contains
only part of the include graph related to itself.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55062
llvm-svn: 348252
PR17686 demonstrates that for some targets FP exceptions can fire in cases where the FP_TO_UINT is expanded using a FP_TO_SINT instruction.
The existing code converts both the inrange and outofrange cases using FP_TO_SINT and then selects the result, this patch changes this for 'strict' cases to pre-select the FP_TO_SINT input and the offset adjustment.
The X87 cases don't need the strict flag but generates much nicer code with it....
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53794
llvm-svn: 348251
Summary:
r348240 assumes that an expression contains the Objective C option if
Objective C Runtime is found. But on MacOS X it seems that the test application
process always contains Objective C Runtime, so the test fails when it assumes
that the language is C++ only. Skip this part on Darwin.
llvm-svn: 348250
As of rev. 268898, clang supports __float128 on SystemZ. This seems to
have been in error. GCC has never supported __float128 on SystemZ,
since the "long double" type on the platform is already IEEE-128. (GCC
only supports __float128 on platforms where "long double" is some other
data type.)
For compatibility reasons this patch removes __float128 on SystemZ
again. The test case is updated accordingly.
llvm-svn: 348247
Add support for ISD::*_EXTEND and ISD::*_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG opcodes.
The extra broadcast in trunc-subvector.ll will be fixed in an upcoming patch.
llvm-svn: 348246
Previously, the iterator range checker only warned upon dereferencing of
iterators outside their valid range as well as increments and decrements of
out-of-range iterators where the result remains out-of-range. However, the C++
standard is more strict than this: decrementing begin() or incrementing end()
results in undefined behaviour even if the iterator is not dereferenced
afterwards. Coming back to the range once out-of-range is also undefined.
This patch corrects the behaviour of the iterator range checker: warnings are
given for any operation whose result is ahead of begin() or past the end()
(which is the past-end iterator itself, thus now we are speaking of past
past-the-end).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53812
llvm-svn: 348245
If an iterator is represented by a derived C++ class but its comparison operator
is for its base the iterator checkers cannot recognize the iterators compared.
This results in false positives in very straightforward cases (range error when
dereferencing an iterator after disclosing that it is equal to the past-the-end
iterator).
To overcome this problem we always use the region of the topmost base class for
iterators stored in a region. A new method called getMostDerivedObjectRegion()
was added to the MemRegion class to get this region.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54466
llvm-svn: 348244
Summary:
This patch adds the check of the language before ignoring names like `id` or
`Class`, which are reserved in Objective C, but are allowed in C++. It is needed
to make it possible to evaluate expressions in a C++ program containing names
like `id` or `Class`.
Reviewers: jingham, zturner, labath, clayborg
Reviewed By: jingham, clayborg
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54843
llvm-svn: 348240
Summary:
In our codebase, `static_assert(std::some_type_trait<Ts...>::value, "msg")`
(where `some_type_trait` is an std type_trait and `Ts...` is the
appropriate template parameters) account for 11.2% of the `static_assert`s.
In these cases, the `Ts` are typically not spelled out explicitly, e.g.
`static_assert(std::is_same<SomeT::TypeT, typename SomeDependentT::value_type>::value, "message");`
The diagnostic when the assert fails is typically not very useful, e.g.
`static_assert failed due to requirement 'std::is_same<SomeT::TypeT, typename SomeDependentT::value_type>::value' "message"`
This change makes the diagnostic spell out the types explicitly , e.g.
`static_assert failed due to requirement 'std::is_same<int, float>::value' "message"`
See tests for more examples.
After this is submitted, I intend to handle
`static_assert(!std::some_type_trait<Ts...>::value, "msg")`,
which is another 6.6% of static_asserts.
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54903
llvm-svn: 348239
We only needed this because it provided really aggressive constant folding even through constant pool entries created from build_vectors. The main case was for vXi8 MULH legalization which was happening as part of legalize DAG instead of as part of legalize vector ops. Now its part of vector op legalization and we've added special handling for build vectors of all constants there. This has removed the need for this code on the list tests we have.
llvm-svn: 348237
This finishes the soft-transition to the new primitive that implements
priority inheritance.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55244
llvm-svn: 348236
Includes "resize" and "shrink" because they can reset the object to a known
state in certain circumstances.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54563
llvm-svn: 348235
When the global new and delete operators aren't declared, Clang
provides and implicit declaration, but this declaration currently
always uses the default visibility. This is a problem when the
C++ library itself is being built with non-default visibility because
the implicit declaration will force the new and delete operators to
have the default visibility unlike the rest of the library.
The existing workaround is to use assembly to enforce the visiblity:
https://fuchsia.googlesource.com/zircon/+/master/system/ulib/zxcpp/new.cpp#108
but that solution is not always available, e.g. in the case of of
libFuzzer which is using an internal version of libc++ that's also built
with -fvisibility=hidden where the existing behavior is causing issues.
This change introduces a new option -fvisibility-global-new-delete-hidden
which makes the implicit declaration of the global new and delete
operators hidden.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53787
llvm-svn: 348234
headers.
Previously, we would only check whether the new declaration is in a
system header, but that requires the user to be able to correctly guess
whether a declaration in a system header is declared as a struct or a
class when specializing standard library traits templates.
We now entirely ignore declarations for which the warning was disabled
when determining whether to warn on a tag mismatch.
Also extend the diagnostic message to clarify that
a) code containing such a tag mismatch is in fact valid and correct,
and
b) the (non-coding-style) reason to emit such a warning is that the
Microsoft C++ ABI is broken and includes the tag kind in decorated
names,
as it seems a lot of users are confused by our diagnostic here (either
not understanding why we produce it, or believing that it represents an
actual language rule).
llvm-svn: 348233
The res returned value might differ with REAL(strlen)(errbuf) + 1,
as the buffer's value is limited with errbuf_size.
Hot fix for D54584.
llvm-svn: 348231
The warning piece traditionally describes the bug itself, i.e.
"The bug is a _____", eg. "Attempt to delete released memory",
"Resource leak", "Method call on a moved-from object".
Event pieces produced by the visitor are usually in a present tense, i.e.
"At this moment _____": "Memory is released", "File is closed",
"Object is moved".
Additionally, type information is added into the event pieces for STL objects
(in order to highlight that it is in fact an STL object), and the respective
event piece now mentions that the object is left in an unspecified state
after it was moved, which is a vital piece of information to understand the bug.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54560
llvm-svn: 348229
Summary:
fts(3) is API to traverse a file hierarchy.
Cover this interface with interceptors.
Add a test to validate the interface reading
the number of regular files in /etc.
Based on original work by Yang Zheng.
Reviewers: joerg, vitalybuka
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Subscribers: tomsun.0.7, kubamracek, llvm-commits, mgorny, #sanitizers
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54247
llvm-svn: 348227
This patch renames both methods (NotifyObjectEmitted -> notifyObjectLoaded, and
NotifyObjectFreed -> notifyObjectFreed), adds an abstract "ObjectKey" (uint64_t)
parameter to notifyObjectLoaded, and replaces the ObjectFile parameter for
notifyObjectFreed with an ObjectKey. Using an ObjectKey to track identify
events, rather than a reference to the ObjectFile, allows us to free the
ObjectFile after notifyObjectLoaded is called, saving memory.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D53773
llvm-svn: 348223
The comment was misplaced, and the code didn't do what the comment indicated,
namely ignoring the varargs portion when computing the local stack size of a
funclet in emitEpilogue. This results in incorrect offset computations within
funclets that are contained in vararg functions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55096
llvm-svn: 348222
Summary:
--asan-use-private-alias increases binary sizes by 10% or more.
Most of this space was long names of aliases and new symbols.
These symbols are not needed for the ODC check at all.
Reviewers: eugenis
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55146
llvm-svn: 348221
This moves the stack check logic into a lambda within getOutliningCandidateInfo.
This allows us to be less conservative with stack checks. Whether or not a
stack instruction is safe to outline is dependent on the frame variant and call
variant of the outlined function; only in cases where we modify the stack can
these be unsafe.
So, if we move that logic later, when we're looking at an individual candidate,
we can make better decisions here.
This gives some code size savings as a result.
llvm-svn: 348220
If we dropped too many candidates to be beneficial when dropping candidates
that modify the stack, there's no reason to check for other cost model
qualities.
llvm-svn: 348219
Downstream forks that have their own attributes often run into this
test failing when a new attribute is added to clang because the
number of supported attributes no longer match. This is redundant
information for this test, so we can get by without it.
rdar://46288577
llvm-svn: 348218
add_llvm_external_projects expects the directory name instead of the
full path, otherwise the check for an in-tree subproject will fail and
the project won't be configured.
llvm-svn: 348217
Without this, we don't consider types used by aliasees in our cache key.
This caused issues when using the same cache for thin-linking the same
TU with different sets of virtual call candidates for a virtual call
inside of a constructor. That's sort of a mouthful. :)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55060
llvm-svn: 348216
In some cases different alignments for function might be used to save
space e.g. thumb mode with -Oz will try to use 2 byte function
alignment. Similar patch that fixed this in other areas exists here
https://reviews.llvm.org/D46110
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55115
llvm-svn: 348215
In general case there use-after-move is not a bug. It depends on how the
move-constructor or move-assignment is implemented.
In STL, the convention that applies to most classes is that the move-constructor
(-assignment) leaves an object in a "valid but unspecified" state. Using such
object without resetting it to a known state first is likely a bug. Objects
Local value-type variables are special because due to their automatic lifetime
there is no intention to reuse space. If you want a fresh object, you might
as well make a new variable, no need to move from a variable and than re-use it.
Therefore, it is not always a bug, but it is obviously easy to suppress when it
isn't, and in most cases it indeed is - as there's no valid intention behind
the intentional use of a local after move.
This applies not only to local variables but also to parameter variables,
not only of value type but also of rvalue reference type (but not to lvalue
references).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54557
llvm-svn: 348210
Martell Malone