Summary:
I haven't added it to all the tests, just those that fail without it
(those that aren't header only).
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21247
llvm-svn: 272443
Summary:
Exactly what it sounds like.
I plan to commit this in a couple of days assuming no objections.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20799
llvm-svn: 271464
This patch addresses the following issues in the test suite:
1. Move "std::bad_array_length" test from std/ to libcxx/ test directory
since the feature is not a part of the standard.
2. Rename "futures.tas" test directory to "futures.task" since that is the
correct stable name.
3. Move tests for "packaged_task<T>::result_type" from std/ to libcxx/
test directory since the typedef is a libc++ extension.
llvm-svn: 271430
Quite a few libcxx tests seem to follow the format:
#if _LIBCPP_STD_VER > X
// Do test.
#else
// Empty test.
#endif
We should instead use the UNSUPPORTED lit directive to exclude the test on
earlier C++ standards. This gives us a more accurate number of test passes
for those standards and avoids unnecessary conflicts with other lit
directives on the same tests.
Reviewers: bcraig, ericwf, mclow.lists
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20730
llvm-svn: 271108
Summary:
GLIBC recently removed the incorrect `int isinf(double)` and `int isnan(double)` overloads in C++11 and greater. This causes previously `XFAIL: linux` tests to start passing.
Since there is no longer a way to 'XFAIL' the tests I choose to simply tolerate this bug.
See https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19439
Reviewers: rsmith, mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: jroelofs, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19835
llvm-svn: 271060
Summary:
Out-of-line symbols for <experimental/...> headers are not ABI or API stable and cannot live in the 'libc++.dylib'. Currently they have nowhere to live. I would like to add a new library target `libc++experimental.a` to fix this.
Previously I had suggested different libraries for different TS's (`libc++filesystem.a`, 'libc++LFTS.a`, ect). I no longer think this is the right approach.
Instead `c++experimental` will hold *all* TS implementations as a single monolithic library. I see two main benefits to this:
1. Users only have to know about and manually link one library.
2. It makes it easy to implement TS's with one or two out-of-line symbols. (Ex. PMRs)
`c++experimental` provides NO ABI compatibility. Symbols can freely be added/removed/changed without concern for ABI stability.
I will add documentation for this after landing this patch (but before adding anything to it).
`c++experimental` only builds as a static library. By default CMake will build/test this library but will *NOT* install it.
This patch adds the CMake and LIT logic needed to build/test the new library. Once this lands I plan on using it to implement parts of `<experimental/memory_resource>`.
Reviewers: mclow.lists
Subscribers: cfe-commits, theraven, krememek, dexonsmith, bcraig, beanz, danalbert
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19856
llvm-svn: 268443
Eric Fiselier