There was an extremely confusing proliferation of LLVM intrinsics to implement
the vacge & vacgt instructions. This combines them all into two polymorphic
intrinsics, shared across both backends.
llvm-svn: 200768
Some of the SHA instructions take a scalar i32 as one argument (largely because
they work on 160-bit hash fragments). This wasn't reflected in the IR
previously, with ARM and AArch64 choosing different types (<4 x i32> and <1 x
i32> respectively) which was ugly.
This makes all the affected intrinsics take a uniform "i32", allowing them to
become non-polymorphic at the same time.
llvm-svn: 200706
When the scalar compare is between floating point and operands are
vector, we custom lower SELECT_CC to use NEON SIMD compare for
generating less instructions.
llvm-svn: 200365
The i8 type is not registered with any register class.
This causes a segmentation fault in MachineLICM::getRegisterClassIDAndCost.
The code selects the first type associated with register class FPR8,
which happens to be i8.
It uses this type (i8) to get the representative class pointer, which is 0.
It then uses this pointer to access a field, resulting in segmentation fault.
Since i8 type is not being used for printing any neon instruction
we can safely remove it.
llvm-svn: 200046
It was commited as r199628 but reverted in r199628 as causing
regression test failed. It's because of old vervsion of patch
I used to commit. Sorry for mistake.
llvm-svn: 199704
We should set them to expand for now since there are no patterns
dealing with them. Actually, there are no instructions either so I
doubt they'll ever be acceptable.
llvm-svn: 199265
APInt only knows how to compare values with the same BitWidth and asserts
in all other cases.
With this fix, function PerformORCombine does not use the APInt equality
operator if the APInt values returned by 'isConstantSplat' differ in BitWidth.
In that case they are different and no comparison is needed.
llvm-svn: 199119
This patch covered 2 more scenarios:
1. Two operands of shuffle_vector are the same, like
%shuffle.i = shufflevector <8 x i8> %a, <8 x i8> %a, <8 x i32> <i32 0, i32 2, i32 4, i32 6, i32 8, i32 10, i32 12, i32 14>
2. One of operands is undef, like
%shuffle.i = shufflevector <8 x i8> %a, <8 x i8> undef, <8 x i32> <i32 0, i32 2, i32 4, i32 6, i32 8, i32 10, i32 12, i32 14>
After this patch, perm instructions will have chance to be emitted instead of lots of INS.
llvm-svn: 199069
There is a wrong assumption that the vector element type and the
type of each ConstantSDNode in the build_vector were the same.
However, when promoting the integer operand of a legally typed
build_vector, the operand type and the vector element type do not
need to be the same
(See method 'DAGTypeLegalizer::PromoteIntOp_BUILD_VECTOR' in
LegalizeIntegerTypes.cpp).
in AArch64 backend, the following dag sequence:
C0: i1 = Constant<0>
C1: i1 = Constant<-1>
V: v8i1 = BUILD_VECTOR C1, C1, C0, C0, C0, C0, C0, C0
is type-legalized into:
NewC0: i32 = Constant<0>
NewC1: i32 = Constant<1>
V: v8i8 = BUILD_VECTOR NewC1, NewC1, NewC0, NewC0, NewC0, NewC0, NewC0, NewC0
Forcing a getZeroExtend to VTBits to ensure that the new constant
is correctly.
llvm-svn: 198582
For AArch64 backend, if DAGCombiner see "sext(setcc)", it will
combine them together to a single setcc with extended value type.
Then if it see "zext(setcc)", it assumes setcc is Vxi1, and try to
create "(and (vsetcc), (1, 1, ...)". While setcc isn't Vxi1,
DAGcombiner will create wrong node and get wrong code emitted.
llvm-svn: 198190
DAG.getVectorShuffle() doesn't always return a vector_shuffle node.
If mask is the exact sequence of it's operand(For example, operand_0
is v8i8, and the mask is 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7), it will directly
return that operand. So a check is added here.
llvm-svn: 197967
This failure caused by improper condition when lowering shuffle_vector
to scalar_to_vector. After this patch NEON_VDUP with v1i64 will not
be generated.
llvm-svn: 197966
Check for single use of fmul node in fused multiply patterns
to allow generation of fused multiply add/sub instructions.
Otherwise fmul operation ends up being repeated more than
once which does not help peformance on targets with
only one MAC unit, as for example cortex-a53.
llvm-svn: 197929
The correct pattern matching should be:
- fnmadd is (-Ra) + (-Rn)*Rm which should be matched as:
fma (fneg node:$Rn), node:$Rm, (fneg node:$Ra) and as
(f32 (fsub (f32 (fneg FPR32:$Ra)), (f32 (fmul FPR32:$Rn, FPR32:$Rm))))
- fnmsub is (-Ra) + Rn*Rm which should be matched as
fma node:$Rn, node:$Rm, (fneg node:$Ra) and as
(f32 (fsub (f32 (fmul FPR32:$Rn, FPR32:$Rm)), FPR32:$Ra))))
llvm-svn: 197928
Hao Liu