Summary:
Libcxx will define its own max_align_t when it is not available. However, the
availability checks today only check for Clang's definition and GCC's
definition. In particular, it does not check for musl's definition, which is the
same as GCC's but guarded with a different macro.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: chandlerc, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28478
llvm-svn: 294683
There are a bunch of macros (__need_size_t etc) that request just one piece of
<stddef.h>; if any one of these is defined, we just directly include the
underlying header.
Note that <stddef.h> provides a ::nullptr_t. We don't want that available to
includers of <cstddef>, so instead of following the usual pattern where <cfoo>
includes <foo.h> then pulls things from :: into std:: with using-declarations,
we implement <stddef.h> and <cstddef> separately; both include <__nullptr> for
the definition of std::nullptr_t.
llvm-svn: 249761
r207606 changed the __need_foo macros to behave like they do with gcc: If they
are set, _only_ the __need_foo stuff gets defined. As a consequence, cstddef
no longer defined "offsetof". It looks like the __need_foo defines aren't
needed anymore, so just remove them.
Fixes PR19723.
llvm-svn: 208942
rather than its own type for std::max_align_t. This is particularly
relevant as the types may not be ABI compatible despite users expecting
them to be.
llvm-svn: 201843
Marshall Clow