Note that this is mostly a structural patch that handles the change from the old
spelling style to the new one. One consequence of this is that all AT_foo_bar
enum values have changed to not be based off of the first spelling, but rather
off of the class name, so they are now AT_FooBar and the like (a straw poll on
IRC showed support for this). Apologies for code churn.
Most attributes have GNU spellings as a temporary solution until everything else
is sorted out (such as a Keyword spelling, which I intend to add if someone else
doesn't beat me to it). This is definitely a WIP.
I've also killed BaseCheckAttr since it was unused, and I had to go through
every attribute anyway.
llvm-svn: 158700
Now, as long as the 'Namespaces' variable is correct inside Attr.td, the
generated code will correctly admit a C++11 attribute only when it has the
appropriate namespace(s).
llvm-svn: 158661
* Don't copy the visibility attribute during instantiations. We have to be able
to distinguish
struct HIDDEN foo {};
template<class T>
DEFAULT void bar() {}
template DEFAULT void bar<foo>();
from
struct HIDDEN foo {};
template<class T>
DEFAULT void bar() {}
template void bar<foo>();
* If an instantiation has an attribute, it takes precedence over an attribute
in the template.
* With instantiation attributes handled with the above logic, we can now
select the minimum visibility when looking at template arguments.
llvm-svn: 156821
TableGen-generated StringMatcher, for a 1.2% speedup in -fparse-only
time in <rdar://problem/11004361>. Thanks to Benjamin for pointing me
at StringMatcher!
llvm-svn: 156003
This submission improves Clang sema handling by using Clang tablegen
to generate common boilerplate code. As a start, it implements AttributeList
enumerator generation and case statements for AttributeList::getKind.
A new field "SemaHandler" is introduced in Attr.td and by default set to 1
as most of attributes in Attr.td have semantic checking in Sema. For a small
number of attributes that don't appear in Sema, the value is set to 0.
Also there are a small number of attributes that only appear in Sema but not
in Attr.td. Currently these attributes are still hardcoded in Sema AttributeList.
Reviewed by Delesley Hutchins.
llvm-svn: 152169
Not long ago, I tightened up the type checking for pointer arguments of
Neon intrinsics to match the specifications provided by ARM. One consequence
was that it became impossible to access the unaligned versions of a few
Neon load/store operations. Since there are just a few of these intrinsics
where it makes a difference, I think it's better to relax the type checking
than to either introduce new non-standard unaligned intrinsics or to disallow
intrinsics for the unaligned operations.
llvm-svn: 146963
The code for checking Neon builtin pointer argument types was assuming that
there would only be one pointer argument. But, for vld2-4 builtins, the first
argument is a special sret pointer where the result will be stored. So,
instead of scanning all the arguments to find a pointer, have TableGen figure
out the index of the pointer argument that needs checking. That's better than
scanning all the arguments regardless. <rdar://problem/10448804>
llvm-svn: 144834
The Neon load/store intrinsics need to be implemented as macros to avoid
hiding alignment attributes on the pointer arguments, and the macros can
only evaluate those pointer arguments once (in case they have side effects),
so it has been hard to get the right type checking for those pointers.
I tried various alternatives in the arm_neon.h header, but it's much more
straightforward to just check directly in Sema.
llvm-svn: 144075
This patch just adds a simple NeonTypeFlags class to replace the various
hardcoded constants that had been used until now. Unfortunately I couldn't
figure out a good way to avoid duplicating that class between clang and
TableGen, but since it's small and rarely changes, that's not so bad.
llvm-svn: 144054
- Remodel Expr::EvaluateAsInt to behave like the other EvaluateAs* functions,
and add Expr::EvaluateKnownConstInt to capture the current fold-or-assert
behaviour.
- Factor out evaluation of bitfield bit widths.
- Fix a few places which would evaluate an expression twice: once to determine
whether it is a constant expression, then again to get the value.
llvm-svn: 141561
Alexis Hunt