Scops that only read seem generally uninteresting and scops that only write are
most likely initializations where there is also little to optimize. To not
waste compile time we bail early.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7735
llvm-svn: 229820
Alias checks might become costly if there are divisions that complicate the
description of the accessed locations. By overaproximating them we get fairly
accurate results without the huge compile time cost.
llvm-svn: 229252
This allows us to skip ast and code generation if we did not optimize
a SCoP and will not generate parallel or alias annotations. The
initial heuristic to exit is simple but allows improvements later on.
All failing test cases have been modified to disable early exit, thus
to keep their coverage.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7254
llvm-svn: 228851
These write are important as they will force the scheduling and code
generation of an otherwise trivial statement and also impose an order of
execution needed to guarantee the correct final value for a scalar in a loop.
Added test case modeled after ClamAV/clamscan.
llvm-svn: 228847
This change has two main purposes:
1) We do not use a static interface to hide an object we create and
destroy for every basic block we copy.
2) We allow the BlockGenerator to store information between calls to
the copyBB method. This will ease scalar/phi code generation
later on.
While a lot of method signatures were changed this should not cause
any real behaviour change.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7467
llvm-svn: 228443
This allows us to model PHI nodes in the polyhedral description
without demoting them. The modeling however will result in the
same accesses as the demotion would have introduced.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7415
llvm-svn: 228433
The support is currently limited as we only allow them in the input but do
not emit them in the transformed SCoP due to the possible semantic changes.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5225
llvm-svn: 227054
The max loop depth was incorrectly computed for scops that contain a
block from a loop but do not contain the entire loop. We need to
check that the full loop is contained in the region when computing
the max loop depth.
These scops occur when a region containing an inner loop is expanded
to include some blocks from the outer loop, but it cannot be fully
expanded to contain the outer loop because the region containing the
outer loop is invalid.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6913
llvm-svn: 225812
This support is still incomplete and consequently hidden behind a switch that
needs to be enabled. One problem is ATM that we incorrectly interpret very large
unsigned values as negative values even if used in an unsigned comparision.
llvm-svn: 225480
AF = dyn_cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(Pair.second) may be NULL for some SCEVs that we do
not support. When reporting the error we still want to pass a pointer that is
known to always be non-NULL.
I do not yet have a test case for this, unfortunately.
llvm-svn: 225461
Schedule dimensions that have the same constant value accross all statements do
not carry any information, but due to the increased dimensionality of the
schedule cost compile time. To not pay this cost, we remove constant dimensions
if possible.
llvm-svn: 225067
Without updating dependences we may lose implicit transitive dependences for
which all explicit dependences have gone through the statement iterations we
have just eliminated.
No test case. We should probably implement a -verify-dependences option.
This fixes llvm.org/PR21227
llvm-svn: 224459
This simplifies the construction of the input for the reduction dependence
computation and at the same time removes an assumption that expects the schedule
to be of 2D + 1 form (the odd dimensions giving textual order, the even
dimensions the loop iterations).
llvm-svn: 223621
This commit drops the Cloog support for Polly. The scripts and
documentation are changed to only use isl as prerequisity. In the code
all Cloog specific parts have been removed and all relevant tests have
been ported to the isl backend when it was created.
llvm-svn: 223141
SCEV based code generation has been the default for two weeks after having
been tested for a long time. We now drop the support the non-scev-based code
generation.
llvm-svn: 222978
In TempScopInfo::buildCondition we extract the conditions to guard the
BB *in addition of* loop bounds. This means we should only consider the
conditions in the paths (in CFG) that do not contain cycles (loops).
At the same time, we set the invert flag if the FalseBB of the current
branch dominates our target BB to indicate that we reach the target BB
with an inverted condition from the current branch.
In this case, the path from the FalseBB contains a cycle if the FalseBB
is the target of a backedge. The conditions implied by such a path should
not be consider. We can identify such a case by checking if the TrueBB
also dominates our target BB, which means we can also reach our target
BB from the TrueBB, without going through the backedge.
llvm-svn: 222907
In case a GEP instruction references into a fixed size array e.g., an access
A[i][j] into an array A[100x100], LLVM-IR does not guarantee that the subscripts
always compute values that are within array bounds. We now derive the set of
parameter values for which all accesses are within bounds and add the assumption
that the scop is only every executed with this set of parameter values.
Example:
void foo(float A[][20], long n, long m {
for (long i = 0; i < n; i++)
for (long j = 0; j < m; j++)
A[i][j] = ...
This loop yields out-of-bound accesses if m is at least 20 and at the same time
at least one iteration of the outer loop is executed. Hence, we assume:
n <= 0 or m <= 20.
Doing so simplifies the dependence analysis problem, allows us to perform
more optimizations and generate better code.
TODO: The location where the GEP instruction is executed is not necessarily the
location where the memory is actually accessed. As a result scanning for GEP[s]
is imprecise. Even though this is not a correctness problem, this imprecision
may result in missed optimizations or non-optimal run-time checks.
In polybench where this mismatch between parametric loop bounds and fixed size
arrays is common, we see with this patch significant reductions in compile time
(up to 50%) and execution time (up to 70%). We see two significant compile time
regressions (fdtd-2d, jacobi-2d-imper), and one execution time regression
(trmm). Both regressions arise due to additional optimizations that have been
enabled by this patch. They can be addressed in subsequent commits.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D6369
llvm-svn: 222754
We will use ScalarEvolution in the ScopInfo.cpp to get the loop trip
count, not cache it in the TempScop object.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6070
llvm-svn: 221035
Now MaxLoopDepth only lives in Scops not in TempScops anymore.
This is the first part of a series of changes to make TempScops
obsolete.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6069
llvm-svn: 221026
By adding braces into the DEBUG statement we can make clang-format format code
such as:
DEBUG(stmt1(); stmt2())
as multi-line code:
DEBUG({
stmt1();
stmt2();
});
This makes control-flow in debug statements easier to read.
llvm-svn: 220441
This patch changes the RegionSet type used in ScopDetection from a
std::set to a llvm::SetVector. The reason for the change is to
ensure deterministic output when printing the result of the
analysis. We had a windows buildbot failure for the modified test
because the output was coming in a different order.
Only one test case needed to be modified for this change. We could
use CHECK-DAG directives instead of CHECK in the analysis test cases
because the actual order of scops does not matter, but I think that
change should be done in a separate patch that modifies all the
appliciable tests. I simply modified the test to reflect the
expected deterministic output.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5897
llvm-svn: 220423
This patch does not change the semantic on it's own. However, the
dependence analysis as well as dce will now use the newest available
access relation for each memory access, thus if at some point the json
importer or any other pass will run before those two and set a new
access relation the behaviour will be different. In general it is
unclear if the dependence analysis and dce should be run on the old or
new access functions anyway. If we need to access the original access
function from the outside later, we can expose the getter again.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5707
llvm-svn: 219612
Johannes Doerfert