Currently the default C calling convention functions are treated
the same as compute kernels. Make this explicit so the default
calling convention can be changed to a non-kernel.
Converted with perl -pi -e 's/define void/define amdgpu_kernel void/'
on the relevant test directories (and undoing in one place that actually
wanted a non-kernel).
llvm-svn: 298444
This switches to the workaround that HSA defaults to
for the mesa path.
This should be applied to the 4.0 branch.
Patch by Vedran Miletić <vedran@miletic.net>
llvm-svn: 292982
When the instruction is processed the first time, it may be
deleted resulting in crashes. While the new test adds the same
user to the worklist twice, this particular case doesn't crash
but I'm not sure why.
llvm-svn: 290191
Allow two users of the condition if the other user
is also a min/max select. i.e.
%c = icmp slt i32 %x, %y
%min = select i1 %c, i32 %x, i32 %y
%max = select i1 %c, i32 %y, i32 %x
llvm-svn: 269699
Summary:
They correspond to BUFFER_LOAD/STORE_DWORD[_X2,X3,X4] and mostly behave like
llvm.amdgcn.buffer.load/store.format. They will be used by Mesa for SSBO and
atomic counters at least when robust buffer access behavior is desired.
(These instructions perform no format conversion and do buffer range checking
per component.)
As a side effect of sharing patterns with llvm.amdgcn.buffer.store.format,
it has become trivial to add support for the f32 and v2f32 variants of that
intrinsic, so the patch does so.
Also DAG-ify (and fix) some tests that I noticed intermittent failures in
while developing this patch.
Some tests were (temporarily) adjusted for the required mayLoad/hasSideEffects
changes to the BUFFER_STORE_DWORD* instructions. See also
http://reviews.llvm.org/D18291.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellarAMD, mareko
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18292
llvm-svn: 266126
v2: added more tests, moved the SALU->VALU conversion to a separate function
It looks like it's not possible to get subregisters in the S_ABS lowering
code, and I don't feel like guessing without testing what the correct code
would look like.
llvm-svn: 254095
Matt Arsenault