Commit Graph

37 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Richard Smith 1338122b25 Add context note to diagnostics that occur while declaring an implicit special member function.
llvm-svn: 296020
2017-02-23 21:43:43 +00:00
Saleem Abdulrasool a6ae060db4 Sema: add warning for c++ member variable shadowing
Add a warning for shadowed variables across records.  Referencing a
shadow'ed variable may not give the desired variable.  Add an optional
warning for the shadowing.

Patch by James Sun!

llvm-svn: 294401
2017-02-08 03:30:13 +00:00
Richard Smith 81f5ade227 Move checks for creation of objects of abstract class type from the various
constructs that can do so into the initialization code. This fixes a number
of different cases in which we used to fail to check for abstract types.

Thanks to Tim Shen for inspiring the weird code that uncovered this!

llvm-svn: 289753
2016-12-15 02:28:18 +00:00
Richard Smith f3cec65d01 When diagnosing that a defaulted function is ill-formed because it would be
implicitly deleted and overrides a non-deleted function, explain why the
function is deleted. For PR30844.

llvm-svn: 285610
2016-10-31 18:18:29 +00:00
Nathan Sidwell 44b21749b9 PR6037
Warn on inaccessible direct base

llvm-svn: 226423
2015-01-19 01:44:02 +00:00
Alexander Potapenko e2e8b0e009 Revert r218925 - "Patch to warn if 'override' is missing"
This CL has caused bootstrap failures on Linux and OSX buildbots running with -Werror.

Example report from http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux/builds/13183/steps/bootstrap%20clang/logs/stdio:

================================================================
[ 91%] Building CXX object tools/clang/tools/diagtool/CMakeFiles/diagtool.dir/ShowEnabledWarnings.cpp.o
In file included from /home/dtoolsbot/build/sanitizer-x86_64-linux/build/llvm/lib/Target/R600/AMDGPUISelDAGToDAG.cpp:20:
In file included from /home/dtoolsbot/build/sanitizer-x86_64-linux/build/llvm/lib/Target/R600/SIISelLowering.h:19:
/home/dtoolsbot/build/sanitizer-x86_64-linux/build/llvm/lib/Target/R600/SIInstrInfo.h:71:8: error: 'getLdStBaseRegImmOfs' overrides a member function but is not marked 'override' [-Werror,-Winconsistent-missing-override]
  bool getLdStBaseRegImmOfs(MachineInstr *LdSt,
       ^
/home/dtoolsbot/build/sanitizer-x86_64-linux/build/llvm/include/llvm/Target/TargetInstrInfo.h:815:16: note: overridden virtual function is here
  virtual bool getLdStBaseRegImmOfs(MachineInstr *LdSt,
               ^
================================================================

llvm-svn: 218969
2014-10-03 09:02:53 +00:00
Fariborz Jahanian b91c5d6a79 Patch to warn if 'override' is missing
for an overriding method if class has at least one
'override' specified on one of its methods.
Reviewed by Doug Gregor. rdar://18295240
(I have already checked in all llvm files with missing 'override'
 methods and Bob Wilson has fixed a TableGen of FastISel so
 no warnings are expected from build of llvm after this patch.
 I have already verified this). 

llvm-svn: 218925
2014-10-02 23:13:51 +00:00
Richard Smith 8b86f2d401 Implement final resolution of DR1402: implicitly-declared move operators that
would be deleted are still declared, but are ignored by overload resolution.

Also, don't delete such members if a subobject has no corresponding move
operation and a non-trivial copy. This causes us to implicitly declare move
operations in more cases, but risks move-assigning virtual bases multiple
times in some circumstances (a warning for that is to follow).

llvm-svn: 193969
2013-11-04 01:48:18 +00:00
Eli Friedman af65120bd3 Improve error for "override" + non-virtual func.
Consider something like the following:

struct X {
  virtual void foo(float x);
};
struct Y : X {
  void foo(double x) override;
};

The error is almost certainly that Y::foo() has the wrong signature,
rather than incorrect usage of the override keyword.  This patch
adds an appropriate diagnostic for that case.

Fixes <rdar://problem/14785106>.

llvm-svn: 190109
2013-09-05 23:51:03 +00:00
Richard Smith 10bb5b90ed Tests and status for core issues 1-50.
llvm-svn: 182207
2013-05-19 07:22:38 +00:00
Richard Smith b4d2a15d17 If a defaulted special member is implicitly deleted, check whether it's
overriding a non-deleted virtual function. The existing check for this doesn't
catch this case, because it fires before we mark the method as deleted.

llvm-svn: 178563
2013-04-02 19:38:47 +00:00
Richard Smith d80b2d57cf Fix CXXRecordDecl::forallBases to not look through bases which are dependent
and defined within the current instantiation, but which are not part of the
current instantiation. Previously, it would look at bases which could be
specialized separately from the current template.

llvm-svn: 168477
2012-11-22 00:24:47 +00:00
Andy Gibbs c6e68daac0 Prior to adding the new "expected-no-diagnostics" directive to VerifyDiagnosticConsumer, make the necessary adjustment to 580 test-cases which will henceforth require this new directive.
llvm-svn: 166280
2012-10-19 12:44:48 +00:00
David Blaikie 7e414261f6 Implement C++ 10.3p16 - overrides involving deleted functions must match.
Only deleted functions may override deleted functions and non-deleted functions
may only override non-deleted functions.

llvm-svn: 166082
2012-10-17 00:47:58 +00:00
Richard Smith 18f07db183 PR13499: Don't try to check whether 'override' has been validly applied until
we know whether the function is virtual. But check it as soon as we do know;
in some cases we don't need to wait for an instantiation.

llvm-svn: 161316
2012-08-06 03:25:17 +00:00
Richard Trieu 553b2b2e5d Modify how the -verify flag works. Currently, the verification string and
diagnostic message are compared.  If either is a substring of the other, then
no error is given.  This gives rise to an unexpected case:

  // expect-error{{candidate function has different number of parameters}}

will match the following error messages from Clang:

  candidate function has different number of parameters (expected 1 but has 2)
  candidate function has different number of parameters

It will also match these other error messages:

  candidate function
  function has different number of parameters
  number of parameters

This patch will change so that the verification string must be a substring of
the diagnostic message before accepting.  Also, all the failing tests from this
change have been corrected.  Some stats from this cleanup:

87 - removed extra spaces around verification strings
70 - wording updates to diagnostics
40 - extra leading or trailing characters (typos, unmatched parens or quotes)
35 - diagnostic level was included (error:, warning:, or note:)
18 - flag name put in the warning (-Wprotocol)

llvm-svn: 146619
2011-12-15 00:38:15 +00:00
David Blaikie dd58d4ca8f Handle redundant 'typename' on base class specifications.
llvm-svn: 142937
2011-10-25 18:46:41 +00:00
David Blaikie afa155fb88 Fix erroneous name-specifiers prior to decltypes better/correctly as per Doug's feedback.
llvm-svn: 142935
2011-10-25 18:17:58 +00:00
David Blaikie 1cd50022b2 Fix cases where the optional nested-name-specifier erroneously preceeded a decltype-specification when specifying a base type.
llvm-svn: 142928
2011-10-25 17:10:12 +00:00
David Blaikie 00ee7a081d Support the use of decltype for specifying base types. Fixes PR11216.
llvm-svn: 142926
2011-10-25 15:01:20 +00:00
Richard Smith 9ca5c42582 Update all tests other than Driver/std.cpp to use -std=c++11 rather than
-std=c++0x. Patch by Ahmed Charles!

llvm-svn: 141900
2011-10-13 22:29:44 +00:00
Anders Carlsson 30f29444c0 Get rid of handling of the 'explicit' keyword from class-head. We still parse it though, although that will change shortly.
llvm-svn: 128277
2011-03-25 14:31:08 +00:00
Chandler Carruth 98e3c568bf Fix PR8767, improve diagnostic wording when allocating an object of an
abstract class type.

Patch by Stephen Hines, with a wording tweak from Doug applied by me.

llvm-svn: 125996
2011-02-18 23:59:51 +00:00
Anders Carlsson 7d59a68330 Implement [class.derived]p8.
llvm-svn: 124047
2011-01-22 22:23:37 +00:00
Anders Carlsson 3f610c75de Diagnose when a virtual member function marked final is overridden.
llvm-svn: 123916
2011-01-20 16:25:36 +00:00
Anders Carlsson 7c812f5a99 When instantiating member functions, propagate whether the member function is marked 'final' and 'override'.
Also, call CheckOverrideControl when instantiating member functions.

llvm-svn: 123900
2011-01-20 06:52:44 +00:00
Anders Carlsson fa8e5d3d67 When checking for functions marked override, ignore dependent contexts.
llvm-svn: 123894
2011-01-20 06:33:26 +00:00
Anders Carlsson fd83553733 Diagnose virtual member functions marked override but not overriding any virtual member functions.
llvm-svn: 123888
2011-01-20 05:57:14 +00:00
Douglas Gregor c0d2490ac4 In the presence of using declarations, we can find the same class
members in class subobjects of different types. So long as the
underlying declaration sets are the same, and the declaration sets
involve non-instance members, this is not an ambiguity.

llvm-svn: 117163
2010-10-22 22:08:47 +00:00
Douglas Gregor 4165bd6772 Implement computation of the final overriders for each virtual
function within a class hierarchy (C++ [class.virtual]p2).

We use the final-overrider computation to determine when a particular
class is ill-formed because it has multiple final overriders for a
given virtual function (e.g., because two virtual functions override
the same virtual function in the same virtual base class). Fixes
PR5973.

We also use the final-overrider computation to determine which virtual
member functions are pure when determining whether a class is
abstract or diagnosing the improper use of an abstract class. The
prior approach to determining whether there were any pure virtual
functions in a class didn't cope with virtual base class subobjects
properly, and could not easily be fixed to deal with the oddities of
subobject hiding. Fixes PR6631.

llvm-svn: 99351
2010-03-23 23:47:56 +00:00
Douglas Gregor cc3f325fa6 Reinstate r97674 with a fix for the assertion that was firing in <list>
llvm-svn: 97686
2010-03-03 23:55:11 +00:00
Douglas Gregor 979302e14a Revert r97674; it's causing failures
llvm-svn: 97677
2010-03-03 23:26:56 +00:00
Douglas Gregor f2a42a66e2 Implement disambiguation of base class members via a
nested-name-specifier. For example, this allows member access in
diamond-shaped hierarchies like:

  struct Base {
    void Foo();
    int Member;
  };

  struct D1 : public Base {};
  struct D2 : public Base {};

  struct Derived : public D1, public D2 { }

  void Test(Derived d) {
    d.Member = 17; // error: ambiguous cast from Derived to Base
    d.D1::Member = 17; // error: okay, modify D1's Base's Member
  }

Fixes PR5820 and <rdar://problem/7535045>. Also, eliminate some
redundancy between Sema::PerformObjectMemberConversion() and
Sema::PerformObjectArgumentInitialization() -- the latter now calls
the former.

llvm-svn: 97674
2010-03-03 22:53:40 +00:00
Douglas Gregor 3e637467d7 Implement name hiding for names found through virtual base subobjects
that are hidden by other derived base subobjects reached along a
lookup path that does *not* pass through the hiding subobject (C++
[class.member.lookup]p6). Fixes PR6462.

llvm-svn: 97640
2010-03-03 04:38:46 +00:00
Eli Friedman 9025ec2ee5 Fix for PR5840: fix the kind of name lookup used for classes in
Sema::getTypeName.

"LookupNestedNameSpecifierName" isn't quite the right kind of lookup, though; 
it doesn't ignore namespaces.  Someone more familiar with the lookup code
should fix this properly.

llvm-svn: 91809
2009-12-21 01:42:38 +00:00
Daniel Dunbar 8fbe78f6fc Update tests to use %clang_cc1 instead of 'clang-cc' or 'clang -cc1'.
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
   which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
   can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
   a default target).

llvm-svn: 91446
2009-12-15 20:14:24 +00:00
Douglas Gregor c190523d7a When a member reference expression includes a qualifier on the member
name, e.g.,
  
  x->Base::f()

retain the qualifier (and its source range information) in a new
subclass of MemberExpr called CXXQualifiedMemberExpr. Provide
construction, transformation, profiling, printing, etc., for this new
expression type.

When a virtual function is called via a qualified name, don't emit a
virtual call. Instead, call that function directly. Mike, could you
add a CodeGen test for this, too?

llvm-svn: 80167
2009-08-26 22:36:53 +00:00