`OmpStructureChecker` has too much boilerplate code in source file.
This patch:
1. Use helpers from `check-directive-structure.h` and reduces the boilerplate.
2. Use TableGen infrastructure as much as possible.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90834
Add some clause validity tests for the host_data directive to avoid future regressions.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91889
Fortran defines "null-init" null pointer initializers as
being function references, syntactically, that have to resolve
to calls to the intrinsic function NULL() with no actual
arguments.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91657
When comparing LOGICAL operands using ".eq." or ".ne." we were not
guiding users to the ".eqv." and ".neqv." operations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91736
When doing out-of-tree builds, FIR tests were failing. I made a change
similar to the one by @jurahul to fix this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91654
According to section 19.4, paragraph 5, the scope of an ac-implied-do variable
is the enclosing ac-implied-do. But we were not creating new scopes upon
entry to an ac-implied-do. This was causing error messages to be erroneously
emitted.
I fixed, the code, added a test to array-constr-values.f90, added the test
folding15.f90 and corrected the test symbol05.f90.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91560
Add the semantic checks for the OpenMP 4.5 - 2.13.9 Depend clause.
1. List items in depend clause should not be zero length array sections.
2. A variable that is part of another variable like structure component
should not be specified on a depend clause.
Test cases : omp-depend01.f90, omp-depend02.f90, omp-depend03.f90
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89934
When comparing arrays whose shapes do not conform, the contant folding
code ran into problems trying to get the value of an extent that did not
exist. There were actually two problems. First, the routine
"CheckConformance()" was returning "true" when the compiler was unable
to get the extent of an array. Second, the function
"ApplyElementwise()" was calling "CheckConformance()" prior to folding
the elements of two arrays, but it was ignoring the return value.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91440
An io-unit that is an internal-file-variable is syntactically identical
to a file-unit-number expression that is a variable reference. An
ambiguous unit is initially parsed as an internal-file-variable. If
semantic analysis determines that the unit is not of character type,
it is rewritten as an internal-file-variable. This modification must
retain source coordinate information.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91375
Avoid a spurious error message about a dummy procedure reference
in a specification expression by restructuring the handling of
use-associated and host-associated symbols.
Updated to fix a circular dependence between shared library
binaries that was introduced by the original patch.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91286
F18 clause 5.3.3 explicitly allows labels on program unit END statements.
Label resolution code accounts for this for singleton program units,
but incorrectly generates an error for host subprograms with internal
subprograms.
subroutine s(n)
call s1(n)
if (n == 0) goto 88 ! incorrect error
print*, 's'
contains
subroutine s1(n)
if (n == 0) goto 77 ! ok
print*, 's1'
77 end subroutine s1
88 end
Label resolution code makes a sequential pass over an entire file to
collect label information for all subprograms, followed by a pass through
that information for semantics checks. The problem is that END statements
may be separated from prior subprogram code by internal subprogram
definitions, so an END label can be associated with the wrong subprogram.
There are several ways to fix this. Labels are always local to a
subprogram. So the two separate passes over the entire file could probably
instead be interleaved to perform analysis on a subprogram as soon as the
end of the subprogram is reached, using a small stack. The stack structure
would account for the "split" code case. This might work.
It is possible that there is some not otherwise apparent advantage to
the current full-file pass design. The parse tree has productions that
provide access to a subprogram END statement "in advance". An alternative
is to access this information to solve the problem. This PR implements
this latter option.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91217
`-###` has always been supported in the new flang driver. This patch
merely makes sure that it's included when printing the help screen (i.e.
`flang-new -help`).
Avoid a spurious error message about a dummy procedure reference
in a specification expression by restructuring the handling of
use-associated and host-associated symbols.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91209
The initial approach was to go with changing parser nodes from `std::list<parser::Name>` to `OmpObjectList`, but that might have lead to illegal programs.
Resolving the symbols inside `OmpAttributeVisitor`.
Fix a couple of `XFAIL` tests.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90538
This patch add some parsing and clause validity tests for the set directive.
It makes use of the possibility introduces in patch D90770 to check the restriction
were one of the default_async, device_num and device_type clauses is required but also
not more than once on the set directive.
Reviewed By: sameeranjoshi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90771
Add the semantic checks for the OpenMP 4.5 - 2.15.4.1 copyin clause.
Resolve OpenMPThreadprivate directive since the list of items specified
in copyin clause should be threadprivate.
Test cases : omp-copyin01.f90, omp-copyin02.f90, omp-copyin03.f90,
omp-copyin04.f90, omp-copyin05.f90
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89385
When the bounds of an implied DO loop in an array constructor are
constant, the index variable of that loop is considered a constant
expression and can be used as such in the items in the value list
of the implied DO loop. Since the KIND type parameter values of items
in the value list can depend on the various values taken by such an
index, it is not possible to represent those values with a single
typed expression. So implement such loops by taking multiple passes
over the parse tree of the implied DO loop instead.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90494
This patch implements the first frontend action for the Flang parser (i.e.
Fortran::parser). This action runs the preprocessor and is invoked with the
`-E` flag. (i.e. `flang-new -E <input-file>). The generated output is printed
to either stdout or the output file (specified with `-` or `-o <output-file>`).
Note that currently there is no mechanism to map options for the
frontend driver (i.e. Fortran::frontend::FrontendOptions) to options for
the parser (i.e. Fortran::parser::Options). Instead,
Frotran::parser::options are hard-coded to:
```
std::vector<std::string> searchDirectories{"."s};
searchDirectories = searchDirectories;
isFixedForm = false;
_encoding(Fortran::parser::Encoding::UTF_8);
```
These default settings are compatible with the current Flang driver. Further
work is required in order for CompilerInvocation to read and map
clang::driver::options to Fortran::parser::options.
Co-authored-by: Andrzej Warzynski <andrzej.warzynski@arm.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88381
Use `--match-full-lines` to make sure that FileCheck doesn't match the
output against the `CHECK` lines (which, like other comments, are also
printed).
More specifically, we want to make sure that the following `check` in the
input file:
```
! CHECK: <some-fortran-input>
```
is matched by FileCheck with `<some-fortran-input>` in the generated
output. Without `--match-full-lines`, that check-line will be matched
with `!CHECK: <some-fortran-input>` instead (which is also
printed together with other contents of the file).
Adding `--match-full-lines` makes the tests stricter and this change
revealed that some `check`s were passing only because that flag was
missing. These are updated accordingly.
Reviewed By: CarolineConcatto, sameeranjoshi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90306
Subclause 10.1.12 in F'2018 prohibits forward references from
a specification expression to an object declared later in the
same specification part. Catch this error better and emit
specific error messages about the violation.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90492
Fortran's FINAL feature is sensitive to object rank.
When an object's rank excludes it from finalization, but
the type has FINAL subroutines for other ranks, emit
a warning. This should be especially helpful in the
case of a scalar FINAL subroutine not being declared
(IMPURE) ELEMENTAL.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90495
READ(CVAR)[,item-list] with a character variable CVAR
could be parsed as an unformatted READ from an internal
unit or as a formatted READ from the default external unit
with a needlessly parenthesized variable format. We parse
it as the former, but Fortran doesn't have unformatted
internal I/O.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90493
From below mentioned standard references
OpenACC 3.0 Standards document
840 • A program may not branch into or out of an OpenACC parallel construct
OpenMP 5.0 Standards document
A program that branches into or out of a parallel region is non-conforming.
This patch
Resolves the issue of exit out of a parallel region, other branching out issues like goto statements are not handled with this patch.
Moves code from D87906 to be reused by other OpenMP/OpenACC to check-directive-structure.h.
Adds support in OpenMP parallel construct and a test case to verify.
Reviewed By: clementval
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88655
Enter data can have the copyin clause and exit data can have the copyout clause.
Both clauses support modifier with other directive but for these two directives no modifier
are supported. This semantic check enforce this rule.
Reviewed By: kiranktp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90280
In the OpenACC specification, there are two different self clause. One for the
update directive with a var-list argument. This clause is a synonym of the host clause.
The second self clause is present for most of the compute construct and takes an optional
condition. To solve this ambiguity, the self clause for the update directive is directly
translated to a host clause during the parsing. The self clause in AccClause refers always
to the compute construct clause.
Reviewed By: kiranktp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90185
2 Bug fixes:
- Do not resolve procedure as intrinsic if they appeared in an
EXTERNAL attribute statement (one path was not considering this flag)
- Emit an error if a procedure resolved to be an intrinsic function
(resp. subroutine) is used as a subroutine (resp. function).
Lowering was attempted while the evaluate::Expression for the
call was missing without any errors.
1 behavior change:
- Do not implicitly resolve subroutines (resp. functions) as intrinsics
because their name is the name of an intrinsic function (resp.
subroutine). Add justification in documentation.
Reviewed By: klausler, tskeith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90049
This patch introduces the dependencies required to read and manage input files
provided by the command line option. It also adds the infrastructure to create
and write to output files. The output is sent to either stdout or a file
(specified with the `-o` flag).
Separately, in order to be able to test the code for file I/O, it adds
infrastructure to create frontend actions. As a basic testable example, it adds
the `InputOutputTest` FrontendAction. The sole purpose of this action is to
read a file from the command line and print it either to stdout or the output
file. This action is run by using the `-test-io` flag also introduced in this
patch (available for `flang-new` and `flang-new -fc1`). With this patch:
```
flang-new -test-io input-file.f90
```
will read input-file.f90 and print it in the output file.
The `InputOutputTest` frontend action has been introduced primarily to
facilitate testing. It is hidden from users (i.e. it's only displayed with
`--help-hidden`). Currently Clang doesn’t have an equivalent action.
`-test-io` is used to trigger the InputOutputTest action in the Flang frontend
driver. This patch makes sure that “flang-new” forwards it to “flang-new -fc1"
by creating a preprocessor job. However, in Flang.cpp, `-test-io` is passed to
“flang-new -fc1” without `-E`. This way we make sure that the preprocessor is
_not_ run in the frontend driver. This is the desired behaviour: `-test-io`
should only read the input file and print it to the output stream.
co-authored-by: Andrzej Warzynski <andrzej.warzynski@arm.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87989
Remove the assumption that the path separator is `/`. Use functions from `llvm::sys::path` instead.
Reviewed By: isuruf, klausler
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89369
I added a test to verify that the associated symbol did not have errors before
doing the anaylsis of a call to a component ref along with a test that
triggers the original problem.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90074
wait and atomic directives are represented by OpenACCWaitConstruct, OpenACCAtmicConstruct in the parser. Those contrsuct were
not taken into account in the semantic check so far.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88628
In my previous implementation of the semantic checks for ASSOCIATED(), I
had neglected to check the TARGET= argument for objects to ensure that
it has either the POINTER or TARGET attributes.
I added an implementation and a test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89717
When processing declarations in resolve-names.cpp, we were returning a
symbol that had SubprogramName details to PushSubprogramScope(), which
expects a symbol with Subprogram details.
I adjusted the code and added a test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89829
Check INTENT(OUT)/INTENT(INOUT) constraints for actual argument
of intrinsic procedure calls.
- Adding a common::Intent field to the IntrinsicDummyArgument
in the intrinsic table.
- Propagating it to the DummyDataObject intent field so that it can
later be used in CheckExplicitDataArg semantic checks.
- Add related tests.
- Fix regression (C846 false error), C846 INTENT(OUT) rule does
not apply to intrinsic call. Propagate the information that we
are in an intrinsic call up to CheckExplicitDataArg (that is
doing this check). Still enforce C846 on intrinsics other than MOVE_ALLOC (for which
allocatable coarrays are explicitly allowed) since it's not clear it is allowed in all
intrinsics and allowing this would lead to runtime penalties in the intrinsic runtime.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89473
From OpenACC 3.0 Standards document
840 • A program may not branch into or out of an OpenACC parallel construct.
Exits are allowed provided it does not cause an exit outside the parallel region.
Test case exits out of the inner do loop, but it is still inside the parallel region.
Patch tries to extract labels from block attached to a construct,
If the exit is to a label not in the collected list then flags an error.
Reviewed By: tskeith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87906
We had neglected to check for name mismatches for procedure definitions that
appear in interfaces.
I also changed label11.f90 to an error test since I think they're better than
"FileCheck" tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89611
Calling "ASSOCATED(NULL()) was causing an internal check of the compiler to
fail.
I fixed this by changing the entry for "ASSOCIATED" in the intrinsics table to
accept "AnyPointer" which contains a new "KindCode" of "pointerType". I also
changed the function "FromActual()" to return a typeless intrinsic when called
on a pointer, which duplicates its behavior for BOZ literals. This required
changing the analysis of procedure arguments. While testing processing for
procedure arguments, I found another bad call to `CHECK()` which I fixed.
I made several other changes:
-- I implemented constant folding for ASSOCIATED().
-- I fixed handling of NULL() in relational operations.
-- I implemented semantic analysis for ASSOCIATED().
-- I noticed that the semantics for ASSOCIATED() are similar to those for
pointer assignment. So I extracted the code that pointer assignment uses
for procedure pointer compatibility to a place where it could be used by
the semantic analysis for ASSOCIATED().
-- I couldn't figure out how to make the general semantic analysis for
procedure arguments work with ASSOCIATED()'s second argument, which can
be either a pointer or a target. So I stopped using normal semantic
analysis for arguments for ASSOCIATED().
-- I added tests for all of this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88313
- Rework the host runtime table so that it is constexpr to avoid
having to construct it and to store/propagate it.
- Make the interface simpler (remove many templates and a file)
- Enable 16bits float folding using 32bits float host runtime
- Move StaticMultimapView into its own header to use it for host
folding
Reviewed By: klausler, PeteSteinfeld
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88981
The OpenMP 5.0 standard restricts nowait clause to appear only once on sections
directive.
See OpenMP 5.0
- 2.8.1
- point 3 in restrictions.
Added a test with fix.
Reviewed By: DavidTruby
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88556
`OmpStructureChecker` is supposed to work only with `parser::OmpClause`
after tablegen changes for OpenMP and OpenACC were introduced.
Hence `OmpMemoryOrderClause`, `OmpAtomicMemoryOrderClause` and similar ones were failing
to catch semantic errors, inspite of having code for semantic checks.
This patch tries to change parser for `OmpMemoryOrderClause` and similar dependent ones
and use `OmpClauseList` which resides/comes from common tablegen for OpenMP/OpenACC eventually using `parser::OmpClause`.
This patch also tries to :
1. Change `OmpCriticalDirective` in `openmp-parsers.cpp` to support `OmpClauseList`.
2. Check-flang regresses when changes were introduced due to missing semantic checks in OmpCritical, patch implements them at the minimal level to pass the regression.
3. Change tablegen to support Hint clause.
4. Adds missing source locations `CharBlock Source` in each atomic construct.
5. Remove dead code realted to `memory-order-clauses` after moving to `OmpClauseList`.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88965
The semantics pass currently checks for several constraints
that apply to the use of whole assumed-size arrays in various
contexts, but C1002 wasn't really implemented. This patch
implements C1002 by disallowing the use of whole assumed-size
arrays in expressions and variables unless specifically
allowed by the context. This centralizes the error reporting,
which has been improved with a link to the array's declaration.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88691
This patch fix the device_num and device_type clauses used in the init clause. device_num was not
spelled correctly in the parser and was to restrictive with scalarIntConstantExpr instead of scalarIntExpr.
device_type is now taking a list of ScalarIntExpr.
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88571
Currently Flang uses TextDiagnostic, TextDiagnosticPrinter &
TestDiagnosticBuffer classes from Clang (more specifically, from
libclangFrontend). This patch introduces simplified equivalents of these
classes in Flang (i.e. it removes the dependency on libclangFrontend).
Flang only needs these diagnostics classes for the compiler driver
diagnostics. This is unlike in Clang in which similar diagnostic classes
are used for e.g. Lexing/Parsing/Sema diagnostics. For this reason, the
implementations introduced here are relatively basic. We can extend them
in the future if this is required.
This patch also enhances how the diagnostics are printed. In particular,
this is the diagnostic that you'd get _before_ the changes introduced here
(no text formatting):
```
$ bin/flang-new
error: no input files
```
This is the diagnostic that you get _after_ the changes introduced here
(in terminals that support it, the text is formatted - bold + red):
```
$ bin/flang-new
flang-new: error: no input files
```
Tests are updated accordingly and options related to enabling/disabling
color diagnostics are flagged as supported by Flang.
Reviewed By: sameeranjoshi, CarolineConcatto
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87774
Represent FINAL subroutines in the symbol table entries of
derived types. Enforce constraints. Update tests that have
inadvertent violations or modified messages. Added a test.
The specific procedure distinguishability checking code for generics
was used to enforce distinguishability of FINAL procedures.
(Also cleaned up some confusion and redundancy noticed in the
type compatibility infrastructure while digging into that area.)
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88613
SAVE statement, according to 8.6.14, must apply to the same scoping
unit, that excludes nested scoping units. For example, if the SAVE
statement is found in a MODULE, the functions contained in that module
should not inherit the SAVE attribute. I think that the code was doing
this, failing the following source:
```
MODULE pippo
SAVE
CONTAINS
PURE FUNCTION fft_stick_index( )
IMPLICIT NONE
INTEGER :: fft_stick_index
INTEGER :: mc !error: A pure subprogram may not have a variable with the SAVE attribute
END FUNCTION
END MODULE
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88279
1. Section 2.5 : Parallel Construct
2. Section 2.7.1 : Loop Construct
3. Section 2.7.2 : Sections Construct
4. Section 2.7.3 : Single Construct
5. Section 2.7.4 : Workshare Construct
6. Section 2.8.1 : Simd Construct
7. Section 2.8.3 : Loop Simd Construct
8. Section 2.9.1 : Task Construct
9. Section 2.9.2 : Taskloop Construct
10. Section 2.9.3 : Taskloop Simd Construct
Most of the test cases added as part of this change contains semantic errors except few cases which are semantically correct but thrown a semantic error.
Currently flang is not throwing the errors for these cases and throwing semantic errors for the following correct test cases
{omp-do03.f90 , omp-loop-simd01.f90 , omp-simd02.f90 , omp-taskloop01.f90}
Hence, all the test cases are marked as XFAIL.
Reviewed By: DavidTruby
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87908
Hew more closely to the C17 standard; perform macro replacement
of arguments to function-like macros unless they're being stringified
or pasted. Test with a model "assert" macro idiom that exposed
the problem.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87650
According to section 9.4.1, paragraph 3,
If the starting point is greater than the ending point, the substring has
length zero
But the compilers code for substring processing was failing a call to `CHECK()`
in this case. I fixed this by just setting the number of items in the
resulting string to 0 for this situation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87799
C-style /*comments*/ are removed during preprocessing directive
tokenization, but Fortran !comments need to be specifically
allowed.
Fixes LLVM bugzilla 47466.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87638
A type name in an IMPLICIT declaration that was later used in a PARAMETER
statement caused problems because the default symbol scope had not yet been
initialized. I avoided dereferencing in the situation where the default scope
was uninitialized and added a test that triggers the problem.
Also, once I corrected the bad dereference, the compiler was putting out
misleading error messages. The underlying error us due to violating section
7.5.10, paragraph 4, which states:
A structure constructor shall not appear before the referenced type is
defined.
I fixed this by testing to see if a type that is used in a structure
constructor is forward referenced.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87535
Change the analyzed form of type-bound assignment to match that of call
statements. Resolve the binding name to a specific subprogram when
possible by using `GetBindingResolution`. Otherwise leave it as a
type-bound procedure call.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87541
Integer case values were being compared as unsigned by operator<
on evaluate::value::Integer. Change that to signed so that overlap
can be detected correctly.
Explicit CompareUnsigned and BLT are still available if unsigned
comparison is needed.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47309
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87595
A type name in an IMPLICIT declaration that was later used in a PARAMETER
statement caused problems because the default symbol scope had not yet been
initialized. I avoided dereferencing in the situation where the default scope
was uninitialized and added a test that triggers the problem.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87535
Summary:
This is the first patch implementing the new Flang driver as outlined in [1],
[2] & [3]. It creates Flang driver (`flang-new`) and Flang frontend driver
(`flang-new -fc1`). These will be renamed as `flang` and `flang -fc1` once the
current Flang throwaway driver, `flang`, can be replaced with `flang-new`.
Currently only 2 options are supported: `-help` and `--version`.
`flang-new` is implemented in terms of libclangDriver, defaulting the driver
mode to `FlangMode` (added to libclangDriver in [4]). This ensures that the
driver runs in Flang mode regardless of the name of the binary inferred from
argv[0].
The design of the new Flang compiler and frontend drivers is inspired by it
counterparts in Clang [3]. Currently, the new Flang compiler and frontend
drivers re-use Clang libraries: clangBasic, clangDriver and clangFrontend.
To identify Flang options, this patch adds FlangOption/FC1Option enums.
Driver::printHelp is updated so that `flang-new` prints only Flang options.
The new Flang driver is disabled by default. To enable it, set
`-DBUILD_FLANG_NEW_DRIVER=ON` when configuring CMake and add clang to
`LLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS` (e.g. -DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=“clang;flang;mlir”).
[1] “RFC: new Flang driver - next steps”
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/flang-dev/2020-July/000470.html
[2] “RFC: Adding a fortran mode to the clang driver for flang”
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2019-June/062669.html
[3] “RFC: refactoring libclangDriver/libclangFrontend to share with Flang”
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2020-July/066393.html
[4] https://reviews.llvm.org/rG6bf55804924d5a1d902925ad080b1a2b57c5c75c
co-authored-by: Andrzej Warzynski <andrzej.warzynski@arm.com>
Reviewed By: richard.barton.arm, sameeranjoshi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86089
When we define a derived type that extends another derived type, we can then
create a structure constructor that contains values for the fields of both the
child type and its parent. The compiler's internal representation of that
value contains the name of the parent type where a component name would
normally appear. This caused an assert during contant folding.
There are three cases for components that appear in structure constructors.
The first is the normal case of a component appearing in a structure
constructor for its type.
The second is a component of the parent (or grandparent) type appearing in a
structure constructor for the child type.
The third is the parent type component, which can appear in the structure
constructor of its child.
There are also cases where the component can be arrays.
I created the test case folding12.f90 that covers all of these cases and
modified the code to handle them.
Most of my changes were to the "Find()" method of the type
"StructureConstructor" where I added code to cover the second and third cases
described above. To handle these cases, I needed to create a
"StructureConstructor" for the parent type component and return it. To handle
returning a newly created "StructureConstructor", I changed the return type of
"Find()" to be "std::optional" rather than an ordinary pointer.
This change supersedes D86172.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87151
Change how generic operators and assignments are checked for
distinguishable procedures. Because of how they are invoked, available
type-bound generics and normal generics all have to be considered
together. This is different from how generic names are checked.
Move common part of checking into DistinguishabilityHelper so that it
can be used in both cases after the appropriate procedures have been
added.
Cache result of Procedure::Characterize(Symbol) in a map in
CheckHelper so that we don't have to worry about passing the
characterized Procedures around or the cost of recomputing them.
Add MakeOpName() to construct names for defined operators and assignment
for using in error messages. This eliminates the need for different
messages in those cases.
When the procedures for a defined operator or assignment are undistinguishable,
include the type name in the error message, otherwise it may be ambiguous.
Add missing check that procedures for defined operators are functions
and that their dummy arguments are INTENT(IN) or VALUE.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87341
These are owned by an instance of a new class AllCookedSources.
This removes the need for a Scope to own a string containing
a module's cooked source stream, and will enable errors to be
emitted when parsing module files in the future.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86891
The DumpSymbolsSources() routine ordered its output by the addresses
of the names of the symbols, and was susceptible to variation across
environments. Fixed by using a multimap using the values of the names.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87035
Fixed some version information in flang/f18:
- fixed the behavior of the -v switch: this flag enables verbosity with used with arguments, but just displays the version when used alone (related to this bug: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46017)
- added __FLANG, __FLANG_MAJOR__, __FLANG_MINOR__ and __FLANG_PATCHLEVEL__ (similar to their __F18* counterparts) for compatibility purpose
Reviewed By: AlexisPerry, richard.barton.arm, tskeith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84334
Don't use just 128-bit integer as the type for integer
CASE statement constants. Use the actual type of the
literal constants that appeared.
Differential Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86875
Conformance checking of the shapes of the operands of
array expressions can't, of course, always be done at
compilation time; but when the shapes are known and
nonconformable, we should catch the errors that we can.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86887
Change the expression representation TypeParamInquiry from being
a class that's templatized on the integer KIND of its result into
a monomorphic representation that results in a SubscriptInteger
that can then be converted.
This is a minor simplification, but it's worth doing because
it is believed to also be a work-around for bugs in the MSVC
compiler with overload resolution that affect the expression
traversal framework.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86551
Compilation of the following program currently generates a warning message:
i = 1
if (i .eq. 0) then
write(6, 200) i
200 format (I8)
end if
write(6, 200) i
end
x.f90:6:9: Label '200' is not in scope
write(6, 200) i
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Whereas branch targets must conform to the Clause 11.1.2.1 program
requirement "Transfer of control to the interior of a block from
outside the block is prohibited, ...", this doesn't apply to format
statement references.
This patch fix the prasing for the gang-arg values for the gang clause. It also adds
some clause validity tests for the loop construct.
Reviewed By: klausler
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86584
The tile clause in OpenACC 3.0 imposes some restriction. Element in the tile size list are either * or a
constant positive integer expression. If there are n tile sizes in the list, the loop construct must be immediately
followed by n tightly-nested loops.
This patch implement these restrictions and add some tests.
Reviewed By: klausler
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86655
A number of I/O syntax rules involve variables that will be written to,
and must therefore be definable. This includes internal file variables,
IOSTAT= and IOMSG= specifiers, most INQUIRE statement specifiers, a few
other specifiers, and input variables. This patch checks for
these violations, and implements several additional I/O TODO constraint
checks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86557
When an illegal character appears in Fortran source (after
preprocessing), catch and report it in the prescanning phase
rather than leaving it for the parser to cope with.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86553
Accept and represent "global" compiler directives that appear
before and between program units in a source file.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86555
If the label field is empty, and macro replacement occurs,
the rescanned text might be misclassified as a comment card
if it happens to begin with a C or a D. Insert a leading
space into these otherwise empty label fields.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47173
A specification expression can reference an implicitly declared variable
in the host procedure. Because we have to process specification parts
before execution parts, this may be the first time we encounter the
variable. We were assuming the variable was implicitly declared in the
scope where it was encountered, leading to an error because local
variables may not be referenced in specification expressions.
The fix is to tentatively create the implicit variable in the host
procedure because that is the only way the specification expression can
be valid. We mark it with the flag `ImplicitOrError` to indicate that
either it must be implicitly defined in the host (by being mentioned in
the execution part) or else its use turned out to be an error.
We need to apply the implicit type rules of the host, which requires
some changes to implicit typing.
Variables in common blocks are allowed to appear in specification expressions
(because they are not locals) but the common block definition may not appear
until after their use. To handle this we create common block symbols and object
entities for each common block object during the `PreSpecificationConstruct`
pass. This allows us to remove the corresponding code in the main visitor and
`commonBlockInfo_.curr`. The change in order of processing causes some
different error messages to be emitted.
Some cleanup is included with this change:
- In `ExpressionAnalyzer`, if an unresolved name is encountered but
no error has been reported, emit an internal error.
- Change `ImplicitRulesVisitor` to hide the `ImplicitRules` object
that implements it. Change the interface to pass in names rather
than having to get the first character of the name.
- Change `DeclareObjectEntity` to have the `attrs` argument default
to an empty set; that is the typical case.
- In `Pre(parser::SpecificationPart)` use "structured bindings" to
give names to the pieces that make up a specification-part.
- Enhance `parser::Unwrap` to unwrap `Statement` and `UnlabeledStatement`
and make use of that in PreSpecificationConstruct.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86322
This patch fix the usage of the wait-argument in a clause and add several tests and fix the unparsing of
the wait-argument.
Reviewed By: sscalpone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86325
When we report an error for a bad character kind, don't keep it in the
`DeclTypeSpec`. Otherwise there could be further problems. In this case,
`ComputeOffsets()` got an assertion error because we didn't recognize
`CHARACTER(*,8)` as needing a descriptor because of the bad kind.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86357
When a procedure name was used on the RHS of an assignment we were not
reporting the error. When one was used in an expression the error
message wasn't very good (e.g. "Operands of + must be numeric; have
INTEGER(4) and untyped").
Detect these cases in ArgumentAnalyzer and emit better messages,
depending on whether the named procedure is a function or subroutine.
Procedure names may appear as actual arguments to function and
subroutine calls so don't report errors in those cases. That is the same
case where assumed type arguments are allowed, so rename `isAssumedType_`
to `isProcedureCall_` and use that to decide if it is an error.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86107
As with use-associated symbols, copy the attributes and flags from the
original symbol onto host-associated symbols when they are created.
This was showing up as an error on a deallocate of a host-associated
name. We reported an error because the symbol didn't have the POINTER
or ALLOCATABLE attribute.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85763
This adds a test for D85862 to ensure that preprocessor definitions
passed on command lines don't regress in future.
Reviewed By: tskeith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85967
OpenACC combined construct can have an optional end directive. This patch handle this
case in the parsing/unparsing with a canonicalization step. Unlike OmpEndLoopDirective,
this doesn't need a special treatment in the pre-fir tree as there is no clause attached to
a AccEndCombinedDirective.
Reviewed By: klausler
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84481
The shape (esp. the size) of the result of a call to TRANSFER
is implemented according to the definition in the standard.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85866
Character literal substrings used as arguments were causing asserts. This
happened when the code was trying to get the DynamicType of the substring. We
were only recording the DynamicType of the Designator on which the substring
was based. For character literal substrings, the Designator was a character
literal, and we weren't handling getting its type.
I fixed this by changing the `GetType()` method for `DynamicType` to check to
see if we were getting the type of a `Substring` and calculating the type of
the substring by getting the number of bytes in an element of the string.
I also changed the test `resolve49.f90` with some tests, one of which causes
the original crash.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85908
If an unrestricted specific intrinsic function name is first encountered
as an actual argument, it should be interpreted as an object entity,
not a procedure entity.
Fix some tests that depended on the previous interpretation by adding
explicit INTRINSIC statements.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85792
Allow compiler directives in the implicit-part and before USE statements
in the specification-part.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85693
If a bound of a subscript triplet is present but fails to analyze
due to an error, return nullopt rather than returning a Triplet with
that bound missing. This is so we can distinguish an absent bound from
an erroneous one and avoid spurious errors.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85672
sameeran joshi