Commit Graph

9 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Daniel Dunbar 8fbe78f6fc Update tests to use %clang_cc1 instead of 'clang-cc' or 'clang -cc1'.
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
   which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
   can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
   a default target).

llvm-svn: 91446
2009-12-15 20:14:24 +00:00
Zhongxing Xu 27f686f8ec Replace clang-cc with clang -cc1.
llvm-svn: 91272
2009-12-14 06:34:20 +00:00
Ted Kremenek 4ef13f8ac9 Add clang-cc option "--analyzer-experimental-internal-checks". This
option enables new "internal" checks that will eventually be turned on
by default but still require broader testing.

llvm-svn: 88671
2009-11-13 18:46:29 +00:00
Daniel Dunbar a45cf5b6b0 Rename clang to clang-cc.
Tests and drivers updated, still need to shuffle dirs.

llvm-svn: 67602
2009-03-24 02:24:46 +00:00
Ted Kremenek 35b13439cc Convert tabs to spaces.
llvm-svn: 64799
2009-02-17 19:53:58 +00:00
Daniel Dunbar 34fc92fdc2 Add -analyze action to run static analyzer, instead of inferring from
individual checker options.

llvm-svn: 62634
2009-01-20 23:17:32 +00:00
Ted Kremenek 81bfc074c9 Distinguish between dead stores and dead initializations.
llvm-svn: 53628
2008-07-15 18:06:32 +00:00
Ted Kremenek f0413bfcda Added AnalysisConsumer, a meta-level ASTConsumer class to drive various
analyses. This potentially is the primordial origins of a Clang-equivalent
"PassManager".

The new AnalysisConsumer interface allows multiple analyses to be run from a
single invocation of Clang.

Migrated the logic of "-warn-dead-stores" and "-warn-uninit-values" to use the
new AnalysisConsumer interface. The new interface results in a significant code
reduction to incorporate an analysis into the Driver.

Updated a test case to (correctly) acknowledge that it contains a dead store
(this check wasn't being performed because it was previously masked by
-warn-uninit-values).

llvm-svn: 52996
2008-07-02 00:03:09 +00:00
Anders Carlsson 801c5c7467 GCC has an extension where the left hand side of the ? : operator can be omitted. Handle this in a few more places.
llvm-svn: 44462
2007-11-30 19:04:31 +00:00