This reverts the revert 02c5ba8679
Fix:
Pass was registered as DUMMY_FUNCTION_PASS causing the newpm-pass
functions to be doubly defined. Triggered in -DLLVM_ENABLE_MODULE=1
builds.
Original commit:
This patch implements expansion of llvm.vp.* intrinsics
(https://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#vector-predication-intrinsics).
VP expansion is required for targets that do not implement VP code
generation. Since expansion is controllable with TTI, targets can switch
on the VP intrinsics they do support in their backend offering a smooth
transition strategy for VP code generation (VE, RISC-V V, ARM SVE,
AVX512, ..).
Reviewed By: rogfer01
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78203
atomicrmw instructions are expanded by AtomicExpandPass before register allocation
into cmpxchg loops. Register allocation can insert spills between the exclusive loads
and stores, which invalidates the exclusive monitor and can lead to infinite loops.
To avoid this, reimplement atomicrmw operations as pseudo-instructions and expand them
after register allocation.
Floating point legalisation:
f16 ATOMIC_LOAD_FADD(*f16, f16) is legalised to
f32 ATOMIC_LOAD_FADD(*i16, f32) and then eventually
f32 ATOMIC_LOAD_FADD_16(*i16, f32)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101164
Originally submitted as 3338290c18.
Reverted in c7df6b1223.
atomicrmw instructions are expanded by AtomicExpandPass before register allocation
into cmpxchg loops. Register allocation can insert spills between the exclusive loads
and stores, which invalidates the exclusive monitor and can lead to infinite loops.
To avoid this, reimplement atomicrmw operations as pseudo-instructions and expand them
after register allocation.
Floating point legalisation:
f16 ATOMIC_LOAD_FADD(*f16, f16) is legalised to
f32 ATOMIC_LOAD_FADD(*i16, f32) and then eventually
f32 ATOMIC_LOAD_FADD_16(*i16, f32)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101164
This patch implements expansion of llvm.vp.* intrinsics
(https://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#vector-predication-intrinsics).
VP expansion is required for targets that do not implement VP code
generation. Since expansion is controllable with TTI, targets can switch
on the VP intrinsics they do support in their backend offering a smooth
transition strategy for VP code generation (VE, RISC-V V, ARM SVE,
AVX512, ..).
Reviewed By: rogfer01
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78203
This expands the VMOVRRD(extract(..(build_vector(a, b, c, d)))) pattern,
to also handle insert_vectors. Providing we can find the correct insert,
this helps further simplify patterns by removing the redundant VMOVRRD.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100245
The generic SoftFloatVectorExtract.ll test was failing when run on arm
machines, as it tries to create a f64 under soft float. Limit the
transform to when f64 is legal.
Also add a missing override, as reported in D100244.
This adds a combine for extract(x, n); extract(x, n+1) ->
VMOVRRD(extract x, n/2). This allows two vector lanes to be moved at the
same time in a single instruction, and thanks to the other VMOVRRD folds
we have added recently can help reduce the amount of executed
instructions. Floating point types are very similar, but will include a
bitcast to an integer type.
This also adds a shouldRewriteCopySrc, to prevent copy propagation from
DPR to SPR, which can break as not all DPR regs can be extracted from
directly. Otherwise the machine verifier is unhappy.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100244
When the ProcResGroup has BufferSize=0,
1. if there is a subunit in the list of write resources for the
scheduling class, do not attempt to schedule the ProcResGroup.
2. if there is not a subunit in the list of write resources for the
scheduling class, choose a subunit to use instead of the ProcResGroup.
3. having both the ProcResGroup and any of its subunits in the resources
implied by a InstRW is not supported.
Used to model parallel uses from a pool of resources.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98976
Used to model structural hazards on FP issue, where some
instructions take up 2 issue slots and others one as well
as similar structural hazards on load issue, where some
instructions take up two load lanes and others one.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98977
The IR stack protector pass must insert stack checks before the call instead of
between it and the return.
Similarly, SDAG one should recognize that ADJCALLFRAME instructions could be
part of the terminal sequence of a tail call. In this case because such call
frames cannot be nested in LLVM the stack protection code must skip over the
whole sequence (or risk clobbering argument registers).
It breaks up the function pass manager in the codegen pipeline.
With empty parameters, it looks at the -mllvm flag -rewrite-map-file.
This is likely not in use.
Add a check that we only have one function pass manager in the codegen
pipeline.
This required reverting commit 9583a3f2625818b78c0cf6d473cdedb9f23ad82c:
"[AsmPrinter] Delete dead takeDeletedSymbsForFunction()".
This was not NFC as initially thought. By coalescing two function
psas managers, this exposed the reverted code as necessary.
addr-label.ll was crashing due to an emitted blockaddress's block being
removed but the label not emitted.
Some tests relied on the fact that we had a module pass somewhere in the
codegen pipeline.
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99707
This allows these optimisations to apply to e.g. `urem i16` directly
before `urem` is promoted to i32 on architectures where i16 operations
are not intrinsically legal (such as on Aarch64). The legalization then
later can happen more directly and generated code gets a chance to avoid
wasting time on computing results in types wider than necessary, in the end.
Seems like mostly an improvement in terms of results at least as far as x86_64 and aarch64 are concerned, with a few regressions here and there. It also helps in preventing regressions in changes like {D87976}.
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88785
MVE does not have a single sext/zext or trunc instruction that takes the
bottom half of a vector and extends to a full width, like NEON has with
MOVL. Instead it is expected that this happens through top/bottom
instructions. So the MVE equivalent VMOVLT/B instructions take either
the even or odd elements of the input and extend them to the larger
type, producing a vector with half the number of elements each of double
the bitwidth. As there is no simple instruction for a normal extend, we
often have to expand sext/zext/trunc into a series of lane moves (or
stack loads/stores, which we do not do yet).
This pass takes vector code that starts at truncs, looks for
interconnected blobs of operations that end with sext/zext and
transforms them by adding shuffles so that the lanes are interleaved and
the MVE VMOVL/VMOVN instructions can be used. This is done pre-ISel so
that it can work across basic blocks.
This initial version of the pass just handles a limited set of
instructions, not handling constants or splats or FP, which can all come
as extensions to this base.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95804
Reuse the existing KnownBits multiplication code to handle the 'extend + multiply + extract high bits' pattern for multiply-high ops.
Noticed while looking at the codegen for D88785 / D98587 - the patch helps division-by-constant expansion code in particular, which suggests that we might have some further KnownBits div/rem cases we could handle - but this was far easier to implement.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98857
Given a sextload i16, we can usually generate "ldrsh [rn. rm]". If we
don't naturally have a rn, rm addressing mode, we can either generate
"ldrh [rn, #0]; sxth" or "mov rm, #0; ldrsh [rn. rm]".
We currently generate the first, always creating a sxth. They are both
the same number of instructions, but if we generate the second then the
mov #0 will likely be CSE'd or pulled out of a loop, etc.
This adjusts the ISel patterns to do that, creating a mov instead of a
sxth.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98693
This also briefly tests a larger set of architectures than the more
exhaustive functionality tests for AArch64 and x86.
As requested in D88785
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98339
The result of ISD::USUBSAT will never be larger than the LHS. We
can use this to put a bound on the number of leading zeros.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98133
:: (store 1 + 4, addrspace 1)
->
:: (store 1 into undef + 4, addrspace 1)
An offset without a base isn't terribly useful but it's convenient to update
the offset without checking the value. For example, when breaking apart
stores into smaller units
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97812
This seems to be more of a Clang thing rather than a generic LLVM thing,
so this moves it out of LLVM pipelines and as Clang extension hooks into
LLVM pipelines.
Move the post-inline EEInstrumentation out of the backend pipeline and
into a late pass, similar to other sanitizer passes. It doesn't fit
into the codegen pipeline.
Also fix up EntryExitInstrumentation not running at -O0 under the new
PM. PR49143
Reviewed By: hans
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97608
Rather than converting 3 signbits to bools and comparing them,
we can do bitwise logic on the whole vector and convert the
resulting sign bit to a bool at the end.
This is still a different algorithm than what we do in LegalizeDAG
through expandSADDOSSUBO. That algorithm needs to know that the
RHS of SSUBO is > 0, but that's costly when the type is split.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97325
Currently the load/store optimizer will only fold in increments of the
same size as the load/store. This patch expands that to any legal
immediate for the post-inc instruction.
This is a recommit of 3b34b06fc5 with correctness fixes and extra
tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95885
This code creates 3 setccs that need to be expanded. It was
creating a sign bit test as setge X, 0 which is non-canonical.
Canonical would be setgt X, -1. This misses the special case in
IntegerExpandSetCCOperands for sign bit tests that assumes
canonical form. If we don't hit this special case we end up
with a multipart setcc instead of just checking the sign of
the high part.
To fix this I've reversed the polarity of all of the setccs to
setlt X, 0 which is canonical. The rest of the logic should
still work. This seems to produce better code on RISCV which
lacks a setgt instruction.
This probably still isn't the best code sequence we could use here.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97181
Early versions of the ARMv7 reference manuals considered the sp register
as a deprecated register for ldm/stm familiy of instructions. However,
later versions such as ARM DDI 0406C.d added a note to the Appendix:
D9.3 Use of the SP as a general-purpose register
Most ARM instructions, unlike Thumb instructions, provide exactly the
same access to the SP as to R0-R12. This means that it is possible to
use the SP as a general-purpose register. Earlier issues of this manual
deprecated the use of SP in an ARM instruction, in any way that is
deprecated, not permitted, or not possible in the corresponding
Thumb instruction. However, user feedback indicates a number of cases
where these instructions are useful. Therefore, ARM no longer deprecates
these instruction uses.
Also Armv8 manuals no longer consider SP as deprecated register for ldm/
stm A32 instructions.
Furthermore, GNU as also does not print a deprecated warning when using
SP with those instructions.
Drop deprecation warning for pop/ldm/push/stm instructions.
Patch by: Stefan Agner.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82692
Currently the load/store optimizer will only fold in increments of the
same size as the load/store. This patch expands that to any legal
immediate for the post-inc instruction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95885
A v8i32 compare will produce a v8i1 predicate, but during codegen the
v8i32 will be split into two v4i32, potentially requiring two v4i1
predicates to be merged into a single v8i1. Because this merging of two
v4i1's into a v8i1 is very expensive, we need to make the cost of the
compare equally high.
This patch adds the cost of that to ARMTTIImpl::getCmpSelInstrCost.
Because we don't know whether the user of the predicate can be split,
and the cost model is mostly pre-instruction, we may be pessimistic but
that should only be for larger and legal types. This also adds min/max
detection to the costmodel where it can be detected, to keep those in
line with the cost of simple min/max instructions. Otherwise for the
most part, costs that were already expensive have become more expensive.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96692
This adds a new flag -lsr-preferred-addressing-mode to override the target's
preferred addressing mode. It replaces flag -lsr-backedge-indexing, which is
equivalent to preindexed addressing that is one of the options that
-lsr-preferred-addressing-mode accepts.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96855
Currently the findIncDecAfter will only look at the next instruction for
post-inc candidates in the load/store optimizer. This extends that to a
search through the current BB, until an instruction that modifies or
uses the increment reg is found. This allows more post-inc load/stores
and ldm/stm's to be created, especially in cases where a schedule might
move instructions further apart.
We make sure not to look any further for an SP, as that might invalidate
stack slots that are still in use.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95881
As discussed on D96413, as long as the promoted bits of the args are zero we can use the basic ISD::USUBSAT pattern directly, without the shifting like we do for other ops.
I think something similar should be possible for ISD::UADDSAT as well, which I'll look at later.
Also, create a ISD::USUBSAT node directly - this will be expanded back by the legalizer later on if necessary.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96622
Begin transitioning the X86 vector code to recognise sub(umax(a,b) ,b) or sub(a,umin(a,b)) USUBSAT patterns to make it more generic and available to all targets.
This initial patch just moves the basic umin/umax patterns to DAG, removing some vector-only checks on the way - these are some of the patterns that the legalizer will try to expand back to so we can be reasonably relaxed about matching these pre-legalization.
We can handle the trunc(sub(..))) variants as well, which helps with patterns where we were promoting to a wider type to detect overflow/saturation.
The remaining x86 code requires some cleanup first - some of it isn't actually tested etc. I also need to resurrect D25987.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96413
This patch adds a pass to replace calls to vector intrinsics (i.e., LLVM
intrinsics operating on vector operands) with calls to a vector library.
Currently, calls to LLVM intrinsics are only replaced with calls to vector
libraries when scalar calls to intrinsics are vectorized by the Loop- or
SLP-Vectorizer.
With this pass, it is now possible to replace calls to LLVM intrinsics
already operating on vector operands, e.g., if such code was generated
by MLIR. For the replacement, information from the TargetLibraryInfo,
e.g., as specified via -vector-library is used.
This is a re-try of the original commit 2303e93e66 that was reverted
due to pass manager problems. Other minor changes have also been made.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95373
This patch adds a pass to replace calls to vector intrinsics
(i.e., LLVM intrinsics operating on vector operands) with
calls to a vector library.
Currently, calls to LLVM intrinsics are only replaced with
calls to vector libraries when scalar calls to intrinsics are
vectorized by the Loop- or SLP-Vectorizer.
With this pass, it is now possible to replace calls to LLVM
intrinsics already operating on vector operands, e.g., if
such code was generated by MLIR. For the replacement,
information from the TargetLibraryInfo, e.g., as specified
via -vector-library is used.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95373
This new f16 shuffle under Neon would hit an assert in
GeneratePerfectShuffle as it would try to treat a f16 vector as an i8.
Add f16 handling, treating them like an i16.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95446
Under the softfp calling convention, we are often left with
VMOVRRD(extract(bitcast(build_vector(a, b, c, d)))) for the return value
of the function. These can be simplified to a,b or c,d directly,
depending on the value of the extract.
Big endian is a little different because the bitcast switches the lanes
around, meaning we end up with b,a or d,c.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94989
This adds a DAG combine for converting sext_inreg of VGetLaneu into
VGetLanes, providing the types match correctly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95073
Simon Moll