Summary: Among other things, this allows -print-after-all/-print-before-all to dump IR around this pass.
Subscribers: aemerson, llvm-commits, rengolin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11373
llvm-svn: 243052
Re-apply of r241928 which had to be reverted because of the r241926
revert.
This commit factors out common code from MergeBaseUpdateLoadStore() and
MergeBaseUpdateLSMultiple() and introduces a new function
MergeBaseUpdateLSDouble() which merges adds/subs preceding/following a
strd/ldrd instruction into an strd/ldrd instruction with writeback where
possible.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10676
llvm-svn: 242743
Re-apply r241926 with an additional check that r13 and r15 are not used
for LDRD/STRD. See http://llvm.org/PR24190. This also already includes
the fix from r241951.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10623
llvm-svn: 242742
Summary:
This change is part of a series of commits dedicated to have a single
DataLayout during compilation by using always the one owned by the
module.
This patch is quite boring overall, except for some uglyness in
ASMPrinter which has a getDataLayout function but has some clients
that use it without a Module (llmv-dsymutil, llvm-dwarfdump), so
some methods are taking a DataLayout as parameter.
Reviewers: echristo
Subscribers: yaron.keren, rafael, llvm-commits, jholewinski
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11090
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 242386
The pass here was clearing kill flags on instructions which had
their sources killed in the instruction being combined. But
given that the new instruction is inserted after the existing ones,
any existing instructions with kill flags will lead to the verifier
complaining that we are reading an undefined physreg.
For example, what we had prior to this optimization is
t2STRi12 %R1, %SP, 12
t2STRi12 %R1<kill>, %SP, 16
t2STRi12 %R0<kill>, %SP, 8
and prior to this fix that would generate
t2STRi12 %R1<kill>, %SP, 16
t2STRDi8 %R0<kill>, %R1, %SP, 8
This is clearly incorrect as it didn't clear the kill flag on R1
used with offset 16 because there was no kill flag on the instruction
with offset 12.
After this change we clear the kill flag on the offset 16 instruction
because we know it will be used afterwards in the new instruction.
I haven't provided a test case. I have a small test, but even it is
very sensitive to register allocation order which isn't ideal.
llvm-svn: 242359
This commit factors out common code from MergeBaseUpdateLoadStore() and
MergeBaseUpdateLSMultiple() and introduces a new function
MergeBaseUpdateLSDouble() which merges adds/subs preceding/following a
strd/ldrd instruction into an strd/ldrd instruction with writeback where
possible.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10676
llvm-svn: 241928
This improves the logic in several ways and is a preparation for
followup patches:
- First perform an analysis and create a list of merge candidates, then
transform. This simplifies the code in that you have don't have to
care to much anymore that you may be holding iterators to
MachineInstrs that get removed.
- Analyze/Transform basic blocks in reverse order. This allows to use
LivePhysRegs to find free registers instead of the RegisterScavenger.
The RegisterScavenger will become less precise in the future as it
relies on the deprecated kill-flags.
- Return the newly created node in MergeOps so there's no need to look
around in the schedule to find it.
- Rename some MBBI iterators to InsertBefore to make their role clear.
- General code cleanup.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10140
llvm-svn: 241920
When the store sequence being combined actually stores the base register, we
should not mark it as killed until the end.
rdar://21504262
llvm-svn: 241003
When UpdateBaseRegUses sees an instruction that defines the base
register it must stop, as the base register value it is updating is no
longer live. Ideally we would already have seen the register be killed
(which is already checked for), but the kill flags may be inaccurate
and we have to account for this.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10566
llvm-svn: 240424
The patch is generated using this command:
tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \
-checks=-*,llvm-namespace-comment -header-filter='llvm/.*|clang/.*' \
llvm/lib/
Thanks to Eugene Kosov for the original patch!
llvm-svn: 240137
The existing code would unnecessarily break LDRD/STRD apart with
non-adjacent registers, on thumb2 this is not necessary.
Ideally on thumb2 we shouldn't match for ldrd/strd pre-regalloc anymore
as there is not reason to set register hints anymore, changing that is
something for a future patch however.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9694
Recommiting after the revert in r238821, the buildbot still failed with
the patch removed so there seems to be another reason for the breakage.
llvm-svn: 238935
This reverts commit r238795, as it broke the Thumb2 self-hosting buildbot.
Since self-hosting issues with Clang are hard to investigate, I'm taking the
liberty to revert now, so we can investigate it offline.
llvm-svn: 238821
The existing code would unnecessarily break LDRD/STRD apart with
non-adjacent registers, on thumb2 this is not necessary.
Ideally on thumb2 we shouldn't match for ldrd/strd pre-regalloc anymore
as there is not reason to set register hints anymore, changing that is
something for a future patch however.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9694
llvm-svn: 238795
MIOperands/ConstMIOperands are classes iterating over the MachineOperand
of a MachineInstr, however MachineInstr::mop_iterator does the same
thing.
I assume these two iterators exist to have a uniform interface to
iterate over the operands of a machine instruction bundle and a single
machine instruction. However in practice I find it more confusing to have 2
different iterator classes, so this patch transforms (nearly all) the
code to use mop_iterators.
The only exception being MIOperands::anlayzePhysReg() and
MIOperands::analyzeVirtReg() still needing an equivalent, I leave that
as an exercise for the next patch.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9932
This version is slightly modified from the proposed revision in that it
introduces MachineInstr::getOperandNo to avoid the extra counting
variable in the few loops that previously used MIOperands::getOperandNo.
llvm-svn: 238539
This was previously returning int. However there are no negative opcode
numbers and more importantly this was needlessly different from
MCInstrDesc::getOpcode() (which even is the value returned here) and
SDValue::getOpcode()/SDNode::getOpcode().
llvm-svn: 237611
Thumb-1 only allows SP-based LDR and STR to be word-sized, and SP-base LDR,
STR, and ADD only allow offsets that are a multiple of 4. Make some changes
to better make use of these instructions:
* Use word loads for anyext byte and halfword loads from the stack.
* Enforce 4-byte alignment on objects accessed in this way, to ensure that
the offset is valid.
* Do the same for objects whose frame index is used, in order to avoid having
to use more than one ADD to generate the frame index.
* Correct how many bits of offset we think AddrModeT1_s has.
Patch by John Brawn.
llvm-svn: 230496
derived classes.
Since global data alignment, layout, and mangling is often based on the
DataLayout, move it to the TargetMachine. This ensures that global
data is going to be layed out and mangled consistently if the subtarget
changes on a per function basis. Prior to this all targets(*) have
had subtarget dependent code moved out and onto the TargetMachine.
*One target hasn't been migrated as part of this change: R600. The
R600 port has, as a subtarget feature, the size of pointers and
this affects global data layout. I've currently hacked in a FIXME
to enable progress, but the port needs to be updated to either pass
the 64-bitness to the TargetMachine, or fix the DataLayout to
avoid subtarget dependent features.
llvm-svn: 227113
Thumbv4t does not have lo->lo copies other than MOVS,
and that can't be predicated. So emit MOVS when needed
and bail if there's a predicate.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D6592
llvm-svn: 226711
If it's safe to clobber the condition flags, we can do a few extra things:
it's then possible to reset the base register writeback using a SUBS, so
we can try to merge even if the base register isn't dead after the merged
instruction.
This is effectively a (heavily bug-fixed) rewrite of r208992.
llvm-svn: 218386
ADDS/SUBS unless it's safe to clobber the condition flags.
If the merged instructions are in a range where the CPSR is live,
e.g. between a CMP -> Bcc, we can't safely materialize a new base
register.
This problem is quite rare, I couldn't come up with a test case and I've
never actually seen this happen in the tests I'm running - there is a
potential trigger for this in LNT/oggenc (spills being inserted between
a CMP/Bcc), but at the moment this isn't being merged. I'll try to
reduce that into a small test case once I've committed my upcoming patch
to make merging less conservative.
llvm-svn: 217881
There are two add-immediate instructions in Thumb1: tADDi8 and tADDi3. Only
the latter supports using different source and destination registers, so
whenever we materialize a new base register (at a certain offset) we'd do
so by moving the base register value to the new register and then adding in
place. This patch changes the code to use a single tADDi3 if the offset is
small enough to fit in 3 bits.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5006
llvm-svn: 216193
In a previous iteration of the pass, we would try to compensate for
writeback by updating later instructions and/or inserting a SUBS to
reset the base register if necessary.
Since such a SUBS sets the condition flags it's not generally safe to do
this. For now, only merge LDR/STRs if there is no writeback to the base
register (LDM that loads into the base register) or the base register is
killed by one of the merged instructions. These cases are clear wins
both in terms of instruction count and performance.
Also add three new test cases, and update the existing ones accordingly.
llvm-svn: 215729
This adds some code back that was deleted in r92053. The location of the
last merged memory operation needs to be kept up-to-date since MemOps
may be in a different order to the original instruction stream to
allow merging (since registers need to be in ascending order). Also
simplify the logic to determine BaseKill using findRegisterUseOperandIdx
to use an equivalent function call instead.
llvm-svn: 215728
shorter/easier and have the DAG use that to do the same lookup. This
can be used in the future for TargetMachine based caching lookups from
the MachineFunction easily.
Update the MIPS subtarget switching machinery to update this pointer
at the same time it runs.
llvm-svn: 214838
Matthias Braun