Summary:
Support for leak sanitizer on darwin has been added to
compiler-rt, this patch adds compiler support.
Reviewers: dexonsmith, compnerd
Subscribers: alekseyshl, kubamracek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32192
llvm-svn: 300894
I originally requested this to be tested in D25263 but in the end
forgot to make sure that it was done.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28289
llvm-svn: 291389
This patch introduces a new cmake variable: CLANG_DEFAULT_RTLIB, thru
which we can specify a default value for -rtlib (libgcc or
compiler-rt) at build time, just like how we set the default C++
stdlib thru CLANG_DEFAULT_CXX_STDLIB.
With these two options, we can configure clang to build binaries on
Linux that have no runtime dependence on any gcc libs (libstdc++ or
libgcc_s).
Patch by Lei Zhang!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22663
llvm-svn: 276848
Summary:
Adds a new -fsanitize=efficiency-working-set flag to enable esan's working
set tool. Adds appropriate tests for the new flag.
Reviewers: aizatsky
Subscribers: vitalybuka, zhaoqin, kcc, eugenis, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20484
llvm-svn: 270641
Summary:
Adds a framework to enable the instrumentation pass for the new
EfficiencySanitizer ("esan") family of tools. Adds a flag for esan's
cache fragmentation tool via -fsanitize=efficiency-cache-frag.
Adds appropriate tests for the new flag.
Reviewers: eugenis, vitalybuka, aizatsky, filcab
Subscribers: filcab, kubabrecka, llvm-commits, zhaoqin, kcc
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19169
llvm-svn: 267059
This is part of a new statistics gathering feature for the sanitizers.
See clang/docs/SanitizerStats.rst for further info and docs.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16175
llvm-svn: 257971
".exe" extension is inherently checked by llvm::fs::can_execute()
This patch fixes the linker extension in clang driver and updates the
unit test to accommodate the the check string on windows.
Differential Revision:http://reviews.llvm.org/D15577
llvm-svn: 255814
Clang-side cross-DSO CFI.
* Adds a command line flag -f[no-]sanitize-cfi-cross-dso.
* Links a runtime library when enabled.
* Emits __cfi_slowpath calls is bitset test fails.
* Emits extra hash-based bitsets for external CFI checks.
* Sets a module flag to enable __cfi_check generation during LTO.
This mode does not yet support diagnostics.
llvm-svn: 255694
Safestack runtime should never be linked on Android targets because
it is implemented directly in libc. This is already the case, but
mostly by chance (collectSanitizerRuntimes would only link shared
sanitizer runtimes, and safestack has only a static one). Protect
this behavior with a test.
llvm-svn: 250128
Embed UBSan runtime into TSan and MSan runtimes in the same as we do
in ASan. Extend UBSan test suite to also run tests for these
combinations.
llvm-svn: 235953
For now tsan_cxx and msan_cxx contain only operator new/delete
replacements. In the future, when we add support for running UBSan+TSan
and UBSan+MSan, they will also contain bits ubsan_cxx runtime.
llvm-svn: 235924
We don't actually need a real Mac sysroot to make the test pass, just a
linker. This makes the test pass in environments where no ld is on
PATH.
llvm-svn: 234533
Summary:
Change the way we use ASan and UBSan together. Instead of keeping two
separate runtimes (libclang_rt.asan and libclang_rt.ubsan), embed UBSan
into ASan and get rid of libclang_rt.ubsan. If UBSan is not supported on
a platform, all UBSan sources are just compiled into dummy empty object
files. UBSan initialization code (e.g. flag parsing) is directly called
from ASan initialization, so we are able to enforce correct
initialization order.
This mirrors the approach we already use for ASan+LSan. This change doesn't
modify the way we use standalone UBSan.
Test Plan: regression test suite
Reviewers: kubabrecka, zaks.anna, kcc, rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8645
llvm-svn: 233860
Get rid of "libclang_rt.san" library that used to contain
sanitizer_common pieces required by UBSan if it's used in a standalone
mode. Instead, build two variants of UBSan runtime: "ubsan" and
"ubsan_standalone" (same for "ubsan_cxx" and "ubsan_standalone_cxx").
Later "ubsan" and "ubsan_cxx" libraries will go away, as they will
embedded it into corresponding ASan runtimes.
llvm-svn: 233010
We are not able to make a reliable solution for using UBSan together
with other sanitizers with runtime support (and sanitizer_common).
Instead, we want to follow the path used for LSan: have a "standalone"
UBSan tool, and plug-in UBSan that would be explicitly embedded into
specific sanitizers (in short term, it will be only ASan).
llvm-svn: 232829
This is a sad thing to do, but all the alternatives look ugly.
Looks like there are legitimate cases when users may want to link
with sanitizer runtimes *and* -nodefaultlibs (and ensure they provide
replacements for system libraries). For example, this happens in libc++
test suite.
"-nodefaultlibs" is told to link only the libraries explicitly provided
by the user, and providing "-fsanitize=address" is a clear indication of
intention to link with ASan runtime.
We can't easily introduce analogue of "-print-libgcc-name": linking with
sanitizers runtimes is not trivial: some runtimes are split into several
archive libraries, which are required to be wrapped in
-whole-archive/-no-whole-archive.
If "-fsanitize=whatever" and "-nodefaultlibs" are provided, system library
dependencies of sanitizer runtimes (-lc/-ldl/-lpthread/-lrt) will *not* be
linked, and user would have to link them in manually. Note that this can
cause problems, as failing to provide "-lrt" might lead to crashes in runtime
during ASan initialization. But looks like we should bite this bullet.
See r218541 review thread for the discussion.
llvm-svn: 220455
It makes no sense to link in sanitizer runtimes in this case: the user
probably doesn't want to see any system/toolchain libs in his link if he
provides these flags, and the link will most likely fail anyway - as sanitizer
runtimes depend on libpthread, libdl, libc etc.
Also, see discussion in https://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/issues/detail?id=344
llvm-svn: 218541
Change 1: we used to add static sanitizer runtimes at the
very beginning of the linker invocation, even before crtbegin.o, which
is gross and not correct in general. Fix this: now addSanitizerRuntimes()
adds all sanitizer-related link flags to the end of the linker invocation
being constructed. It means, that we should call this function in the
correct place, namely, before AddLinkerInputs() to make sure sanitizer
versions of library functions will be preferred.
Change 2: Put system libraries sanitizer libraries depend on at the
end of the linker invocation, where all the rest system libraries are
located. Respect --nodefaultlibs and --nostdlib flags. This is another way
to fix PR15823. Original fix landed in r215940 put "-lpthread" and friends
immediately after static ASan runtime, before the user linker inputs.
This caused significant slowdown in dynamic linker for large binaries
linked against thousands of shared objects. Instead, to mark system
libraries as DT_NEEDED we prepend them with "--no-as-needed" flag,
discarding the "-Wl,--as-needed" flag that could be provided by the user.
Otherwise, this change is a code cleanup. Instead of having a special method
for each sanitizer, we introduce a function collectSanitizerRuntimes() that
analyzes -fsanitize= flags and returns the set of static and shared
libraries that needs to be linked.
llvm-svn: 217817
There is no reason to have different library names for shared and static
cases on linux. It also breaks Android where we install the shared asan-rt
library into the system and should keep the old name.
This change reverts most of r216380 limiting it to win32 targets only.
llvm-svn: 216533
1. Always put static sanitizer runtimes to the front of the linker
invocation line. This was already done for all sanitizers except UBSan:
in case user provides static libstdc++ we need to make sure that new/delete
operator definitions are picked from sanitizer runtimes instead of libstdc++.
We have to put UBSan runtime first for similar reasons: it depends on some
libstdc++ parts (e.g. __dynamic_cast function), and has to go first in
link line to ensure these functions will be picked up from libstdc++.
2. Put sanitizer libraries system dependencies (-ldl, -lpthread etc.) right
after sanitizer runtimes. This will ensure these libraries participate in
the link even if user provided -Wl,-as-needed flag. This should fix PR15823.
3. In case we link in several sanitizer runtimes (e.g. "ubsan", "ubsan_cxx"
and "san"), add system dependencies (-ldl, -lpthread, ...) only once.
llvm-svn: 215940
Summary:
This flag can be used to force linking of CXX-specific parts
of sanitizer runtimes into the final executable. It gives more precise
control than --driver-mode=g++ and comes handy when user links several
object files with sanitized C++ code into an executable, but wants
to provide libstdc++ himself, instead of relying on Clang dirver's
behavior.
Test Plan: clang regression test suite
Reviewers: chandlerc, rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4824
llvm-svn: 215252
It used to be a feature of UBSan (it could sanitize a standalone
shared object instead of the whole program), but now it causes
more problems, like PR20165.
llvm-svn: 212064
library. That results in the linker resolving all references to weak symbols in
the DSO to the definition from within that DSO. Ironically, this rarely causes
observable problems, except that it causes ubsan's own dynamic type check to
spuriously fail (because we fail to properly merge type_info object names).
llvm-svn: 210220
asan_cxx containts replacements for new/delete operators, and should
only be linked in C++ mode. We plan to start building this part
with exception support to make new more standard-compliant.
See https://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/issues/detail?id=295
for more details.
llvm-svn: 208610
Francis Ricci