Modify getRegForInlineAsmConstraint to return special singleton
register class when a constraint references ST(7) not RFP80 for which
ST(7) is not a member.
llvm-svn: 351206
If we're shuffling with a zero vector, then we are better off not doing VECTOR_SHUFFLE(UNPCK()) as we lose track of those zero elements.
We were already doing this for SSSE3 targets as we have PSHUFB, but its worth doing for all targets.
llvm-svn: 351203
Summary:
In r345197 ESP and RSP were added to GR32_TC/GR64_TC, allowing them to
be used for tail calls, but this also caused `findDeadCallerSavedReg` to
think they were acceptable targets for clobbering. Filter them out.
Fixes PR40289.
Patch by Geoffry Song!
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56617
llvm-svn: 351146
If we have PSHUFB and we're shuffling with a zero vector, then we are better off not doing VECTOR_SHUFFLE(UNPCK()) as we lose track of those zero elements.
llvm-svn: 351103
add (extractelt (X, 0), extractelt (X, 1)) --> extractelt (hadd X, X), 0
This is the integer sibling to D56011.
There's an additional restriction to only to do this transform in the
case where we don't have extra extracts from the source vector. Without
that, we can fail to match larger horizontal patterns that are more
beneficial than this minimal case. An improvement to the more general
h-op lowering may allow us to remove the restriction here in a follow-up.
llvm-svn: 351093
We can't represent this properly with vselect like we normally do. We also have to update the instruction definition to use a VK2WM mask instead of VK4WM to represent this.
Fixes another case from PR34877
llvm-svn: 351018
We can't represent this properly with vselect like we normally do. We also have to update the instruction definition to use a VK2WM mask instead of VK4WM to represent this.
Fixes another case from PR34877.
llvm-svn: 351017
This patch takes some of the code from D49837 to allow us to enable ISD::ABS support for all SSE vector types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56544
llvm-svn: 350998
The 128-bit input produces 64-bits of output and fills the upper 64-bits with 0. The mask only applies to the lower elements. But we can't represent this with a vselect like we normally do.
This also avoids the need to have a special X86ISD::SELECT when avx512bw isn't enabled since vselect v8i16 isn't legal there.
Fixes another instruction for PR34877.
llvm-svn: 350994
We no longer need to extend mask scalars before bitcasting them to vXi1. This was only needed for the truncate intrinsics. And was really a bug in our lowering of them.
llvm-svn: 350991
We still use i8 for the load/store type. So we need to convert to/from i16 to around the mask type.
By doing this we get an i8->i16 extload which we can then pattern match to a KMOVW if the access is aligned.
llvm-svn: 350989
We can't properly represent this with a vselect since the upper elements of the result are supposed to be zeroed regardless of the mask.
This also reuses the new nodes even when the result type fits in 128 bits if the input is q/d and the result is w/b since vselect w/b using k-register condition isn't legal without avx512bw. Currently we're doing this even when avx512bw is enabled, but I might change that.
This fixes some of PR34877
llvm-svn: 350985
Teach x86 assembly operand parsing to distinguish between assembler
variable assigned to named registers and those assigned to immediate
values.
Reviewers: rnk, nickdesaulniers, void
Subscribers: hiraditya, jyknight, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56287
llvm-svn: 350966
Previously, we limited this transform to cases where the
extraction into the build vector happens from vectors of
the same type as the build vector, but that's not required.
There's a slight potential regression seen in the AVX512
result for phadd -- we're using the 256-bit flavor of the
instruction now even though the 128-bit subset is sufficient.
The same problem could already be seen in the AVX2 result.
Follow-up patches will attempt to narrow that back down.
llvm-svn: 350928
We were lowering the last step extract_vector_elt to a bitcast+truncate. Change it to use an extract_vector_elt of index 0 instead. Add isel patterns to do the equivalent of what the bitcast would have done. Plus an isel pattern for an any_extend+extract to prevent some regressions.
Finally add a DAG combine to turn v1i1 scalar_to_vector+extract_vector_elt of 0 into an extract_subvector.
This fixes some of the regressions from D350800.
llvm-svn: 350918
This extends to combineVSelectToShrunkBlend to be able to resimplify SHRUNKBLENDS that have already been created.
This should help some of the regressions from D56387
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56421
llvm-svn: 350875
Despite what the comment says, FCMP_UNE would be an OR not an AND. In the lowering code the first branch created still goes to the original destination. The second branch was exchanged to go to where the subsequent unconditional branch went. This is different than what we do for FCMP_OEQ where both branches that we create go to the original unconditional branch.
As far as I can tell, I think this means we don't need to exchange the branch target with the unconditional branch for FCMP_UNE at all.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56309
llvm-svn: 350873
When we use the partial-matching function on a 128-bit chunk, we must
account for the possibility that we've matched undef halves of the
original source vectors, so the outputs may need to be reset.
This should allow closing PR40243:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40243
llvm-svn: 350830
This is a partial fix for:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40243
...as seen in the integer test, we still need to correct the result when using the
existing (old) horizontal op matching function because it does not model the way
x86 256-bit horizontal ops return results (each 128-bit half is its own horizontal-op).
A potential follow-up change for that is discussed in the bug report - see also D56490.
This generally duplicates a lot of the existing matching code, but we can't just remove
that without introducing regressions, so the existing code is renamed and used less often.
Follow-ups may try to reduce that overlap.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56450
llvm-svn: 350826
Summary:
This pass replaces GR8/GR16/GR32/GR64 with their equivalent sized mask register classes. But VK32/VK64 aren't legal without AVX512BW. Apparently this mostly appears to work if the register coalescer is able to remove the VK32/VK64 register class reference. Or if we don't ever spill it. But there's no guarantee of that.
Another Intel employee managed to trigger a crash due to this with ISPC. Unfortunately, I've lost the test case he sent me at the time. I'm trying to get him to reproduce it for me. I'd like to get this in before 8.0 branches since its a little scary.
The regressions here are unfortunate, but I think we can make some improvements to DAG combine, load folding, etc. to fix them. Just not sure if we can get that done for 8.0.
Fixes PR39741
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56460
llvm-svn: 350800
Found while trying to figure out why my second version of D56421 worked better than the first version. We weren't deleting the vselect in a timely fashion and that caused SimplfyDemandedBit to see an additional user.
The new version doesn't have this problem so this fix isn't needed there, but seemed like the right thing to do.
llvm-svn: 350781
When the result type is v2i64/v2f64 and the index element size is i32, the index vector has two unused elements making the type v4i32. The mask VT should match the number of memory accesses that will be made.
This is consistent with the isel patterns used for the target independent gather/scatter intrinsic.
llvm-svn: 350687
For stack frames on the size of a register in x86, a code size optimization
emits "push rax/eax" instead of "sub" for stack allocation. For example:
foo:
.cfi_startproc
BB#0:
pushq %rax
Ltmp0:
.cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
...
.cfi_endproc
However, we are falling back to DWARF in this case because we cannot
encode %rax as a saved register.
This requirement is wrong, since we don't care about the contents of
%rax, it is the equivalent of a sub.
In order to specify that we care about the contents of %rax, we would
need a .cfi_offset %rax, <offset>.
It's also overzealous in the case where there are pushes for callee saved
registers followed by a "push rax/eax" instead of "sub", in which case we should
also be able to encode the callee saved regs and everything else using compact
unwind.
Patch authored by Bruno Cardoso Lopes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D13793
llvm-svn: 350623
Summary: AVX512VBMI2 supports a funnel shift by immediate and a funnel shift by a variable vector.
Reviewers: spatel, RKSimon
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56361
llvm-svn: 350498
There are no test changes here in the existing cost model
regression tests because integer add/sub have a default
legal cost of 1 already. This would break, however, if
we custom lower those ops because the default cost model
assumes that custom-lowered ops are more expensive.
This is similar to the change in rL350403. See discussion
in D56011 for more details. When we enhance that patch to
handle integer ops, we need this cost model change to avoid
unintended diffs here from the custom lowering.
llvm-svn: 350496
This was here because out and in instructions allow '(%dx)' even though its not a memory reference. To handle this we build a special operand for the DX register reference before we get to the call to CheckBaseRegAndIndexRegAndScale. So we no longer need this special case.
llvm-svn: 350483
This is especially helpful on targets without avx512bw since we don't have a good way to convert from v16i8/v32i8 to v16i1/v32i1 for the truncate anyway. If we're just going to convert it to a GPR we might as well use pmovmskb to accomplish both.
llvm-svn: 350480
We don't need to require the first operand to be an integer because we already said it was the same type as the result which we also constrained to an integer.
llvm-svn: 350455
The 1st try for this was at rL350369, but it caused IR-level diffs because
our cost models differentiate custom vs. legal/promote lowering. So that was
reverted at rL350373. The cost models were fixed independently at rL350403,
so this is effectively the same patch as last time.
Original commit message:
This would show up if we fix horizontal reductions to narrow as they go along,
but it's an improvement for size and/or Jaguar (fast-hops) independent of that.
We need to do this late to not interfere with other pattern matching of larger
horizontal sequences.
We can extend this to integer ops in a follow-up patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56011
llvm-svn: 350421
Noticed in D56011 - handle the case that scalar fp ops are quicker on P3 than P4
Add the other costs so that we're not relying on the default "is legal/custom" cost logic.
llvm-svn: 350403
Doing this late so we will prefer to fold the AND into a masked comparison first. That can be better for the live range of the mask register.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56246
llvm-svn: 350374
This would show up if we fix horizontal reductions to narrow as they go along,
but it's an improvement for size and/or Jaguar (fast-hops) independent of that.
We need to do this late to not interfere with other pattern matching of larger
horizontal sequences.
We can extend this to integer ops in a follow-up patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56011
llvm-svn: 350369
As noted in PR39973 and D55558:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39973
...this is a partial implementation of a fold that we do as an IR canonicalization in instcombine:
// extelt (binop X, Y), Index --> binop (extelt X, Index), (extelt Y, Index)
We want to have this in the DAG too because as we can see in some of the test diffs (reductions),
the pattern may not be visible in IR.
Given that this is already an IR canonicalization, any backend that would prefer a vector op over
a scalar op is expected to already have the reverse transform in DAG lowering (not sure if that's
a realistic expectation though). The transform is limited with a TLI hook because there's an
existing transform in CodeGenPrepare that tries to do the opposite transform.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55722
llvm-svn: 350354
INC/DEC are pretty much the same as ADD/SUB except that they don't update the C flag.
This patch removes the special nodes and just pattern matches from ADD/SUB during isel if the C flag isn't being used.
I had to avoid selecting DEC is the result isn't used. This will become a SUB immediate which will turned into a CMP later by optimizeCompareInstr. This lead to the one test change where we use a CMP instead of a DEC for an overflow intrinsic since we only checked the flag.
This also exposed a hole in our RMW flag matching use of hasNoCarryFlagUses. Our root node for the match is a store and there's no guarantee that all the flag users have been selected yet. So hasNoCarryFlagUses needs to check copyToReg and machine opcodes, but it also needs to check for the pre-match SETCC, SETCC_CARRY, BRCOND, and CMOV opcodes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55975
llvm-svn: 350245
Peek through shift modulo masks while matching double shift patterns.
I was hoping to delay this until I could remove the X86 code with generic funnel shift matching (PR40081) but this will do for now.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56199
llvm-svn: 350222
All of these use custom isel so we can pretty easily detect the differences in the custom code in X86ISelDAGToDAG. The ISD opcodes just need to express the desired semantics not the details of how they would be selected by isel. So unifying them lets us remove the special casing from lowering.
llvm-svn: 350206
These require a different X86ISD node to be created than i16/i32/i64. I guess no one wanted to add the special code for that except in LowerXALUO. But now LowerXALUO, LowerSELECT, and LowerBRCOND all use a common helper function so they all share the special code.
Unfortunately, there are no test changes because we seem to correct the miss in a DAG combine later. I did verify it manually using test cases from xmulo.ll
llvm-svn: 350205
This makes it easier to keep the LowerBRCOND and LowerSELECT code in sync with LowerXALUO so they always pick the same operation for overflowing instructions.
This is inspired by the helper functions used by ARM and AArch64 for the same purpose.
The test change is because LowerSELECT was not in sync with LowerXALUO with regard to INC/DEC for SADDO/SSUBO.
llvm-svn: 350198
This seems to be getting in the way more than its helping. This does mean we stop scalarizing some cases, but I'm not convinced the scalarization was really better.
Some of the changes to vsel-cmp-load.ll are a regression but D56156 should fix it.
llvm-svn: 350159
This allows us to sign extend to v4i32 first. And then share that extension to implement the final steps to v4i64 using a pcmpgt and punpckl and punpckh.
We already do something similar for SIGN_EXTEND with -x86-experimental-vector-widening-legalization.
llvm-svn: 350158
This was tricking us into making these operations and then letting them get scalarized later. But I can't prove that the scalarized version is actually better.
llvm-svn: 350141
Previously we emitted a multiply and some masking that was supposed to matched to PMULUDQ, but the masking could sometimes be removed before we got a chance to match it. So instead just emit the PMULUDQ directly.
Remove the DAG combine that was added when the ReplaceNodeResults code was originally added. Add a new DAG combine to avoid regressions in shrink_vmul.ll
Some of the shrink_vmul.ll test cases now pick PMULUDQ instead of PMADDWD/PMULLD, but I think this should be an improvement on most CPUs.
I think all of this can go away if/when we switch to -x86-experimental-vector-widening-legalization
llvm-svn: 350134
Create PMULDQ/PMULUDQ as long as the number of elements is a power of 2.
This seems to give some improvements in our ability to use SimplifyDemandedBits.
llvm-svn: 350084
Make each of the helper functions only return their comparison node and the condition code. Leave X86ISD::SETCC creation to the LowerSETCC function itself.
Looking into whether we can use this code directly in BRCOND and SELECT lowering instead of going through LowerSETCC which creates an X86ISD::SETCC node we need to look through.
llvm-svn: 350082
Only one of the 3 callers of LowerAndToBT need the SETCC node. Two of them have to look through it to find the operands they really need. Instead create it after the one call that needs it.
LowerAndToBT now returns both the BT node and the X86 specific condition code separately.
llvm-svn: 350081
This is an alternative to what I attempted in D56057.
GetDemandedBits is a special version of SimplifyDemandedBits that allows simplifications even when the operand has other uses. GetDemandedBits will only do simplifications that allow a node to be bypassed. It won't create new nodes or alter any of the other users.
I had to add support for bypassing SIGN_EXTEND_INREG to GetDemandedBits.
Based on a patch that Simon Pilgrim sent me in email.
Fixes PR40142.
llvm-svn: 350059
Remove the TESTmr isel patterns and add another postprocessing combine for TESTrr+ANDrm->TESTmr. We already have a postprocessing combine for TESTrr+ANDrr->TESTrr. With this we can give ANDN a chance to match first. And clean it up during post processing if we ended up with just a regular AND.
This is another step towards my plan to gut EmitTest and do more flag handling during isel matching or by using optimizeCompare.
llvm-svn: 350038
The missed load folding noticed in D55898 is visible independent of that change
either with an adjusted IR pattern to start or with AVX2/AVX512 (where the build
vector becomes a broadcast first; movddup is not produced until we get into isel
via tablegen patterns).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55936
llvm-svn: 350005
Summary:
Added a pair of APIs for encoding/decoding the 3 components of a DWARF discriminator described in http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-October/106532.html: the base discriminator, the duplication factor (useful in profile-guided optimization) and the copy index (used to identify copies of code in cases like loop unrolling)
The encoding packs 3 unsigned values in 32 bits. This CL addresses 2 issues:
- communicates overflow back to the user
- supports encoding all 3 components together. Current APIs assume a sequencing of events. For example, creating a new discriminator based on an existing one by changing the base discriminator was not supported.
Reviewers: davidxl, danielcdh, wmi, dblaikie
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Subscribers: zzheng, dmgreen, aprantl, JDevlieghere, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55681
llvm-svn: 349973
This fixes the patterns that have or/and as a root. 'and' is handled differently since thy usually have a CMP wrapped around them.
I had to look for uses of the CF flag because all these nodes have non-standard CF flag behavior. A real or/xor would always clear CF. In practice we shouldn't be using the CF flag from these nodes as far as I know.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55813
llvm-svn: 349962
The BEXTR instruction documents the SF bit as undefined.
The TBM BEXTR instruction has the same issue, but I'm not sure how to test it. With the control being an immediate we can determine the sign bit is 0 or the BEXTR would have been removed.
Fixes PR40060
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55807
llvm-svn: 349956
This is admittedly a narrow fix for the problem:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37502
...but as the XOP restriction shows, it's a maze to get this right.
In the motivating example, note that we have movddup before SSE4.1 and
again with AVX2. That's because insertps isn't available pre-SSE41 and
vbroadcast is (more generally) available with AVX2 (and the splat is
reduced to movddup via isel pattern).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55898
llvm-svn: 349937
This shortens the switches in X86ISelDAGToDAG.cpp to only need to check condition code instead of a list of opcodes.
This also fixes a bug where the memory forms of SETcc were missing from hasNoCarryFlagUses.
llvm-svn: 349868
Summary:
This allows expanding {7,11,13,14,15,21,22,23,25,26,27,28,29,30,31}-byte memcmp
in just two loads on X86. These were previously calling memcmp.
Reviewers: spatel, gchatelet
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55263
llvm-svn: 349731
The (cmp (and X, Y) 0) pattern is greedy and ends up forming a TESTrr and consuming the and when it might be better to use one of the BMI/TBM like BLSR or BLSI.
This patch moves removes the pattern from isel and adds a post processing check to combine TESTrr+ANDrr into just a TESTrr. With this patch we are able to select the BMI/TBM instructions, but we'll also emit a TESTrr when the result is compared to 0. In many cases the peephole pass will be able to use optimizeCompareInstr to remove the TEST, but its probably not perfect.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55870
llvm-svn: 349661
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38743
The function removeRedundantBlockingStores is supposed to remove any blocking stores contained in each other in lockingStoresDispSizeMap.
But it currently looks only at the previous one, which will miss some cases that result in assert.
This patch refine the function to check all previous layouts until find the uncontained one. So all redundant stores will be removed.
Patch by Pengfei Wang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55642
llvm-svn: 349660
We already had BSF here as part of __builtin_ffs improvements and I was just wondering yesterday whether we should have BSR there.
This addresses one issue from PR40090.
llvm-svn: 349531
Migrate the X86 backend from X86ISD opcodes ADDS and SUBS to generic
ISD opcodes SADDSAT and SSUBSAT. This also improves scodegen for
@llvm.sadd.sat() and @llvm.ssub.sat() intrinsics.
This is a followup to D55787 and part of PR40056.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55833
llvm-svn: 349520
InstCombine seems to canonicalize or PSUB patter into a max with the cosntant and an add with an inverse of the constant.
This patch recognizes this pattern and turns it into PSUBUS. Future work could improve undef element handling.
Fixes some of PR40053
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55780
llvm-svn: 349519
Replace the X86ISD opcodes ADDUS and SUBUS with generic ISD opcodes
UADDSAT and USUBSAT. As a side-effect, this also makes codegen for
the @llvm.uadd.sat and @llvm.usub.sat intrinsics reasonable.
This only replaces use in the X86 backend, and does not move any of
the ADDUS/SUBUS X86 specific combines into generic codegen.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55787
llvm-svn: 349481
(VSRAI (VSHLI X, C1), C1) --> X iff NumSignBits(X) > C1
This works better as part of SimplifyDemandedBits than part of the general combine.
llvm-svn: 349462
This fold was incredibly specific - replace with a SimplifyDemandedBits fold to remove a VSRAI if only the original sign bit is demanded (its guaranteed to stay the same).
Test change is merely a rescheduling.
llvm-svn: 349459
Convert VSRAI to VSRLI is the sign bit is known zero and improve KnownBits output for all shift instruction.
Fixes the poor codegen comments in D55768.
llvm-svn: 349407
This allows a TEST to be used and can be combined with any AND that may already exist as an input to the shift.
This was already done in EmitTest, but was easily tricked by multiple uses because the setcc might be used by multiple instructions. Once the SETCC and users are legalized then we can look for the shift to be used by a single CMP, but the CMP itself can have multiple users.
This appears to fix the case in PR39968.
llvm-svn: 349385
This is an initial patch to add the necessary support for a DemandedElts argument to SimplifyDemandedBits, more closely matching computeKnownBits and to help improve vector codegen.
I've added only a small amount of the changes necessary to get at least one test to update - a lot more can be done but I'd like to add these methodically with proper test coverage, at the same time the hope is to slowly move some/all of SimplifyDemandedVectorElts into SimplifyDemandedBits as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55768
llvm-svn: 349374
We keep a few iterators into the basic block we're selecting while
performing FastISel. Usually this is fine, but occasionally code wants
to remove already-emitted instructions. When this happens we have to be
careful to update those iterators so they're not pointint at dangling
memory.
llvm-svn: 349365
I'd like to try to move a lot of the flag matching out of EmitTest and push it to isel or isel preprocessing. This is a step towards that.
The test-shrink-bug.ll changie is an improvement because we are no longer interfering with test shrink handling in isel.
The pr34137.ll change is a regression, but the IR came from -O0 and was not reduced by InstCombine. So it contains a lot of redundancies like duplicate loads that made it combine poorly.
llvm-svn: 349315
Use consistent rules for when to lower to SHLD/SHRD for slow machines - fixes a weird issue where funnel shift gets expanded but then X86ISelLowering's combineOr sees the optsize and combines to SHLD/SHRD, but now with the modulo amount guard......
llvm-svn: 349285
The only caller of this turns CMP with 0 into TEST. CMP with 0 and TEST both set OF to 0 so we should have no issues with instructions that only use OF.
Though I don't think there's any reason we would read just OF after a compare with 0 anyway. So this probably isn't an observable change.
llvm-svn: 349223
hasNoCarryFlagUses hardcoded that the flag result is 1 and used that to filter which uses were of interest. hasNoSignedComparisonUses just assumes the only result is flags and checks whether any user of the node is a CopyToReg instruction.
After this patch we now do a result number check in both and rely on the caller to provide the result number.
This shouldn't change behavior it was just an odd difference between the two functions that I noticed.
llvm-svn: 349222
Summary:
If the setcc already has the target desired type we can reach the getSetCC/getSExtOrTrunc after the MatchingVecType check with the exact same types as the nodes we started with. This causes those causes VsetCC to be CSEd to N0 and the getSExtOrTrunc will CSE to N. When we return N, the caller will think that meant we called CombineTo and did our own worklist management. But that's not what happened. This prevents target hooks from being called for the node.
To fix this, I've now returned SDValue if the setcc is already the desired type. But to avoid some regressions in X86 I've had to disable one of the target combines that wasn't being reached before in the case of a (sext (setcc)). If we get vector widening legalization enabled that entire function will be deleted anyway so hopefully this is only for the short term.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55459
llvm-svn: 349137
This requires the two callers to manifest a 0 to make EmitCmp call EmitTest.
I'm looking into changing how we combine TEST and flag setting instructions to not be part of lowering. And instead be part of DAG combine or isel. Which will mean EmitTest will probably become gutted and maybe disappear entirely.
llvm-svn: 349094
Summary:
Macros are expanded on a single line. In case of large expansions,
with sufficiently many instructions with memory operands (and when
-fdebug-info-for-profiling is requested), we may be unable to generate
new base discriminator values - new values overflow (base
discriminators may not be larger than 2^12).
This CL warns instead of asserting in such a case. A subsequent CL
will add APIs to check for overflow before creating new debug info.
See https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39890
Reviewers: davidxl, wmi, gbedwell
Reviewed By: davidxl
Subscribers: aprantl, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55643
llvm-svn: 349075
There's still a couple of minor SimplifyDemandedElts regressions in some of the shift amount splats that will be fixed in future patches.
llvm-svn: 349052
Move existing rotation expansion code into TargetLowering and set it up for vectors as well.
Ideally this would share more of the funnel shift expansion, but we handle the shift amount modulo quite differently at the moment.
Begun removing x86 vector rotate custom lowering to use the expansion.
llvm-svn: 349025
MULX has somewhat improved register allocation constraints compared to the legacy MUL instruction. Both output registers are encoded instead of fixed to EAX/EDX, but EDX is used as input. It also doesn't touch flags. Unfortunately, the encoding is longer.
Prefering it whenever BMI2 is enabled is probably not optimal. Choosing it should somehow be a function of register allocation constraints like converting adds to three address. gcc and icc definitely don't pick MULX by default. Not sure what if any rules they have for using it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55565
llvm-svn: 348975
I'm hoping we can just replace SETCC_CARRY with SBB. This is another step towards that.
I've explicitly used zero as the input to the setcc to avoid a false dependency that we've had with the SETCC_CARRY. I changed one of the patterns that used NEG to instead use an explicit compare with 0 on the LHS. We needed the zero anyway to avoid the false dependency. The negate would clobber its input register. By using a CMP we can avoid that which could be useful.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55414
llvm-svn: 348959
This patch introduces a generic function to determine whether a given vector type is known to be a splat value for the specified demanded elements, recursing up the DAG looking for BUILD_VECTOR or VECTOR_SHUFFLE splat patterns.
It also keeps track of the elements that are known to be UNDEF - it returns true if all the demanded elements are UNDEF (as this may be useful under some circumstances), so this needs to be handled by the caller.
A wrapper variant is also provided that doesn't take the DemandedElts or UndefElts arguments for cases where we just want to know if the SDValue is a splat or not (with/without UNDEFS).
I had hoped to completely remove the X86 local version of this function, but I'm seeing some regressions in shift/rotate codegen that will take a little longer to fix and I hope to get this in sooner so I can continue work on PR38243 which needs more capable splat detection.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55426
llvm-svn: 348953
This extends the code that handles 16-bit add promotion to form LEA to also allow 8-bit adds.
That allows us to combine add ops with register moves and save some instructions. This is
another step towards allowing add truncation in generic DAGCombiner (see D54640).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55494
llvm-svn: 348946
Summary:
When doing X86CondBrFolding::analyzeCompare, it will meet the SUB32ri instruction as below to use the global address for its operand,
%733:gr32 = SUB32ri %62:gr32(tied-def 0), @img2buf_normal, implicit-def $eflags
JNE_1 %bb.41, implicit $eflags
so the assertion "assert(MI.getOperand(ValueIndex).isImm() && "Expecting Imm operand")" is not correct and change the assert to if make X86CondBrFolding::analyzeCompare return false as not finding the compare for this
Patch by Jianping Chen
Reviewers: smaslov, LuoYuanke, liutianle, Jianping
Reviewed By: Jianping
Subscribers: lebedev.ri, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54250
llvm-svn: 348853
As discussed in D55494, we want to extend this to handle 8-bit
ops too, but that could be extended further to enable this on
32-bit systems too.
llvm-svn: 348851
As discussed in:
D55494
...this code has been disabled/dead for a long time (the code references
Athlon and Pentium 4), and there's almost no chance that it will be used
given the last decade of uarch evolution. Also, in SDAG we promote 16-bit
ops to 32-bit, so there's almost no way to test this code any more.
llvm-svn: 348845
This patch restricts the capability of G_MERGE_VALUES, and uses the new
G_BUILD_VECTOR and G_CONCAT_VECTORS opcodes instead in the appropriate places.
This patch also includes AArch64 support for selecting G_BUILD_VECTOR of <4 x s32>
and <2 x s64> vectors.
Differential Revisions: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53629
llvm-svn: 348788
This should really be generalized to allow increment and/or
we should replace it by using ISD::matchUnaryPredicate().
See D55515 for context.
llvm-svn: 348776
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39926.
The size of the first copy was computed as
std::abs(std::abs(LdDisp2) - std::abs(LdDisp1)), which results in
skipped bytes if the signs of LdDisp2 and LdDisp1 differ. As far as
I can see, this should just be LdDisp2 - LdDisp1. The case where
LdDisp1 > LdDisp2 is already handled in the code above, in which case
LdDisp2 is set to LdDisp1 and this subtraction will evaluate to
Size1 = 0, which is the correct value to skip an overlapping copy.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55485
llvm-svn: 348750
Nirav Dave