This encourages checkers to make logical decisions depending on
value of which region was the symbol under consideration
introduced to denote.
A similar technique is already used in a couple of checkers;
they were modified to call the new method.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D22242
llvm-svn: 275290
The analyzer trims unnecessary nodes from the exploded graph before reporting
path diagnostics. However, in some cases it can trim all nodes (including the
error node), leading to an assertion failure (see
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24184).
This commit addresses the issue by adding two new APIs to CheckerContext to
explicitly create error nodes. Unless the client provides a custom tag, these
APIs tag the node with the checker's tag -- preventing it from being trimmed.
The generateErrorNode() method creates a sink error node, while
generateNonFatalErrorNode() creates an error node for a path that should
continue being explored.
The intent is that one of these two methods should be used whenever a checker
creates an error node.
This commit updates the checkers to use these APIs. These APIs
(unlike addTransition() and generateSink()) do not take an explicit Pred node.
This is because there are not any error nodes in the checkers that were created
with an explicit different than the default (the CheckerContext's Pred node).
It also changes generateSink() to require state and pred nodes (previously
these were optional) to reduce confusion.
Additionally, there were several cases where checkers did check whether a
generated node could be null; we now explicitly check for null in these places.
This commit also includes a test case written by Ying Yi as part of
http://reviews.llvm.org/D12163 (that patch originally addressed this issue but
was reverted because it introduced false positive regressions).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12780
llvm-svn: 247859
(return by value is in ExprEngine::processPointerEscapedOnBind and any
other call to the scanReachableSymbols function template used there)
Protect the special members in the base class to avoid slicing, and make
derived classes final so these special members don't accidentally become
public on an intermediate base which would open up the possibility of
slicing again.
llvm-svn: 244975
The patch is generated using this command:
$ tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \
-checks=-*,llvm-namespace-comment -header-filter='llvm/.*|clang/.*' \
work/llvm/tools/clang
To reduce churn, not touching namespaces spanning less than 10 lines.
llvm-svn: 240270
Includes a simple static analyzer check and not much else, but we'll also
be able to take advantage of this in Swift.
This feature can be tested for using __has_feature(cf_returns_on_parameters).
This commit also contains two fixes:
- Look through non-typedef sugar when deciding whether something is a CF type.
- When (cf|ns)_returns(_not)?_retained is applied to invalid properties,
refer to "property" instead of "method" in the error message.
rdar://problem/18742441
llvm-svn: 240185
This is imitating a pre-r228174 state where ivars are not considered tracked by
default, but with the addition that even ivars /with/ retain count information
(e.g. "[_ivar retain]; [ivar _release];") are not being tracked as well. This is
to ensure that we don't regress on values accessed through both properties and
ivars, which is what r228174 was trying to fix.
The issue occurs in code like this:
[_contentView retain];
[_contentView removeFromSuperview];
[self addSubview:_contentView]; // invalidates 'self'
[_contentView release];
In this case, the call to -addSubview: may change the value of self->_contentView,
and so the analyzer can't be sure that we didn't leak the original _contentView.
This is a correct conservative view of the world, but not a useful one. Until we
have a heuristic that allows us to not consider this a leak, not emitting a
diagnostic is our best bet.
This commit disables all of the ivar-related retain count tests, but does not
remove them to ensure that we don't crash trying to evaluate either valid or
erroneous code. The next commit will add a new test for the example above so
that this commit (and the previous one) can be reverted wholesale when a better
solution is implemented.
Rest of rdar://problem/20335433
llvm-svn: 233592
Give up this checking in order to continue tracking that these values came from
direct ivar access, which will be important in the next commit.
Part of rdar://problem/20335433
llvm-svn: 233591
Similarly, don't assume +0 if the property's setter is manually implemented.
In both cases, if the property's ownership is explicitly written, then we /do/
assume the ivar has the same ownership.
rdar://problem/20218183
llvm-svn: 232849
In theory we could assume a CF property is stored at +0 if there's not a custom
setter, but that's not really worth the complexity. What we do know is that a
CF property can't have ownership attributes, and so we shouldn't assume anything
about the ownership of the ivar.
rdar://problem/20076963
llvm-svn: 231553
We expect in general that any nil value has no retain count information
associated with it; violating this results in unexpected state unification
/later/ when we decide to throw the information away. Unexpectedly caching
out can lead to an assertion failure or crash.
rdar://problem/19862648
llvm-svn: 229934
Instead of handling edge cases (mostly involving blocks), where we have difficulty finding
an allocation statement, allow the allocation site to be in a parent node.
Previously we assumed that the allocation site can always be found in the same frame
as allocation, but there are scenarios in which an element is leaked in a child
frame but is allocated in the parent.
llvm-svn: 228247
A refinement of r204730, itself a refinement of r198953, to better handle
cases where an object is accessed both through a property getter and
through direct ivar access. An object accessed through a property should
always be treated as +0, i.e. not owned by the caller. However, an object
accessed through an ivar may be at +0 or at +1, depending on whether the
ivar is a strong reference. Outside of ARC, we don't always have that
information.
The previous attempt would clear out the +0 provided by a getter, but only
if that +0 hadn't already participated in other retain counting operations.
(That is, "self.foo" is okay, but "[[self.foo retain] autorelease]" is
problematic.) This turned out to not be good enough when our synthesized
getters get involved.
This commit drops the notion of "overridable" reference counting and instead
just tracks whether a value ever came from a (strong) ivar. If it has, we
allow one more release than we otherwise would. This has the added benefit
of being able to catch /some/ overreleases of instance variables, though
it's not likely to come up in practice.
We do still get some false negatives because we currently throw away
refcount state upon assigning a value into an ivar. We should probably
improve on that in the future, especially once we synthesize setters as
well as getters.
rdar://problem/18075108
llvm-svn: 228174
Richard rejected my Sema change to interpret an integer literal zero in
a varargs context as a null pointer, so -Wsentinel sees an integer
literal zero and fires off a warning. Only CodeGen currently knows that
it promotes integer literal zeroes in this context to pointer size on
Windows. I didn't want to teach -Wsentinel about that compatibility
hack. Therefore, I'm migrating to C++11 nullptr.
llvm-svn: 223079
Fixes a crash in Retain Count checker error reporting logic by handing
the allocation statement retrieval from a BlockEdge program point.
Also added a simple CFG dump routine for debugging.
llvm-svn: 210960
This also includes some infrastructure to make it easier to build multi-argument
selectors, rather than trying to use string matching on each piece. There's a bit
more setup code, but less cost at runtime.
PR18908
llvm-svn: 205827
A refinement of r198953 to handle cases where an object is accessed both through
a property getter and through direct ivar access. An object accessed through a
property should always be treated as +0, i.e. not owned by the caller. However,
an object accessed through an ivar may be at +0 or at +1, depending on whether
the ivar is a strong reference. Outside of ARC, we don't have that information,
so we just don't track objects accessed through ivars.
With this change, accessing an ivar directly will deliberately override the +0
provided by a getter, but only if the +0 hasn't participated in other retain
counting yet. That isn't perfect, but it's already unusual for people to be
mixing property access with direct ivar access. (The primary use case for this
is in setters, init methods, and -dealloc.)
Thanks to Ted for spotting a few mistakes in private review.
<rdar://problem/16333368>
llvm-svn: 204730
This implements FIXME from Checker.cpp (FIXME: We want to return the package + name of the checker here.) and replaces hardcoded checker names with the new ones obtained via getCheckName().getName().
llvm-svn: 201525
Summary:
In clang-tidy we'd like to know the name of the checker producing each
diagnostic message. PathDiagnostic has BugType and Category fields, which are
both arbitrary human-readable strings, but we need to know the exact name of the
checker in the form that can be used in the CheckersControlList option to
enable/disable the specific checker.
This patch adds the CheckName field to the CheckerBase class, and sets it in
the CheckerManager::registerChecker() method, which gets them from the
CheckerRegistry.
Checkers that implement multiple checks have to store the names of each check
in the respective registerXXXChecker method.
Reviewers: jordan_rose, krememek
Reviewed By: jordan_rose
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2557
llvm-svn: 201186
A return type is the declared or deduced part of the function type specified in
the declaration.
A result type is the (potentially adjusted) type of the value of an expression
that calls the function.
Rule of thumb:
* Declarations have return types and parameters.
* Expressions have result types and arguments.
llvm-svn: 200082
Fix a perennial source of confusion in the clang type system: Declarations and
function prototypes have parameters to which arguments are supplied, so calling
these 'arguments' was a stretch even in C mode, let alone C++ where default
arguments, templates and overloading make the distinction important to get
right.
Readability win across the board, especially in the casting, ADL and
overloading implementations which make a lot more sense at a glance now.
Will keep an eye on the builders and update dependent projects shortly.
No functional change.
llvm-svn: 199686
Per discussion with Anna a /long/ time ago, it was way too easy to misuse
BlockCall: because it inherited from AnyFunctionCall (through SimpleCall),
getDecl() was constrained to return a FunctionDecl, and you had to call
getBlockDecl() instead. This goes against the whole point of CallEvent
(to abstract over different ways to invoke bodies of code).
Now, BlockCall just inherits directly from CallEvent. There's a bit of
duplication in getting things out of the origin expression (which is still
known to be a CallExpr), but nothing significant.
llvm-svn: 199321
...by synthesizing their body to be "return self->_prop;", with an extra
nudge to RetainCountChecker to still treat the value as +0 if we have no
other information.
This doesn't handle weak properties, but that's mostly correct anyway,
since they can go to nil at any time. This also doesn't apply to properties
whose implementations we can't see, since they may not be backed by an
ivar at all. And finally, this doesn't handle properties of C++ class type,
because we can't invoke the copy constructor. (Sema has actually done this
work already, but the AST it synthesizes is one the analyzer doesn't quite
handle -- it has an rvalue DeclRefExpr.)
Modeling setters is likely to be more difficult (since it requires
handling strong/copy), but not impossible.
<rdar://problem/11956898>
llvm-svn: 198953
RetainCountChecker has to track returned object values to know if they are
retained or not. Under ARC, even methods that return +1 are tracked by the
system and should be treated as +0. However, this effect behaves exactly
like NotOwned(ObjC), i.e. a generic Objective-C method that actually returns
+0, so we don't need a special case for it.
No functionality change.
llvm-svn: 198709
encodes the canonical rules for LLVM's style. I noticed this had drifted
quite a bit when cleaning up LLVM, so wanted to clean up Clang as well.
llvm-svn: 198686
Artem Dergachev