overridden methods to diagnose their type mismatch.
This is a general solution for previous fixes
for // rdar://6191214 and // rdar://9352731
and removes lots of duplicate code.
llvm-svn: 137222
situation. When a class explicitly or implicitly (through inheritance)
"conformsTo" two protocols which conflict (have methods which conflict).
This patch fixes the previous patch where warnings were coming out in
non-deterministic order. This is 2nd part of // rdar://6191214.
llvm-svn: 137055
implementations of +load do not replace the class definition in a meaningful
sense, they are run when the category loads, the +load method for class is run
when the class is loaded.
llvm-svn: 137053
situation. When a class explicitly or implicitly (through inheritance)
"conformsTo" two protocols which conflict (have methods which conflict).
This is 2nd part of // rdar://6191214.
llvm-svn: 136927
masks an existing method in its primary class, class extensions,
and primary class's non-optional protocol methods; as primary
class, or one of its subclass's will implement this method.
This warning has potential of being noisy so it has its own
group. // rdar://7020493
llvm-svn: 136426
declared in protocol in the class qualified by the
protocol have type conflicts. To reduce amount of
noise, this is done when class is implemented.
// rdar://9352731
llvm-svn: 135890
methods, including indirectly overridden methods like those
declared in protocols and categories. There are mismatches
that we would like to diagnose but aren't yet, but this
is fine for now.
I looked at approaches that avoided doing this lookup
unless we needed it, but the infer-related-result-type
checks were doing it anyway, so I left it with the same
fast-path check for no previous declartions of that
selector.
llvm-svn: 135743
This was previously not-const only because it has to lazily construct a chain
of ivars the first time it is called (and after the chain is invalidated).
In practice, all the clients were just const_casting their const Decls;
all those now-unnecessary const_casts have been removed.
llvm-svn: 135741
vector<int>
to
std::vector<int>
Patch by Kaelyn Uhrain, with minor tweaks + PCH support from me. Fixes
PR5776/<rdar://problem/8652971>.
Thanks Kaelyn!
llvm-svn: 134007
Language-design credit goes to a lot of people, but I particularly want
to single out Blaine Garst and Patrick Beard for their contributions.
Compiler implementation credit goes to Argyrios, Doug, Fariborz, and myself,
in no particular order.
llvm-svn: 133103
Related result types apply Cocoa conventions to the type of message
sends and property accesses to Objective-C methods that are known to
always return objects whose type is the same as the type of the
receiving class (or a subclass thereof), such as +alloc and
-init. This tightens up static type safety for Objective-C, so that we
now diagnose mistakes like this:
t.m:4:10: warning: incompatible pointer types initializing 'NSSet *'
with an
expression of type 'NSArray *' [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
NSSet *array = [[NSArray alloc] init];
^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/System/Library/Frameworks/Foundation.framework/Headers/NSObject.h:72:1:
note:
instance method 'init' is assumed to return an instance of its
receiver
type ('NSArray *')
- (id)init;
^
It also means that we get decent type inference when writing code in
Objective-C++0x:
auto array = [[NSMutableArray alloc] initWithObjects:@"one", @"two",nil];
// ^ now infers NSMutableArray* rather than id
llvm-svn: 132868
don't build circular AST in protocol's protocol list
when user code has introduced it. Indexer and other
clients may crash. // rdar://9221614
llvm-svn: 131254
ObjC NeXt runtime where method pointer registered in
metadata belongs to an unrelated method. Ast part of this fix,
I turned at @end missing warning (for class
implementations) into an error as we can never
be sure that meta-data being generated is correct.
// rdar://9072317
llvm-svn: 130019
which versions of an OS provide a certain facility. For example,
void foo()
__attribute__((availability(macosx,introduced=10.2,deprecated=10.4,obsoleted=10.6)));
says that the function "foo" was introduced in 10.2, deprecated in
10.4, and completely obsoleted in 10.6. This attribute ties in with
the deployment targets (e.g., -mmacosx-version-min=10.1 specifies that
we want to deploy back to Mac OS X 10.1). There are several concrete
behaviors that this attribute enables, as illustrated with the
function foo() above:
- If we choose a deployment target >= Mac OS X 10.4, uses of "foo"
will result in a deprecation warning, as if we had placed
attribute((deprecated)) on it (but with a better diagnostic)
- If we choose a deployment target >= Mac OS X 10.6, uses of "foo"
will result in an "unavailable" warning (in C)/error (in C++), as
if we had placed attribute((unavailable)) on it
- If we choose a deployment target prior to 10.2, foo() is
weak-imported (if it is a kind of entity that can be weak
imported), as if we had placed the weak_import attribute on it.
Naturally, there can be multiple availability attributes on a
declaration, for different platforms; only the current platform
matters when checking availability attributes.
The only platforms this attribute currently works for are "ios" and
"macosx", since we already have -mxxxx-version-min flags for them and we
have experience there with macro tricks translating down to the
deprecated/unavailable/weak_import attributes. The end goal is to open
this up to other platforms, and even extension to other "platforms"
that are really libraries (say, through a #pragma clang
define_system), but that hasn't yet been designed and we may want to
shake out more issues with this narrower problem first.
Addresses <rdar://problem/6690412>.
As a drive-by bug-fix, if an entity is both deprecated and
unavailable, we only emit the "unavailable" diagnostic.
llvm-svn: 128127
Warn if class for a deprecated class is implemented.
Warn if category for a deprecated class is implemented.
All under control of -Wdeprecated-implementations.
// rdar://8973810.
llvm-svn: 125545
when selector metadata is generated, which is triggered
by at least on class implementation. This is to match gcc's
behavior. // rdar://8851684.
llvm-svn: 124909
Fariborz Jahanian