Summary:
The affected transforms all implicitly use associativity of addition,
for which we usually require unsafe math to be enabled.
The "Aggressive" flag is only meant to convey information about the
performance of the fused ops relative to a fmul+fadd sequence.
Fixes Bug 31626.
Reviewers: spatel, hfinkel, mehdi_amini, arsenm, tstellarAMD
Subscribers: jholewinski, nemanjai, wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28675
llvm-svn: 293635
Summary:
When X = 0 and Y = inf, the original code produces inf, but the transformed
code produces nan. So this transform (and its relatives) should only be
used when the no-infs-fp-math flag is explicitly enabled.
Also disable the transform using fmad (intermediate rounding) when unsafe-math
is not enabled, since it can reduce the precision of the result; consider this
example with binary floating point numbers with two bits of mantissa:
x = 1.01
y = 111
x * (y + 1) = 1.01 * 1000 = 1010 (this is the exact result; no rounding occurs at any step)
x * y + x = 1000.11 + 1.01 =r 1000 + 1.01 = 1001.01 =r 1000 (with rounding towards zero)
The example relies on rounding towards zero at least in the second step.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98578
Reviewers: RKSimon, tstellarAMD, spatel, arsenm
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26602
llvm-svn: 288506
When the memory vectorizer is enabled, these tests break.
These tests don't really care about the memory instructions,
and it's easier to write check lines with the unmerged loads.
llvm-svn: 266071
This patch adds support for combining patterns such as (FMUL(FADD(1.0, x), y)) and (FMUL(FSUB(x, 1.0), y)) to their FMA equivalents.
This is useful in particular for linear interpolation cases such as (FADD(FMUL(x, t), FMUL(y, FSUB(1.0, t))))
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13003
llvm-svn: 248210
Nicolai Haehnle