We seem to be inheriting the cost from sse4.1. But if we have 256-bit registers we should be able to do this with just one extract to split the 16i16 and two v8i16->v8i32 operations so our cost should be 3 not 4.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73646
Now that we legalize by widening, the element types here won't change. Previously these were modeled as the elements being widened and then the instruction might become an AND or SHL/ASHR pair. But now they'll become something like a ZERO_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG/SIGN_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG.
For AVX2, when the destination type is legal its clear the cost should be 1 since we have extend instructions that can produce 256 bit vectors from less than 128 bit vectors. I'm a little less sure about AVX1 costs, but I think the ones I changed were definitely too high, but they might still be too high.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66169
llvm-svn: 368858
Unlike most cost model functions this code makes a lot of table lookups without using the results from getTypeLegalizationCost. This means 512-bit vectors can be looked up even when the type isn't legal.
This patch adds a check around the two tables that contain 512-bit types to make sure that neither of the types would be split by type legalization. Meaning 512 bit types are illegal. I wanted to write this in a somewhat generic way that uses type legalization query hooks. But if prefered, I can switch to just using is512BitVector and the subtarget feature.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54984
llvm-svn: 347786
This fixes some of scalarization costs reported for sext/zext using avx512bw. This does not fix all scalarization costs being reported. Just the worst.
I've restricted this only to combinations of types that are legal with avx512bw like v32i1/v64i1/v32i16/v64i8 and conversions between vXi1 and vXi8/vXi16 with legal vXi8/vXi16 result types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54979
llvm-svn: 347785
The check lines marked AVX256 in the zext256/sext256 functions should be closer to the AVX values which would take into account a splitting cost.
llvm-svn: 347722
Craig Topper