For IR generated by a compiler, this is really simple: you just take the
datalayout from the beginning of the file, and apply it to all the IR
later in the file. For optimization testcases that don't care about the
datalayout, this is also really simple: we just use the default
datalayout.
The complexity here comes from the fact that some LLVM tools allow
overriding the datalayout: some tools have an explicit flag for this,
some tools will infer a datalayout based on the code generation target.
Supporting this properly required plumbing through a bunch of new
machinery: we want to allow overriding the datalayout after the
datalayout is parsed from the file, but before we use any information
from it. Therefore, IR/bitcode parsing now has a callback to allow tools
to compute the datalayout at the appropriate time.
Not sure if I covered all the LLVM tools that want to use the callback.
(clang? lli? Misc IR manipulation tools like llvm-link?). But this is at
least enough for all the LLVM regression tests, and IR without a
datalayout is not something frontends should generate.
This change had some sort of weird effects for certain CodeGen
regression tests: if the datalayout is overridden with a datalayout with
a different program or stack address space, we now parse IR based on the
overridden datalayout, instead of the one written in the file (or the
default one, if none is specified). This broke a few AVR tests, and one
AMDGPU test.
Outside the CodeGen tests I mentioned, the test changes are all just
fixing CHECK lines and moving around datalayout lines in weird places.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78403
Splitting basic blocks into multiple statements if there are now
additional scalar dependencies gives more freedom to the scheduler, but
more statements also means higher compile-time complexity. Switch to
finer statement granularity, the additional compile time should be
limited by the number of operations quota.
The regression tests are written for the -polly-stmt-granularity=bb
setting, therefore we add that flag to those tests that break with the
new default. Some of the tests only fail because the statements are
named differently due to a basic block resulting in multiple statements,
but which are removed during simplification of statements without
side-effects. Previous commits tried to reduce this effect, but it is
not completely avoidable.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42151
llvm-svn: 324169
Summary:
Most changes are mechanical, but in one place I changed the program semantics
by fixing a likely bug:
In `Scop::hasFeasibleRuntimeContext()`, I'm now explicitely handling the
error-case. Before, when the call to `addNonEmptyDomainConstraints()`
returned a null set, this (probably) accidentally worked because
isl_bool_error converts to true. I'm checking for nullptr now.
Reviewers: grosser, Meinersbur, bollu
Reviewed By: Meinersbur
Subscribers: nemanjai, kbarton, pollydev, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39971
llvm-svn: 318632
This is an addition to the -polly-optree pass that reuses the array
content analysis from DeLICM to find array elements that contain the
same value as the value loaded when the target statement instance
is executed.
The analysis is now enabled by default.
The known content analysis could also be used to rematerialize any
llvm::Value that was written to some array element, but currently
only loads are forwarded.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36380
llvm-svn: 310279
Eli Friedman