Followup to D56636, this time handling the UADDSAT case by expanding
uadd.sat(a, b) to umin(a, ~b) + b.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56869
llvm-svn: 352409
This contains all of the legalizer changes from D57197 necessary to select
G_FCOS and G_FSIN. It also updates several existing IR tests in
test/CodeGen/AArch64 that verify that we correctly lower the G_FCOS and G_FSIN
instructions.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D57197
3/3
llvm-svn: 352402
First step towards adding support for 64-bit unary "sublane" handling (a bit like lowerShuffleAsRepeatedMaskAndLanePermute).
This allows us to add lowerV64I8Shuffle handling.
llvm-svn: 352389
This is tricky to make optimal: sometimes we're better off using
a single wider op, but other times it makes more sense to combine
a narrow ops to achieve the same result.
This solves the case from:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40434
There's potentially a similar change for vectors with 64-bit elements,
but it needs adjustments similar to rL352333 to avoid creating infinite
loops.
llvm-svn: 352380
As the codebase is now under the Apache 2.0 license with LLVM
Exceptions, and all Arm's contributions, past or future, are under that
new license, this Arm specific LICENSE.TXT is no longer needed, thus
removing it.
llvm-svn: 352376
Instruction abs.[ds] is not generating correct result when working
with NaNs for revisions prior mips32r6 and mips64r6.
To generate a sequence which always produce a correct result, but also
to allow user more control on how his code is compiled, attribute
+abs2008 is added, so user can choose legacy or 2008.
By default legacy mode is used on revisions prior R6. Mips32r6 and
mips64r6 use abs2008 mode by default.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35983
llvm-svn: 352370
Lower G_USUBO and G_USUBE. Add narrowScalar for G_SUB.
Legalize and select G_SUB for MIPS 32.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53416
llvm-svn: 352351
Support G_SDIV, G_UDIV, G_SREM and G_UREM.
The only significant difference between arm and thumb mode is that we
need to check a different subtarget feature.
llvm-svn: 352346
This transform was added with rL351346, and we had
an escape for shufps, but we also want one for
unpckps vs. vpermps because vpermps doesn't take
an immediate shuffle index operand.
llvm-svn: 352333
Although this is longer code, this is no-functional-change-intended.
The goal is to untangle the conditions under which we bail out, so
that's easier to adjust.
llvm-svn: 352320
The add+and sequence followed by a branch can
happen e.g. when looping over the set bits of an integer:
```
while (x != 0) {
func(x & ~x);
x &= x - 1;
}
```
Reviewed By: ctopper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57296
llvm-svn: 352306
def32 here means the producing instruction zeroed bits 63:32. We already do this for zext, but it looks like we can get an and+anyext sometimes.
Spotted in the diffs from D33587.
llvm-svn: 352303
Fix issue noted in D57281 that only tested the one use for the SDValue (the result flag), not the entire SUB.
I've added the getNode() to make it clearer what is intended than just the -> redirection.
llvm-svn: 352291
As discussed on PR24545, we should try to commute X86::COND_A 'icmp ugt' cases to X86::COND_B 'icmp ult' to more optimally bind the carry flag output to a SBB instruction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57281
llvm-svn: 352289
We often generate X86ISD::SBB(X, 0) for carry flag arithmetic.
I had tried to create test cases for the ADC equivalent (which often uses the same pattern) but haven't managed to find anything yet.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57169
llvm-svn: 352288
This reduces a bit of duplication between the combining and
lowering places that use it, but the primary motivation is
to make it easier to rearrange the lowering logic and solve
PR40434:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40434
llvm-svn: 352280
For the power9 CPU, vector operations consume a pair of execution units rather
than one execution unit like a scalar operation. Update the target transform
cost functions to reflect the higher cost of vector operations when targeting
Power9.
Patch by RolandF.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55461
llvm-svn: 352261
Summary: We have isel patterns for this, but we're missing some load patterns and all broadcast patterns. A DAG combine seems like a better fit for this.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56971
llvm-svn: 352260
Summary:
I'm not sure why we were using SEXTLOAD. EXTLOAD seems more appropriate since we don't care about the upper bits.
This patch changes this and then modifies the X86 post legalization combine to emit a extending shuffle instead of a sign_extend_vector_inreg. Could maybe use an any_extend_vector_inreg, but I just did what we already do in LowerLoad. I think we can actually get rid of this code entirely if we switch to -x86-experimental-vector-widening-legalization.
On AVX512 targets I think we might be able to use a masked vpmovzx and not have to expand this at all.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57186
llvm-svn: 352255
DAGCombiner::visitBITCAST will perform:
fold (bitconvert (fneg x)) -> (xor (bitconvert x), signbit)
fold (bitconvert (fabs x)) -> (and (bitconvert x), (not signbit))
As shown in double-bitmanip-dagcombines.ll, this can be advantageous. But
RV32FD doesn't use bitcast directly (as i64 isn't a legal type), and instead
uses RISCVISD::SplitF64. This patch adds an equivalent DAG combine for
SplitF64.
llvm-svn: 352247
Summary:
Currently, if an instruction with a memory operand has no debug information,
X86DiscriminateMemOps will generate one based on the first line of the
enclosing function, or the last seen debug info.
This may cause confusion in certain debugging scenarios. The long term
approach would be to use the line number '0' in such cases, however, that
brings in challenges: the base discriminator value range is limited
(4096 values).
For the short term, adding an opt-in flag for this feature.
See bug 40319 (https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40319)
Reviewers: dblaikie, jmorse, gbedwell
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Subscribers: aprantl, eraman, hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57257
llvm-svn: 352246
We also need to combine to masked truncating with saturation stores, but I'm leaving that for a future patch.
This does regress some tests that used truncate wtih saturation followed by a masked store. Those now use a truncating store and use min/max to saturate.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57218
llvm-svn: 352230
This seems unnecessarily complicated because we gave names to
opposite polarity bools and have code comments that don't really
line up with the logic.
Step 1: remove UndefUpper and assert that it is the opposite of
UndefLower after the initial early exit.
llvm-svn: 352217
Simplify to the generic ISD::ADD/SUB if we don't make use of the result flag.
This mainly helps with ADDCARRY/SUBBORROW intrinsics which get expanded to X86ISD::ADD/SUB but could be simplified further.
Noticed in some of the test cases in PR31754
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57234
llvm-svn: 352210
This isn't the final fix for our reduction/horizontal codegen, but it takes care
of a lot of the problems. After we narrow the shuffle, existing combines for
insert/extract and binops kick in, and we end up with cheaper 128-bit ops.
The avg and mul reduction tests show an existing shuffle lowering hole for
AVX2/AVX512. I think in its most minimal form this is:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40434
...but we might need multiple fixes to get it right.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57156
llvm-svn: 352209
Same as ARM.
On this occasion we split some of the instruction select tests for more
complicated instructions into their own files, so we can reuse them for
ARM and Thumb mode. Likewise for the legalizer tests.
llvm-svn: 352188
Fast selection of llvm icmp and fcmp instructions is not handled well about VSX instruction support.
We'd use VSX float comparison instruction instead of non-vsx float comparison instruction
if the operand register class is VSSRC or VSFRC because i32 and i64 are mapped to VSSRC and
VSFRC correspondingly if VSX feature is opened.
If the target does not have corresponding VSX instruction comparison for some type,
just copy VSX-related register to common float register class and use non-vsx comparison instruction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57078
llvm-svn: 352174
Nikita Popov