commit ae14bf6488e8441f0f6d74f00455555f6f3943ac
Author: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
Date: Fri Mar 11 17:15:50 2016 +0000
Remove PreserveNames template parameter from IRBuilder
Summary:
Following r263086, we are now relying on a flag on the Context to
discard Value names in release builds.
Reviewers: chandlerc
Subscribers: mzolotukhin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18023
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@263258
91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
until we can figure out what to do about clang and Release build testing.
This reverts commit 263258.
llvm-svn: 263321
Summary: As we now have unit-tests for UnrollAnalyzer, we can convert some existing tests to this format. It should make the tests more robust.
Reviewers: chandlerc, sanjoy
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17904
llvm-svn: 263318
Summary:
Following r263086, we are now relying on a flag on the Context to
discard Value names in release builds.
Reviewers: chandlerc
Subscribers: mzolotukhin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18023
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 263258
Added new string conversion wrappers that convert between `std::string` (of UTF-8 bytes) and `std::wstring`, which is particularly useful for Win32 interop. Also fixed a missing string conversion for `getenv` on Win32, using these new wrappers.
The motivation behind this is to provide the support functions required for LLDB to work properly on Windows with non-ASCII data; however, the functions are not LLDB specific.
Patch by cameron314
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17549
llvm-svn: 263247
This was originally a pointer to support pass managers which didn't use
AnalysisManagers. However, that doesn't realistically come up much and
the complexity of supporting it doesn't really make sense.
In fact, *many* parts of the pass manager were just assuming the pointer
was never null already. This at least makes it much more explicit and
clear.
llvm-svn: 263219
clarify their purpose.
Firstly, call them "...Mixin" types so it is clear that there is no
type hierarchy being formed here. Secondly, use the term 'Info' to
clarify that they aren't adding any interesting *semantics* to the
passes or analyses, just exposing APIs used by the management layer to
get information about the pass or analysis.
Thanks to Manuel for helping pin down the naming confusion here and come
up with effective names to address it.
In case you already have some out-of-tree stuff, the following should be
roughly what you want to update:
perl -pi -e 's/\b(Pass|Analysis)Base\b/\1InfoMixin/g'
llvm-svn: 263217
work in the face of the limitations of DLLs and templated static
variables.
This requires passes that use the AnalysisBase mixin provide a static
variable themselves. So as to keep their APIs clean, I've made these
private and befriended the CRTP base class (which is the common
practice).
I've added documentation to AnalysisBase for why this is necessary and
at what point we can go back to the much simpler system.
This is clearly a better pattern than the extern template as it caught
*numerous* places where the template magic hadn't been applied and
things were "just working" but would eventually have broken
mysteriously.
llvm-svn: 263216
Without actually parsing a type it is difficult to perdict where
the type definition ends. In other words, instead of expecting
the user of the parser API to hand over only the relevant bits
of the string being parsed, take the whole string, parse the type,
and get back the number of characters that have been read.
This will be used by the MIR testing infrastructure.
llvm-svn: 262884
This is useful for MIR serialization. Indeed generic machine instructions
must have a type and we don't want to duplicate the logic in the MIParser.
llvm-svn: 262868
The ARM TargetParser would construct invalid StringRefs. This would cause
asserts to trigger. Add some tests in LLVM to ensure that we dont regress on
this in the future. Although there is a test for this in clang, this ensures
that the changes would get caught in the same repository.
llvm-svn: 262790
The RTDyldMemoryManager::getSymbolAddressInProcess method accepts a
linker-mangled symbol name, but it calls through to dlsym to do the lookup (via
DynamicLibrary::SearchForAddressOfSymbol), and dlsym expects an unmangled
symbol name.
Historically we've attempted to "demangle" by removing leading '_'s on all
platforms, and fallen back to an extra search if that failed. That's broken, as
it can cause symbols to resolve incorrectly on platforms that don't do mangling
if you query '_foo' and the process also happens to contain a 'foo'.
Fix this by demangling conditionally based on the host platform. That's safe
here because this function is specifically for symbols in the host process, so
the usual cross-process JIT looking concerns don't apply.
M unittests/ExecutionEngine/ExecutionEngineTest.cpp
M lib/ExecutionEngine/RuntimeDyld/RTDyldMemoryManager.cpp
llvm-svn: 262657
Summary: With discriminator, LineLocation can uniquely identify a callsite without the need to specifying callee name. Remove Callee function name from the key, and put it in the value (FunctionSamples).
Reviewers: davidxl, dnovillo
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17827
llvm-svn: 262634
parts of the AA interface out of the base class of every single AA
result object.
Because this logic reformulates the query in terms of some other aspect
of the API, it would easily cause O(n^2) query patterns in alias
analysis. These could in turn be magnified further based on the number
of call arguments, and then further based on the number of AA queries
made for a particular call. This ended up causing problems for Rust that
were actually noticable enough to get a bug (PR26564) and probably other
places as well.
When originally re-working the AA infrastructure, the desire was to
regularize the pattern of refinement without losing any generality.
While I think it was successful, that is clearly proving to be too
costly. And the cost is needless: we gain no actual improvement for this
generality of making a direct query to tbaa actually be able to
re-use some other alias analysis's refinement logic for one of the other
APIs, or some such. In short, this is entirely wasted work.
To the extent possible, delegation to other API surfaces should be done
at the aggregation layer so that we can avoid re-walking the
aggregation. In fact, this significantly simplifies the logic as we no
longer need to smuggle the aggregation layer into each alias analysis
(or the TargetLibraryInfo into each alias analysis just so we can form
argument memory locations!).
However, we also have some delegation logic inside of BasicAA and some
of it even makes sense. When the delegation logic is baking in specific
knowledge of aliasing properties of the LLVM IR, as opposed to simply
reformulating the query to utilize a different alias analysis interface
entry point, it makes a lot of sense to restrict that logic to
a different layer such as BasicAA. So one aspect of the delegation that
was in every AA base class is that when we don't have operand bundles,
we re-use function AA results as a fallback for callsite alias results.
This relies on the IR properties of calls and functions w.r.t. aliasing,
and so seems a better fit to BasicAA. I've lifted the logic up to that
point where it seems to be a natural fit. This still does a bit of
redundant work (we query function attributes twice, once via the
callsite and once via the function AA query) but it is *exactly* twice
here, no more.
The end result is that all of the delegation logic is hoisted out of the
base class and into either the aggregation layer when it is a pure
retargeting to a different API surface, or into BasicAA when it relies
on the IR's aliasing properties. This should fix the quadratic query
pattern reported in PR26564, although I don't have a stand-alone test
case to reproduce it.
It also seems general goodness. Now the numerous AAs that don't need
target library info don't carry it around and depend on it. I think
I can even rip out the general access to the aggregation layer and only
expose that in BasicAA as it is the only place where we re-query in that
manner.
However, this is a non-trivial change to the AA infrastructure so I want
to get some additional eyes on this before it lands. Sadly, it can't
wait long because we should really cherry pick this into 3.8 if we're
going to go this route.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17329
llvm-svn: 262490
Summary:
This adds the beginning of an update API to preserve MemorySSA. In particular,
this patch adds a way to remove memory SSA accesses when instructions are
deleted.
It also adds relevant unit testing infrastructure for MemorySSA's API.
(There is an actual user of this API, i will make that diff dependent on this one. In practice, a ton of opt passes remove memory instructions, so it's hopefully an obviously useful API :P)
Reviewers: hfinkel, reames, george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17157
llvm-svn: 262362
This adds support to convert ProfileSummary object to Metadata and create a
ProfileSummary object from metadata. This would allow attaching profile summary
information to Module allowing optimization passes to use it.
llvm-svn: 262360
analyses in the new pass manager.
These just handle really basic stuff: turning a type name into a string
statically that is nice to print in logs, and getting a static unique ID
for each analysis.
Sadly, the format of passes in anonymous namespaces makes using their
names in tests really annoying so I've customized the names of the no-op
passes to keep tests sane to read.
This is the first of a few simplifying refactorings for the new pass
manager that should reduce boilerplate and confusion.
llvm-svn: 262004
Summary: Check that we're using SCEV for the same loop we're simulating. Otherwise, we might try to use the iteration number of the current loop in SCEV expressions for inner/outer loops IVs, which is clearly incorrect.
Reviewers: chandlerc, hfinkel
Subscribers: sanjoy, llvm-commits, mzolotukhin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17632
llvm-svn: 261958
This creates the new-style LoopPassManager and wires it up with dummy
and print passes.
This version doesn't support modifying the loop nest at all. It will
be far easier to discuss and evaluate the approaches to that with this
in place so that the boilerplate is out of the way.
llvm-svn: 261831
This extracts the type name from __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ for compilers that
support it (I've opted Clang, GCC, and ICC into this as I've tested that
they work) and from __FUNCSIG__ which is very similar on MSVC. The
routine falls back gracefully on a stub "UNKNOWN_TYPE" string with
compilers or formats it doesn't understand.
This should be enough for a lot of common cases in LLVM where the real
goal is just to log or print a type name as a debugging aid, and save
a ton of boilerplate in the process. Notably, I'm planning to use this
to remove all the getName() boiler plate from the new pass manager.
The design and implementation is based on a bunch of advice and
discussion with Richard Smith and experimenting with most versions of
Clang and GCC. David Majnemer also provided excellent advice on how best
to do this with MSVC. Richard also checked that ICC does something
reasonable and I'll watch the build bots for other compilers. It'd be
great if someone could contribute logic for xlC and/or other toolchains.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17565
llvm-svn: 261819
pattern that triggers it. This essentially requires an immutable
function analysis, as that will survive anything we do to invalidate it.
When we have such patterns, the function analysis manager will not get
cleared between runs of the proxy.
If we actually need an assert about how things are queried, we can add
more elaborate machinery for computing it, but so far I'm not aware of
significant value provided.
Thanks to Justin Lebar for noticing this when he made a (seemingly
innocuous) change to FunctionAttrs that is enough to trigger it in one
test there. Now it is covered by a direct test of the pass manager code.
llvm-svn: 261627
system.
Previously, this was only being tested with larger integration tests.
That makes it hard to isolated specific issues with it, and makes the
APIs themselves less well tested. Add a unittest based around the same
patterns used for testing the general pass manager.
llvm-svn: 261624
Rename makeNoWrapRegion to a more obvious makeGuaranteedNoWrapRegion,
and add a comment about the counter-intuitive aspects of the function.
This is to help prevent cases like PR26628.
llvm-svn: 261532
Before this patch simplified SCEV expressions for PHI nodes were only returned
the very first time getSCEV() was called, but later calls to getSCEV always
returned the non-simplified value, which had "temporarily" been stored in the
ValueExprMap, but was never removed and consequently blocked the caching of the
simplified PHI expression.
llvm-svn: 261485
it to actually test the new pass manager AA wiring.
This patch was extracted from the (somewhat too large) D12357 and
rebosed on top of the slightly different design of the new pass manager
AA wiring that I just landed. With this we can start testing the AA in
a thorough way with the new pass manager.
Some minor cleanups to the code in the pass was necessitated here, but
otherwise it is a very minimal change.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17372
llvm-svn: 261403
analysis passes, support pre-registering analyses, and use that to
implement parsing and pre-registering a custom alias analysis pipeline.
With this its possible to configure the particular alias analysis
pipeline used by the AAManager from the commandline of opt. I've updated
the test to show this effectively in use to build a pipeline including
basic-aa as part of it.
My big question for reviewers are around the APIs that are used to
expose this functionality. Are folks happy with pass-by-lambda to do
pass registration? Are folks happy with pre-registering analyses as
a way to inject customized instances of an analysis while still using
the registry for the general case?
Other thoughts of course welcome. The next round of patches will be to
add the rest of the alias analyses into the new pass manager and wire
them up here so that they can be used from opt. This will require
extending the (somewhate limited) functionality of AAManager w.r.t.
module passes.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17259
llvm-svn: 261197
The commit breaks stage2 compilation on PowerPC. Reverting for now while
this is analyzed. I also have to revert the LiveIntervalTest for now as
that depends on this commit.
Revert "LiveIntervalAnalysis: Remove LiveVariables requirement"
This reverts commit r260806.
Revert "Remove an unnecessary std::move to fix -Wpessimizing-move warning."
This reverts commit r260931.
Revert "Fix typo in LiveIntervalTest"
This reverts commit r260907.
Revert "Add unittest for LiveIntervalAnalysis::handleMove()"
This reverts commit r260905.
llvm-svn: 261189
David Blaikie